ByLawyers News and Updates
  • Publication updates
    • Federal
    • New South Wales
    • Victoria
    • Queensland
    • South Australia
    • Western Australia
    • Northern Territory
    • Tasmania
    • Australian Capital Territory
  • By area of law
    • Bankruptcy and Liquidation
    • Business and Franchise
    • Companies, Trusts, Partnerships and Superannuation
    • Conveyancing and Property
    • Criminal Law
    • Defamation and Protecting Reputation
    • Employment Law
    • Family Law
    • Immigration
    • Litigation
    • Neighbourhood Disputes
    • Personal injury
    • Personal Property Securities
    • Practice Management
    • Security of Payments
    • Trade Marks
    • Wills and Estates
  • Legal alerts
  • Articles
  • By Lawyers

Family violence – WA

14 April 2020 by By Lawyers

Various legislation has been amended as a result of the Family Violence Legislation Reform (COVID-19 Response) Act 2020.

The amendments provide for:

  • applications for Family Violence Restraining Orders and Violence Restraining Orders to be made online;
  • increased flexibility for courts in allocating hearing dates and serving documents in relation to applications for restraining orders;
  • police to be able to grant bail for breaches of a Family Violence Restraining Order or a Violence Restraining Order in urban areas, consistent with their existing power in regional areas;
  • courts to be able to impose electronic monitoring requirements as part of a home detention order in relation to a restraining order, a bail condition, or a sentence.
  • new offences and penalties for interfering with electronic monitoring equipment, or failing to follow the directions of a community corrections officer for electronic monitoring.

These amendments have been incorporated in the relevant By Lawyers Guides.

See Criminal Magistrates Court, under both Bail and Sentencing and also Restraining Orders for more information.

Filed Under: Criminal Law, Domestic Violence Orders, Western Australia Tagged With: bail, electronic monitoring, family violence, home detention

Coronavirus legal issues – All states

6 April 2020 by By Lawyers

Dealing with coronavirus legal issues is currently a major challenge for legal practitioners everywhere. A great deal of emergency legislation has been passed already in response to the pandemic, both temporary and permanent. Temporary arrangements are daily being introduced by courts, land registries and other authorities to allow business to be transacted despite the need for social distancing. There are also practical measures that can and must be taken to allow practitioners to continue to provide their services and assist their clients.

By Lawyers have produced a publication which brings together in one place a collection of practical information to help the profession at this time. Dealing with coronavirus legal issues is a valuable resource for lawyers. It is now available by clicking on the link at the top of the matter plan in every By Lawyers Guide.

The content within Dealing with coronavirus legal issues is also published here on our Obiter News and Updates site.

The Dealing with coronavirus legal issues publication will be updated and enhanced as the response to the pandemic develops. As always, By Lawyers will keep practitioners abreast of ongoing changes and provide our trademark practical assistance to guide the profession in these difficult times.

Filed Under: Federal, Miscellaneous, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: By Lawyers, coronavirus, COVID 19, legislation, practice management

Policies and procedures – All states

3 April 2020 by By Lawyers

New content has been added to the By Lawyers reference manual 101 Policies and Procedures, after a recent author review.

The new content covers:

  • Managing client communications – Policies and procedures covering all aspects of firm communications including phone, email and written correspondence. In addition, a comprehensive complaint-handling procedure has been included.
  • Confidential information – A policy on protection of confidential information has been added, which includes breaches.
  • Intellectual property – A simple policy has been added for protecting the firm’s existing IP and dealing with any new IP created by team members in the course of their employment.
  • Working from home – A policy which clarifies the rights and obligations of team members and the firm in relation to working from home arrangements.

The By Lawyers 101 Policies and Procedures manual makes it easy for law firms to adopt, modify and enhance their in-house policies and procedures. Practitioners can also use this resource to assist clients with implementing appropriate policies and procedures in their businesses.

In these difficult times it is more important than ever to ensure that all team members are clear about their obligations and are on the same page when communicating with clients, handling confidential information and working from home. These enhancements can assist all law firms with their practice management.

Filed Under: Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Practice Management, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia

Commonwealth offences – All states

2 April 2020 by By Lawyers

Commentary on Commonwealth offences dealt with in state magistrates’ courts has been added to all By Lawyers Criminal Guides.

This new commentary and additional precedents will assist practitioners advising and representing clients charged with offences under the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) and the Commonwealth Criminal Code.

The new commentary sets out the procedure for summary and indictable Commonwealth charges in state courts, from bail considerations to sentencing.

The possible sentencing options are covered in detail and there is a very helpful table of the Commonwealth offences most frequently encountered in state magistrates’ courts.

New precedents include:

  • Example written submissions in support of an application for discharge of an offender without proceeding to conviction; and
  • Letter to client after sentence – providing for various outcomes.

All existing Retainer Instructions for criminal and bail matters have been enhanced to include Commonwealth offences.

The new content can be found in the IF REQUIRED – COMMONWEALTH OFFENCES folder on the matter plan in every By Lawyers Criminal law guide.

 

Filed Under: Criminal Law, Federal, New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: commonwealth offences, criminal law, criminal procedure, magistrates court

Remote signing – All states

1 April 2020 by By Lawyers

Practical issues relating to the remote signing of documents such as agreements, deeds, wills and powers of attorney by companies and individuals

Remote signing of documents has become an important issue for solicitors and their clients due to the coronavirus pandemic. Face to face meetings are now largely excluded meaning clients are unable to attend at their lawyer’s office to sign documents.

Documents which must be signed need to be mailed or emailed to clients and then signed remotely.

Signatures

Signatures establish the identity of the person signing and their intention to create legal relations.  It is this intention indicated by placing their mark on a document that gives it its legal character or functionality, not the mark itself. There is no real distinction made at law between handwritten signatures, marks or electronic signatures. Signing a document electronically might be done by typing one’s name, pasting an image of one’s usual signature, using a stylus or finger on a touchscreen or using e-signing software.

Agreements

An agreement can be in electronic form and executed electronically, if witnessing is not required.

Most contracts, such as the contract for the sale of land, do not require a witness.

If witnessing is required, it can be done electronically provided the witness is present when the deed is signed. If witnessing is not possible this way due to virus related isolation, then the counterparty will need to agree to another method.

Electronic conveyancing requirements

A Client Authorisation Form may be electronically signed, subject to specific jurisdictional requirements. Whilst the Verification of Identity Standard requires a face-to-face in person interview, compliance with the standard is not mandatory and taking ‘reasonable steps’ to verify the identity of the client, such as by video meeting, is sufficient.

The By Lawyers Contract for Sale of Land in NSW and in VIC allows for electronic exchange and electronic settlement in compliance with electronic transactions legislation and the Verification of Identity Standard rules.

Deeds

Deeds usually require signatures to be witnessed and to be in writing.

An electronically-signed deed that is immediately printed out on paper may satisfy the common law requirement for paper with the first printed version being the original deed rather than a copy. However, parties to a transaction are better served to agree in advance to the acceptability of a particular form of deed and its electronic signature. Similarly, checking before execution  the requirements of organisations such as registries with whom the deeds must be registered will ensure their acceptability.

As mentioned above, witnessing can be electronic provided the witness is present when the deed is signed. If this is not possible then the counterparty will need to agree to another method.

An acceptable method might be by video attendance of the party’s lawyer who on return of the signed deed certifies it to be identical to the one submitted for signing and that the signing was witnessed by video.

Wills

The issue with executing wills remotely given social distancing, is the availability of two witnesses who are not themselves beneficiaries.

Where the required two disinterested witnesses are not available, the will may be executed informally, by the testator, who after signing it, returns it to their solicitor with a statement that they intend it to be their last will and testament. Accompanied by an affidavit explaining the signing in the prevailing circumstances, perhaps with video witnessing, a grant of probate of the informal will is likely to be made if required. Once the pandemic ends the will can be properly signed.

Powers of attorney

A general power of attorney does not need a witness and can be signed remotely.

However, an enduring power of attorney must be witnessed by a prescribed witness – usually the principal’s solicitor – who must also certify that they explained the effect of the document to the principal and that they appeared to understand it. On that basis remote signing is technically impossible.

Where a face to face meeting – even one at an outdoor location with appropriate distancing – is not possible, the document could be sent to the client by post or email for their written or electronic signature. Their lawyer could hold a video conference with the client and explain the document and see it signed by their client. When returned the lawyer can certify that they gave the explanation and were satisfied as to the principal’s understanding, but whilst unable to personally witness the document being signed, they witnessed the signing in video conference.

In this practical way the power is likely to be acceptable in most cases where there is no issue raised.

Where this approach is taken, the risks that the document may not be effective need to be explained to the client and appropriate file notes made.

Appointments of enduring guardian and Advance medical directives

The same witnessing and certification procedures apply to these instruments as for enduring powers of attorney. Similar practical, emergency measures might be undertaken.

Company execution

It is arguable whether a company can execute a document electronically under s 127 of the Corporations Act 2001.

However, in this busy world of commerce it is common for documents to be signed by duly authorised officers, or one director, or by a duly appointed attorney.

Generally

The ongoing response to Coronavirus means that emergency measures are rapidly being introduced to modify the usual signing and witnessing requirements. For example, some courts will currently accept unsigned affidavits on the basis that they will later be formally executed if necessary. The website of each court should be referred to as required.

 

Keep up-to-date with our latest COVID-19 News & Updates

Filed Under: Articles, Australian Capital Territory, Companies, Trusts, Partnerships and Superannuation, Conveyancing and Property, Miscellaneous, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Practice Management, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia, Wills and Estates Tagged With: companies, conveyancing, e-conveyancing, enduring guardianship, informal wills, power of attorney, remote signing, Wills

FIDS – Conveyancing -TAS

1 April 2020 by By Lawyers

Foreign Investor Duty Surcharge (FIDS) is increasing from 1 April 2020.

FIDS applies to acquisitions of residential or primary production property by a foreign person occurring on or after 1 July 2018. It is an additional amount of duty charged on the direct, or indirect, acquisition of residential or primary production property by any foreign person.

The increase applies from 1 April 2020. For transactions which are the result of a written agreement for sale entered into after 1 April 2020, FIDS is charged at:

  • 8% on the proportion of the dutiable value of residential property acquired by a foreign person; and
  • 1.5% on the proportion of the dutiable value of primary production property acquired by a foreign person.

The By Lawyers Purchase of Real Property (TAS) Guide has been updated in line with these changes.

Filed Under: Conveyancing and Property, Publication Updates, Tasmania Tagged With: 1.5%, 8%, conveyancing, FIDS, Foreign Investor Duty Surcharge

Duration of orders – ADVOs – NSW

27 March 2020 by By Lawyers

The duration of orders for apprehended domestic violence (ADVOs) provided for in the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 has been amended.

From 28 March 2020 the default duration of orders increases to 2 years for adult defendants. It remains 12 months for a defendant who was under 18 years of age at the time the application was first made.

Longer periods can apply if the court considers it necessary. Final orders can be for any period, including an indefinite period.

Unless the court specifies a different period, an order remains in force for the default period under s 79A of the Act. The parties can agree on a different period and the court can make such an order by consent.

Section 79A also sets out the matters to which the court is to have regard when deciding on the period of an order.

See Duration of orders in the commentary in the By Lawyers Apprehended Violence Order guide, within the NSW Criminal – Local Court publication, for further detail.

Filed Under: Criminal Law, Domestic Violence Orders, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Publication Updates Tagged With: AVO, Criminal (NSW) Guide, domestic violence, family and domestic violence

Parenting orders and the Coronavirus – FED

27 March 2020 by By Lawyers

The Chief Justice of the Family Court has issued a comprehensive and helpful bulletin on parenting orders and the Coronavirus.

A key point in the bulletin is His Honour’s call that:

As a first step, and only if it is safe to do so, parties should communicate with each other about their ability to comply with current orders and they should attempt to find a practical solution to these difficulties. These should be considered sensibly and reasonably. Each parent should always consider the safety and best interests of the child, but also appreciate the concerns of the other parent when attempting to reach new or revised arrangements.

His Honour notes that the Courts remain open to assist parties and to provide parents with general guidance. The Family Court’s general Coronavirus arrangements are available on the Court’s website and are being regularly updated.

The most important point regarding Coronavirus and parenting arrangements is that the best interests of the children remains the paramount consideration: s 60CA Family Law Act 1975.

In accordance with their obligations to act in their children’s best interests, parents and carers are expected to comply with Court orders in relation to parenting arrangements, notwithstanding the ‘highly unusual’ current circumstances. This includes facilitating time being spent by the children with each parent or carer pursuant to parenting orders. This is where sense and reason need to be applied by the parties, and where lawyers can play a critical role.

For more information about parenting orders and the Coronavirus, including what the parties should consider and what the Court will consider when making orders, see the commentary on parenting orders in the By Lawyers Family Law – Children Guide.

 

Keep up-to-date with our latest COVID-19 News & Updates

Filed Under: Family Law, Federal, Legal Alerts Tagged With: coronavirus, family court, family law, family law act, parenting orders

Employment and the Coronavirus – FED

26 March 2020 by By Lawyers

Many questions arise at the moment about Employment and the Coronavirus. The By Lawyers Employment Law Guide and the 101 Employment Law Answers reference manual located within that publication can assist subscribers to advise their clients, whether employers or employees.

In addition, our author Brad Petley, an accredited specialist in Workplace Relations, has prepared a timely article on the issues that practitioners and their clients need to consider. This article has been added to the By Lawyers Employment Law Guide, under the Reference Materials folder. The text of Mr Petley’s article is reproduced here for general assistance:

Employer obligations

Employers have legal obligations to ensure the health and safety of their employees and contractors, and also to ensure that the health and safety of members of the public is not put at risk from the conduct of their business or undertaking. This includes managing the risk of exposure to and spread of Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the workplace.

Health risks such as Coronavirus need to be carefully and sensitively managed, as they can give rise to a risk of claims of discrimination, unfair treatment and even unfair dismissal.

Therefore, employers should ensure they act fairly and on the basis of reliable and current medical information. Similarly, employers should not permit or encourage their employees to target or treat adversely any particular demographic in the workplace.

There are legal protections against discrimination or adverse action based on race, ethnicity, national origin or impairment – which can include disease or illness.  In an atmosphere of heightened anxiety due to the impact of Coronavirus, it important that employees’ emotions and conduct are managed by clear and open commu­nication from senior manage­ment.

The rapidly changing situation with the Coronavirus pandemic means that many employers will be focused on reducing their labour costs in the current business climate.  To reduce labour costs employers may consider options such as:

  • Asking employees to take their accrued paid leave such as annual leave and long service leave;
  • Implementing stand-downs pursuant to s 524 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth); or
  • Implementing redundancies.

Leave

Under the Fair Work Act full-time and part-time national system employees are entitled to 10 days personal/carer’s leave each year of service. The entitlement accumulates progressively.

Employees who access their accrued personal/carer’s leave due to injury or illness such as Coronavirus, are considered to be temporarily absent from work and, as such, are protected from dismissal because of their illness or injury: see s 352.

That does not mean that an employee on personal/carer’s leave, who is suffering from Coronavirus, cannot be required to obey reasonable and lawful OHS based instructions intended to minimise the risk of the person spreading disease in the workplace.  For example, an employee diagnosed with COVID-19 who disobeyed an instruction not to attend the workplace unless cleared medically would risk disciplinary action.

Stand-down

An employer may stand down an employee during a period in which the employee cannot usefully be employed due to circumstances for which the employer cannot reasonably be held responsible.

The employer does not pay wages for the period of a stand down. This is not a deferment but a pause during the stand-down in the obligation to pay wages.

An employee stood down continues to accrue entitlements to annual leave and personal/carer’s leave under the National Employment Standards, as well as an entitlement to a public holiday that falls on a day the employee would ordinarily work during the stand-down period: see. s 524.

Redundancy

For a redundancy-based dismissal, employees who are dismissed on the grounds of a ‘genuine redundancy’ are not eligible to bring an unfair dismissal application: see s 385(d).

A genuine redundancy occurs where:

  • the person’s employer no longer required the person’s job to be performed by anyone because of changes in the operational requirements of the employer’s enterprise; and
  • the employer has complied with any obligation in a modern award or enterprise agreement that applied to the employment to consult about the redundancy.

A genuine redundancy does not occur if it would have been reasonable in all the circumstances for the person to be redeployed within:

  • the employer’s enterprise; or
  • the enterprise of an associated entity of the employer.

Dismissal

When interviewing a client who claims to have been dismissed due to the Coronavirus, it is important to ascertain the basis of the client’s belief.

If there is evidence supporting the claim that the virus was the reason for the dismissal, then a claim for unfair dismissal or breach of general protections provisions may be available.

 

– Brad Petley solicitor is the main author of the By Lawyers Employment Law guides. He will continue to update our subscribers regarding Employment and the Coronavirus as circumstances demand.

 

Keep up-to-date with our latest COVID-19 News & Updates

Filed Under: Articles, Employment Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: Corona virus, employees, employer, Employment law, workplace

Temporary changes to insolvency laws – FED

25 March 2020 by By Lawyers

The Federal Government has made temporary changes to insolvency laws under the Coronavirus Economic Response Package Omnibus Act 2020, aimed at relieving current economic pressures on individuals and companies.

The Act commenced on 25 March 2020.

These temporary changes to insolvency laws are as follows:

Bankruptcy

The time for a debtor to comply with a bankruptcy notice has been extended from 21 days to six months. The threshold for initiating bankruptcy proceedings increases from $5,000 to $20,000. These changes will apply for six months from commencement of the Act.

The same six month time extension applies to the time within which a debtor is protected from enforcement action by a creditor, following their presentation of a declaration of intention to present a debtor’s petition, under s 54A Bankruptcy Act.

Liquidation

The time for a debtor company to comply with a statutory demand has been extended from 21 days to six months. The threshold to issue a statutory demand has been increased from $2,000 to $20,000. These changes will apply until 25 September 2020.

Safe harbour

A new, temporary, s 588GAAA ‘Safe harbour—temporary relief in response to the coronavirus’, of the Corporations Act 2001 provides that the existing civil penalties for directors failing to prevent insolvent trading under ss 588G(2) do not apply in relation to a debt incurred by a company if the debt is incurred in the ordinary course of the company’s business and until 25 September 2020.

Practitioners should keep these changes in mind for the next six months and be aware of the end date, which is 25 September 2020.

Alerts have been added to the By Lawyers Insolvency – Bankruptcy of Individuals, Insolvency – Company Liquidation and Companies commentaries notifying subscribers of these changes.

 

Keep up-to-date with our latest COVID-19 News & Updates

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Bankruptcy and Liquidation, Companies, Trusts, Partnerships and Superannuation, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: bankruptcy, bankruptcy proceedings, companies, company law, corporate insolvency, insolvency

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • …
  • 102
  • Next Page »

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Preferred State

Connect with us

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 · Privacy Policy
Created and hosted by LEAP · Log in