ByLawyers News and Updates
  • Publication updates
    • Federal
    • New South Wales
    • Victoria
    • Queensland
    • South Australia
    • Western Australia
    • Northern Territory
    • Tasmania
    • Australian Capital Territory
  • By area of law
    • Bankruptcy and Liquidation
    • Business and Franchise
    • Companies, Trusts, Partnerships and Superannuation
    • Conveyancing and Property
    • Criminal Law
    • Defamation and Protecting Reputation
    • Employment Law
    • Family Law
    • Immigration
    • Litigation
    • Neighbourhood Disputes
    • Personal injury
    • Personal Property Securities
    • Practice Management
    • Security of Payments
    • Trade Marks
    • Wills and Estates
  • Legal alerts
  • Articles
  • Question of the week
  • By Lawyers

Work health and safety – WA

27 April 2022 by By Lawyers

Work, health and safety laws in WA have changed. The Occupational Health and Safety Act 1984 (WA) has been repealed from 31 March, 2022.

The repealed Act has been replaced with the Work Health and Safety Act 2020. The provisions of the old Act have been consolidated and recast in the new Act, which is substantially based on the national model Work Health and Safety Bill.

The national model Bill was developed under the Inter-Governmental Agreement for Regulatory and Operational Reform in Occupational Health and Safety to underpin a harmonised WHS framework in Australia.

This means WA has now harmonised its legislation with the majority of other Australian jurisdictions.

The key elements of the new Act include:

  • a primary duty of care requiring persons conducting a business or undertaking to ensure the health and safety of workers and others who may be affected by their activities;
  • duties of care for persons who influence the way work is carried out, as well as the integrity of products used for work and persons who conduct training in workplaces;
  • a requirement that officers exercise due diligence to ensure compliance;
  • a framework to establish a general scheme for authorisations such as licences, permits and registrations;
  • protection against discrimination for those who exercise or perform or seek to exercise or perform powers, functions or rights under the Act;
  • continuation of Western Australia’s peak consultative bodies, re-established as the Work Health and Safety Commission (WHSC) and the Mining and Petroleum Advisory Committee (MAPAC).

The commentary in the By Lawyers Employment Law publication has been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Employment Law, Federal, Legal Alerts, Publication Updates, Western Australia Tagged With: Employment law, work health and safety

Letter of offer – FED

12 April 2022 by By Lawyers

Two new Letter of offer precedents have been added to the By Lawyers Employment Law guide.

Letters of offer can be used to create an employment relationship between employer and employee when a full employment agreement is not required. These precedent letters set out the terms and conditions upon which the employment position is offered. The use of an optional schedule allows greater detail of the position description and the employee’s duties and responsibilities to be added if it is considered necessary.

The employee signs and returns a copy of the letter to confirm their acceptance of the position and the terms of employment.

One of the new precedents is for general use, the other is specific to employing apprentices.

The apprentice version extends the employee’s responsibilities to attending and undertaking the necessary training for completion of their apprenticeship. It also includes reference to the relevant requirements such as:

  • training contracts with an Australian Apprenticeship Support Network Provider;
  • specific state-based apprentice training legislation;
  • registered training organisations, such as TAFE;
  • training plans;
  • training records.

The apprentice version of the precedent also provides for the employee’s employment to terminate upon completion, cessation or transfer of the apprenticeship.

These new precedents Letter of offer and Letter of offer for an apprentice have been added to the matter plan in the Acting for Employer sub-folder under Folder B. Employment agreements.

By Lawyers comprehensive employment agreement precedents are also available in Folder B. for use when clients require a more detailed and flexible document. These precedents include:

  • Standard individual employment agreement;
  • Casual employment agreement; and
  • Executive employment agreement.

The new precedents have been added by our employment law author following a subscriber request. By Lawyers loves to receive feedback from our users – don’t hesitate to contact us if there are precedents you need.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: employee, employment, Employment law

Spent convictions – VIC

7 December 2021 by By Lawyers

The Spent Convictions Act 2021 (Vic), along with the Spent Convictions Regulations 2021 (Vic), establishes a legislative scheme for criminal convictions to lapse after a set period automatically.

The commencement of this legislation on 1 December 2021, brought Victoria into line with the other states which already have such a scheme.

Employees and job candidates have rights under the Act, relating to an employer’s access to their criminal records. When particular criminal convictions lapse they may not be used as a basis for making decisions about a person’s employment. This generally applies to less serious offences.

Convictions which have lapsed under the legislation will not appear on a police record check unless the check is for certain types of employment, such as working with children. Specific provisions under some legislation, for example an application for a firearms licence, will still require full criminal histories to be disclosed.

Convictions for offences which are not deemed serious are eligible to be spent automatically after a 10-year crime-free period, for offences committed as an adult. The period is 5 years for offences committed as a minor.

The Spent convictions commentary has been updated in the By Lawyers Employment Law and Magistrates’ Court – Criminal (Vic) guides.

Filed Under: Criminal Law, Employment Law, Legal Alerts, Publication Updates, Victoria Tagged With: convictions, criminal law, employment, Employment law, spent convictions

Sexual harassment – FED

29 November 2021 by By Lawyers

New provisions for the prevention of sexual harassment and bullying in the workplace have commenced.

Part 6-4B of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) now provides that workers can apply to the Fair Work Commission for orders to stop sexual harassment as well as workplace bullying. To be eligible to make an application a worker must be employed in a constitutionally-covered business.

There is no time limit for making an application for an order to stop bullying or sexual harassment at work. Section 789FF of the Fair Work Act 2009 provides that for the Fair Work Commission to be able to make an order there needs to be a risk that the applicant will continue to be bullied or sexually harassed at work. If the worker no longer has a connection to the workplace, an order cannot be made as there is no future risk of the relevant behaviour occurring.

‘Sexually harass’, for these purposes, has the same meaning as in s 28A of the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth).

Examples of sexual harassment include:

  • inappropriate behaviour including staring, leering, loitering or unwelcome touching;
  • suggestive comments, jokes or gestures based on sex or a person’s private life or body;
  • communicating sexually explicit material in person or electronically.

The objectionable conduct must occur at work, which is not defined but is tied to work activities wherever they occur and is not limited to the confines of a physical workplace. It includes entering, moving about and leaving a workplace.

The application needs to be lodged with the Fair Work Commission using the prescribed form: Application for an order to stop bullying or sexual harassment (or both).

The employer needs to respond within 7 days of being served using the prescribed form: Response from an employer or principal to an application for an order to stop bullying or sexual harassment (or both).

The alleged perpetrator will receive a copy of the application and be invited to respond within 7 days using the prescribed form: Response from a person named as having engaged in bullying or sexual harassment (or both).

All the prescribed forms are available in the Workplace bullying and sexual harassment folder on the matter plan in the By Lawyers Employment Law publication. The commentary has also been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Federal, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: employment, Employment law, fair work commission, sexual harassment, Workplace bullying

Employment law publication – FED

2 August 2021 by By Lawyers

The Employment Law publication has been extensively reviewed and enhanced. This work is part of By Lawyers continual commitment to updating and enhancing our publications.

Key components of the Employment Law publication – the matter plan, commentary and 101 Employment Law Answers reference materials – have been re-organised and augmented.

Matter plan

The matter plan has been reordered to:

  • better reflect the distinction between matters relating to employment agreements and employment disputes;
  • separate the content – both commentary and precedents – on employment agreements and non-employment agreements, such as independent contractor agreements;
  • add a new dedicated folder for the important content on workplace bullying.

Commentary

Updates include the following:

  • Getting the matter underway – initial consideration of employment status;
  • Awards –  expanded discussion of applicability and effect of awards;
  • Coverage of The National Employment Standards (NES) and a link to the Fair Work Ombudsman’s new Small Business Employer Advisory Service;
  • The new provisions for casual conversion;
  • Other rights and entitlements – additional commentary on children in the workplace, overtime, vehicles, deductions, access to records and employers in liquidation;
  • Employment agreements – considerations for negotiating and documenting terms, with a link to the Commonwealth Government’s helpful Employment contract tool;
  • Termination of employment, including when it happens during workers compensation claims;
  • Redundancy – entitlement under the NES and the connection to unfair dismissal;
  • Unfair dismissal claims – coverage of all relevant considerations, including who is protected, the small business exception, high-income threshold, what the Fair Work Commission considers, the application and response, the claims procedure, conciliation, hearings and conferences, remedies and costs orders;
  • General protections claims – coverage of adverse action, discrimination, other protections and sham contracts; and
  • Dedicated commentary on unlawful termination claims.

The comprehensive History of legislative changes has been relocated to 101 Employment Law Answers. This will assist when the rights of a client need to be determined as at a certain prior date.

101 Employment Law Answers

This handy reference material has received a comprehensive revamp that is a precursor to a more detailed review. As with all By Lawyers reference materials 101 Employment Law Answers provides relevant and up-to-date case law summaries and links to legislation. It covers such topics as leave entitlements, the multi-indicia test, abandonment, non-solicitation, redundancy entitlement, and unfair dismissal.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Federal, New South Wales, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: disputes, employee, employer, employment, employment agreement, Employment law

Casual employment – FED

13 April 2021 by By Lawyers

Recent amendments to the Fair Work Act

There is a new statutory definition of ‘casual employee’ from 27 March 2021. There is also an expanded statutory pathway for regular casual employees to convert their employment status to full time. Employers now have an obligation to offer permanent employment in certain circumstances.

Some relief has been granted to employers for underpayment claims from employees incorrectly classified as casual. This addresses instances of ‘double dipping’.

The Fair Work Amendment (Supporting Australia’s Jobs and Economic Recovery) Act 2021 has introduced significant amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 including:

Statutory definition

Section 15A provides that a person is a casual employee if they have been offered and have accepted employment on the basis that the employer gave ‘no firm advance commitment to continuing and indefinite work according to an agreed pattern…’.

Conversion to permanent employment

Additionally, for casual employees who fall outside the modern award framework there is a statutory obligation for employers to offer conversion to full or part-time employment, unless there are reasonable business grounds not to do so. This does not apply to small business employers.

Casual Employment Information Statement

Employers must provide casual employees with a Casual Employment Information Statement, before, or as soon as practicable after, they start their employment. This is additional to the Fair Work Information Statement.

Off-setting casual loading to prevent ‘double-dipping’

Employers are provided with relief for underpayment claims from employees incorrectly classified as casual.

Regular casual employee

The previous definition of ‘long term casual’ is replaced with ‘regular casual employee’. The definition relates to the element of employment on a regular and systematic basis, but without any specific time requirement.

By Lawyers keeps you up to date

For further details see the By Lawyers Employment Law publication which has been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Employment Law, Federal, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: casual, employee, employer, employment, Employment law

Unpaid parental leave – FED

4 December 2020 by By Lawyers

Unpaid parental leave entitlements have been enhanced by the Fair Work Amendment (Improving Unpaid Parental Leave for Parents of Stillborn Babies and Other Measures) Act 2020.

These amendments provide greater support to parents who experience stillbirth, infant death, premature birth and the hospitalisation of their baby immediately following birth.

The amendments ensure the following:

  • Employees who are parents of stillborn babies or parents of babies or infants that die have the same entitlement to leave as parents of babies that survive;
  • Following a stillbirth or the death of an infant or child, the employee parent’s unpaid leave can only be cancelled by the employee;
  • Employees who are parents of premature babies and newborns that require hospitalisation after birth can put their unpaid parental leave on hold during the hospitalisation; and
  • Employees cannot also take compassionate leave unless it is following the stillbirth or the death of the child.

Employees may choose to access flexible unpaid leave options in the first 24 months after the child’s actual or expected date of birth or placement, for example, to enable a gradual return to work or shared caring responsibilities between parents.

The commentary in the By Lawyers Employment Law publication has been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Employment Law, Federal, Publication Updates Tagged With: employee, employer, employment, Employment law, unpaid leave, unpaid parental leave

JobKeeper extension – FED

15 September 2020 by By Lawyers

The Federal Government has announced another Jobkeeper extension. The payment scheme will continue until 28 March 2021.

Options for flexibility for managing workforce costs, such as reducing working hours continue. Employers are no longer allowed to require employees to take annual leave.

The amendments change the eligibility requirements for employers. Two broad categories of employers have been created: those who qualify for the new scheme after 28 September 2020, referred to as ‘qualifying employers’ and those who previously received at least one payment but no longer qualify, referred to as ‘legacy’ employers.

Qualifying employers

The minimum requirements under this JobKeeper extension remain the same regarding notification and consultation. The By Lawyers example content letters remain available from within the commentary and have been updated where necessary.

Any JobKeeper enabling directions or agreements existing on 27 September 2020 remain valid if the employer continues to qualify for the scheme.

Legacy employers

Legacy employers must have received one or more JobKeeper payments in the period prior to 28 September 2020, but have ceased to qualify. They now need to show a 10% decline in current GST turnover for the previous quarter. They must obtain a ‘10% decline in turnover certificate’ from a financial service provider.

Small business employers may choose to make a statutory declaration instead.

Legacy employers have been given access to modified directions and agreements and have extra notice and consultation requirements. Any existing on 27 September 2020 will need to be reissued or new arrangements made. They may not request an employee to work less than 2 hours per day or less than 60% of their ordinary hours as at 1 March 2020.

The By Lawyers example content letters provide for legacy employers.

The Fair Work Commission has the power to deal with disputes relating to legacy employers and satisfaction of the 10% decline in turnover test.

More information on Jobkeeper extension

The JobKeeper section of the By Lawyers Dealing with COVID-19 Legal Issues – Some practical information commentary has been updated. A link to this helpful resource is available at the top of the matter plan in every By Lawyers guide.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: coronavirus, COVID 19, employment, Employment law, jobkeeper

Criminal records – Employment – FED

31 August 2020 by By Lawyers

Commentary on the disclosure of criminal records by job seekers has been added to the By Lawyers Employment guide. This useful enhancement covers ‘spent’ convictions in all Australian jurisdictions.

Employees and job candidates have rights under state legislation except in Victoria, and also under federal legislation, relating to their employer or prospective employer accessing their criminal records.

Employers normally have the right to conduct criminal record checks on current and prospective employees. This generally does not include ‘lapsed’ or ‘spent’ convictions.

All states, except Victoria, have different legislative schemes for convictions that lapse, commonly known as ‘spent’ convictions. Commonwealth crimes fall under federal legislation which also covers the ACT and the Northern Territory.

These legislative schemes prescribe when certain criminal convictions lapse, after which time they may not be used as a basis for making decisions about a person’s employment. This allows offenders to put their past behind them, provided they have had the required law-abiding period.

For example, under s 85ZV of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), an organisation is prohibited from taking into account or disclosing to others an individual’s past criminal conviction under federal law if it is defined as having lapsed. An individual is not required to disclose such a conviction when applying for employment. A lapsed conviction is defined as an adult conviction more than ten years old, or a juvenile conviction more than five years old. The maximum penalty for the original offence cannot exceed 30 months imprisonment.

There are exceptions, such as where people are applying for jobs that involve working with children.

For further information on ‘spent’ convictions and employment applications see the By Lawyers Employment guide.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: criminal record, employees, employment, Employment law

JobKeeper – updates – FED

19 August 2020 by By Lawyers

The Federal Government has further amended the JobKeeper extension. These further changes to our previous post are shown in italics.

The employment stimulus package will continue for a further six months until 28 March 2021.

Amendments

There are changes to employer eligibility for JobKeeper and to the payment rates. The additional six-months is divided into two periods:

  • 28 September 2020 to 3 January 2021; and
  • 4 January 2021 to 28 March 2021.

Eligible employers will continue to claim a fortnightly payment of $1,500 per eligible employee until 27 September 2020.

Eligible employees will continue to receive a minimum of $1,500 per fortnight before tax from their employer until 27 September 2020.

From 28 September 2020 the payment rates will be reduced.

Eligibility for employers

From 28 September 2020 to 3 January 2021 businesses with turnover of less than $1 billion must experience a decline in turnover of 30% for the September 2020 quarter only compared to the equivalent 2019 quarter. The employer must have been in an employment relationship with each eligible employee on 1 March 2020 or 1 July 2020 and needs to confirm that they are currently employed. From 4 January 2021 to 28 March 2021, the December 2020 quarter only must fall by the relevant percentage compared to the December 2019 quarter.

JobKeeper payment rates

From 28 September to 3 January 2021 for employees who worked 20 hours or more per week on average in February 2020 or June 2020, employers will receive $1,200 per employee fortnightly. These employees must therefore be paid a minimum of $1,200 fortnightly before tax. For employees who worked less than 20 hours per week on average in February 2020 or June 2020, the employers will receive $750 per employee fortnightly. These employees must therefore be paid a minimum of $750 fortnightly before tax.

From 4 January 2021 to 28 March 2021 the relevant amounts fall from $1,200 to $1,000 and from $750 to $650.

If employees were employed for both February 2020 and June 2020 then the period with the higher number of hours worked is to be used.

More information

The JobKeeper section of the By Lawyers Dealing with COVID-19 Legal Issues – Some practical information commentary has been updated. A link to this helpful resource is available at the top of the matter plan in every By Lawyers guide.

 

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: Employment law, jobkeeper

  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page »

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Preferred State

Connect with us

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 · Privacy Policy
Created and hosted by LEAP · Log in