ByLawyers News and Updates

Testamentary capacity checklist

by

A testamentary capacity checklist has been added to the matter plans in all By Lawyers will guides. This helpful precedent distills the critical information that practitioners must elicit to properly assess capacity. It is designed to assist lawyers both when taking instructions and when the will is being executed, whether in the office or at the client’s bedside.

Whether or not a client has testamentary capacity is not calculated via a legislated formula but derived from case law. It has been described as requiring time, situation, person, and task specific focus on a testator’s ability to remember, reflect, and reason.

The cases, starting from Banks v Goodfellow (1870) LR 5 QB 549 require a testator to understand:

  • what it means to be making a will;
  • the assets they have and are leaving to others;
  • the obligation owed to those who could make a claim on the estate; and
  • whether or not they are affected by a delusion that influences the disposal of their assets.

The Court determines testamentary capacity on the facts and circumstances of each case.

In Star v Miller [2021] NSWSC 426, the court said that, when taking instructions, it is prudent for lawyers to ascertain the client’s capacity and the possibility of undue influence by asking non-leading questions to determine the facts and circumstances of each case. The By Lawyers testamentary capacity checklist includes such questions.

In Ryan v Dalton; Estate of Ryan [2017] NSWSC 1007 at 107, the court suggests that where an elderly client is being cared for by someone or is residing in an aged care facility, it is prudent to ask both clients and their carers whether there is any reason to be concerned about capacity. The By Lawyers testamentary capacity checklist prompts for these inquiries to be made.

The checklist was suggested by one of our subscribers. We worked with our authors to draft a document that is as short and simple as possible but protects practitioners by covering all necessary considerations. The checklist should be used in conjunction with the By Lawyers Wills retainer instructions.

Wills guide reviewed – WA

by

The continuing commitment of By Lawyers to updating and enhancing our publications has seen the Western Australian Wills guide reviewed.

Subscribers using this popular publication will benefit from a re-ordered and extended matter plan, revised and updated commentary and a number of new precedents.

Execution is now a top-level heading on the matter plan, with dedicated commentary on issues such as blind witnesses, gifts to witnesses and solicitors as witnesses. The revisions and enhancements to commentary also include:

  • First steps and taking instructions for wills
  • Testamentary capacity and the test in Banks v Goodfellow
  • The formal requirements for a valid will
  • Informal wills
  • Intestacy
  • Executors
  • Execution
  • Challenges to the validity of a will

New and amended precedents

  • Letter to client to confirming instructions
  • Instructions for signing
  • Letter reminding client that will is ready for signing

Other resources in the Wills guide reviewed

Links have been added to the By Lawyers reference materials Other trusted and useful resources, which can be found in the Reference materials folder on the matter plan and at the end of the full commentary.

COVID signing provisions – QLD

by

From 1 July 2021, some of the COVID signing provisions applicable in Queensland during the pandemic will cease.

The Justice Legislation (COVID-19 Emergency Response– Documents and Oaths) Amendment Regulation (No.2) 2021 means that from 1 July any ‘enduring’ documents – wills, enduring powers of attorney, and advance health directives – to be signed by a signatory or substitute signatory need to be made, signed and witnessed under the ordinary law.

One remaining exception is the modified COVID signing provisions that enable nursing practitioners, in addition to doctors, to complete a certificate in an advance health directive stating that the signatory appeared to have the necessary capacity to make it.

This regulation also does not affect the modified arrangements under the Justice Legislation (COVID-19 Emergency Response—Documents and Oaths) Regulation 2020 in relation to the making, signing and witnessing of affidavits, statutory declarations, oaths, deeds, particular mortgages and general powers of attorney under the documents regulation. These measures are currently scheduled to expire on 30 September 2021.

The By Lawyers dedicated Dealing with COVID-19 legal issues commentary will be updated. This guide, accessed via a link at the top of every By Lawyers matter plan, provides practitioners with helpful information about all relevant COVID signing provisions and other important temporary COVID measures.

See the By Lawyers Wills, Powers of Attorney & Advance Health Directives and Mortgages publications for more information. See also the folder of Blank deeds, agreements, statutory declarations and execution clauses in folder A. Getting the matter underway folder on the matter plan in every By Lawyers publication.

Remote execution of wills – VIC

by

Victoria has introduced a permanent procedure for remote execution of wills.

The procedure arises from the temporary COVID-19 related remote execution and witnessing laws, that are now repealed.

The remote execution of wills requires:

  1. A special witness, who can be an Australian legal practitioner or justice of the peace;
  2. All steps of the procedure to be completed on the same day and within Victoria;
  3. The testator to sign the will – or to direct someone to sign the will on their behalf, with that direction being heard by the witnesses – with all witnesses seeing the signature by audio visual link, or a combination of physical presence and audio visual link;
  4. The special witness to be the last person to witness the will;
  5. The will to be emailed to any witness attending by audio visual link, who must:
    • be reasonably satisfied that the will is the same document they witnessed the testator sign;
    • ensure that there is a statement on the will noting that the witness witnessed the will being signed by audio visual link in accordance with the procedure;
    • sign the will, with the testator clearly seeing them do so by audio visual link; and
    • in the case of the special witness, check to ensure the will complies with the remote execution procedure and also ensure there is a statement on the will noting that the will was witnessed in accordance with the procedure and that they are a special witness and note whether there is a recording of the remote execution process.

The procedure for remote execution of wills also applies to revoking or altering an existing will.

The By Lawyers Wills (Vic) guide has been updated accordingly. This includes the addition of two new jurat clause precedents to the matter plan: Remote execution procedure – Witness and Remote execution procedure – Special witness.

Wills guide review – TAS

by

The continuing commitment of By Lawyers to updating and enhancing our publications has seen a Tasmanian Wills guide review completed.

Subscribers using this publication will find a re-ordered and extended matter plan, plus a revised and updated commentary.

The commentary revisions and enhancements arising from this Wills guide review include:

  • The Overview has been expanded and re-ordered;
  • Additional practical guidance added under the new heading ‘Taking instructions for wills’;
  • New commentary on testamentary capacity and the test set out in the leading case of Banks v Goodfellow (1870) LR 5 QB 549 at 565;
  • Enhanced commentary and links to legislative provisions regarding the formal requirements for a valid will;
  • Newly consolidated commentary under  new heading: Revocation, marriage, divorce and revival;
  • Expanded commentary on Informal wills, with links to cases;
  • Re-ordered section on the rules of succession on intestacy, with relevant links to the Intestacy Act 2010 and the Relationships Act 2003;
  • Expanded commentary on executors and trustees, including solicitors as executors;
  • New commentary section focusing on the requirements for valid execution of a will, including issues such as blind witnesses, gifts to witnesses, and solicitors as witnesses;
  • Extensive discussion of the law on challenges to the validity of a will;
  • A new section called Finalising the matter which emphasises the importance of terminating the retainer.

A new To Do List precedent has also been added to the matter plan, under Folder A. Getting the matter underway. The new precedent provides a checklist of all usual and necessary steps in the preparation of a will for a client. The To Do list will assist practitioners and their support teams with both workflow and risk-management.

Special grants of probate – NSW

by

A recent Supreme Court case on special grants of probate has been added to 101 Succession Answers NSW. Application of Penhall and Dutton; Estate of the late Kylie Anne Dutton [2021] NSWSC 79 relates to an application for special administration ad colligenda bona defuncti, whereby a grant is obtained to protect the estate.

In this case the deceased’s home was unoccupied for 6 months with no insurance cover, which presented a real risk of diminishing the value of the estate. The Court granted the application to allow the property to be sold and the proceeds placed in an interest bearing account. The Court noted this was an interim measure and a full grant was still required to distribute the estate.

The By Lawyers Probate and Letters and Administration commentaries and 101 Succession Answers all deal with special grants. These apply when there is no one able to seek a grant and there are special needs for the estate. The special grants include:

  • Administration de bonis non administrates cum testamento annexo – administrator dies before completing the administration of will;
  • Administration de bonis non administrates – administrator dies before completing the administration of intestacy;
  • Administration for the purposes of the family provisions claim under s 91 of the Succession Act 2006 – also covered in the By Lawyers Family provision claims guide;
  • Administration pendente lite – s 73 Administration during litigation;
  • Administration ad litem to commence or defend proceedings;
  • Administration by a manager appointed by the Guardianship Division of the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal for a person lacking mental capacity;
  • Administration during minority;
  • Application by a guardian;
  • Administration durante absentia – executor or administrator outside NSW grant to an attorney – s 72;
  • Application under s 76 if executor or administrator out of jurisdiction special administrator may be appointed;
  • Administration when the sole beneficiary/executor/administrator suffers from a disability, he can nominate another; and
  • Grant to a creditor.

The 101 Succession Answers publication can be found in the Reference materials folder at the top of the matter plans in all By Lawyers succession-related guides – Wills, Powers of Attorney, Appointments of enduring guardian and Family provision claims.

Wills guide reviewed – SA

by

The continuing commitment of By Lawyers to updating and enhancing our publications has seen the South Australian Wills guide reviewed.

Subscribers using this popular publication will find a re-ordered and extended matter plan, revised and updated commentary and a number of new precedents. Execution is now a top-level heading on the matter plan, with dedicated commentary on issues such as blind witnesses, gifts to witnesses and solicitors as witnesses. The revisions also include:

  • First steps and taking instructions for wills
  • Testamentary capacity and the test in Banks v Goodfellow
  • The formal requirements for a valid will
  • Informal wills
  • Intestacy
  • Executors
  • Execution
  • Challenges to the validity of a will

New and amended precedents

  • Initial letter to client enclosing costs agreement
  • Letter to client to confirming instructions
  • To do list
  • Instructions for signing
  • Letter reminding client that will is ready for signing

Other resources in the Wills guide reviewed

Links have been added to the By Lawyers reference materials Other trusted and useful resources. This resource can be found in the Reference materials folder on the matter plan.

Estates cases – VIC

by

New estate cases have been added to the By Lawyers 101 Succession Answers (VIC) reference manual.

The new cases under the Estates section of the publication relate to:

Vesting of interest in beneficiaries – Rule in Saunders v Vautier

A beneficiary can apply to the court to have their interest vest earlier than provided for in the will. The rule in Saunders v Vautier possibly provides such a mechanism.

The High Court set out the modern formulation of the rule in Saunders v Vautier in CPT Custodian Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2005] HCA 53 at [47]:

Under the rule in Saunders v Vautier, an adult beneficiary (or a number of adult beneficiaries acting together) who has (or between them have) an absolute, vested and indefeasible interest in the capital and income of property may at any time require the transfer of the property to him (or them) and may terminate any accumulation.

If the beneficiaries are ascertained, have capacity and all consent then ‘they may put an end to the trust by directing the trustee to transfer the interest in the estate to themselves, notwithstanding any direction to the contrary in the trust instrument’: Krstic v State Trustees Ltd [2012] VSC 344 at [15].

For a case where the rule was not upheld due to the beneficial interest being classed as contingent, see Arnott v Kiss [2014] NSWSC 1385. This case also suggests that a gift over clause may defeat application of the rule.

Accordingly, whether there is any reason for the executor to resist the application would depend upon there being any terms of the will that might support such a position. If the executor is in any doubt then the trustee can and should seek judicial advice.

The addition of these new estate cases to 101 Succession Answers (VIC) is part of our continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Estate cases – QLD

by

New estate cases have been added to the By Lawyers 101 Succession Answers (QLD) reference manual.

The new cases under the Estates section of the publication relate to:

Vesting of interest in beneficiaries – Rule in Saunders v Vautier

A beneficiary can apply to the court to have their interest vest earlier than provided for in the will. The rule in Saunders v Vautier possibly provides such a mechanism.

The High Court set out the modern formulation of the rule in Saunders v Vautier in CPT Custodian Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2005] HCA 53 at [47]:

Under the rule in Saunders v Vautier, an adult beneficiary (or a number of adult beneficiaries acting together) who has (or between them have) an absolute, vested and indefeasible interest in the capital and income of property may at any time require the transfer of the property to him (or them) and may terminate any accumulation.

In Re Tracey [2016] QCA 194 the Court of Appeal at [10] stated that:

The context of that reference makes it clear that the rule may be invoked only by a beneficiary who is sui juris. The expression sui juris connotes in law “a person who can validly contract and bind himself by legal obligation uncontrolled by another person”.

For a case where the rule was not upheld due to the beneficial interest being classed as contingent, see Arnott v Kiss [2014] NSWSC 1385. This case also suggests that a gift over clause may defeat application of the rule.

Accordingly, whether there is any reason for the executor to resist the application would depend upon there being any terms of the will that might support such a position. If the executor is in any doubt then the trustee can and should seek judicial advice.

The addition of these new estate cases to 101 Succession Answers (QLD) is part of our continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Estates cases – NSW

by

New estates cases have been added to By Lawyers 101 Succession Answers (NSW) reference manual.

The new cases under the Estates section of the publication relate to:

Additional assets after grant

The administrator’s obligation to disclose is a continuous one. Any assets not disclosed in the initial affidavit must be disclosed to the court by way of further affidavit: r 78.91 Supreme Court Rules 1970. If an asset has come to light after the grant has been finalised, an Affidavit of Additional Assets needs to be filed.

If an updated copy of the grant is required, an Application for Exemplification also needs to be filed. An exemplification is a certified and sealed copy of a grant. The Inventory of Property does not need to be amended.

The Affidavit of Additional Assets and the Application for Exemplification are available in the By Lawyers Estates guide, on the Probate and Letters of Administration matter plans.

Vesting of interest in beneficiaries

A beneficiary can apply to the court to have their interest vest earlier than provided for in the will under the rule in Saunders v Vautier.

The High Court set out the modern formulation of the rule in Saunders v Vautier in CPT Custodian Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2005] HCA 53 at [47]:

Under the rule in Saunders v Vautier, an adult beneficiary (or a number of adult beneficiaries acting together) who has (or between them have) an absolute, vested and indefeasible interest in the capital and income of property may at any time require the transfer of the property to him (or them) and may terminate any accumulation.

In Beck v Henley [2014] NSWCA 201 the Court of appeal at [35] stated that:

Adult beneficiaries who are absolutely and indefeasibly entitled have power to “overbear and defeat the intention of a testator or settlor to subject property to the continuing trusts, powers and limitations of a will or trust instrument”.

A case where the rule was not upheld has been added –  Arnott v Kiss [2014] NSWSC 1385.

The addition of these new estates cases to 101 Succession Answers (NSW) is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Connect with us