obiter | ByLawyers News and Updates

Unpaid parental leave – FED

by

Unpaid parental leave entitlements have been enhanced by the Fair Work Amendment (Improving Unpaid Parental Leave for Parents of Stillborn Babies and Other Measures) Act 2020.

These amendments provide greater support to parents who experience stillbirth, infant death, premature birth and the hospitalisation of their baby immediately following birth.

The amendments ensure the following:

  • Employees who are parents of stillborn babies or parents of babies or infants that die have the same entitlement to leave as parents of babies that survive;
  • Following a stillbirth or the death of an infant or child, the employee parent’s unpaid leave can only be cancelled by the employee;
  • Employees who are parents of premature babies and newborns that require hospitalisation after birth can put their unpaid parental leave on hold during the hospitalisation; and
  • Employees cannot also take compassionate leave unless it is following the stillbirth or the death of the child.

Employees may choose to access flexible unpaid leave options in the first 24 months after the child’s actual or expected date of birth or placement, for example, to enable a gradual return to work or shared caring responsibilities between parents.

The commentary in the By Lawyers Employment Law publication has been updated accordingly.

JobKeeper scheme – FED

by

Details of the Federal government’s JobKeeper scheme have been added to By Lawyers Dealing with COVID-19 legal issues – Some practical information publication.

JobKeeper payment stimulus package

The purpose of the JobKeeper package is to assist employers to retain their employees and improve the viability of businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Under the scheme, employers will receive $1,500 per employee fortnightly. Employees must be paid a minimum of $1,500 fortnightly before tax. The JobKeeper payment will be available from 30 March 2020 until 27 September 2020.

Employers pay their employees as usual and then get reimbursed by the ATO, monthly in arrears.

The new commentary covers the important aspects of the scheme. These include the eligibility criteria for both employers and employees. There are also answers to frequently asked questions.

A link is provided to the ATO website which sets out how to Enrol for the JobKeeper payment.

New powers for employers under the JobKeeper scheme

The Federal parliament has complemented the JobKeeper scheme by giving new powers to employers covered by the scheme. The Fair Work Act has been amended by the insertion of Part 6-4C that allows an employer to temporarily modify employment terms and conditions, if they are eligible for the JobKeeper scheme. This is referred to as an employer giving a ‘JobKeeper enabling direction’ to a particular employee.

The new powers include options for workforce flexibility and reducing workforce costs. This gives eligible employers the ability to stand down employees or reduce their hours, change the duties they perform, or change their location of work. The amendments also allow an eligible employer to make an agreement with an employee about work days or times, as well as the employee taking annual leave, including at half pay.

Before a JobKeeper direction can be given, employers must meet minimum requirements. For example, employers need to satisfy consultation requirements which includes notifying the employee at least three days before making a JobKeeper enabling direction, or a lesser time by agreement. No forms have been prescribed for this purpose. By Lawyers has provided example content letters, which are available from within the commentary.

These amendments enable the Fair Work Commission to conciliate and arbitrate disputes about a JobKeeper direction or request.

For more information about the JobKeeper scheme refer to Dealing with COVID-19 legal issues – Some practical information, which is available in all By Lawyers guides.

Employment and the Coronavirus – FED

by

Many questions arise at the moment about Employment and the Coronavirus. The By Lawyers Employment Law Guide and the 101 Employment Law Answers reference manual located within that publication can assist subscribers to advise their clients, whether employers or employees.

In addition, our author Brad Petley, an accredited specialist in Workplace Relations, has prepared a timely article on the issues that practitioners and their clients need to consider. This article has been added to the By Lawyers Employment Law Guide, under the Reference Materials folder. The text of Mr Petley’s article is reproduced here for general assistance:

Employer obligations

Employers have legal obligations to ensure the health and safety of their employees and contractors, and also to ensure that the health and safety of members of the public is not put at risk from the conduct of their business or undertaking. This includes managing the risk of exposure to and spread of Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the workplace.

Health risks such as Coronavirus need to be carefully and sensitively managed, as they can give rise to a risk of claims of discrimination, unfair treatment and even unfair dismissal.

Therefore, employers should ensure they act fairly and on the basis of reliable and current medical information. Similarly, employers should not permit or encourage their employees to target or treat adversely any particular demographic in the workplace.

There are legal protections against discrimination or adverse action based on race, ethnicity, national origin or impairment – which can include disease or illness.  In an atmosphere of heightened anxiety due to the impact of Coronavirus, it important that employees’ emotions and conduct are managed by clear and open commu­nication from senior manage­ment.

The rapidly changing situation with the Coronavirus pandemic means that many employers will be focused on reducing their labour costs in the current business climate.  To reduce labour costs employers may consider options such as:

  • Asking employees to take their accrued paid leave such as annual leave and long service leave;
  • Implementing stand-downs pursuant to s 524 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth); or
  • Implementing redundancies.

Leave

Under the Fair Work Act full-time and part-time national system employees are entitled to 10 days personal/carer’s leave each year of service. The entitlement accumulates progressively.

Employees who access their accrued personal/carer’s leave due to injury or illness such as Coronavirus, are considered to be temporarily absent from work and, as such, are protected from dismissal because of their illness or injury: see s 352.

That does not mean that an employee on personal/carer’s leave, who is suffering from Coronavirus, cannot be required to obey reasonable and lawful OHS based instructions intended to minimise the risk of the person spreading disease in the workplace.  For example, an employee diagnosed with COVID-19 who disobeyed an instruction not to attend the workplace unless cleared medically would risk disciplinary action.

Stand-down

An employer may stand down an employee during a period in which the employee cannot usefully be employed due to circumstances for which the employer cannot reasonably be held responsible.

The employer does not pay wages for the period of a stand down. This is not a deferment but a pause during the stand-down in the obligation to pay wages.

An employee stood down continues to accrue entitlements to annual leave and personal/carer’s leave under the National Employment Standards, as well as an entitlement to a public holiday that falls on a day the employee would ordinarily work during the stand-down period: see. s 524.

Redundancy

For a redundancy-based dismissal, employees who are dismissed on the grounds of a ‘genuine redundancy’ are not eligible to bring an unfair dismissal application: see s 385(d).

A genuine redundancy occurs where:

  • the person’s employer no longer required the person’s job to be performed by anyone because of changes in the operational requirements of the employer’s enterprise; and
  • the employer has complied with any obligation in a modern award or enterprise agreement that applied to the employment to consult about the redundancy.

A genuine redundancy does not occur if it would have been reasonable in all the circumstances for the person to be redeployed within:

  • the employer’s enterprise; or
  • the enterprise of an associated entity of the employer.

Dismissal

When interviewing a client who claims to have been dismissed due to the Coronavirus, it is important to ascertain the basis of the client’s belief.

If there is evidence supporting the claim that the virus was the reason for the dismissal, then a claim for unfair dismissal or breach of general protections provisions may be available.

 

– Brad Petley solicitor is the main author of the By Lawyers Employment Law guides. He will continue to update our subscribers regarding Employment and the Coronavirus as circumstances demand.

 

Keep up-to-date with our latest COVID-19 News & Updates

101 Employment Answers – commentary added

by

By Lawyers Reference Manual – 101 Employment Answers has been enhanced with the addition of commentary regarding Unfair dismissal – period of continuous employment and Casual Employment.

An employee’s period of employment with an employer at a particular time is the period of continuous service the employee has completed with the employer at that time as an employee: see s 384(1).

Under s 384(2), a ‘period of service’ as a casual employee does not count towards the employee’s period of employment unless:

  • the casual employee was employed on a regular and systematic basis; and
  • the casual employee had a reasonable expectation of continuing employment on a regular and systematic basis.

The Full Bench decision of the Fair Work Commission in Shortland v Smiths Snackfood Co Ltd (2010) 198 IR 237 (particularly paragraphs 10 to 13) provides guidance as to the approach to take for calculating a ‘period of service’ as a casual employee.

Connect with us