obiter | ByLawyers News and Updates

Companies during COVID-19 – FED

By

The Federal government has made things easier for companies during COVID-19. Amendments to the Corporations Act enable companies to circumvent formal requirements which made signing documents and holding meetings in the current environment difficult or impossible. These practical temporary measures apply to companies during COVID-19 and are set for repeal on 6 November 2020.

Execution of documents by companies during COVID-19

Amendments introduced by the Corporations (Coronavirus Economic Response) Determination (No. 1) 2020 that commenced on 6 May 2020 provide for execution of documents by companies during COVID-19. The amendments mean that a company can execute a document electronically under s 127 of the Corporations Act 2001. The method used must be appropriate in the circumstances, identify the person in the electronic communication and indicate the person’s intention in respect of the contents of the document. The Determination also provides for the execution of a document requiring a common seal, to be executed otherwise: s 6(3).

Meetings of companies during COVID-19

Amendments introduced by the Corporations (Coronavirus Economic Response) Determination (No. 1) 2020 that commenced on 6 May 2020 provide for meetings of companies during COVID-19. The amendments modify the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 and the Corporations Regulations 2001, or any equivalent provisions in a company constitution, that require or permit a meeting to be held, or that regulate giving notice of a meeting or the conduct of a meeting. These amendments mean that:

  • a meeting can be held using one or more technologies that give all persons entitled to attend a reasonable opportunity to participate without being physically present in the same place. This would include platforms such as Zoom, Skype or Microsoft Teams;
  • all persons thus participating in the meeting are taken for all purposes, including quorum requirements, to be present at the meeting;
  • a vote taken at the meeting must be taken on a poll, and not on a show of hands, by using one or more technologies to give each person entitled to vote the opportunity to participate in the vote in real time and, where practicable, by recording their vote in advance of the meeting;
  • a requirement to allow persons attending the meeting to speak, such as asking questions, may be complied with by using one or more technologies that allow that opportunity;
  • a proxy may be appointed using one or more technologies specified in the notice of the meeting; and
  • notice of a meeting may be given by using one or more technologies to communicate along with any other information to be provided, or details of an online location where the content can be viewed or downloaded. For example, a company could send members an email setting out or attaching a notice of a meeting and any other material relating to the meeting, or else providing a link to where the notice and the other material can be viewed or downloaded.
  • a notice of meeting must include information about how those entitled to attend can participate in the meeting, including how they can vote and speak at the meeting.

If notice of the meeting has been given before 6 May 2020 a fresh notice of the meeting that includes the information referred to above must be issued at least 7 days before the meeting is held.

Updates

Keep up-to-date with our ‘Dealing with COVID-19 legal issues – Some practical information‘ commentary. This can be found at the top of each By Lawyers Guide.

Remote signing – All states

By

Practical issues relating to the remote signing of documents such as agreements, deeds, wills and powers of attorney by companies and individuals

Remote signing of documents has become an important issue for solicitors and their clients due to the coronavirus pandemic. Face to face meetings are now largely excluded meaning clients are unable to attend at their lawyer’s office to sign documents.

Documents which must be signed need to be mailed or emailed to clients and then signed remotely.

Signatures

Signatures establish the identity of the person signing and their intention to create legal relations.  It is this intention indicated by placing their mark on a document that gives it its legal character or functionality, not the mark itself. There is no real distinction made at law between handwritten signatures, marks or electronic signatures. Signing a document electronically might be done by typing one’s name, pasting an image of one’s usual signature, using a stylus or finger on a touchscreen or using e-signing software.

Agreements

An agreement can be in electronic form and executed electronically, if witnessing is not required.

Most contracts, such as the contract for the sale of land, do not require a witness.

If witnessing is required, it can be done electronically provided the witness is present when the deed is signed. If witnessing is not possible this way due to virus related isolation, then the counterparty will need to agree to another method.

Electronic conveyancing requirements

A Client Authorisation Form may be electronically signed, subject to specific jurisdictional requirements. Whilst the Verification of Identity Standard requires a face-to-face in person interview, compliance with the standard is not mandatory and taking ‘reasonable steps’ to verify the identity of the client, such as by video meeting, is sufficient.

The By Lawyers Contract for Sale of Land in NSW and in VIC allows for electronic exchange and electronic settlement in compliance with electronic transactions legislation and the Verification of Identity Standard rules.

Deeds

Deeds usually require signatures to be witnessed and to be in writing.

An electronically-signed deed that is immediately printed out on paper may satisfy the common law requirement for paper with the first printed version being the original deed rather than a copy. However, parties to a transaction are better served to agree in advance to the acceptability of a particular form of deed and its electronic signature. Similarly, checking before execution  the requirements of organisations such as registries with whom the deeds must be registered will ensure their acceptability.

As mentioned above, witnessing can be electronic provided the witness is present when the deed is signed. If this is not possible then the counterparty will need to agree to another method.

An acceptable method might be by video attendance of the party’s lawyer who on return of the signed deed certifies it to be identical to the one submitted for signing and that the signing was witnessed by video.

Wills

The issue with executing wills remotely given social distancing, is the availability of two witnesses who are not themselves beneficiaries.

Where the required two disinterested witnesses are not available, the will may be executed informally, by the testator, who after signing it, returns it to their solicitor with a statement that they intend it to be their last will and testament. Accompanied by an affidavit explaining the signing in the prevailing circumstances, perhaps with video witnessing, a grant of probate of the informal will is likely to be made if required. Once the pandemic ends the will can be properly signed.

Powers of attorney

A general power of attorney does not need a witness and can be signed remotely.

However, an enduring power of attorney must be witnessed by a prescribed witness – usually the principal’s solicitor – who must also certify that they explained the effect of the document to the principal and that they appeared to understand it. On that basis remote signing is technically impossible.

Where a face to face meeting – even one at an outdoor location with appropriate distancing – is not possible, the document could be sent to the client by post or email for their written or electronic signature. Their lawyer could hold a video conference with the client and explain the document and see it signed by their client. When returned the lawyer can certify that they gave the explanation and were satisfied as to the principal’s understanding, but whilst unable to personally witness the document being signed, they witnessed the signing in video conference.

In this practical way the power is likely to be acceptable in most cases where there is no issue raised.

Where this approach is taken, the risks that the document may not be effective need to be explained to the client and appropriate file notes made.

Appointments of enduring guardian and Advance medical directives

The same witnessing and certification procedures apply to these instruments as for enduring powers of attorney. Similar practical, emergency measures might be undertaken.

Company execution

It is arguable whether a company can execute a document electronically under s 127 of the Corporations Act 2001.

However, in this busy world of commerce it is common for documents to be signed by duly authorised officers, or one director, or by a duly appointed attorney.

Generally

The ongoing response to Coronavirus means that emergency measures are rapidly being introduced to modify the usual signing and witnessing requirements. For example, some courts will currently accept unsigned affidavits on the basis that they will later be formally executed if necessary. The website of each court should be referred to as required.

 

Keep up-to-date with our latest COVID-19 News & Updates

Temporary changes to insolvency laws – FED

By

The Federal Government has made temporary changes to insolvency laws under the Coronavirus Economic Response Package Omnibus Act 2020, aimed at relieving current economic pressures on individuals and companies.

The Act commenced on 25 March 2020.

These temporary changes to insolvency laws are as follows:

Bankruptcy

The time for a debtor to comply with a bankruptcy notice has been extended from 21 days to six months. The threshold for initiating bankruptcy proceedings increases from $5,000 to $20,000. These changes will apply for six months from commencement of the Act.

The same six month time extension applies to the time within which a debtor is protected from enforcement action by a creditor, following their presentation of a declaration of intention to present a debtor’s petition, under s 54A Bankruptcy Act.

Liquidation

The time for a debtor company to comply with a statutory demand has been extended from 21 days to six months. The threshold to issue a statutory demand has been increased from $2,000 to $20,000. These changes will apply until 25 September 2020.

Safe harbour

A new, temporary, s 588GAAA ‘Safe harbour—temporary relief in response to the coronavirus’, of the Corporations Act 2001 provides that the existing civil penalties for directors failing to prevent insolvent trading under ss 588G(2) do not apply in relation to a debt incurred by a company if the debt is incurred in the ordinary course of the company’s business and until 25 September 2020.

Practitioners should keep these changes in mind for the next six months and be aware of the end date, which is 25 September 2020.

Alerts have been added to the By Lawyers Insolvency – Bankruptcy of Individuals, Insolvency – Company Liquidation and Companies commentaries notifying subscribers of these changes.

 

Keep up-to-date with our latest COVID-19 News & Updates

Insolvency – Company liquidation – FED

By

A full review of the By Lawyers Insolvency – Company Liquidation guide has been conducted by our highly experienced author, Michael Murray.

The review ensures that all content is in line with current law and practice.

Updates and enhancements include:

  • New commentary on the statutory demand process, including applications to set aside statutory demands; and
  • Updates to a number of precedents to improve the Insolvency – Company Liquidation matter plan.

Keep up to date with By Lawyers

These updates to our Insolvency – Company Liquidation guide are part of By Lawyers commitment to the continual enhancement of our publications. By Lawyers subscribers can be confident that their guides and precedents are always kept up to date so they can enjoy practice more.

Trusts – Foreign person – NSW

By

Discretionary trusts – foreign person

Where a foreign person acquires or holds residential property, duty and land tax surcharge can apply. Foreign person surcharge duty and land tax can also apply to discretionary trusts where foreign persons are beneficiaries or potential beneficiaries.

The NSW Commissioner of State Revenue issued a ruling in March 2017 allowing exemption of discretionary trusts from surcharge duty and land tax if the trust deed was amended to exclude foreign beneficiaries within six months of the exemption being granted.

The State Revenue Legislation Further Amendment Bill 2019 is currently before the NSW Parliament. If this Bill is passed, the ability to amend a trust deed to avoid the surcharge will be restricted. Once the Bill passes, the exemption is likely to be removed. The second reading speech for the Bill states: ‘the Government considers that the end of 2019 allows sufficient time for any remaining trustees and their advisers to make necessary changes to trust deeds’.

It is therefore important for trustees to review existing discretionary trust deeds and consider whether they require amendment.

In order to avoid the application of surcharge duty and land tax, discretionary trust deeds must include a clause that prohibits the trustee from making trust distributions to, or otherwise benefiting a foreign person. The deed must also prohibit an amendment that has the effect of allowing the trustee to make distributions to, or to otherwise benefit, a foreign person.

The By Lawyers Discretionary Trust deed precedents and commentary have been amended accordingly. A note has also been added to the ‘Retainer Instructions – Trusts’ precedent, to prompt practitioners to raise this issue with clients when drafting trust deeds.

See the commentary in the By Lawyers Trusts Publication for further details.

 

Companies – FED

By

Following an extensive author review, the By Lawyers Companies guide has been substantially enhanced. Users will find new commentary and a number of helpful new precedents.

The commentary now includes sections on Running a company and Company disputes.

With trademark By Lawyers practicality, the new sections of commentary assist practitioners to advise clients about most of the common issues which arise in the operation of small private companies, from managing company business, conducting meetings, issuing new shares and dealing with various types of company disputes, to negotiating share sales, handling insolvency events and participating in voluntarily winding up. Some aspects of the existing commentary on Setting up a company have also been enhanced and new precedents added.

Users will find the following new precedents have been added to the By Lawyers Companies Guide:

  • Retainer instructions – Company disputes;
  • Initial letter to company which has received a statutory demand;
  • Letter to the client  to make an appointment to sign documentation required for incorporation;
  • Letter to the client advising that the company has been incorporated;
  • Letter to the client with draft shareholder’s agreement;
  • New letters gathering information relevant to company disputes:
    • Letter to client requesting relevant documents;
    • Letter to director requesting inspection of company minutes;
    • Letter to director requesting company records; and
    • Letter to director advising of intention to seek a s 247A order to inspect company records;
  • New option precedents:
    • Notice of exercise of call option;
    • Notice of exercise of option to purchase
    • Notice of exercise of put option;
    • Notice of appointment of nominee;
    • Letter to seller’s solicitor exercising option; and
    • Letter to buyer’s solicitor exercising option;
  • Company resolution; and
  • Minutes of meeting – Directors.

These substantial enhancements to this already popular publication are part of By Lawyers commitment to constantly add value for our users and keep our content updated.

We invite you to peruse the new commentary and precedents in the Companies Guide, located in the Companies, Trusts, Partnerships and Superannuation publication. Also available in the Reference materials folder on each of these matter plans is the helpful reference manual Business structures and comparative table, which compares and contrasts the different types of business structures and considers their advantages and disadvantages, including from a taxation point of view.

 

 

 

Partnerships – updated precedents- FED

By

The By Lawyers Partnerships publication has been updated, as follows:

Partnership agreements amended in Partnerships guide

The Partnership agreement and Limited partnership agreement precedents have been amended in a number of respects, including:

    • The ‘Duration of partnership’ clause has been removed, as this is sufficiently covered in the ‘Expulsion, retirement or death of a partner’ and ‘Dissolution’ clauses;
    • A new clause 4 (b) has been inserted, to allow for non-monetary capital contributions if these are agreed between the partners. A corresponding clause has been inserted as 8(d) in the Limited partnership agreement;
    • The ‘Expulsion of a partner’ clause has been updated to become ‘Expulsion, retirement or death of a partner’ and now has improved function. Please review the clause for the changes made. The corresponding clause in the Limited partnership agreement is named ‘Termination of partner’;
    • The ‘Winding up’ clause in the Partnership agreement has been renamed ‘Dissolution’ and amended to provide additionally for the situation where the partners agree to dissolve the partnership;
    • The ‘Notices’ clause has been amended to remove facsimile delivery;
    • Various other small amendments have been made to improve readability.

New letters added to Partnerships matter plan

Two new precedents letters have been added to the Partnerships matter plan:

      • Letter to client with draft partnership agreement – for originally sending the draft partnership agreement to the client;
      • Letter to client with draft agreement – for sending later variations of the document to the client.

These additions and amendments have been made as a result of user feedback and author review, to enhance the publication and assist solicitors in their daily practice when advising upon and preparing documents for clients entering into partnerships.

Practitioners who are regular users of these precedents may benefit from a careful review of each clause in the agreements, to ensure they are familiar with the amendments.

Costs disclosure – Increase of legal rates during a matter

By

Increase of legal rates during a matter

All By Lawyers Costs Agreements and Client Service Agreements have been updated to include a clause notifying a client that legal rates may increase during the course of a matter requiring a revision of the costs estimate provided. This clause provides for 30 days written notice of any proposed changes to legal rates. While such a clause is not required by Legal Profession legislation concerning costs disclosure requirements, providing such notice on initial costs disclosure is considered best practice.

All of our Guides contain Costs Agreements (Client Service Agreements for QLD Guides) within the folder ‘A. Getting the mater underway’. All of our agreements are compliant with the relevant Legal Profession legislation and are reviewed and updated regularly to ensure compliance.

New Publication – Trusts Guide – FED

By

By Lawyers have a comprehensive new Trusts Guide.

The new guide contains commentary and precedents for establishing a new trust, amending an existing trust, or bringing a trust to an end through vesting or termination.

This new publication is a substantial enhancement of the previous trusts section in our Companies, Trusts, Partnerships and Superannuation guide.

The new detailed Trusts Guide deals with the various types of trust structures, including:

  • Discretionary trusts;
  • Fixed unit trusts;
  • Non-fixed unit trusts;
  • Hybrid trusts;
  • Charitable trusts; and
  • Special disability trusts.

The commentary discusses important issues affecting the use of trusts including:

  • The financial planning and asset protection merits of different trust structures;
  • The rights and obligations of beneficiaries, unit holders and trustees, including corporate trustees;
  • Taxation requirements including income tax, land tax and trust loss provisions; and
  • Common dispute resolution methods.

The new guide also contains many essential and useful precedents such as:

  • A unit trust deed that meets the requirements of a fixed trust for land tax and loss-streaming purposes;
  • A unit trust deed creating multiple classes of unit holders;
  • A discretionary trust deed;
  • A combined unit holder and shareholder agreement;
  • A hybrid trust deed;
  • A charitable trust deed;
  • A special disability trust deed; and
  • Numerous supporting documents, such as deeds of amendment.

The new Trusts Guide is available to LEAP companion product subscribers through the Guides and Precedents button in a LEAP matter, or to By Lawyers website subscribers as part of the Companies, trusts, partnerships and superannuation guide.

Trusts – New precedent – Deed of termination

By

Following a subscriber request, we have added a new precedent to our Unit Trusts Guide, being a Deed of termination of trust.

There are many reasons a client may wish to terminate or dissolve a trust prior to the vesting date. There are also several methods of bringing a trust to an early end including:

  • complete distribution of the trust property by the trustee;
  • revocation by the settlor or trustee;
  • the beneficiaries or unit holders consent to end the trust; and
  • a Court ordered termination of trust.

When brining a trust to an end there are many important issues for the trustee to consider including:

  • the procedures prescribed by the original trust deed;
  • all possible creditors; and
  • all possible taxation consequences – particularly CGT arising from the sale of any trust assets or in specie distributions.

The need for a deed confirming the termination of the trust was suggested by one of our subscribers. Having considered the issue, By Lawyers have created a simple new precedent Deed poll, terminating the trust. This will allow practitioners to ensure that when their trustee clients terminate a trust it is evidenced and supported by proper documentation.

At By Lawyers we are always grateful for any feedback on our precedents and will happily accommodate subscriber requests for new documents where appropriate.

 

 

Connect with us