ByLawyers News and Updates

Family provision claims VIC

by

New precedents have been added to the By Lawyers Family Provision Claims VIC publication.

Following an author review of the guides, there is new content on the matter plans for both Acting for the Estate and Acting for the Plaintiff.

The new content to assist practitioners acting for clients in relation to claims on a deceased estate under Part IV of the Administration and Probate Act 1958 includes:

Acting for the Estate – new family provision precedents

  • Letter to beneficiary affected by settlement of claim
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavits for signing
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavits
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing

Acting for the Plaintiff – new family provision precedents

  • Letter to potential claimant
  • Authority to settle and receive
  • Direction to pay and authority to receive
  • Letter to client enclosing settlement deed
  • Letter to client after filing claim
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavit
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to client enclosing estate affidavits
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – Payment
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – No payment

This review of the Family Provision Claims VIC publication and the addition of these new family provision precedents is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Family provision claims SA

by

New precedents have been added to the By Lawyers Family Provision Claims SA publication.

Following an author review of the guides, there is new content on the matter plans for both Acting for the Respondent and Acting for the Applicant.

The new content to assist practitioners acting for clients in relation to claims on a deceased estate under the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1972, includes:

Acting for the Respondent – new family provision precedents

  • Letter to beneficiary affected by settlement of claim
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavits for signing
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavits
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing

Acting for the Applicant – new family provision precedents

  • Authority to settle and receive
  • Direction to pay and authority to receive
  • Letter to client enclosing settlement deed
  • Letter to client after filing claim
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavit
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – Payment
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – No payment

The review of the Family Provision Claims SA publication and the addition of these new family provision precedents is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

New Family provision precedents – NSW

by

Following an author review, a raft of helpful new Family provision precedents have been added to the By Lawyers Family Provision Claims (NSW) publication.

There is new content on the matter plans in both Acting for the Estate and Acting for the Plaintiff.

The new content includes:

Acting for the Estate – new family provision precedents

  • Letter to eligible person
  • Letter to beneficiary affected by settlement of claim
  • Letter to client enclosing Practice Note SC EQ 7
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavits for signing
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavits
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing

Acting for the Plaintiff – new family provision precedents

  • Letter to potential claimant
  • Letter to client enclosing Practice Note SC EQ 7
  • Letter to client enclosing settlement deed
  • Authority to settle and receive
  • Direction to pay and authority to receive
  • Letter to client enclosing settlement deed
  • Letter to client after filing claim
  • Letter to defendant serving summons and other documents
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavit
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to client enclosing estate affidavits
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client updating costs disclosure
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – Payment
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – No payment

This review and the addition of these new family provision precedents is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

101 Succession Answers – Vic

by

By Lawyers is delighted to release the latest in our 101 Reference Series – the comprehensive reference guide 101 Succession Answers – VIC. This useful resource provides more detailed information than the By Lawyers commentaries on the various areas and issues in succession law. It includes discussion, with links to legislation and cases, on:

  • powers of attorney and supportive attorney appointment;
  • medical treatment decision-making;
  • wills;
  • appointments of guardianship and administration;
  • estates – probate and administration; and
  • family provision.

101 Succession Answers VIC is now a related guide in LEAP – and included for new and existing website subscribers – to these Victorian By Lawyers publications:

  • Wills, Powers of Attorney and Advance Health Directives;
  • Estates; and
  • Family Provision Claims.

This is a must-have, easy-reference, resource providing detailed information in a quickly accessible and searchable format. Tricky questions can be answered quickly using the guide’s alphabetical headings, ‘Ctrl+F’ searchability and plain English format. Practitioners can quickly address specific technical issues as they arise in a matter.

The By Lawyers team will be keeping 101 Succession Answers VIC updated with all relevant new cases and legislation as developments in these areas of law occur.

Family provision claims – NSW

by

A full review of the By Lawyers Family provision claims – Acting for the estate guide has been conducted. This follows upon the recent review of Family provision claims – Acting for the plaintiff.

The review of this popular practical guide ensures that all content is in line with current law and practice.

Updates and enhancements include:

  • a re-organised and streamlined commentary that better caters for current practice;
  • additional assistance to help the practitioner get the matter underway;
  • enhanced commentary on preparing for and attending at mediation;
  • an updated matter plan that includes links to important sections of the commentary; and
  • significantly enhanced precedents:
    • Letter to plaintiff’s solicitor in response to their initial letter;
    • Brief to counsel – Defendant;
    • Defendant’s notice to eligible persons; and
    • Outline of submissions – Defendant.

This review of our NSW Family provision claims guides are part of By Lawyers ongoing commitment to continual improvement and enhancement of our content.

Additional information on Family provision claims can be found in the By Lawyers reference manual 101 Succession Answers (NSW). This includes the leading and latest cases on various important aspects of family provision claims. 101 Succession Answers is available in the Reference Materials folder in all related guides for NSW – Family provision, Wills, Estates, Powers of attorney and Appointments of enduring guardian.

Family provision claims – Acting for the Plaintiff (NSW)

by

A full review of the By Lawyers Family provision claims – Acting for the plaintiff guide has been conducted.

The review ensures that all content is in line with current law and practice.

Improved content and new precedents

Updates and enhancements include:

  • a re-organised and streamlined commentary that better caters for current practice;
  • additional assistance to help the practitioner get the matter underway;
  • enhanced commentary on preparing for and attending at mediation;
  • an updated matter plan that includes links to important sections of the commentary; and
  • six new precedents – additional initial letters which cater for different circumstances regarding the estate.

101 Succession Answers (NSW)

Subscribers are reminded that the By Lawyers reference manual 101 Succession Answers (NSW) also has a large and helpful section on Family provision claims. This includes many links to relevant sections of the legislation, plus links to leading and recent cases on various aspects of Family provision claims.

101 Succession Answers (NSW) is found at the top of the Family provision claims – Acting for the plaintiff matter plan and also in the Reference materials folder.

Keep up to date with By Lawyers

These updates to our Family provision claims – Acting for the plaintiff guide, and the regular updates to 101 Succession Answers (NSW) with the latest cases on Family provision claims, are part of By Lawyers commitment to the continual enhancement of our publications. By Lawyers subscribers can be confident that their guides and precedents are always kept up to date so they can enjoy practice more.

‘To do’ list – Family provision claims – NSW

by

New precedent ‘To do’ lists have been added to the By Lawyers Family Provision Claims – Acting for the plaintiff and Acting for the estate Guides for NSW.

Many subscribers would be familiar with By Lawyers helpful ‘To do’ lists, which serve as a checklist for progress through the matter. The ‘To do’ list ensures no critical steps are missed and allows practitioners to mark-off each step and make sure they know where the matter is up to.

The new ‘To do’ lists for Family Provision claims prompts for each of the critical steps at each stage of the matter, namely:

  • Getting the matter underway – including costs disclosure
  • Settling it early – initial offers of settlement
  • The claim – preparing and filing the summons and plaintiff’s affidavit OR notice of appearance and notice to eligible persons
  • The first directions hearing
  • Mediation
  • Next directions hearing
  • Preparation for hearing
  • Hearing
  • After hearing – including advice on appeal rights.

These new precedents will assist lawyers in Family Provision claims to manage their matters, whether acting for the claimant or the estate.

Family Provision – 101 Succession Answers (NSW)

by

Two new cases on Family Provision claims have been added to the By Lawyers Reference manual 101 Succession Answers (NSW).

Affidavits and Disclosure

In Megerditchian v Khatchadourian [2019] NSWSC 1870 the court considered a number of important procedural issues, including the requirement that the plaintiff file an affidavit at the time of filing their summons and the issues relating to the form and evidentiary status of that affidavit. At [159]  the court stated:

… the purpose of the affidavit prescribed by the Practice Note is to identify, in broad terms, the plaintiff’s evidence concerning the factors enumerated in s 60(2) which may bear on the application. It will not necessarily be exhaustive, or all in admissible form, and it may be supplemented by further evidence as the case moves towards hearing.

The court also considered the plaintiff’s duty of disclosure. At [145] the court noted that:

It is well established that, in some circumstances, where a plaintiff in a family provision application fails to make full and proper disclosure of his or her financial position, the Court will refuse the application.

This case has been added to the Affidavits and Disclosure sections under Family Provision claims in 101 Succession Answers (NSW).

Disabled adult child claimant

In Cowap v Cowap [2020] NSWCA 19 the Court of Appeal considered the competing claims on an estate of a disabled adult son, the applicant/respondent, and an elderly widow, the respondent/appellant. The son was in fact a child of the widow’s previous marriage but had been adopted by the deceased.

The court at first instance granted the son provision of $600,000. This meant the widow had to sell the former matrimonial home where she had long resided with the deceased and to which she had significant emotional attachment. The son had ‘severe and permanent disability, including cognitive impairment’ because of which there was strong evidence in support of his need for provision. The widow, to whom the entire estate had been left, also had a strong claim on the estate as it was a long marriage.

The sale of the property allowed the widow to purchase another smaller property and maintain her existing income. The judge at first instance, in granting provision to the son, decided that was an appropriate outcome given the 91-year-old widow would inevitably leave the property in due course in any event.

The Court of Appeal held that the first instance judge had made no error and dismissed the appeal.

Of further interest in this case is that the Court of Appeal refused to admit on the appeal any new evidence of valuation of the property. [35].

This case has been added to the Adult Children section under Family Provision claims in 101 Succession Answers (NSW).

101 Succession Answers – NSW

by

Following an author review new cases have been added and other enhancements made to the By Lawyers Reference Manual 101 Succession Answers (NSW).

Nobarani v Mariconte [2018] HCA 36

This case supports the requirement of an ‘interested’ party wishing to challenge the validity of a will to show that they have rights which will be affected by the disputed grant of probate or administration.

Re Estates Brooker-Pain and Soulos [2019] NSWSC 671

Considerations regarding disclosure of documents and information in contested probate proceedings were extensively discussed. This case analysed the applicable law, practice and procedure in the context of applications to set aside subpoenas and notices to produce which called for documents relating to the making of the disputed wills. This included solicitors’ notes and files. The interplay between subpoenas, the court’s Practice Note SC Eq 11 and case management orders was examined in detail.

The court addressed the determination of ‘legitimate forensic purpose’ in such cases, especially where pleadings had not closed and the issues in dispute were uncertain. This decision has therefore been added to the By Lawyers Reference Manual 101 Subpoena Answers too.

The court also commented on the practice of sending ‘Larke v Nugus’ letters to ‘…a person involved in the preparation or execution of a will…[seeking] disclosures about the circumstances in which a will was prepared or executed’.

Application of NSW Trustee & Guardian; Estate of Dudley Keith Vaughn [2019] NSWSC 850 and In the Estate of Hansie Hart [2019] ACTSC 317

These two recent cases each dealt with issues relating to the presumption of death.

Gregory Joseph Mills as trustee v Julie Elizabeth Mills and Ors [2018] NSWSC 363

This case is instructive as to the considerations the court applies when giving judicial advice and determining construction issues on testamentary trusts.

Finnegan & Anor v Garner & Ors [2019] QSC 100

Here the estate faced claims which, if they were resolved by litigation would result in the estate being consumed by legal costs. The court noted, at [10], that:

It is the duty of trustees of the estate not to embark upon expensive litigation which will have the effect of depleting the estate. In Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Inc v His Eminence Petar The Diocesan Bishop of The Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand Gummow ACJ, Kirby, Hayne and Heydon JJ said that: “a trustee who is sued should take no step in defence of the suit without first obtaining judicial advice about whether it is proper to defend the proceedings.”

Koellner v Spicer [2019] NSWSC 1571

On a family provision claim, an adult child with a medical condition and meagre financial resources was awarded a 35% legacy from the reasonably small estate even though the deceased had expressly excluded him on the basis they had no relationship.

Grant v Roberts; Smith v Smith; Roberts v Smith; Curtis v Smith [2019] NSWSC 843

The court emphasised, including by reference to the ‘overriding principles’ of the Civil Procedure Act, the duty on parties to contain costs in family provision litigation. The court heavily criticised disproportionate costs being incurred.

 

Like all By Lawyers Reference Materials, 101 Succession Answers (NSW) is updated regularly to cover developments in case law and procedure.

Family provision claims – SA

by

The new By Lawyers Family Provision claims – SA Guide has received its first update. A recent Supreme Court case on joinder has been added.

A solicitor might receive instructions from a potential claimant after the client receives notice, as a person with an interest in the estate, from another claimant who has already commenced proceedings. Plaintiffs in Family Provision claims are required under the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1972 to serve other potential claimants with the proceedings.

Those potential claimants may then make an interlocutory application within 28 days of service, seeking to be joined as a plaintiff under s 8(7) of the Act. That section provides that the court may, ‘if satisfied that it is just and expedient to do so’, permit joinder of further claimants at any time prior to the final determination of the proceedings.

The recent Supreme Court case of Columbus v Efstathis & Ors [2019] SASC 149 makes it clear that in considering such an application, the court will in effect need to be satisfied that the applicant has reasonable prospects of success.

In that case the court found there was no reasonable prospect of the applicant, a grandchild of the deceased, establishing any moral obligation on the part of the deceased to have made provision for the applicant out of the estate. Leave for the applicant to be joined as a claimant was therefore refused.

In the course of its determination, the court reviewed the case law on the status of grandchildren with Family Provision claims, affirming the NSW Supreme Court decision of Bowditch v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2012] NSWSC 275 in finding that ‘as a general rule a grandparent does not have a responsibility to make provision for a grandchild in his or her testamentary disposition’.

This useful case has been added to the Family Provision claims – SA Commentary on page 25 under Acting for a potential claimant.

Connect with us