ByLawyers News and Updates

Estate applications – QLD

by

A new system for lodging estate applications online in the Supreme Court has commenced.

New e-lodgment portal

The Queensland Courts and Tribunals Online Services Portal allows legal practitioners to electronically lodge estate applications such as for grants of probate, letters of administration, caveats, renunciations, reseals, and revocations of grants of probate.

The court’s Guide to e-lodgment for legal practitioners assists practitioners in navigating the new e-lodgment portal. A log-in using a digital identity is required.

Law firms using the portal need to create an organisation profile, which allows individual users to be added and managed. To add a new user to the portal as part of a firm, an Organisation Request Code has to be created and entered.

Staff of a law firm who log into the portal have to identify themselves as a legal practitioner, paralegal, legal assistant, or administrative officer.

The home page of the new e-lodgment portal offers three services:

  • Probate search;
  • Wills and Estates;
  • Document verification.

Probate search

Searches for applications or grants and to locate wills and estate records can be conducted through the portal.

Wills and Estates

The wills and estates service enables the user to prepare and submit estate applications which can be saved in draft.

When the application is ready, it can be submitted choosing which location the application should be filed in: Brisbane, Cairns, Townsville, or Rockhampton.

Supporting documents must be uploaded in pdf format, with a size limit of 20MB per document, before an application can be submitted.

Once the application is submitted, a reference number will issue.

The original will must be provided to the Registry together with a covering letter and the reference number.

The portal does not currently accept payments. An invoice will be sent out with a link to pay online.

When the registry has filed the application, a court file number will be allocated to the matter. This is a different number to the reference number.

The registry will confirm by email when the application has been lodged and filed, and the grant has been issued. A link to download the court sealed documents will also be provided.

Document verification

The document verification service is for financial institutions to verify the authenticity of court-issued documents provided to them by administrators or customers.

Publication updates

The By Lawyers Probate (QLD) and Letters of Administration (QLD) publications have been updated accordingly.

Probate advertising – VIC

by

There is a new procedure for Probate advertising in Victoria from 11 November 2024.

Applications for probate and letters of administration from that date will be advertised via RedCrest-Probate instead of the Probate Online Advertising System (POAS). The intention of the change is to streamline the process and remove the need for information to be entered twice. Practitioners will only need to use one system to search, advertise, and apply for grants of representation in Victoria.

The POAS ceases to operate on 7 November, and no probate advertising will be possible from that date until Monday, 11 November, when the new system commences.

RedCrest-Probate is the Supreme Court’s existing online filing system for all applications for grants and all documents in relation to grants.

The first step in any application is a Notice of Intention to Apply. This is now lodged and advertised via RedCrest-Probate.

All advertisements previously published on POAS remain valid for three years from their date of publication. POAS advertisements will be searchable on RedCrest-Probate once the new system commences.

The Supreme Court (Administration and Probate) Rules 2023 set out the information that must be included in the Notice of Intention to apply. There are different requirements under the rules depending on whether the application is for probate, letters of administration on intestacy, letters of administration with the will attached, or resealing a grant from another jurisdiction.

The By Lawyers Probate (VIC) and Letters of Administration (VIC) will be updated accordingly for the commencement of the new probate advertising procedure.

Probate – NSW

by

From 1 August 2023 most applications for an uncontested grant of representation must be applied for and filed online. The lodgment platform is available via the Probate tab on the Supreme Court website, and on the NSW Online Registry website. New users are required to register for an account.

The online process provides guidance as to the evidence required for a grant to be determined. It is intended to facilitate uncontested probate matters being processed quickly and accurately.

The new system applies also to applications for Reseal, and Letters of Administration.

Under the new process applicants are no longer required to lodge notice of an intended application at least 14 days prior to filing a summons. Instead, a notice of intended application will automatically be generated when an online application is filed.

The current paper forms will no longer be used. The new Probate system will generate the summons, affidavit of executor or administrator, inventory of property, and grant based on the information provided in the online application. These documents are then downloaded, executed, and filed via the online system. The system prompts for and allows additional affidavit evidence to be uploaded.

Rather than the previous process where applicants provided the court with a pre-paid envelope for the sealed copies to be returned when the grant is made, the new Probate system will generate these documents with a digital seal on each page. Copies of the grant will be immediately available for download once the grant issues.

Copies of testamentary documents, such as wills and codicils, are scanned and uploaded into the new Probate system. The originals of testamentary documents must still be filed with the court registry, either personally or by mail. They must be accompanied by a coversheet. See our previous News & Updates post: Wills coversheet.

The court has advised that  the registry will continue to accept paper-based applications up to and including 1 September 2023 to assist with the transition.

The By Lawyers Probate (NSW) and Letters of Administration (NSW) guides have been updated accordingly.

Succession & Probate Lists – NSW

by

The New South Wales Supreme Court has introduced combined Succession & Probate lists, for family provision claims and contested probate applications.

The new list replaces the Family Provisions Claims list previously managed by Justice Hallen, who is retiring. The court has never previously had a specialist list for contested probate matters.

Re-issued Practice Note SC EQ 07 – Succession & Probate Lists updates the procedures applicable to family provision and contested probate matters in the Court.

Key points include:

  • These types of matters will be managed and heard in the Succession & Probate List.
  • Directions and the hearing of interlocutory motions will be dealt with on Fridays, with Monday directions being phased out.
  • There will be two judges managing the list, initially Justices Meek and Lindsay.
  • There will be two judges available for the list on Fridays.
  • If possible, family provision applications whether combined with probate or not, will be dealt with by one judge and probate matters will be dealt with by the other judge.
  • Most interlocutory motions for matters in the list will require leave except urgent matters which can be listed by arrangement.
  • Subpoenas and Notices to produce for matters in the list will require leave.
  • Mediation for all matters in the list will be court annexed by default, unless the parties consent to private mediation or the Court otherwise orders.
  • Requirements for the content of the plaintiff’s affidavit in Family Provision matters updated.

The Court has indicated that the emphasis of the new list will be on strict case management and efficiency, in accordance with the overriding principal of just, quick and cheap disposal of the real issues in the proceedings under Section 56 Civil Procedure Act 2005 .

By Lawyers Family Provision Claims (NSW) and Supreme Court (NSW) – Equity Division guides have been updated accordingly, including the Retainer Instructions precedents which prompt practitioners to obtain the necessary instructions and documents required by the practice note.

Online probate notifications – ACT

by

Online probate notifications have commenced in the ACT.

A named executor or administrator, as the legal personal representative of the deceased estate, has the responsibility to account for the assets and liabilities of the estate before distributing them by the terms of the Will.

In some cases, the estate assets may be released to the named legal personal representative of the estate, however to release certain assets a grant of probate must be obtained.

The legal personal representative commences an application in the probate list of the ACT Supreme Court. Until recently this required publication of a Notice of Intention to Apply in a daily newspaper circulating generally in the ACT. The notice is required to list the identity of the deceased, the date of death, and the date of the will. An application for probate is filed with the Court at least 14 days after this notice is published.

The ACT Supreme Court has amended the Court Procedures Rules 2006 (ACT), to introduce online probate notifications for:

  • a grant of probate;
  • a grant of letters of administration, on intestacy or with a will attached;
  • a reseal of a foreign grant.

Notices of Intention to Apply for a grant must now be published by completing the online form on the ACT Supreme Court website, not less than 14 days and not more than 3 months before the day the application is filed in Court.

The fee for publishing a notice is set out on the ACT Supreme Court website. A unique reference code is generated in the receipt from the online advertisement.

The By Lawyers ACT Probate and Letters of Administration commentaries have been updated accordingly.

Estates cases – NSW

by

New estates cases have been added to By Lawyers 101 Succession Answers (NSW) reference manual.

The new cases under the Estates section of the publication relate to:

Additional assets after grant

The administrator’s obligation to disclose is a continuous one. Any assets not disclosed in the initial affidavit must be disclosed to the court by way of further affidavit: r 78.91 Supreme Court Rules 1970. If an asset has come to light after the grant has been finalised, an Affidavit of Additional Assets needs to be filed.

If an updated copy of the grant is required, an Application for Exemplification also needs to be filed. An exemplification is a certified and sealed copy of a grant. The Inventory of Property does not need to be amended.

The Affidavit of Additional Assets and the Application for Exemplification are available in the By Lawyers Estates guide, on the Probate and Letters of Administration matter plans.

Vesting of interest in beneficiaries

A beneficiary can apply to the court to have their interest vest earlier than provided for in the will under the rule in Saunders v Vautier.

The High Court set out the modern formulation of the rule in Saunders v Vautier in CPT Custodian Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2005] HCA 53 at [47]:

Under the rule in Saunders v Vautier, an adult beneficiary (or a number of adult beneficiaries acting together) who has (or between them have) an absolute, vested and indefeasible interest in the capital and income of property may at any time require the transfer of the property to him (or them) and may terminate any accumulation.

In Beck v Henley [2014] NSWCA 201 the Court of appeal at [35] stated that:

Adult beneficiaries who are absolutely and indefeasibly entitled have power to “overbear and defeat the intention of a testator or settlor to subject property to the continuing trusts, powers and limitations of a will or trust instrument”.

A case where the rule was not upheld has been added –  Arnott v Kiss [2014] NSWSC 1385.

The addition of these new estates cases to 101 Succession Answers (NSW) is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

RedCrest-Probate – VIC

by

From 1 July 2020 all applications for grants of probate and letters of administration must be filed in RedCrest-Probate, which is the Supreme Court’s online filing system.

The documents required for a grant can be completed and uploaded as PDFs into RedCrest-Probate. Alternately they can be completed using the guided questions in the system.

The original will, or any other document upon which the application for a grant is based, must still be physically filed, or posted to the Court.

In a move to make the new process as electronic as possible, the original grant is the electronic copy issued by the court. Asset holders can view the original grant through RedCrest-Probate using a unique identifier and the application number appearing on the grant.

The By Lawyers Probate and Letters of Administration guides have been updated accordingly.

Guardianship – VIC

by

Changes to guardianship legislation in Victoria commence on 1 March 2020.

The Guardianship and Administration Act 2019 repeals and replaces the Guardianship and Administration Act 1986 from 1 March 2020.

Described by Attorney-General Jill Hennessy as ‘the biggest changes to Victoria’s guardianship and administration laws in more than 30 years‘, the amendments are aimed at ensuring greater protections for adults with a disability who have impaired capacity to make and participate in decisions that affect their lives.

As a result of the new legislation commentaries in the following By Lawyers Guides have been updated:

  • Probate;
  • Letters of Administration;
  • Wills;
  • Powers and Advance Care Directives;
  • County Court – Acting for the plaintiff and Acting for the defendant;
  • Magistrates Court – Acting for the plaintiff;
  • Supreme Court – Acting for the plaintiff and Acting for the defendant; and
  • Personal Injury.

When announcing the amendments, the Attorney General stated that: ‘The changes reflect a more modern understanding of decision-making capacity and disability, and ensure that a person’s will and preferences are followed where possible and appropriate.’

The updates to our Guides were overseen by our highly experienced author Rossyln Curnow.

By Lawyers are committed to always keeping our subscribers up-to-date.

101 Succession Answers – NSW

by

Following an author review new cases have been added and other enhancements made to the By Lawyers Reference Manual 101 Succession Answers (NSW).

Nobarani v Mariconte [2018] HCA 36

This case supports the requirement of an ‘interested’ party wishing to challenge the validity of a will to show that they have rights which will be affected by the disputed grant of probate or administration.

Re Estates Brooker-Pain and Soulos [2019] NSWSC 671

Considerations regarding disclosure of documents and information in contested probate proceedings were extensively discussed. This case analysed the applicable law, practice and procedure in the context of applications to set aside subpoenas and notices to produce which called for documents relating to the making of the disputed wills. This included solicitors’ notes and files. The interplay between subpoenas, the court’s Practice Note SC Eq 11 and case management orders was examined in detail.

The court addressed the determination of ‘legitimate forensic purpose’ in such cases, especially where pleadings had not closed and the issues in dispute were uncertain. This decision has therefore been added to the By Lawyers Reference Manual 101 Subpoena Answers too.

The court also commented on the practice of sending ‘Larke v Nugus’ letters to ‘…a person involved in the preparation or execution of a will…[seeking] disclosures about the circumstances in which a will was prepared or executed’.

Application of NSW Trustee & Guardian; Estate of Dudley Keith Vaughn [2019] NSWSC 850 and In the Estate of Hansie Hart [2019] ACTSC 317

These two recent cases each dealt with issues relating to the presumption of death.

Gregory Joseph Mills as trustee v Julie Elizabeth Mills and Ors [2018] NSWSC 363

This case is instructive as to the considerations the court applies when giving judicial advice and determining construction issues on testamentary trusts.

Finnegan & Anor v Garner & Ors [2019] QSC 100

Here the estate faced claims which, if they were resolved by litigation would result in the estate being consumed by legal costs. The court noted, at [10], that:

It is the duty of trustees of the estate not to embark upon expensive litigation which will have the effect of depleting the estate. In Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Inc v His Eminence Petar The Diocesan Bishop of The Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand Gummow ACJ, Kirby, Hayne and Heydon JJ said that: “a trustee who is sued should take no step in defence of the suit without first obtaining judicial advice about whether it is proper to defend the proceedings.”

Koellner v Spicer [2019] NSWSC 1571

On a family provision claim, an adult child with a medical condition and meagre financial resources was awarded a 35% legacy from the reasonably small estate even though the deceased had expressly excluded him on the basis they had no relationship.

Grant v Roberts; Smith v Smith; Roberts v Smith; Curtis v Smith [2019] NSWSC 843

The court emphasised, including by reference to the ‘overriding principles’ of the Civil Procedure Act, the duty on parties to contain costs in family provision litigation. The court heavily criticised disproportionate costs being incurred.

 

Like all By Lawyers Reference Materials, 101 Succession Answers (NSW) is updated regularly to cover developments in case law and procedure.

Condition and finding – All states

by

A new precedent with example content has been added to all By Lawyers Estates guides. The example content is for an affidavit regarding the condition and finding of a will.

Such an affidavit may be required to satisfy the court as to any issues surrounding the condition an original will is in, or the circumstances by which it was found. This affidavit may be lodged either with an application or in response to a requisition when applying for a grant of probate, or a grant of letters with the will annexed.

This new precedent provides extensive example wording addressing the issues of the will’s condition and finding. The content encompasses evidence to be given by an employee of the firm, the executor, a subscribing witness, or another person who has knowledge of how, for example, marks upon the will are not an indication of revocation.

As with all By Lawyers ‘example content’ precedents, the relevant form can be found immediately above the new precedent on the matter plan. The example content can be modified as required and pasted into the appropriate place in the form.

Connect with us