ByLawyers News and Updates

Succession Act – SA

by

The Succession Act 2023 (SA) extensively reframes South Australian succession law.

The Act commences on 1 January 2025.

It consolidates and amends existing laws relating to:

  • wills;
  • probate and administration;
  • administration of deceased estates;
  • intestacy; and
  • family provision claims.

The Succession Act contains all legislative provisions, including new provisions, relating to those areas. The new Act repeals three existing Acts:

Revised court rules and practice directions for probate, administration, contested wills, and family provision matters will follow the commencement of the new Act.

Key provisions of the new legislation include:

  • the right of certain classes of person to inspect a will of a deceased person;
  • the power of the Supreme Court to pass over applicants for a grant of probate or administration and appoint another person it considers appropriate;
  • the removal of the need for a grant to administer smaller estates;
  • additional court powers to hold executors and administrators to account;
  • codification of the application of assets to payment of debts and liabilities in solvent estates;
  • the increase to the preferential legacy for a surviving spouse of an intestate;
  • the addition of the children of first cousins of an intestate to the distribution on intestacy;
  • no entitlement of a spouse or domestic partner of an intestate to any part of an intestate’s estate if they are a party to:
    • a binding financial agreement; or
    • orders for distribution of property under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth);
  • primary consideration of the deceased’s wishes by the court when determining whether to make a family provision order;
  • narrowing eligibility for family provision claims to:
    • exclude former partners and spouses when financial matters have already been settled;
    • require adult stepchildren to demonstrate they:
      • are disabled and vulnerable;
      • were genuinely dependent on the deceased;
      • cared for or maintained the deceased; or
      • contributed to the estate, or their parent substantially contributed to the estate;
    • require grandchildren to satisfy the court that:
      • their parents died before the deceased; or
      • they were wholly or partly maintained by the deceased.

The By Lawyers Wills (SA), Probate (SA), Letters of Administration (SA), and Family Provision Claims (SA) publications have been updated accordingly. Further updates will follow when the new court rules are available.

Foreign resident capital gains withholding – FED

by

The foreign resident capital gains withholding tax regime is changing.

With effect from 1 January 2025:

  • the withholding rate increases from 12.5% to 15%; and
  • the $750,000 threshold is removed.

The foreign resident capital gains withholding regime applies to sales of taxable Australian property, including vacant land, residential property, and commercial property.

Until 1 January 2025, the regime applied only to properties valued at $750,000 or more. From 1 January it applies to all properties.

Buyers must withhold a percentage of the purchase price and pay it to the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) instead of to the seller unless the seller is an Australian resident and provides evidence of that fact by way of a clearance certificate from the ATO. Sellers who are foreign residents can apply to the ATO for a variation notice and potentially reduce the amount required to be withheld.

Without a clearance certificate or a variation notice, all buyers must withhold the required percentage of the purchase price, even if the seller is an Australian resident.

For sales of taxable real property before 1 January 2025, the foreign resident capital gains withholding amount was 12.5%. From 1 January 2025 it is 15%.

The effect of these amendments is that ALL sellers of real property in all states and territories, whether Australian residents or foreign residents, need to apply for a clearance certificate from the ATO and provide it to the buyer before the completion of the sale. If they do not, then the buyer must pay 15% of the purchase price to the Australian Taxation Office on settlement. For those jurisdictions with electronic conveyancing, this may be able to be done via the settlement platform.

All By Lawyers publications that cover foreign resident capital gains withholding have been updated to reflect this change. This includes the Conveyancing and Property and Estates guides in each state and territory, Retirement Villages (NSW), and 1001 Conveyancing Answers (VIC), (NSW), and (QLD).

Estate applications – QLD

by

A new system for lodging estate applications online in the Supreme Court has commenced.

New e-lodgment portal

The Queensland Courts and Tribunals Online Services Portal allows legal practitioners to electronically lodge estate applications such as for grants of probate, letters of administration, caveats, renunciations, reseals, and revocations of grants of probate.

The court’s Guide to e-lodgment for legal practitioners assists practitioners in navigating the new e-lodgment portal. A log-in using a digital identity is required.

Law firms using the portal need to create an organisation profile, which allows individual users to be added and managed. To add a new user to the portal as part of a firm, an Organisation Request Code has to be created and entered.

Staff of a law firm who log into the portal have to identify themselves as a legal practitioner, paralegal, legal assistant, or administrative officer.

The home page of the new e-lodgment portal offers three services:

  • Probate search;
  • Wills and Estates;
  • Document verification.

Probate search

Searches for applications or grants and to locate wills and estate records can be conducted through the portal.

Wills and Estates

The wills and estates service enables the user to prepare and submit estate applications which can be saved in draft.

When the application is ready, it can be submitted choosing which location the application should be filed in: Brisbane, Cairns, Townsville, or Rockhampton.

Supporting documents must be uploaded in pdf format, with a size limit of 20MB per document, before an application can be submitted.

Once the application is submitted, a reference number will issue.

The original will must be provided to the Registry together with a covering letter and the reference number.

The portal does not currently accept payments. An invoice will be sent out with a link to pay online.

When the registry has filed the application, a court file number will be allocated to the matter. This is a different number to the reference number.

The registry will confirm by email when the application has been lodged and filed, and the grant has been issued. A link to download the court sealed documents will also be provided.

Document verification

The document verification service is for financial institutions to verify the authenticity of court-issued documents provided to them by administrators or customers.

Publication updates

The By Lawyers Probate (QLD) and Letters of Administration (QLD) publications have been updated accordingly.

Probate fees – VIC

by

Probate fees for applications in the Supreme Court of Victoria have increased with effect from 18 November 2024.

Changes under the Supreme Court (Fees) Amendment Regulations 2024 have the effect of dramatically increasing, in many cases, the fees payable to file an application for probate or letters of administration at the Probate Office.

The changes to include:

  • new estate value brackets and corresponding fees;
  • changes to the advertising and small estate fees;
  • a new fee for re-advertising an application; and
  • a new fee for filing an amended originating motion.

The new estate value brackets and corresponding application fees are:

Gross value of estate for commencement of an application for a grant of representation Filing fee
$0 – $249,999.99 NIL
$250,000 – $499,999.99 $514.40
$500,000 – $999,999.99 $1,028.80
$1,000,000 – $1,999,999.99 $2,400.50
$2,000,000 – $2,999,999.99 $4,801.00
$3,000,000 – $4,999,999.99 $7,185.20
$5,000,000 – $6,999,999.99 $12,002.60
$7,000,000 and over $16,803.60

The full list of fees is available on the Supreme Court’s Probate Office fees webpage.

The By Lawyers Estates (VIC) publication has been updated, including the Retainer Instructions and Costs Agreements precedents, on the Probate and Letters of Administration matter plans.

These amendments come hot on the heels of a change to the way applications for probate, letters of administration, and reseal are advertised. See our recent News and Updates post concerning probate advertising for more information.

Probate advertising – VIC

by

There is a new procedure for Probate advertising in Victoria from 11 November 2024.

Applications for probate and letters of administration from that date will be advertised via RedCrest-Probate instead of the Probate Online Advertising System (POAS). The intention of the change is to streamline the process and remove the need for information to be entered twice. Practitioners will only need to use one system to search, advertise, and apply for grants of representation in Victoria.

The POAS ceases to operate on 7 November, and no probate advertising will be possible from that date until Monday, 11 November, when the new system commences.

RedCrest-Probate is the Supreme Court’s existing online filing system for all applications for grants and all documents in relation to grants.

The first step in any application is a Notice of Intention to Apply. This is now lodged and advertised via RedCrest-Probate.

All advertisements previously published on POAS remain valid for three years from their date of publication. POAS advertisements will be searchable on RedCrest-Probate once the new system commences.

The Supreme Court (Administration and Probate) Rules 2023 set out the information that must be included in the Notice of Intention to apply. There are different requirements under the rules depending on whether the application is for probate, letters of administration on intestacy, letters of administration with the will attached, or resealing a grant from another jurisdiction.

The By Lawyers Probate (VIC) and Letters of Administration (VIC) will be updated accordingly for the commencement of the new probate advertising procedure.

Transfer duty – NSW

by

A recent case dealing with transfer duty on real property in deceased estates has been added to the By Lawyers wills and estates publications in New South Wales.

A reassessment of duty almost 5 years after the transaction is a cautionary tale for practitioners to ensure compliance with the Duties Act 1997 and relevant transfer duty rulings.

Section 63 of the Duties Act 1997 provides for concessions when dutiable property is transferred pursuant to a will or the laws of intestacy. The concessions apply when a transfer is made to a beneficiary in conformity with the trusts contained in a will, or arising on an intestacy, or as an appropriation of the deceased’s property towards satisfaction of a beneficiary’s entitlement in the estate.

When a transfer is made to a beneficiary under an agreement, whether or not in writing, to vary the trusts contained in the will or arising on intestacy, the dutiable value of the property is reduced by the value of the beneficiary’s entitlement.

However, under s 63 and NSW Revenue Ruling DUT 046, the transfer duty concessions do not apply to a contract of sale, only to a transfer.

This was confirmed in Cohen v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2024] NSWCATAD 136, in this case, Harry Cohen left a property to his three children, Stephen, Peter, and Wendy, in equal shares. The beneficiaries agreed that Stephen could have the property if he paid each of his siblings for their one-third share plus an extra $100,000 each. Rather than a transfer pursuant to a deed of family arrangement, the executors of the estate executed a contract to sell the property to Stephen for the total value.

The contract was submitted to Revenue NSW in 2017, noting that Stephen was beneficially entitled to a one third share of the property from his father’s estate. Duty was assessed and paid on the reduced dutiable value, reflecting Stephen’s one-third interest in the property.

In 2022, the Chief Commissioner issued a Notice of Investigation and ultimately decided that duty had been underpaid. The reassessment stated the dutiable value was the full value of the property as shown on the contract, not two-thirds as initially assessed, resulting in a further duty liability of $29,315.00 plus interest, which was ultimately waived.

The commentary in the By Lawyers Probate (NSW) and Letters of Administration (NSW) guides has been enhanced to cover this situation, and a summary of the case is being added to both 101 Succession Answers (NSW) and 1001 Conveyancing Answers (NSW).

Removal of an executor – VIC

by

New precedents for the removal of an executor have been added to the Probate and Letters of Administration matter plans.

In Victoria, an application can be made to the Supreme Court for the removal of an executor under s 34(1)(c) of the Administration and Probate Act 1958.

The court can remove the executor if, following an examination of the facts including a significant weighting to the testator’s intention to appoint the executor, the court is satisfied there is:

  • undue delay in the administration of the estate; or
  • a conflict of interest; or
  • an unworkable relationship between co-executors;

that would lead to significant mischief or harm to the beneficiaries’ interests.

In Connock v Connock (in His Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Connock) [2021] VSC 64 the plaintiff was the widow of the deceased. Both had previously been married and had children from these marriages. The plaintiff’s interest in the estate was limited to the assets of the deceased’s superannuation fund and proceeds from various bank accounts. The deceased’s will made no provision for the widow to take an interest in the residue of the estate.

The executor, the deceased’s child of the first marriage, commenced estoppel proceedings seeking a declaration that the plaintiff held the estate assets for her benefit and maintenance during her lifetime, but, on her death, for the benefit equally of the deceased’s children – one of whom was the executor.

The plaintiff claimed and the court accepted that the executor had a conflict of interest between the executor’s duties and his personal interest in the outcome of the estoppel proceeding, but that this conflict did not warrant the removal of the executor. The court held that, although the executor is in a position of conflict, in the circumstances the welfare of the beneficiaries of the estate did not warrant his removal.

The new form content precedents added to the Probate and Letters of Administration publications are:

  • Originating motion to remove and replace executor;
  • Originating motion to remove and replace trustee;
  • Originating motion to remove and replace executor and trustee.

Statutory legacy – WA

by

The statutory legacy for intestacy in Western Australia has increased significantly.

Intestacy occurs when a will does not distribute a deceased estate effectively. The statutory legacy is the amount the deceased’s surviving relatives are entitled to on intestacy under the Administration Act 1903. However, since it was last amended in 1982, Western Australia had the lowest statutory legacy in Australia with the deceased’s surviving partner entitled to:

  • the deceased’s household chattels;
  • the first $50,000 of the intestate estate; and
  • an additional one-third of the balance of the intestate estate.

Where the deceased had children, they were entitled to an equal share of the remaining two-thirds of the balance of the intestate estate.

Where the deceased left a surviving partner but no children, the partner was entitled to $75,000.

If real property was not transferred to the deceased’s partner via survivorship, the statutory legacy could be insufficient for their maintenance.  This often led to a negotiated financial arrangement with their children or proceedings under the Family Provision Act 1972.

From 29 March 2022, with the commencement of the Administration Amendment Bill 2021 (WA), the surviving partner is entitled to:

  • the deceased’s household chattels;
  • the first $435,000 of the intestate estate; and
  • an additional one-third of the balance of the intestate estate.

The deceased’s children are still entitled to an equal share of the remaining two-thirds of the balance of the intestate estate.

Where the deceased left a surviving partner but no children, the partner is now entitled to $705,000

Under the existing scheme, the parental statutory legacy where the deceased is survived by parents, siblings, and nieces and nephews but is not survived by a partner or children, was $6,000. It has been increased to $56,500.

A formula has been added to the Act requiring the amount of these statutory legacies be reviewed every two years.

The commentary in the By Lawyers WA Letters of administration publication has been updated accordingly.

Special grants of probate – NSW

by

A recent Supreme Court case on special grants of probate has been added to 101 Succession Answers NSW. Application of Penhall and Dutton; Estate of the late Kylie Anne Dutton [2021] NSWSC 79 relates to an application for special administration ad colligenda bona defuncti, whereby a grant is obtained to protect the estate.

In this case the deceased’s home was unoccupied for 6 months with no insurance cover, which presented a real risk of diminishing the value of the estate. The Court granted the application to allow the property to be sold and the proceeds placed in an interest bearing account. The Court noted this was an interim measure and a full grant was still required to distribute the estate.

The By Lawyers Probate and Letters and Administration commentaries and 101 Succession Answers all deal with special grants. These apply when there is no one able to seek a grant and there are special needs for the estate. The special grants include:

  • Administration de bonis non administrates cum testamento annexo – administrator dies before completing the administration of will;
  • Administration de bonis non administrates – administrator dies before completing the administration of intestacy;
  • Administration for the purposes of the family provisions claim under s 91 of the Succession Act 2006 – also covered in the By Lawyers Family provision claims guide;
  • Administration pendente lite – s 73 Administration during litigation;
  • Administration ad litem to commence or defend proceedings;
  • Administration by a manager appointed by the Guardianship Division of the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal for a person lacking mental capacity;
  • Administration during minority;
  • Application by a guardian;
  • Administration durante absentia – executor or administrator outside NSW grant to an attorney – s 72;
  • Application under s 76 if executor or administrator out of jurisdiction special administrator may be appointed;
  • Administration when the sole beneficiary/executor/administrator suffers from a disability, he can nominate another; and
  • Grant to a creditor.

The 101 Succession Answers publication can be found in the Reference materials folder at the top of the matter plans in all By Lawyers succession-related guides – Wills, Powers of Attorney, Appointments of enduring guardian and Family provision claims.

Estates cases – VIC

by

New estate cases have been added to the By Lawyers 101 Succession Answers (VIC) reference manual.

The new cases under the Estates section of the publication relate to:

Vesting of interest in beneficiaries – Rule in Saunders v Vautier

A beneficiary can apply to the court to have their interest vest earlier than provided for in the will. The rule in Saunders v Vautier possibly provides such a mechanism.

The High Court set out the modern formulation of the rule in Saunders v Vautier in CPT Custodian Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2005] HCA 53 at [47]:

Under the rule in Saunders v Vautier, an adult beneficiary (or a number of adult beneficiaries acting together) who has (or between them have) an absolute, vested and indefeasible interest in the capital and income of property may at any time require the transfer of the property to him (or them) and may terminate any accumulation.

If the beneficiaries are ascertained, have capacity and all consent then ‘they may put an end to the trust by directing the trustee to transfer the interest in the estate to themselves, notwithstanding any direction to the contrary in the trust instrument’: Krstic v State Trustees Ltd [2012] VSC 344 at [15].

For a case where the rule was not upheld due to the beneficial interest being classed as contingent, see Arnott v Kiss [2014] NSWSC 1385. This case also suggests that a gift over clause may defeat application of the rule.

Accordingly, whether there is any reason for the executor to resist the application would depend upon there being any terms of the will that might support such a position. If the executor is in any doubt then the trustee can and should seek judicial advice.

The addition of these new estate cases to 101 Succession Answers (VIC) is part of our continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Connect with us