ByLawyers News and Updates
  • Publication updates
    • Federal
    • New South Wales
    • Victoria
    • Queensland
    • South Australia
    • Western Australia
    • Northern Territory
    • Tasmania
    • Australian Capital Territory
  • By area of law
    • Bankruptcy and Liquidation
    • Business and Franchise
    • Companies, Trusts, Partnerships and Superannuation
    • Conveyancing and Property
    • Criminal Law
    • Defamation and Protecting Reputation
    • Employment Law
    • Family Law
    • Immigration
    • Litigation
    • Neighbourhood Disputes
    • Personal injury
    • Personal Property Securities
    • Practice Management
    • Security of Payments
    • Trade Marks
    • Wills and Estates
  • Legal alerts
  • Articles
  • By Lawyers

Criminal Rules – SA

16 January 2024 by By Lawyers

The Joint Criminal Rules 2022 have been amended with effect from 1 January 2024. These rules apply to all SA courts that deal with criminal matters.

Amendments under the Joint Criminal (No 3) Amending Rules 2023 include the following.

Continuity of representation after committal

A new rule 24.2(4A) provides that a law firm, and the responsible solicitor at that firm, that represented the defendant in committal proceedings which resulted in the defendant being committed to a higher court, is deemed to be representing them in the higher court. If a lawyer ceases to act after a committal proceeding, an application to the higher court will be required.

Remote appearances

A  substituted r 38.5 allows the court to direct or permit a party or a lawyer to appear by audio or audio-visual link, if the court considers it is justified in the circumstances.

This requires:

  • an application in the prescribed form; or
  • an oral application at a prior hearing; or
  • ticking the remote appearance box on any form filed via the court’s electronic filing system; or
  • sending an email to the chambers of the judicial officer who will hear the matter.

The request must specify why the remote appearance is necessary.

If a request is granted the requesting party must pay any costs involved, and if they are uncontactable after 15 minutes of the appointed time it will be treated as a non-appearance.

An application for a witness to appear by audio link or by audio visual link must be made by an interlocutory application in the prescribed form supported by an affidavit in the prescribed form, or an oral application at a prior hearing.

Written submissions

A new rule 38.9(3) provides that any written submissions must include at the end of the document the name of counsel who settled them, or, if there is no counsel, the name of the solicitor responsible.

Sentencing material

A new Division 8—Sentencing material in Part 2 of Chapter 7 provides that any material filed for the purposes of sentencing, including reports, victim or community impact statements, or references, must be filed with a sentencing material form in the prescribed form, being Form 136 Sentencing Material.

Publication updates

The By Lawyers Criminal Magistrates Court guide has been updated in line with the amended criminal rules.

Filed Under: Criminal Law, Legal Alerts, Publication Updates, South Australia Tagged With: acting for a defendant in criminal proceedings, criminal law, criminal procedure, SA Magistrates Court

Closing loopholes – FED

8 January 2024 by By Lawyers

A raft of amendments closing loopholes in the Fair Work Act 2009 commenced on 15 December 2023.

Changes introduced by the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act 2023 include:

Redundancy

Entitlement to a redundancy payment is extended to employees of a small business, being one with fewer than 15 employees, in certain circumstances. Generally, such businesses are exempt from the requirement to pay redundancy. However, under the amended provisions employees may be entitled if the employer is bankrupt or in liquidation and the  only reason the exemption applies is that the trustee in bankruptcy or liquidator has reduced the number of employees to less than 15.

Labour Hire

New provisions in Part 2-7A of the Fair Work Act restrict labour hire arrangements and allow employees or unions to apply to the Fair Work Commission for regulated labour hire arrangement orders prescribing the rates of pay that employees under a labour hire arrangement must receive. However, any such orders made by the Commission have no effect until at least 1 November 2024. The new provisions also introduce strict anti-avoidance provisions and civil penalties. There are some exceptions to the Commission’s ability to make orders, including for small business employers.

Unlawful dismissal

Prohibited grounds for dismissal are extended to include the fact that an employee is subject to domestic or family violence.

Right of entry

The amending Act removes the requirement for state or territory work health and safety representatives to hold an entry permit before entering a workplace. However that innovation is a subject to review after 9 months.

Further amendments

The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act 2023 includes additional provisions criminalising the intentional underpayment of wages by employers. Those provisions do not commence until 1 January 2025.

Publication updates

The By Lawyers Employment Law commentary has been updated accordingly. The amending Act’s further provisions will be the subject of additional publication updates in due course, as required.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: employees, employers, Employment law, Fair Work Act, fair work commission

State taxation – VIC

8 January 2024 by By Lawyers

Amendments to various state taxation provisions affecting conveyancing transactions came into effect on 1 January 2024.

Summary of amendments

Amendments introduced by the State Taxation Acts Amendment Act 2023 and the State Taxation Acts and Other Acts Amendment Act 2023 include:

  • A prohibition on apportioning land tax between a vendor and a purchaser at settlement under a contract of sale of land when the sale price is under the prescribed threshold, currently $10M.
  • A prohibition on apportioning an existing windfall gains tax liability between a vendor and a purchaser under a contract of sale of land or an option agreement.
  • The introduction of a temporary land tax surcharge which will expire after 10 years in addition to existing land tax rates – part of the government’s debt levy measures to recover COVID related spending.
  • An increase of the absentee owner surcharge rate from 2% to 4%, and a reduction of the tax‑free threshold from $300,000 to $50,000 for non-trust absentee owners, with the minimum threshold for trusts unchanged.
  • An extension of the land tax exemption for owners affected by builder insolvencies for an additional two years for a principal residence undergoing construction or renovation.

Land tax and windfall gains tax

Land tax

A new s 10G of the Sale of Land Act 1962 makes it an offence for a vendor to enter into a contract of sale of land that purports to apportion land tax between a vendor and a purchaser when the sale price is under the prescribed threshold. The threshold, set out in s 10I of the Act, is $10,000,000 for 2024, and will be adjusted annually for CPI. Any such clause will be taken to have no effect.

Windfall gains tax

A new s 10H of the Sale of Land Act 1962 makes it an offence for a vendor to enter into a contract of sale of land or an option agreement that apportions an existing windfall gains tax liability to a purchaser. Any such clause will be taken to have no effect.

Adjustment of the purchase price

The allocation of land tax and windfall gains tax liabilities may be reflected in the negotiated purchase price, but cannot be an adjustment on settlement.

Pre-1 January 2024 contracts and options

Sections 10G and 10H do not apply to a contract of sale entered into before 1 January 2024. Further, s 10H does not apply to an option to enter into a contract of sale granted before 1 January 2024, or a contract of sale entered into on or after 1 January 2024 under the exercise of an option that was granted before 1 January 2024.

By Lawyers updates

The commentaries in the Sale of Real Property and Purchase of Real Property guides in the Conveyancing (VIC) publication have been updated to account for these state taxation amendments. The land tax amendments are reflected in clause 15 of the By Lawyers Contract of Sale of Land, and a note concerning the land tax and windfall gains tax offences has been added to the Retainer instructions – Sale of real property.

Filed Under: Conveyancing and Property, Legal Alerts, Publication Updates, Victoria Tagged With: Adjustment on settlement, By Lawyers, Conveyancing VIC, Penalties, Prohibition on apportioning land tax and windfall gains tax, Settlement statement

Stamp duty – SA

8 January 2024 by By Lawyers

Amendments to stamp duty and land tax concessions were introduced in the most recent state budget and apply in the current financial year.

Summary of changes

  • Introduction of stamp duty relief for eligible first home buyers who enter into a contract to purchase a new home or vacant land to build a new home on or after 15 June 2023.
  • Increase in the property value cap for the first home owner grant in relation to eligible transactions entered into on or after 15 June 2023 from $575,000 to $650,000.
  • Introduction of a land tax reduction for eligible build-to-rent projects where construction commences on or after 1 July 2023.

Stamp duty relief for first home buyers

Stamp duty relief is now available to eligible first home buyers who entered into a contract to purchase a new home or vacant land to build a new home on or after 15 June 2023.

This relief is not available on the purchase of an established home, including a planned knock-down and rebuild.

New home

Full stamp duty relief applies on the purchase of an eligible new home valued up to $650,000, with reduced relief for properties valued up to $700,000.

Vacant land on which a new home will be built

For the purchase of vacant land on which a new home will be built, full stamp duty relief applies for land valued at up to $400,000, with reduced relief for land valued up to $450,000.

Eligibility requirements

The eligibility criteria are based the first home owner grant. This is set out in detail in the commentary in the By Lawyers Purchase of Real Property guide.

First Home Owner Grant threshold increase

The property value cap was increased for the first home owner grant in relation to eligible transactions entered into on or after 15 June 2023 from $575,000 to $650,000.

Land tax reduction for build-to-rent projects

To promote new housing opportunities, a land tax reduction is available for eligible build-to-rent projects when construction commences on or after 1 July 2023. This is applied as a 50% reduction in the land value of relevant parcels of land being used for an eligible build-to-rent project.

The land tax reduction is available from the 2023-24 financial year up to, and including, the 2039-40 financial year.

By Lawyers publication updates

The By Lawyers Conveyancing (SA) publication, which includes the Sale of Real Property guide and the Purchase of Real Property guide, has been updated to reflect these changes, including the commentaries, to-do lists, retainer instructions, and initial letters.

Filed Under: Conveyancing and Property, Publication Updates, South Australia Tagged With: Budget amendments, first home owner grant, Land tax reduction for build-to-rent projects, Stamp duty relief

First remand hearing – VIC

8 January 2024 by By Lawyers

New procedures apply to the first remand hearing for criminal matters in the Magistrates’ Court from 8 January, 2024.

A first remand hearing is when an accused in custody is initially brought before the court. Under Practice Direction no. 1 of 2024, the accused is required to attend in person unless the court has directed under s 42MAA(1) of the Evidence (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1958 that they can appear online.

An application under s 42MAA(1) for the accused to appear online can be made by a police officer, the prosecutor, or the accused’s lawyer.

The application must include:

  • a statement as to how an online appearance is consistent with the interests of justice;
  • a statement either that the accused consents to appearing online or that exceptional circumstances apply, in which case they must be set out;
  • whether the accused has received legal advice;
  • whether there are facilities to enable the accused to communicate with their lawyer before and during the hearing;
  • whether the accused intends to apply for bail;
  • whether the accused requires an interpreter; and
  • whether the accused identifies as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander

Lawyers must also appear in person at the first remand hearing. Exceptions to this requirement apply if the court has directed that the client can appear online, or the client is Aboriginal and the lawyer’s appearance would assist the court considering the issues in s 3A of the Bail Act1977, but the lawyer cannot appear in person, or the court has directed otherwise. If an exception applies the lawyer can attend online.

If appearing online, it is the practitioner’s responsibility to ensure they have audio-visual capability from an appropriate, private location and their online appearance must not cause delay or interrupt the court.

The By Lawyers Criminal Magistrates Court guide has been updated accordingly, including with the new form of application.

 

 

Filed Under: Criminal Law, Publication Updates, Victoria Tagged With: criminal law, criminal procedure, first remand hearing, VIC magistrates court

Fixed term employment contracts – FED

11 December 2023 by By Lawyers

Limitations apply to fixed-term employment contracts from 6 December 2023, with the commencement of the final tranche of the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022.

Fixed-term employment contracts

A fixed-term contract of employment is one that terminates at the end of an identifiable period, such as on a set date or at the end of a season.

Under fixed-term contracts, full-time or part-time employees have comparable conditions and entitlements to permanent employees, including leave entitlements, but no right to redundancy or unfair dismissal claims on termination at the end of their contract period.

Limitations on fixed-term employment contracts

The legislative amendments introduce limitations which apply to fixed-term contracts entered after 6 December 2023.  The limitations do not apply to contracts entered earlier, however earlier contracts are taken into account when determining consecutive contract periods.

Fixed-term contracts now cannot be used for the same role for more than two years, or by extending or renewing a fixed-term contract for a role that would otherwise be an ongoing full-time or part-time position even if the total period is less than two years. Only one extension option is allowable.

Exceptions to limitations on fixed-term employment contracts

A new s 333F of the Fair Work Act sets out various exceptions which, if applicable, mean the new limitations do not apply and a fixed term contract can be for more than two years or have multiple extensions. These essentially require there be a good operational reason for the fixed-term contract continuing, or the employee to have annual earnings under the contract above the high-income threshold.

Neither the limitations nor the exceptions apply to casual employees.

See the Fair Work Australia Fixed Term Contract Information Statement for further details.

Amending legislation

The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 passed Federal parliament in December 2022, making many changes to the Fair Work Act 2009.

These amendments have all now commenced and include:

  • expansion of the objects of the Fair Work Act;
  • equal pay provisions to address gender inequality;
  • prohibition of pay secrecy – designed to augment the equal pay provisions;
  • prohibition of sexual harassment in the workplace, including Stop Sexual Harassment Orders via the Fair Work Commission;
  • additional grounds for anti-discrimination in the workplace;
  • expanded availability of flexible work arrangements;
  • a new small claims process for unpaid entitlement recovery; and
  • fixed-term contracts are generally no longer permitted.

Publication updates

The By Lawyers Employment Law publication has been updated for all the relevant amendments.

 

 

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Federal, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: employee, employer, Employment law, Fair Work Act

Conveyancing cases – VIC

4 December 2023 by By Lawyers

New conveyancing cases have been added to By Lawyers reference manual 1001 Conveyancing Answers (VIC) as part of a review by our author Russell Cocks. The publication has been generally updated for recent developments in the law and practice.

New cases on various aspects of the conveyancing process have been added, including:

  • Definition of domestic building work – Li v Smith [2023] VCAT 112 – construction of a brick wall at a residential property found to meet the definition of domestic building work.
  • Caveatable interests – PEXA – A F Welco Holdings P/L v Canterbury Hills P/L [2022] VSC 490 – considering the overlap between the different types of caveatable interests that are listed in PEXA and all the possible caveatable interests.
  • Solicitors and caveats – Lanciana v Alderuccio [2019] VSC 198 – a solicitor who lodges a caveat on behalf of a client is not a person who lodges within the meaning of s 118 of the Transfer of Land Act 1958.
  • Discharging obsolete covenants – City of Stonnington v Wallish [2021] VSC 84 – a successful application to discharge obsolete restrictive covenants where the plaintiff intended to carry out construction on the land, including social facilities.
  • Payment of deposit – Castaway Av P/L v CSC1957 Investments P/L [2023] VSCA 30 – a preliminary deposit paid into the purchaser’s solicitors trust account may not be considered a deposit under the contract.
  • Objection to release of deposit – GLP Batesford Holdings P/L v 68 Bridge Road Land P/L [2022] VSC 614 – once a purchaser has raised an objection in relation to financial information provided, that is sufficient to stop the release of the deposit under s 27 of the Sale of Land Act 1962.
  • Legal professional privilege – Regent 125 P/L v Brdar [2019] VSC 177 – privilege will rarely arise in relation to conveyancing transactions but may do so in limited circumstances.

Practical commentary has also been added about setting up and running electronic workspaces in the electronic lodgement platforms.

1001 Conveyancing Answers (VIC) is available in the Reference Materials folder on the matter plan in all Victorian By Lawyers conveyancing and property guides. It contains many conveyancing cases with summaries and hyperlinks. It assists property lawyers and conveyancers to understand more complex issues in the conveyancing process and solve problems for their clients.

 

Filed Under: Conveyancing and Property, Legal Alerts, Publication Updates, Victoria Tagged With: 1001 Conveyancing Answers Victoria, Conveyancers, conveyancing, property law, property lawyers

Sunset clause – QLD

28 November 2023 by By Lawyers

Amendments to the Land Sales Act 1984 affecting sunset clauses in off the plan contracts commenced on 22 November 2023. The new provisions provide that there is no automatic termination under a sunset clause.

The changes under Part 4 of the Body Corporate and Community Management and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2023 are intended to prevent developers using delaying tactics to enable them to terminate a contract under a sunset clause and sell the property for a higher price.

A new Division 4A of the Land Sales Act 1984 applies to all off the plan contracts that include a sunset clause entered into on or after 22 November 2023, and retrospectively to existing unsettled contracts.

When a seller can terminate under a sunset clause

Section 19D now provides that a seller can only terminate a contract for a relevant event not occurring by the sunset date if:

  • the seller has provided all buyers with a sunset clause notice and has their written consent to the proposed termination; or
  • the seller obtains an order permitting the termination from the Supreme Court; or
  • a regulation otherwise permits the seller to terminate the contract.

A relevant event is:

    • registration of the plan of subdivision for the proposed lot;
    • creation of a separate indefeasible title for the proposed lot;
    • settlement of the contract;
    • another event prescribed by regulation as a relevant event.

The sunset date means:

    • for a relevant event other than settlement, the day it must happen under the contract, including an extension provided for in the contract; or
    • the settlement day, including an extension provided for in the contract.

Section 19C provides that a sunset clause cannot automatically terminate an off the plan contract. If a sunset clause purports to automatically terminate the contract, it is taken to mean the contract can be terminated under the new provisions, on or after the sunset date.

Notice of termination under a sunset clause

A seller proposing to terminate a contract under s 19D must serve notice in writing on each buyer at least 28 days before the sunset date containing certain information including their reasons.

The buyer must consider the information in the notice and act reasonably in the circumstances. They must respond to the notice by the day before the sunset date. Failure to respond does not represent consent to the termination.

Supreme Court order for termination under a sunset clause

The Supreme Court can make an order permitting the seller to terminate the contract under a sunset clause if the seller satisfies the court it is just and equitable in the circumstances. Section 19F(3) sets out the factors the court can consider in making this determination.

The seller will also be liable to pay the buyer’s costs of the proceedings unless the seller satisfies the court that the buyer unreasonably withheld consent to the termination.

Publication updates

The By Lawyers Sale and Purchase of Real Property guides have been updated accordingly. Precedents for a termination notice and consent to termination precedent have been added to the respective matter plans, with letters enclosing them.

Filed Under: Conveyancing and Property, Legal Alerts, Publication Updates, Queensland Tagged With: off the plan, Residential off the plan contracts, sunset clause, sunset date

Priority Property Pool – FED

22 November 2023 by By Lawyers

From 30 October 2023, under a new Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia practice direction, special procedures apply for property matters that qualify as Priority Property Pool (PPP) Cases.

Some registries of the FCFCOA have operated special arrangements under the PPP500 pilot since February 2020. The arrangements will now apply to proceedings in all registries.

Priority Property Pool Cases are those where the net value of the asset pool is, or appears to be, less than $550,000 excluding superannuation interests, or not significantly greater and the court considers it appropriate to include the matter as a PPP case.

Previously, under the pilot program, the cap was $500,000.

Priority property Pool cases can include matters involving applications for property settlement, spouse maintenance, or urgent spouse maintenance.

Cases will not qualify as a PPP Case if:

  1. they involve entities such as a family trust, company, or self-managed superannuation fund the value of which is contested and requires valuation or expert investigation,
  2. only parenting orders are sought,
  3. both parenting and financial orders are sought, or
  4. child support is the issue.

The new Family Law Practice Direction – Priority Property Pool Cases applies. It revokes and replaces the previous Family Law Practice Direction Priority Property Pools Under $500,000, and must be read in conjunction with:

  • the Family Law Act 1975,
  • The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021,
  • the court’s Guide for practitioners and parties in PPP Cases, and
  • the court’s Family Law Practice Direction – Financial Proceedings.

PPP Cases proceed differently to standard cases. The Guide for practitioners in PPP Cases sets out the applicable procedure. Important differences from standard case procedures include:

  • At each court date the parties’ lawyers must inform the judicial registrar of the costs their client has incurred to date, their estimated costs to the conclusion of a final hearing, and the source of the funding for representation.
  • Adjournments are discouraged and will be granted only in exceptional circumstances.

The By Lawyers Family Law Property Settlement publication has been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Family Law, Federal, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: family law, family law act, family law property, family law rules, Priority Property Pool Cases

Bail provision – NSW

7 November 2023 by By Lawyers

A new provision of the Bail Act 2013 commenced on 30 October 2023, under the Justice Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous) Act 2023.

The new provision, s 28A of the Bail Act, enables a bail authority to impose a bail condition that an accused person only be released on bail into the care or company of a specified person or class of persons. This is called an accompaniment requirement.

The bail authority can impose such a condition as a pre-release requirement on an accused person’s bail. The condition is met when the specified person, or a person of the specified class, is present at the place from which the accused person is to be released on bail, and able to accompany them.

The condition is intended to be used to address identified bail concerns.

Reference to a class of persons is intended to ensure an accused person can be accompanied, where applicable, by someone from an organisation such as the National Disability Insurance Service or Youth Justice, in circumstances where the specific identity of the accompanying person may not be known in advance.

This new provision is subject to the existing provisions of the Act. Section 20A requires the bail authority to assess bail concerns and impose conditions that are:

  • reasonably necessary to address a bail concern,
  • no more onerous than necessary to address the bail concern in relation to which it is imposed, and
  • reasonably practicable for the accused person to comply with.

The commentary about bail in the By Lawyers Local Court Criminal guide has been amended accordingly, and the Retainer instructions – Bail precedent has been amended to prompt the practitioner to seek instructions about an accompanying person or persons.

Filed Under: Criminal Law, New South Wales, Publication Updates Tagged With: bail, bail conditions, Criminal (NSW) Guide, criminal law

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • …
  • 102
  • Next Page »

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Preferred State

Connect with us

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 · Privacy Policy
Created and hosted by LEAP · Log in