ByLawyers News and Updates

Electronic Transactions – NSW

by

Schedule 1 to the Electronic Transactions Regulation 2017 (NSW) came into operation on 22 April 2020 . It allows for witnessing of documents by audio visual link in New South Wales.

This is a practical step by NSW parliament. It allows wills, powers of attorney, deeds and agreements, enduring guardianship appointments, affidavits and statutory declarations to be witnessed through audio visual means. Formats such as Zoom, Skype or Microsoft Teams, which integrates with LEAP, can be used.

Practitioners can send a document to a client by email, if the client has printing facilities, or by post. A meeting can then be arranged via any audio visual format to witness the client signing the document.

Under the regulation the practitioner witness must:

  • Observe the client sign the document in real time – this may involve ensuring that the practitioner can view the document on screen as the signature is made;
  • Sign the document or a copy of the document themselves;
  • Be reasonably satisfied that the document that they sign is the same document, or a copy of the document, signed by the client; and
  • Endorse the document, or copy, with a statement specifying the method used to witness the signature and that the document was witnessed in accordance with the regulation.

The following wording is suggested for the endorsement:

This document was signed in counterpart and witnessed over audio visual link in accordance with clause 2 of Schedule 1 to the Electronic Transactions Regulation 2017.

The regulation allows a witness to sign a counterpart of the document, or have the client scan and email the signed document back to the practitioner, who may then print and witness the copy. Of course, the client may also post the original back to the practitioner, who may then sign the original document on receipt.

The regulation also allows for swearing or affirming the contents of an affidavit by audio visual link.

This is a temporary, COVID-19 related measure. Schedule 1 expires 6 months from the date of commencement, being 22 October 2020.

Remote signing – All states

by

Practical issues relating to the remote signing of documents such as agreements, deeds, wills and powers of attorney by companies and individuals

Remote signing of documents has become an important issue for solicitors and their clients due to the coronavirus pandemic. Face to face meetings are now largely excluded meaning clients are unable to attend at their lawyer’s office to sign documents.

Documents which must be signed need to be mailed or emailed to clients and then signed remotely.

Signatures

Signatures establish the identity of the person signing and their intention to create legal relations.  It is this intention indicated by placing their mark on a document that gives it its legal character or functionality, not the mark itself. There is no real distinction made at law between handwritten signatures, marks or electronic signatures. Signing a document electronically might be done by typing one’s name, pasting an image of one’s usual signature, using a stylus or finger on a touchscreen or using e-signing software.

Agreements

An agreement can be in electronic form and executed electronically, if witnessing is not required.

Most contracts, such as the contract for the sale of land, do not require a witness.

If witnessing is required, it can be done electronically provided the witness is present when the deed is signed. If witnessing is not possible this way due to virus related isolation, then the counterparty will need to agree to another method.

Electronic conveyancing requirements

A Client Authorisation Form may be electronically signed, subject to specific jurisdictional requirements. Whilst the Verification of Identity Standard requires a face-to-face in person interview, compliance with the standard is not mandatory and taking ‘reasonable steps’ to verify the identity of the client, such as by video meeting, is sufficient.

The By Lawyers Contract for Sale of Land in NSW and in VIC allows for electronic exchange and electronic settlement in compliance with electronic transactions legislation and the Verification of Identity Standard rules.

Deeds

Deeds usually require signatures to be witnessed and to be in writing.

An electronically-signed deed that is immediately printed out on paper may satisfy the common law requirement for paper with the first printed version being the original deed rather than a copy. However, parties to a transaction are better served to agree in advance to the acceptability of a particular form of deed and its electronic signature. Similarly, checking before execution  the requirements of organisations such as registries with whom the deeds must be registered will ensure their acceptability.

As mentioned above, witnessing can be electronic provided the witness is present when the deed is signed. If this is not possible then the counterparty will need to agree to another method.

An acceptable method might be by video attendance of the party’s lawyer who on return of the signed deed certifies it to be identical to the one submitted for signing and that the signing was witnessed by video.

Wills

The issue with executing wills remotely given social distancing, is the availability of two witnesses who are not themselves beneficiaries.

Where the required two disinterested witnesses are not available, the will may be executed informally, by the testator, who after signing it, returns it to their solicitor with a statement that they intend it to be their last will and testament. Accompanied by an affidavit explaining the signing in the prevailing circumstances, perhaps with video witnessing, a grant of probate of the informal will is likely to be made if required. Once the pandemic ends the will can be properly signed.

Powers of attorney

A general power of attorney does not need a witness and can be signed remotely.

However, an enduring power of attorney must be witnessed by a prescribed witness – usually the principal’s solicitor – who must also certify that they explained the effect of the document to the principal and that they appeared to understand it. On that basis remote signing is technically impossible.

Where a face to face meeting – even one at an outdoor location with appropriate distancing – is not possible, the document could be sent to the client by post or email for their written or electronic signature. Their lawyer could hold a video conference with the client and explain the document and see it signed by their client. When returned the lawyer can certify that they gave the explanation and were satisfied as to the principal’s understanding, but whilst unable to personally witness the document being signed, they witnessed the signing in video conference.

In this practical way the power is likely to be acceptable in most cases where there is no issue raised.

Where this approach is taken, the risks that the document may not be effective need to be explained to the client and appropriate file notes made.

Appointments of enduring guardian and Advance medical directives

The same witnessing and certification procedures apply to these instruments as for enduring powers of attorney. Similar practical, emergency measures might be undertaken.

Company execution

It is arguable whether a company can execute a document electronically under s 127 of the Corporations Act 2001.

However, in this busy world of commerce it is common for documents to be signed by duly authorised officers, or one director, or by a duly appointed attorney.

Generally

The ongoing response to Coronavirus means that emergency measures are rapidly being introduced to modify the usual signing and witnessing requirements. For example, some courts will currently accept unsigned affidavits on the basis that they will later be formally executed if necessary. The website of each court should be referred to as required.

 

Keep up-to-date with our latest COVID-19 News & Updates

Assisting clients to manage their affairs – All states

by

Assisting clients to manage their affairs

With the threat and uncertainty surrounding the Coronavirus many practitioners will be asked to prepare documents assisting clients to manage their affairs should the need arise.

By Lawyers commentary and precedents for Wills, Powers of Attorney, Guardianship and Directives across every state of Australia are available to help practitioners to respond to these requests.

In brief:

  • A will provides for the administration and distribution of a person’s property in the event of their death.
  • A power of attorney enables a person to empower someone they trust to conduct their legal and financial affairs on request. However, this power ceases should the principal lose capacity to authorise its use. This power can be witnessed by any adult.
  • An enduring power of attorney enables a person to empower someone they trust to conduct their legal and financial affairs without specific authorisation should the principal become unable to conduct their own affairs. Note: This power requires specific witnessing.
  • An enduring guardian or a medical power or an advance care directive. These powers are similar to an enduring power of attorney in that they allow a person to choose someone they trust to manage their health and lifestyle decisions, but not their financial affairs, should they become unable to do so themselves.

Helpful resources

The By Lawyers Wills publications provide detailed retainer instructions which can also be signed as an informal will in emergency situations should the need arise. Otherwise a will should be witnessed by two uninterested parties over the age of 18. The By Lawyers publication provides signing clauses for wills by handicapped, blind, non-English speaking and illiterate testators.

Detailed signing instructions are available and can be emailed to the client with the will should personal attendance at the office be difficult or undesirable.

The guides contain a full suite of wills for single people, people with a partner and for people with blended families. There are testamentary trust wills as well as international wills.

Practitioners will also find a full suite of the other important estate planning documents, for both financial and health & lifestyle matters.

There are practical and detailed commentaries to assist the practitioner to quickly and efficiently advise their clients on any issue of concern to them.  The retainer instructions and ‘to do’ lists ensure thorough and complete attention to all relevant considerations.

For further information

Please don’t hesitate to contact us at askus@bylawyers.com.au

Family provision claims – Acting for the Plaintiff (NSW)

by

A full review of the By Lawyers Family provision claims – Acting for the plaintiff guide has been conducted.

The review ensures that all content is in line with current law and practice.

Improved content and new precedents

Updates and enhancements include:

  • a re-organised and streamlined commentary that better caters for current practice;
  • additional assistance to help the practitioner get the matter underway;
  • enhanced commentary on preparing for and attending at mediation;
  • an updated matter plan that includes links to important sections of the commentary; and
  • six new precedents – additional initial letters which cater for different circumstances regarding the estate.

101 Succession Answers (NSW)

Subscribers are reminded that the By Lawyers reference manual 101 Succession Answers (NSW) also has a large and helpful section on Family provision claims. This includes many links to relevant sections of the legislation, plus links to leading and recent cases on various aspects of Family provision claims.

101 Succession Answers (NSW) is found at the top of the Family provision claims – Acting for the plaintiff matter plan and also in the Reference materials folder.

Keep up to date with By Lawyers

These updates to our Family provision claims – Acting for the plaintiff guide, and the regular updates to 101 Succession Answers (NSW) with the latest cases on Family provision claims, are part of By Lawyers commitment to the continual enhancement of our publications. By Lawyers subscribers can be confident that their guides and precedents are always kept up to date so they can enjoy practice more.

Guardianship – VIC

by

Changes to guardianship legislation in Victoria commence on 1 March 2020.

The Guardianship and Administration Act 2019 repeals and replaces the Guardianship and Administration Act 1986 from 1 March 2020.

Described by Attorney-General Jill Hennessy as ‘the biggest changes to Victoria’s guardianship and administration laws in more than 30 years‘, the amendments are aimed at ensuring greater protections for adults with a disability who have impaired capacity to make and participate in decisions that affect their lives.

As a result of the new legislation commentaries in the following By Lawyers Guides have been updated:

  • Probate;
  • Letters of Administration;
  • Wills;
  • Powers and Advance Care Directives;
  • County Court – Acting for the plaintiff and Acting for the defendant;
  • Magistrates Court – Acting for the plaintiff;
  • Supreme Court – Acting for the plaintiff and Acting for the defendant; and
  • Personal Injury.

When announcing the amendments, the Attorney General stated that: ‘The changes reflect a more modern understanding of decision-making capacity and disability, and ensure that a person’s will and preferences are followed where possible and appropriate.’

The updates to our Guides were overseen by our highly experienced author Rossyln Curnow.

By Lawyers are committed to always keeping our subscribers up-to-date.

‘To do’ list – Family provision claims – NSW

by

New precedent ‘To do’ lists have been added to the By Lawyers Family Provision Claims – Acting for the plaintiff and Acting for the estate Guides for NSW.

Many subscribers would be familiar with By Lawyers helpful ‘To do’ lists, which serve as a checklist for progress through the matter. The ‘To do’ list ensures no critical steps are missed and allows practitioners to mark-off each step and make sure they know where the matter is up to.

The new ‘To do’ lists for Family Provision claims prompts for each of the critical steps at each stage of the matter, namely:

  • Getting the matter underway – including costs disclosure
  • Settling it early – initial offers of settlement
  • The claim – preparing and filing the summons and plaintiff’s affidavit OR notice of appearance and notice to eligible persons
  • The first directions hearing
  • Mediation
  • Next directions hearing
  • Preparation for hearing
  • Hearing
  • After hearing – including advice on appeal rights.

These new precedents will assist lawyers in Family Provision claims to manage their matters, whether acting for the claimant or the estate.

Family Provision – 101 Succession Answers (NSW)

by

Two new cases on Family Provision claims have been added to the By Lawyers Reference manual 101 Succession Answers (NSW).

Affidavits and Disclosure

In Megerditchian v Khatchadourian [2019] NSWSC 1870 the court considered a number of important procedural issues, including the requirement that the plaintiff file an affidavit at the time of filing their summons and the issues relating to the form and evidentiary status of that affidavit. At [159]  the court stated:

… the purpose of the affidavit prescribed by the Practice Note is to identify, in broad terms, the plaintiff’s evidence concerning the factors enumerated in s 60(2) which may bear on the application. It will not necessarily be exhaustive, or all in admissible form, and it may be supplemented by further evidence as the case moves towards hearing.

The court also considered the plaintiff’s duty of disclosure. At [145] the court noted that:

It is well established that, in some circumstances, where a plaintiff in a family provision application fails to make full and proper disclosure of his or her financial position, the Court will refuse the application.

This case has been added to the Affidavits and Disclosure sections under Family Provision claims in 101 Succession Answers (NSW).

Disabled adult child claimant

In Cowap v Cowap [2020] NSWCA 19 the Court of Appeal considered the competing claims on an estate of a disabled adult son, the applicant/respondent, and an elderly widow, the respondent/appellant. The son was in fact a child of the widow’s previous marriage but had been adopted by the deceased.

The court at first instance granted the son provision of $600,000. This meant the widow had to sell the former matrimonial home where she had long resided with the deceased and to which she had significant emotional attachment. The son had ‘severe and permanent disability, including cognitive impairment’ because of which there was strong evidence in support of his need for provision. The widow, to whom the entire estate had been left, also had a strong claim on the estate as it was a long marriage.

The sale of the property allowed the widow to purchase another smaller property and maintain her existing income. The judge at first instance, in granting provision to the son, decided that was an appropriate outcome given the 91-year-old widow would inevitably leave the property in due course in any event.

The Court of Appeal held that the first instance judge had made no error and dismissed the appeal.

Of further interest in this case is that the Court of Appeal refused to admit on the appeal any new evidence of valuation of the property. [35].

This case has been added to the Adult Children section under Family Provision claims in 101 Succession Answers (NSW).

101 Succession Answers – NSW

by

Following an author review new cases have been added and other enhancements made to the By Lawyers Reference Manual 101 Succession Answers (NSW).

Nobarani v Mariconte [2018] HCA 36

This case supports the requirement of an ‘interested’ party wishing to challenge the validity of a will to show that they have rights which will be affected by the disputed grant of probate or administration.

Re Estates Brooker-Pain and Soulos [2019] NSWSC 671

Considerations regarding disclosure of documents and information in contested probate proceedings were extensively discussed. This case analysed the applicable law, practice and procedure in the context of applications to set aside subpoenas and notices to produce which called for documents relating to the making of the disputed wills. This included solicitors’ notes and files. The interplay between subpoenas, the court’s Practice Note SC Eq 11 and case management orders was examined in detail.

The court addressed the determination of ‘legitimate forensic purpose’ in such cases, especially where pleadings had not closed and the issues in dispute were uncertain. This decision has therefore been added to the By Lawyers Reference Manual 101 Subpoena Answers too.

The court also commented on the practice of sending ‘Larke v Nugus’ letters to ‘…a person involved in the preparation or execution of a will…[seeking] disclosures about the circumstances in which a will was prepared or executed’.

Application of NSW Trustee & Guardian; Estate of Dudley Keith Vaughn [2019] NSWSC 850 and In the Estate of Hansie Hart [2019] ACTSC 317

These two recent cases each dealt with issues relating to the presumption of death.

Gregory Joseph Mills as trustee v Julie Elizabeth Mills and Ors [2018] NSWSC 363

This case is instructive as to the considerations the court applies when giving judicial advice and determining construction issues on testamentary trusts.

Finnegan & Anor v Garner & Ors [2019] QSC 100

Here the estate faced claims which, if they were resolved by litigation would result in the estate being consumed by legal costs. The court noted, at [10], that:

It is the duty of trustees of the estate not to embark upon expensive litigation which will have the effect of depleting the estate. In Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Inc v His Eminence Petar The Diocesan Bishop of The Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand Gummow ACJ, Kirby, Hayne and Heydon JJ said that: “a trustee who is sued should take no step in defence of the suit without first obtaining judicial advice about whether it is proper to defend the proceedings.”

Koellner v Spicer [2019] NSWSC 1571

On a family provision claim, an adult child with a medical condition and meagre financial resources was awarded a 35% legacy from the reasonably small estate even though the deceased had expressly excluded him on the basis they had no relationship.

Grant v Roberts; Smith v Smith; Roberts v Smith; Curtis v Smith [2019] NSWSC 843

The court emphasised, including by reference to the ‘overriding principles’ of the Civil Procedure Act, the duty on parties to contain costs in family provision litigation. The court heavily criticised disproportionate costs being incurred.

 

Like all By Lawyers Reference Materials, 101 Succession Answers (NSW) is updated regularly to cover developments in case law and procedure.

Testamentary discretionary trusts – Foreign person – NSW

by

Testamentary discretionary trusts holding residential property – Surcharge duty and land tax

Where a foreign person acquires or holds residential property, duty and land tax surcharge can apply. Foreign person surcharge duty and land tax can also apply to testamentary discretionary trusts where foreign persons are beneficiaries or potential beneficiaries.

The NSW Commissioner of State Revenue issued a ruling in March 2017 allowing exemption of discretionary trusts from surcharge duty and land tax if the trust deed was amended to exclude foreign beneficiaries within six months of the exemption being granted.

The State Revenue Legislation Further Amendment Bill 2019 is currently before the NSW Parliament. If this Bill is passed, the ability to amend a trust deed to avoid the surcharge will be restricted. Once the Bill passes, the exemption is likely to be removed. The second reading speech for the Bill states: ‘the Government considers that the end of 2019 allows sufficient time for any remaining trustees and their advisers to make necessary changes to trust deeds’.

There is two-year period of grace, from the commencement of the proposed new s 104JA of the Duties Act 1997. During that period, the trustee of a testamentary discretionary trust will not be deemed a foreign person if the deceased was not a foreign person, even if the trust does not prevent a foreign person from being a beneficiary of the trust.

In order to avoid the application of surcharge duty and land tax, the By Lawyers wills creating testamentary discretionary trusts and library of testamentary discretionary trust provisions include a clause titled ‘Foreign beneficiaries’ that prohibits the trustee from making trust distributions to, or otherwise benefiting, a foreign person. The clause must also prohibit an amendment that has the effect of including a beneficiary or potential beneficiary who is a foreign person. Where it is intended for a foreign person to benefit under a testamentary discretionary trust, this clause should be appropriately amended or removed when drafting the will.

It is important to review existing testamentary trust provisions arising under a will and consider whether it is necessary to amend to avoid the application of surcharge duty and land tax.

See the commentary in the Wills (NSW) Guide for further details.

Revocation of Power of Attorney – NSW

by

Revocation of Power of Attorney

Unlike a will, a power of attorney does not revoke a previous appointment of an attorney by the principal. Powers of attorney which are not intended to continue must be revoked.

The By Lawyers Powers of Attorney, Appointment of Enduring Guardian and Advance Care Planning Guide for NSW includes commentary on revoking a power of attorney, as well as a Revocation of Power of Attorney precedent.

Following some helpful feedback from our subscribers, the Revocation of Power of Attorney precedent has been amended for enhanced functioning.

Amended precedent

The following amendments have been made:

  • Guidance notes have been added to the precedent;
  • For LEAP users, the precedent has been coded for matters with multiple clients so that an ‘ASK’ will run when the precedent is opened asking which client is revoking and the address of all attorneys now populates.

This precedent can be found in the Revocation of Powers of Attorney sub-folder under Folder B. Powers of Attorney in the By Lawyers Powers of Attorney, Appointment of Enduring Guardian and Advance Care Planning Guide.

 

Connect with us