ByLawyers News and Updates

HomeBuilder – FED

by

The Federal Government has announced an extension to the HomeBuilder scheme to 31 March 2021, however the grant amount has been reduced to $15,000. The $25,000 grant is still available, with amended eligibility criteria, for building contracts signed on or before 31 December 2020.

HomeBuilder $25,000 grant

For building contracts signed between 4 June 2020 and 31 December 2020, a $25,000 grant is available to certain individuals who build a new home or buy an off the plan home, or substantially renovate an existing home. The grant cannot be used to buy an existing house and is limited to Australian citizens earning less than $125,000 or couples earning less than $200,000.

The value of new builds is capped at $750,000. For renovations, the home must be worth less than $1.5 million before the renovation, and projects must cost between $150,000 and $750,000.

The building contract must be signed between 4 June 2020 and 31 December 2020, and work must commence within six months of the contract date.

Applications must be submitted by 14 April 2021.

HomeBuilder $15,000 grant

For building contracts signed between 1 January 2021 to 31 March 2021, a $15,000 grant is available to certain individuals who build a new home or buy an off the plan home, or substantially renovate an existing home. The grant cannot be used to buy an existing house and is limited to Australian citizens earning less than $125,000 or couples earning less than $200,000.

The value of new builds is capped at $950,000 for NSW, $850,000 for VIC and $750,000 for all other States and Territories. For renovations, the home must be worth less than $1.5 million before the renovation, and projects must cost between $150,000 and $750,000.

The building contract must be signed between 1 January 2021 and 31 March 2021, and work must commence within six months of the contract date.

Applications must be submitted by 14 April 2021.

State-based grants

On top of the HomeBuilder scheme, some states are offering related payments in addition to the Federal grant. See the relevant By Lawyers Conveyancing – Purchase Guide for further information and relevant application forms or links where applications are made online.

All By Lawyers Conveyancing – Purchase Retainer instructions precedents now also include these grant details.

Estates cases – VIC

by

New estate cases have been added to the By Lawyers 101 Succession Answers (VIC) reference manual.

The new cases under the Estates section of the publication relate to:

Vesting of interest in beneficiaries – Rule in Saunders v Vautier

A beneficiary can apply to the court to have their interest vest earlier than provided for in the will. The rule in Saunders v Vautier possibly provides such a mechanism.

The High Court set out the modern formulation of the rule in Saunders v Vautier in CPT Custodian Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2005] HCA 53 at [47]:

Under the rule in Saunders v Vautier, an adult beneficiary (or a number of adult beneficiaries acting together) who has (or between them have) an absolute, vested and indefeasible interest in the capital and income of property may at any time require the transfer of the property to him (or them) and may terminate any accumulation.

If the beneficiaries are ascertained, have capacity and all consent then ‘they may put an end to the trust by directing the trustee to transfer the interest in the estate to themselves, notwithstanding any direction to the contrary in the trust instrument’: Krstic v State Trustees Ltd [2012] VSC 344 at [15].

For a case where the rule was not upheld due to the beneficial interest being classed as contingent, see Arnott v Kiss [2014] NSWSC 1385. This case also suggests that a gift over clause may defeat application of the rule.

Accordingly, whether there is any reason for the executor to resist the application would depend upon there being any terms of the will that might support such a position. If the executor is in any doubt then the trustee can and should seek judicial advice.

The addition of these new estate cases to 101 Succession Answers (VIC) is part of our continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

New succession cases – VIC

by

New succession cases have been added to the By Lawyers 101 Succession Answers (VIC) reference manual. These helpful recent cases fall under the Estates and Family provisions claims sections of the publication.

Costs in Family provision claims

Shelly v Prager (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 1553 concerned the court assessing the overall justice of a case when determining whether special provision for costs should be made in a family provision claim. Williams J at [18] stated the following factors may be relevant:

– whether one party has engaged in unreasonable conduct in the commencement or maintenance of the proceedings which has resulted in the other party (or parties) to the proceeding incurring unnecessary costs;

– whether an applicant’s claim for provision out of an estate is frivolous, vexatious or made without reasonable prospects of success;

– whether an applicant’s claim, although unsuccessful, was otherwise reasonable, meritorious or borderline; and

– the relative size of the deceased estate.

Judicial advice for trustees

Re Perpetual Trustee Company Limited as a trustee for the Joseph Banington Davis Settlement [2020] NSWSC 1574 concerned the dual purpose of an application for judicial advice by an executor/trustee. Robb J at [72] noted that:

It is…not right to see a trustee’s application for judicial advice about whether to sue or defend proceedings as directed only to the personal protection of the trustee. Proceedings for judicial advice have another and no less important purpose of protecting the interests of the trust.

The addition of these recent cases to 101 Succession Answers (VIC) is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Traffic offences – VIC

by

The By Lawyers Traffic Offences – VIC publication has been updated and revised.

With the final commencement of the Road Safety and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2020 on 12 November 2020, the Road Safety Act 1986 has been amended to provide for immediate driver licence or learner permit suspensions in certain cases.

This includes excessive speed offences more than 45 kph over the speed limit which are mobile camera detected or for offences where a motor vehicle is used to cause serious injury or death, police can give the driver notice of immediate licence suspension. This requires the driver to surrender their licence for up to 12 months.

There are also immediate suspensions for certain drink and drug-driving offences and heavy vehicle offences.

These legislative amendments have been incorporated in the commentary in the Traffic Offences – VIC publication.

In addition, the commentary has been reviewed with resultant enhancements. The content is re-ordered for better workflow and improved searchability; specific sections have been added for various aspects of sentencing, such as obtaining medical reports; and links to VicRoads and Transport for Victoria online resources are enhanced. The matter plan has been revised to incorporate these revisions.

101 Costs Answers – ALL STATES

by

101 Costs Answers is the latest addition to the By Lawyers ‘101’ series of helpful reference materials.

Located in the Reference materials folder on every By Lawyers matter plan, this publication contains valuable commentary and precedents on all aspects of legal costs.

The precedents include all of the By Lawyers costs agreements/client services agreements and costs disclosures, drawn together from all By Lawyers publications into a convenient single publication.

The By Lawyers costs agreements are compliant with the strict requirements of the various state laws. They cater for all areas of law, with detailed recitals of the scope of work usually undertaken in each type of matter. This not only defines the retainer but makes it easy for practitioners to produce documents quickly upon engagement.

The 101 Costs Answers commentary includes:

Disclosure requirements

The commentary helps practitioners to navigate some of the more complicated disclosure requirements including regulated costs and the specific obligations for different types of litigation matters. The effect of non-disclosure is also covered.

Disbursements

Commentary on defining and recovering disbursements includes relevant case law and examples. The By Lawyers costs agreements are drafted to clearly identify usual disbursements.

Counsel’s fees

The commentary deals with the contractual relationship between solicitors and barristers as well as disclosure requirements. With the solicitor responsible for payment of counsel’s fees regardless of the solicitor’s agreement with the client, the By Lawyers costs agreements include counsel’s fees as specific disbursements which the client is obliged to pay.

Debt recovery

Where debt recovery is necessary, 101 Costs Answers contains letters of demand and example pleadings to assist with the recovery of costs. There is also detailed commentary on costs assessment procedures and the relevant forms for each state are available on the matter plan.

Like all By Lawyers publications, 101 Costs Answers contains interactive links to relevant legislation and cases, which are always kept updated.

Family provision claims VIC

by

New precedents have been added to the By Lawyers Family Provision Claims VIC publication.

Following an author review of the guides, there is new content on the matter plans for both Acting for the Estate and Acting for the Plaintiff.

The new content to assist practitioners acting for clients in relation to claims on a deceased estate under Part IV of the Administration and Probate Act 1958 includes:

Acting for the Estate – new family provision precedents

  • Letter to beneficiary affected by settlement of claim
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavits for signing
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavits
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing

Acting for the Plaintiff – new family provision precedents

  • Letter to potential claimant
  • Authority to settle and receive
  • Direction to pay and authority to receive
  • Letter to client enclosing settlement deed
  • Letter to client after filing claim
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavit
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to client enclosing estate affidavits
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – Payment
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – No payment

This review of the Family Provision Claims VIC publication and the addition of these new family provision precedents is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Non-disclosure – All states

by

Non-disclosure agreements and clauses have been added to all By Lawyers guides. These precedents augment the existing Confidentiality Deed and clauses in the Folder of Blank Deeds, Agreements and Statutory Declarations in Folder A. Getting the matter underway on every By Lawyers matter plan.

In general, non-disclosure is passive and unilateral, whereas confidentiality is active and bipartite. The former generally requires a party simply not to reveal or release confidential information, whereas the latter requires a party to take positive steps to keep information secret and safe.

There are also other distinctions to be drawn when dealing with confidential information. Sometimes only one party is to provide confidential information to the other. In other cases, two or more parties propose to exchange it. Sometimes the parties wish only to protect the contents of their agreement, whereas sometimes they wish to protect other specific information relevant to their decision to enter into the agreement, or relevant to the subject matter of the agreement.

The various By Lawyers deeds and agreements and precedent clauses have been revised and enhanced to encompass these distinctions.

The commentary on Deeds and agreements in the Folder of Blank Deeds, Agreements and Statutory Declarations has also been enhanced to cover these points.

Apart from the precedents available in the Folder of Blank Deeds, Agreements and Statutory Declarations, relevant precedents relating to non-disclosure and confidentiality are also located in various guides as required.

Adding these non-disclosure agreements and clauses, and revising the existing confidentiality deeds and clauses, is part of By Lawyers continual commitment to the expansion and enhancement of our content.

Amended precedents:

Deed for general use

Agreement for general use

Confidentiality deed

Confidentiality clause for defined information – All parties

Confidentiality clause for defined information – One party

New precedents:

Non-disclosure agreements – Informal

Non-disclosure agreement – Formal

Confidentiality clause for terms of agreement – All parties

Confidentiality clause for terms of agreement – One party

Supreme Court – urgent applications – VIC

by

The By Lawyers Victorian Supreme Court litigation publication has been reviewed by our author, resulting in consolidation and enhancement of the commentary, especially relating to urgent applications.

Both the Acting for the Plaintiff and Acting for the Defendant guides in the Supreme Court publication have been reviewed.  The matter plans and related commentary have been re-ordered, with additional subheadings for improved searchability. The commentary on Urgent cases and applications has been expanded. Direct links have been added to the relevant Supreme Court webpages with contact details and specific procedures for making urgent applications.

See the subfolder If required – Urgent applications and injunctions, in folder C. Going to court and folder D. Interlocutory steps on both matter plans, for the relevant commentary, links and precedents. Folder D also contains commentary and precedents covering all types of interlocutory applications, urgent and otherwise.

The Victorian Supreme Court publication also includes an Enforcement Guide, which provides practitioners with comprehensive practical assistance on enforcing judgments for their clients.

Also included in the publication is the popular reference manual 101 Subpoena Answers. This valuable resource substantially augments the commentary in the Supreme Court guide regarding the law and practice on issuing and responding to subpoenas.

This author review is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Magistrates Court – Civil – VIC

by

The By Lawyers Magistrates Court – Civil litigation publication has been reviewed by our author, resulting in consolidation and enhancement.

Both the Acting for the Plaintiff and Acting for the Defendant guides in the Magistrates Court – Civil publication have been reviewed. Precedents on the matter plan have been consolidated, with some updates and amendments. This includes a number of bespoke By Lawyers precedents in the nature of ‘court forms’ drafted for use where there is no prescribed court form for certain actions required under the rules of court.

Amended precedents include:

  • Notice of discontinuance
  • Notice of ceasing to act
  • Notice of change of solicitor
  • Notice of change of solicitor’s address
  • Offer of compromise
  • Acceptance of offer of compromise under order 26
  • Application for administrative transfer to the County Court
  • Answers to interrogatories

The precedent Notice of Defence to Counterclaim has been deleted. This is because when a counterclaim is served the rules apply as if the defendant were the plaintiff and the plaintiff were the defendant. Accordingly, the usual Defence – Form 8A is used to defend a counterclaim which is on the matter plan.

Commentary on administratively transferring matters to the County Court, pursuant to s 17 of the Courts (Case Transfer) Act 1991, and appropriately responding to counterclaims has also been added.

This review is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

JobKeeper extension – FED

by

The Federal Government has announced another Jobkeeper extension. The payment scheme will continue until 28 March 2021.

Options for flexibility for managing workforce costs, such as reducing working hours continue. Employers are no longer allowed to require employees to take annual leave.

The amendments change the eligibility requirements for employers. Two broad categories of employers have been created: those who qualify for the new scheme after 28 September 2020, referred to as ‘qualifying employers’ and those who previously received at least one payment but no longer qualify, referred to as ‘legacy’ employers.

Qualifying employers

The minimum requirements under this JobKeeper extension remain the same regarding notification and consultation. The By Lawyers example content letters remain available from within the commentary and have been updated where necessary.

Any JobKeeper enabling directions or agreements existing on 27 September 2020 remain valid if the employer continues to qualify for the scheme.

Legacy employers

Legacy employers must have received one or more JobKeeper payments in the period prior to 28 September 2020, but have ceased to qualify. They now need to show a 10% decline in current GST turnover for the previous quarter. They must obtain a ‘10% decline in turnover certificate’ from a financial service provider.

Small business employers may choose to make a statutory declaration instead.

Legacy employers have been given access to modified directions and agreements and have extra notice and consultation requirements. Any existing on 27 September 2020 will need to be reissued or new arrangements made. They may not request an employee to work less than 2 hours per day or less than 60% of their ordinary hours as at 1 March 2020.

The By Lawyers example content letters provide for legacy employers.

The Fair Work Commission has the power to deal with disputes relating to legacy employers and satisfaction of the 10% decline in turnover test.

More information on Jobkeeper extension

The JobKeeper section of the By Lawyers Dealing with COVID-19 Legal Issues – Some practical information commentary has been updated. A link to this helpful resource is available at the top of the matter plan in every By Lawyers guide.

Connect with us