ByLawyers News and Updates

Letter of offer – FED

by

Two new Letter of offer precedents have been added to the By Lawyers Employment Law guide.

Letters of offer can be used to create an employment relationship between employer and employee when a full employment agreement is not required. These precedent letters set out the terms and conditions upon which the employment position is offered. The use of an optional schedule allows greater detail of the position description and the employee’s duties and responsibilities to be added if it is considered necessary.

The employee signs and returns a copy of the letter to confirm their acceptance of the position and the terms of employment.

One of the new precedents is for general use, the other is specific to employing apprentices.

The apprentice version extends the employee’s responsibilities to attending and undertaking the necessary training for completion of their apprenticeship. It also includes reference to the relevant requirements such as:

  • training contracts with an Australian Apprenticeship Support Network Provider;
  • specific state-based apprentice training legislation;
  • registered training organisations, such as TAFE;
  • training plans;
  • training records.

The apprentice version of the precedent also provides for the employee’s employment to terminate upon completion, cessation or transfer of the apprenticeship.

These new precedents Letter of offer and Letter of offer for an apprentice have been added to the matter plan in the Acting for Employer sub-folder under Folder B. Employment agreements.

By Lawyers comprehensive employment agreement precedents are also available in Folder B. for use when clients require a more detailed and flexible document. These precedents include:

  • Standard individual employment agreement;
  • Casual employment agreement; and
  • Executive employment agreement.

The new precedents have been added by our employment law author following a subscriber request. By Lawyers loves to receive feedback from our users – don’t hesitate to contact us if there are precedents you need.

Visa subclasses – FED

by

There have been changes to a number of visa subclasses. These changes create new conditions and affect the expiration dates and cancellation grounds across various visa subclasses.

The Migration Amendment (2022 Measures No. 2) Regulations 2022 introduce the following three migration law changes.

  1. Visa holders in the 482 temporary skill shortage visa subclass can apply for a further 482 visa without leaving Australia. Applicants must have been in Australia between 1 February 2020 and 14 December 2021, when international borders were shut. This only applies to 482 visas in the short-term stream. Applicants will be able to make a further 482 visa application onshore from 1 July 2022 to 1 July 2023.
  2. Holders of skilled graduate visa subclass 476 who were affected by the COVID-19 pandemic have now had their visas extended to 14 April 2024. The extension commenced retrospectively on 31 January 2022, and includes secondary visa holders.
  3. Tourists who hold an Electronic Travel Authority eligible passport can now apply for a tourist visa subclass 601 through the new Australian ETA digital app, in addition to the existing Electronic Travel Authority website.

The Migration Amendment (Protecting Australia’s Critical Technology) Regulations 2022 introduces concepts of public interest criterion in granting and cancelling visas. These changes impact student visa subclass 500, and a postgraduate research course will satisfy the public interest criterion. However, the Minister may cancel any visa class where there is an unreasonable risk of any unwanted transfer of critical technology by a visa holder.

The By Lawyers Immigration commentary for both LEAP and website subscribers has been updated with these amendments. The commentary summarises the new conditions and dates for each affected visa subclass neatly within existing coverage of those visa subclasses.

Meetings and documents – FED

by

COVID-related changes which affected the way companies deal with meetings and documents have been made permanent.

Companies and registered management investment schemes are now permanently able to use technology to hold meetings and execute documents under the Corporations Act 2001.

The Corporations Amendment (Meeting and Documents) Act 2022 makes permanent the previous COVID-related changes in the Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Act 2021.

Meetings

A company can choose to hold a meeting:

  • in one or more physical locations;
  • as a hybrid at one or more physical locations and using technology;
  • virtually, if expressly permitted by the company’s constitution.

Members are to be provided with a reasonable opportunity to participate in meetings s 249S. Appropriate notice and provision of sufficient technology for members to participate and vote is required.

Documents

At least once each financial year members may elect to receive documents either electronically or in paper form. A member can request not to be sent any document prescribed in the regulations. The company is required to make notices available on a website and take reasonable steps to provide the member with any requested documents.

The following documents may be provided by the company in electronic or physical form:

  • notices of meetings;
  • resolutions;
  • matters to be considered at a meeting; and
  • minute books.

Execution

Corporate documents can be signed and executed electronically, with company signatories no longer required to sign the document in the presence of a witness physically.

A copy or counterpart of the document can be signed instead of the original therefore split execution is permitted.

Where there is a sole director, but no company secretary, a document is validly executed if:

  • the sole director signs the document; or
  • the sole director witnesses the fixing of the seal.

Where the new rules are followed people dealing with companies are entitled to assume that a document is validly executed.

The permanent changes apply to documents sent and meetings held on or after 1 April 2022.

The By Lawyers Companies guide has been updated to reflect these changes in the way companies may deal with meetings and documents.

Employee or independent contractor – FED

by

A new section Employee or independent contractor has been added to 101 Employment Law Answers summarising and providing links to these important recent cases:

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 1; and

ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek [2022] HCA 2

These appeals from the full Court of the Federal Court both turned on the question of determining the workers’ status as employee or independent contractor and were heard together. The High Court held that where parties have comprehensively committed the terms of their relationship to a written contract, which is not challenged as a sham or otherwise ineffective under general law, the characterisation of the relationship as one of employment, or otherwise must proceed by reference to the rights and obligations of the parties under that contract.

Only where there is no written agreement, or the agreement is ineffective, will the traditional multi-factorial test be required to determine the nature and conditions of the parties relationship.

Whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor is important for a number reasons including:

  • vicarious liability – which generally extends to employees but not independent contractors;
  • workers compensation insurance – who is covered and who is responsible for obtaining it;
  • superannuation guarantee payments – whether they apply;
  • unfair dismissal claims – whether a worker has recourse;
  • taxation responsibilities – including whether PAYG tax is required to be deducted from worker payments;
  • long service leave and other leave entitlements – whether they apply;
  • availability of remedies for workers; and
  • the jurisdiction of tribunals.

See 101 Employment Law Answers in the Reference materials folder on the Employment Law matter plan, and the Employment Law commentary for more information.

Testamentary capacity checklist

by

A testamentary capacity checklist has been added to the matter plans in all By Lawyers will guides. This helpful precedent distills the critical information that practitioners must elicit to properly assess capacity. It is designed to assist lawyers both when taking instructions and when the will is being executed, whether in the office or at the client’s bedside.

Whether or not a client has testamentary capacity is not calculated via a legislated formula but derived from case law. It has been described as requiring time, situation, person, and task specific focus on a testator’s ability to remember, reflect, and reason.

The cases, starting from Banks v Goodfellow (1870) LR 5 QB 549 require a testator to understand:

  • what it means to be making a will;
  • the assets they have and are leaving to others;
  • the obligation owed to those who could make a claim on the estate; and
  • whether or not they are affected by a delusion that influences the disposal of their assets.

The Court determines testamentary capacity on the facts and circumstances of each case.

In Star v Miller [2021] NSWSC 426, the court said that, when taking instructions, it is prudent for lawyers to ascertain the client’s capacity and the possibility of undue influence by asking non-leading questions to determine the facts and circumstances of each case. The By Lawyers testamentary capacity checklist includes such questions.

In Ryan v Dalton; Estate of Ryan [2017] NSWSC 1007 at 107, the court suggests that where an elderly client is being cared for by someone or is residing in an aged care facility, it is prudent to ask both clients and their carers whether there is any reason to be concerned about capacity. The By Lawyers testamentary capacity checklist prompts for these inquiries to be made.

The checklist was suggested by one of our subscribers. We worked with our authors to draft a document that is as short and simple as possible but protects practitioners by covering all necessary considerations. The checklist should be used in conjunction with the By Lawyers Wills retainer instructions.

Pre-action procedures – SA

by

New precedents have been added to the Magistrates Court guides to assist practitioners to comply with the requirements for pre-action procedures in civil claims.

The options and requirements for pre-action procedures are set out clearly in Division 3 of Chapter 7 of the Uniform Civil Rules 2020.

The commentary in the By Lawyers SA Magistrates Court publications sets out these requirements and also deals with:

  • Alternatives to pre-action steps, involving the optional use of a Form P1 Final Notice, and Form P2 Enforceable Payment Agreement which sets
    out the money that the debtor owes and an agreed payment plan. These forms are available on the matter plans;
  • Pre-action steps for originating applications, including letters of demand and costs considerations;
  • Pre-action steps for minor civil claims, for which there is a simplified process.

The commentary also provides practical tips on taking instructions and giving advice about pre-action steps and letters of demand. This focuses on the overarching obligations that apply in all proceedings to parties and their representatives as set out in the rules. These are particularly pertinent to drafting letters of demand or pre-action claims.

New precedents

Two new precedents have been added to the Magistrates Court (SA) – Acting for the applicant matter plan:

  • Pre-action claim letter to respondent’s solicitor
  • Pre-action claim letter to respondent

Four new precedents have been added to the Magistrates Court (SA) – Acting for the respondent matter plan:

  • Pre-action response accepting offer
  • Pre-action third party notice
  • Letter serving pre-action response on other proposed respondents
  • Letter serving pre-action third party notice on applicant

These new precedents were prepared by our South Australian litigation author following a request from a subscriber. By Lawyers love to receive feedback from our users and often enhance our publications as a result. It is one of the ways we help lawyers enjoy practice more!

New By Lawyers platform coming soon!

by

New By Lawyers platform

The By Lawyers website and LEAP Companion Product is about to undergo several significant new improvements! We are excited to announce a new major release of our By Lawyers platform.

The new platform will be rolling out in February.

Apart from a bright new look with refreshed branding, the functionality of our content will improve dramatically. Our practical publications will be faster to access and easier to use, including a super-powered new search!

Using By Lawyers, over 4,000 Australian law firms already enjoy practice more with practical Matter Plans, Commentary, Precedents and Reference Materials, which contain active hyperlinks to relevant legislation and cases. By Lawyers publications assist every member of the firm to conduct matters and create value for the client.

Offline for a short while

To enable this upgrade there may be a short period during which you will not be able to access your By Lawyers subscription. We appreciate your patience. The upgrade will be done over a weekend to minimise any operational impacts.

Feedback is welcome

You know we love to hear from our subscribers about our content! Well that applies to our platform too. Once it is up and running, please let us know what you think of the new website and the LEAP Companion Product. As always, By Lawyers will listen and respond to all feedback from our users and strive for constant improvement. Its one of the ways we help you enjoy practice more.

 

1 January updates – All states

by

1 January updates are always a big focus for By Lawyers. While the profession takes a well-earned break By Lawyers remains hard at work ensuring our publications are updated for legislative and regulatory changes that take effect from the new year.

Updates

This year’s 1 January updates for relevant jurisdictions include:

Land tax

In New South Wales and Victoria, land tax is calculated for the calendar year. Threshold values increase annually.

In New South Wales, the 2022 threshold combined land value has increased to $822,000 for all liable land. Special trusts and non-concessional companies are excepted. A marginal tax rate of 1.6% of the aggregate taxable value above the tax-free threshold, plus $100 applies from 1 January. If the aggregate taxable value exceeds the premium rate threshold of $5,026,000 then $61,876 is payable, plus a marginal tax rate of 2% over that amount.

In Victoria, the tax-free threshold for general land tax has increased to $300,000. The trust surcharge threshold remains at $25,000.

All relevant commentary and precedents in the By Lawyers Conveyancing and Property and Trusts guides for each relevant state will be updated for these new threshold amounts from 1 January.

By Lawyers Contract of sale of land

The 2022 edition of the By Lawyers contract will be available 1 January in the Sale of real property publications for Victoria and New South Wales. The contract is located in the Contract folder on the matter plan.

Leases and subleases

In New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia the 2022 editions of lease and sub-lease precedents will be available from 1 January. these are found in the Leases – Act for Lessor section of each Leases publication.

Keeping up to date

In addition to our 1 January updates, By Lawyers updates our publications for 1 June and other regulated adjustments where necessary.

Of course we always update our content for relevant legislative amendments and other legal developments throughout the year, in all jurisdictions, as required.

Keeping up to date is one of the ways By Lawyers help our subscribers enjoy practice – and holidays – more!

The team at By Lawyers wishes everyone a prosperous and safe 2022.

Sexual harassment – FED

by

New provisions for the prevention of sexual harassment and bullying in the workplace have commenced.

Part 6-4B of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) now provides that workers can apply to the Fair Work Commission for orders to stop sexual harassment as well as workplace bullying. To be eligible to make an application a worker must be employed in a constitutionally-covered business.

There is no time limit for making an application for an order to stop bullying or sexual harassment at work. Section 789FF of the Fair Work Act 2009 provides that for the Fair Work Commission to be able to make an order there needs to be a risk that the applicant will continue to be bullied or sexually harassed at work. If the worker no longer has a connection to the workplace, an order cannot be made as there is no future risk of the relevant behaviour occurring.

‘Sexually harass’, for these purposes, has the same meaning as in s 28A of the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth).

Examples of sexual harassment include:

  • inappropriate behaviour including staring, leering, loitering or unwelcome touching;
  • suggestive comments, jokes or gestures based on sex or a person’s private life or body;
  • communicating sexually explicit material in person or electronically.

The objectionable conduct must occur at work, which is not defined but is tied to work activities wherever they occur and is not limited to the confines of a physical workplace. It includes entering, moving about and leaving a workplace.

The application needs to be lodged with the Fair Work Commission using the prescribed form: Application for an order to stop bullying or sexual harassment (or both).

The employer needs to respond within 7 days of being served using the prescribed form: Response from an employer or principal to an application for an order to stop bullying or sexual harassment (or both).

The alleged perpetrator will receive a copy of the application and be invited to respond within 7 days using the prescribed form: Response from a person named as having engaged in bullying or sexual harassment (or both).

All the prescribed forms are available in the Workplace bullying and sexual harassment folder on the matter plan in the By Lawyers Employment Law publication. The commentary has also been updated accordingly.

Disclosure – Family Law – FED

by

Rule 6.02 of the Family Law Rules 2021 provides that a party must file a written notice stating that they have read Parts 6.1 and 6.2 of the Rules and that they will comply with their disclosure obligations. This written notice is given in the Undertaking as to Disclosure form that each party is required to file before the first court date unless the court orders otherwise.

New precedent Enclosure – Parts 6.1 and 6.2 of the Family Law Rules 2021 conveniently sets out all of the rules in Parts 6.1 and 6.2 for the client’s ease of reference. Practitioners can give this enclosure to clients involved in parenting or financial proceedings when first instructing them, making it easy for practitioners to comply with the requirements under the rules to fully inform their clients.

The enclosure accompanies the Letter to client regarding duty of disclosure and can be found on the Property Settlement and Children matter plans directly under the Duty of disclosure brochure in the Pre-action procedures folder.

The By Lawyers Family law publication is up to date with all of the recent changes to the family law system after the merger of the two courts into the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.

Connect with us