ByLawyers News and Updates

Retirement Villages (NSW) – Amendments

by

Retirement Villages Amendment Act 2020

The Retirement Villages Amendment Act 2020 has introduced significant changes to exit entitlements, recurrent charges and has enhanced the rights and safeguards of registered interest holders.

Recognising that more than 60% of retirement village residents directly transition into aged care accommodation and that the average age of a person entering a retirement village is 75 and the average age of residents is 81 and more people will be moving into aged care accommodation, the Retirement Villages Amendment Act 2020 address the easing of the financing of the transition.

Most notably, the Act has amended the Retirement Villages Act 1999:

  • to enable the Secretary of the Department of Customer Services to make an order requiring an operator to pay a resident the amount the resident will be entitled to once their residential premises are sold – the exit entitlement – in circumstances where the resident has moved out or intends to move out, and the premises have not yet been sold.
  • To require an operator to pay part of the resident’s exit entitlement directly to an aged care facility in which the resident resides or proposes to reside as payment for accommodation in the facility, instead of paying the exit entitlement to the resident, in circumstances where the premises in the retirement village have not yet been sold.
  • To provide that a former resident of residential premises in a retirement village is not required to pay recurrent charges to the operator of the retirement village once 42 days have passed since the former resident permanently vacated the premises.

The By Lawyers Retirement Villages (NSW) Guide has been updated accordingly. This guide is available within the Conveyancing (NSW) publication.

Court books – All states

by

Court books are an indexed collection of all documents that the parties rely upon in proceedings, collated for convenience of use during a hearing. They are commonly used in all litigation matters and are compulsory in some courts, especially in specialist lists and on appeal.

A court book ordinarily includes all pleadings and evidence. It generally omits any irrelevant documents, even if they were disclosed in the proceedings. For example, a voluminous bundle of documents may have been produced under a subpoena issued by one of the parties in the lead-up to the hearing, but the party only seeks to rely on a few documents out of the bundle. The court book will contain the subpoena itself plus those relevant documents only.

A properly compiled and indexed court book allows solicitors, counsel and the bench to have a common reference point and easily navigate to relevant documents and issues as the hearing proceeds.

Two new precedents for creating court books have been added to every By Lawyers litigation guide in Australia.

The precedents Court book cover page and Court book index are customised for each court in each jurisdiction. They comply with each court’s requirements and will assist practitioners in compiling court books in all types of litigation.

 

HomeBuilder – FED

by

The Federal Government has announced an extension to the HomeBuilder scheme to 31 March 2021, however the grant amount has been reduced to $15,000. The $25,000 grant is still available, with amended eligibility criteria, for building contracts signed on or before 31 December 2020.

HomeBuilder $25,000 grant

For building contracts signed between 4 June 2020 and 31 December 2020, a $25,000 grant is available to certain individuals who build a new home or buy an off the plan home, or substantially renovate an existing home. The grant cannot be used to buy an existing house and is limited to Australian citizens earning less than $125,000 or couples earning less than $200,000.

The value of new builds is capped at $750,000. For renovations, the home must be worth less than $1.5 million before the renovation, and projects must cost between $150,000 and $750,000.

The building contract must be signed between 4 June 2020 and 31 December 2020, and work must commence within six months of the contract date.

Applications must be submitted by 14 April 2021.

HomeBuilder $15,000 grant

For building contracts signed between 1 January 2021 to 31 March 2021, a $15,000 grant is available to certain individuals who build a new home or buy an off the plan home, or substantially renovate an existing home. The grant cannot be used to buy an existing house and is limited to Australian citizens earning less than $125,000 or couples earning less than $200,000.

The value of new builds is capped at $950,000 for NSW, $850,000 for VIC and $750,000 for all other States and Territories. For renovations, the home must be worth less than $1.5 million before the renovation, and projects must cost between $150,000 and $750,000.

The building contract must be signed between 1 January 2021 and 31 March 2021, and work must commence within six months of the contract date.

Applications must be submitted by 14 April 2021.

State-based grants

On top of the HomeBuilder scheme, some states are offering related payments in addition to the Federal grant. See the relevant By Lawyers Conveyancing – Purchase Guide for further information and relevant application forms or links where applications are made online.

All By Lawyers Conveyancing – Purchase Retainer instructions precedents now also include these grant details.

Estates cases – NSW

by

New estates cases have been added to By Lawyers 101 Succession Answers (NSW) reference manual.

The new cases under the Estates section of the publication relate to:

Additional assets after grant

The administrator’s obligation to disclose is a continuous one. Any assets not disclosed in the initial affidavit must be disclosed to the court by way of further affidavit: r 78.91 Supreme Court Rules 1970. If an asset has come to light after the grant has been finalised, an Affidavit of Additional Assets needs to be filed.

If an updated copy of the grant is required, an Application for Exemplification also needs to be filed. An exemplification is a certified and sealed copy of a grant. The Inventory of Property does not need to be amended.

The Affidavit of Additional Assets and the Application for Exemplification are available in the By Lawyers Estates guide, on the Probate and Letters of Administration matter plans.

Vesting of interest in beneficiaries

A beneficiary can apply to the court to have their interest vest earlier than provided for in the will under the rule in Saunders v Vautier.

The High Court set out the modern formulation of the rule in Saunders v Vautier in CPT Custodian Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2005] HCA 53 at [47]:

Under the rule in Saunders v Vautier, an adult beneficiary (or a number of adult beneficiaries acting together) who has (or between them have) an absolute, vested and indefeasible interest in the capital and income of property may at any time require the transfer of the property to him (or them) and may terminate any accumulation.

In Beck v Henley [2014] NSWCA 201 the Court of appeal at [35] stated that:

Adult beneficiaries who are absolutely and indefeasibly entitled have power to “overbear and defeat the intention of a testator or settlor to subject property to the continuing trusts, powers and limitations of a will or trust instrument”.

A case where the rule was not upheld has been added –  Arnott v Kiss [2014] NSWSC 1385.

The addition of these new estates cases to 101 Succession Answers (NSW) is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

New succession cases – NSW

by

New succession cases have been added to the By Lawyers 101 Succession Answers (NSW) reference manual. These helpful recent cases fall under the Estates and Family provision claims sections of the publication.

Proof of death by inference

The Estate of Alan Bruce Beeby [2020] NSWSC 1512 concerned proof of death by inference. A court may declare a missing person dead, without a death certificate and before the seven-year period relating to the presumption of death is met. At [53] Hallen J explained:

…an inferred death is one where, although a body is not found or recovered, the death can be inferred from the surrounding circumstances, and where it can be inferred that it is more probable that the person has died, rather than that he, or she, is living.

Judicial advice for trustees

Re Perpetual Trustee Company Limited as a trustee for the Joseph Banington Davis Settlement [2020] NSWSC 1574 concerned the dual purpose of an application for judicial advice by an executor/trustee. Robb J at [72] noted that:

It is…not right to see a trustee’s application for judicial advice about whether to sue or defend proceedings as directed only to the personal protection of the trustee. Proceedings for judicial advice have another and no less important purpose of protecting the interests of the trust.

Intermeddling by executors

The Victorian case of Re Abat [2020] VSC 560 contains a discussion of when intermeddling in an estate might deprive an executor of the right to renounce. It should be read in conjunction with the NSW case of Mulray v Ogilvie [1987] 9 NSWLR 1 which is already in 101 Succession Answers.

Costs in Family provision claims

Shelly v Prager (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 1553 concerned the court assessing the overall justice of a case when determining whether special provision for costs should be made in a family provision claim. Williams J at [18] stated the following factors may be relevant:

– whether one party has engaged in unreasonable conduct in the commencement or maintenance of the proceedings which has resulted in the other party (or parties) to the proceeding incurring unnecessary costs;

– whether an applicant’s claim for provision out of an estate is frivolous, vexatious or made without reasonable prospects of success;

– whether an applicant’s claim, although unsuccessful, was otherwise reasonable, meritorious or borderline; and

– the relative size of the deceased estate.

The addition of these recent cases to 101 Succession Answers (NSW) is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

The Lighthouse Project – FED

by

The Lighthouse Project is a new family-violence and risk screening initiative that will run in both the Family Court and the Federal Circuit Court for parenting matters. The legislative framework is provided by the recent Family Law Amendment (Risk Screening Protections) Act 2020.

The project will be initially available in the Adelaide, Brisbane and Parramatta registries of the courts. It is scheduled to commence before the end of 2020.

The Lighthouse Project includes:

  • early risk screening through a secure online platform;
  • early identification and management of safety concerns; and
  • assessment and triage of cases by a specialised team, who will provide resources and safe and suitable case management.

All cases identified as high-risk following the screening process will be referred to a dedicated list in the court. The specialist list will be known as the Evatt List. This will be a judge-managed list which will focus on early information gathering and intervention through a judge-led, dedicated support team in appropriate cases.

Both courts have a dedicated page on their websites with information about the Lighthouse Project.

The By Lawyers Family Law Children publication has been updated accordingly. Information on The Lighthouse Project has been included under Pre-Action procedures in the full commentary and on the matter plan. Practitioners are also reminded of the related information on family violence and cross-examination of parties, in the Going to court folders.

101 Costs Answers – ALL STATES

by

101 Costs Answers is the latest addition to the By Lawyers ‘101’ series of helpful reference materials.

Located in the Reference materials folder on every By Lawyers matter plan, this publication contains valuable commentary and precedents on all aspects of legal costs.

The precedents include all of the By Lawyers costs agreements/client services agreements and costs disclosures, drawn together from all By Lawyers publications into a convenient single publication.

The By Lawyers costs agreements are compliant with the strict requirements of the various state laws. They cater for all areas of law, with detailed recitals of the scope of work usually undertaken in each type of matter. This not only defines the retainer but makes it easy for practitioners to produce documents quickly upon engagement.

The 101 Costs Answers commentary includes:

Disclosure requirements

The commentary helps practitioners to navigate some of the more complicated disclosure requirements including regulated costs and the specific obligations for different types of litigation matters. The effect of non-disclosure is also covered.

Disbursements

Commentary on defining and recovering disbursements includes relevant case law and examples. The By Lawyers costs agreements are drafted to clearly identify usual disbursements.

Counsel’s fees

The commentary deals with the contractual relationship between solicitors and barristers as well as disclosure requirements. With the solicitor responsible for payment of counsel’s fees regardless of the solicitor’s agreement with the client, the By Lawyers costs agreements include counsel’s fees as specific disbursements which the client is obliged to pay.

Debt recovery

Where debt recovery is necessary, 101 Costs Answers contains letters of demand and example pleadings to assist with the recovery of costs. There is also detailed commentary on costs assessment procedures and the relevant forms for each state are available on the matter plan.

Like all By Lawyers publications, 101 Costs Answers contains interactive links to relevant legislation and cases, which are always kept updated.

Non-disclosure – All states

by

Non-disclosure agreements and clauses have been added to all By Lawyers guides. These precedents augment the existing Confidentiality Deed and clauses in the Folder of Blank Deeds, Agreements and Statutory Declarations in Folder A. Getting the matter underway on every By Lawyers matter plan.

In general, non-disclosure is passive and unilateral, whereas confidentiality is active and bipartite. The former generally requires a party simply not to reveal or release confidential information, whereas the latter requires a party to take positive steps to keep information secret and safe.

There are also other distinctions to be drawn when dealing with confidential information. Sometimes only one party is to provide confidential information to the other. In other cases, two or more parties propose to exchange it. Sometimes the parties wish only to protect the contents of their agreement, whereas sometimes they wish to protect other specific information relevant to their decision to enter into the agreement, or relevant to the subject matter of the agreement.

The various By Lawyers deeds and agreements and precedent clauses have been revised and enhanced to encompass these distinctions.

The commentary on Deeds and agreements in the Folder of Blank Deeds, Agreements and Statutory Declarations has also been enhanced to cover these points.

Apart from the precedents available in the Folder of Blank Deeds, Agreements and Statutory Declarations, relevant precedents relating to non-disclosure and confidentiality are also located in various guides as required.

Adding these non-disclosure agreements and clauses, and revising the existing confidentiality deeds and clauses, is part of By Lawyers continual commitment to the expansion and enhancement of our content.

Amended precedents:

Deed for general use

Agreement for general use

Confidentiality deed

Confidentiality clause for defined information – All parties

Confidentiality clause for defined information – One party

New precedents:

Non-disclosure agreements – Informal

Non-disclosure agreement – Formal

Confidentiality clause for terms of agreement – All parties

Confidentiality clause for terms of agreement – One party

Motor Vehicle Accidents – NSW

by

The Costs section in the By Lawyers Motor Vehicle Accidents From 1 December 2017  guide has been reviewed and enhanced.

The By Lawyers NSW Motor Vehicle Accident publication contains two separate guides – one for motor vehicle accidents which occurred before 1 December 2017, another for motor vehicle accidents which occurred from that date. This reflects the two separate statutory schemes which apply.

The Costs section of the matter plan and commentary has been re-organised with new sub-headings for improved searchability and additional content. Enhancements include:

  • Restrictions on costs generally clarified and emphasised, given their significance to practitioners for claims under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017;
  • Costs in statutory benefits claims – maximum allowances for work relating to each of the three types of disputes in statutory benefits claims – merit, medical and miscellaneous;
  • Costs in common law claims – the allowable costs for common law claims divided into stages of the matter now listed in the commentary;
  • Contracting out of the maximum costs provisions, with commentary on the restrictions that apply;
  • Addition of the recent case AAI Limited trading as GIO v Moon [2020] NSWSC 714 on the ability of the Dispute Resolution Service to award costs above the maximum in certain cases;
  • Payment – how a practitioner submits a tax invoice to the insurer; and
  • Costs disclosure to SIRA – lawyers representing claimants are required to provide SIRA with a breakdown of the costs charged to the client at the end of the matter.

This review is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

District Court litigation – NSW

by

The By Lawyers District Court Litigation publication has been revised following the Court’s re-issue of Practice Note DC (Civil) No. 1. The revised practice note commenced on 31 August 2020.

The revision of this critical practice note also provided the opportunity for an author review of the District Court litigation publication, with resulting enhancement.

Both the Acting for the Defendant – District Court Civil (NSW) and Acting for the Plaintiff – District Court Civil (NSW) Guides have been reviewed. The matter plan is re-ordered and the procedural requirements of the practice note are further emphasised.

In addition, a new precedent Letter to client enclosing Practice Note DC (Civil) No. 1, has been added to each guide. The new precedent assists practitioners in complying with the court’s disclosure requirements. 

This review and the addition of the new precedent is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Connect with us