ByLawyers News and Updates

1 July updates – All states

by

1 July updates are a big focus for By Lawyers. This is because many Commonwealth and state legislative instruments provide for the scheduled indexing of relevant monetary amounts and for adjustments – usually increases – in government fees and charges. Those regular updates occur every year and have an impact on many different areas of law and therefore on numerous By Lawyers publications.

These updates can include court filing fees, lodgement fees for property dealings, land tax thresholds, minimum weekly compensation amounts for Workers Compensation, and penalty units for fines for various criminal offences and civil penalty provisions.

By Lawyers always monitor and action these changes for our subscribers. Each year we ensure that our publications are amended where necessary to reflect 1 July updates.

We also monitor and update for similar legislative indexing and increases which occur regularly at other times of the year. These include 1 January changes and also other specific dates for various areas of law as prescribed by some statutes.

The 1 July updates have been applied this year, or are in the process of being applied as they get released, to the following By Lawyers publications:

  • Conveyancing and Property;
  • Business and Franchise;
  • Criminal;
  • Litigation;
  • Estates;
  • Injuries; and
  • Employment.

Quite separately, there is also usually a raft of new and amending legislation, from both Commonwealth and state parliaments, which is set to commence on 1 July. This year is no different in that regard. By Lawyers have made various substantive amendments to a number of publications to account for the commencement of such legislation. Please see the various other Obiter posts dealing with those updates.

By Lawyers always keep our content – and our subscribers – up to date!

Defamation reforms – All states

by

The By Lawyers Defamation and protecting reputation guide has been substantially reviewed and updated. This review is related to the current and imminent defamation reforms to the various laws around the country.

Practitioners may be aware of the long-heralded and substantial reforms to the uniform defamation law, following approval at COAG in 2020. As the uniform law is not Commonwealth legislation, but depends on the various state and territory Defamation Acts, implementing the reforms requires each state to pass amendments to its own Act.

So far only some states have passed their legislation, with some including NSW, VIC, QLD, SA and ACT to commence from 1 July 2021. The other states and territories are expected to follow soon. However, the result is that for the first time since 2005 – and for an indeterminate but hopefully brief period – Australia does not have uniform defamation laws. Rather, there are different laws in different states.

The By Lawyers Defamation and protecting reputation publication is being updated on an interim and graduated basis for these amendments. The publication will be finally updated when the defamation reforms become law in all states and territories.

The key aspects of the current amendments are:

  • a new ‘serious harm’ requirement;
  • new defences, including a new ‘public interest’ defence;
  • amendments to the way some damages for reputational harm are capped;
  • new limitation periods taking account of the fact content remains online for years.

There is also a second round of defamation reform currently under consideration. The main focus of these reforms is the liability of social media companies for defamation. Further updates to the By Lawyers Defamation and protecting reputation publication will occur when the proposed reforms are enacted.

As a precursor to these reforms, By Lawyers has been working with our author Peter Breen to revise and streamline our publication. Users will find that the matter plan now provides the usual, practical By Lawyers guidance to conducting a matter, with the relevant commentary, precedents and example content in sequential order. The commentary is adapted from Peter’s book Defamation and protecting reputation which is reproduced in its entirety in the ‘Reference materials’ folder on the matter plan in the By Lawyers guide.

The detail of the current reforms is explained in the publication.

Drink and drug driving – NSW

by

There is a new category of traffic offence in NSW of combined drink and drug driving. The Road Transport Legislation Amendment (Drink and Drug Driving Offences) Act 2021 commenced on 28 June 2021.

It has long been an offence for a person to drive with drugs in their oral fluid, blood or urine. Likewise, the offence of driving with the prescribed concentration of alcohol in the breath or bloodstream. The new category of offences relates to driving with the presence of both a prescribed illicit drug in a person’s oral fluid, blood or urine and the prescribed concentration of alcohol in a person’s breath or blood.

Note that a person cannot, in relation to the same conduct, be convicted of both an existing offence of either drink or drug driving and also the new combined offence. However, a person can still be convicted of drink or drug driving where the combined offence is not proven.

The commentary in the By Lawyers NSW Traffic offences guide has been updated accordingly. New precedents have also been added to the Library of initial letters to the client as follows:

  • Initial letter to client – Alcohol and drug driving middle range – First offence
  • Initial letter to client – Alcohol and drug driving middle range – Second offence
  • Initial letter to client – Alcohol and drug driving high range – First offence
  • Initial letter to client – Alcohol and drug driving high range – Second offence
  • Initial letter to client – Second offence of combined alcohol and drug offence

Like all of the initial letters to client in the By Lawyers criminal law guides, these new precedent letters set out the penalties and sentencing options for the new offences of combined drink driving and drug driving. These letters make it easy for practitioners to quickly and accurately confirm their advice on penalties to clients charged with traffic offences at the point of engagement.

There are also relevant amendments to the Retainer instructions – Traffic offences.

COVID signing provisions – QLD

by

From 1 July 2021, some of the COVID signing provisions applicable in Queensland during the pandemic will cease.

The Justice Legislation (COVID-19 Emergency Response– Documents and Oaths) Amendment Regulation (No.2) 2021 means that from 1 July any ‘enduring’ documents – wills, enduring powers of attorney, and advance health directives – to be signed by a signatory or substitute signatory need to be made, signed and witnessed under the ordinary law.

One remaining exception is the modified COVID signing provisions that enable nursing practitioners, in addition to doctors, to complete a certificate in an advance health directive stating that the signatory appeared to have the necessary capacity to make it.

This regulation also does not affect the modified arrangements under the Justice Legislation (COVID-19 Emergency Response—Documents and Oaths) Regulation 2020 in relation to the making, signing and witnessing of affidavits, statutory declarations, oaths, deeds, particular mortgages and general powers of attorney under the documents regulation. These measures are currently scheduled to expire on 30 September 2021.

The By Lawyers dedicated Dealing with COVID-19 legal issues commentary will be updated. This guide, accessed via a link at the top of every By Lawyers matter plan, provides practitioners with helpful information about all relevant COVID signing provisions and other important temporary COVID measures.

See the By Lawyers Wills, Powers of Attorney & Advance Health Directives and Mortgages publications for more information. See also the folder of Blank deeds, agreements, statutory declarations and execution clauses in folder A. Getting the matter underway folder on the matter plan in every By Lawyers publication.

Statutory demand – FED

by

The minimum amount for issue of a statutory demand increases from 1 July 2021.

The Corporations Amendment (Statutory Minimum) Regulations 2021 permanently increases the amount at which a creditor can issue a statutory demand to a company. This ‘statutory minimum’ will be increased from $2,000 to $4,000.

The By Lawyers Insolvency – Company liquidation Guide has been updated with an Alert, to assist practitioners who may be advising clients about their debt recovery options and need to consider the forthcoming increase. The commentary will be amended accordingly in due course.

A statutory demand, under s 459E of the Corporations Act 2001, for a company to pay a debt due and owing, can be a precursor to an application for winding up the company, relying upon non-compliance with the demand to establish a presumption of insolvency. The demand may be contested on the grounds of a genuine dispute about the debt, given that the demand does not need to be based upon a judgment.

County Court Civil – VIC

by

The By Lawyers County Court Civil (VIC) publication has been updated.

This update reflects recent amendments to the Court’s practice notes in the Common Law Division issued by Her Honour Judge Tsalamandris, the Head of the Common Law Division. The links to the practice notes within the Acting for the plaintiff and the Acting for the defendant commentaries have now been updated.

Practice notes provide practitioners with information and direction on the court’s practice and procedures. They particularly explain how matters are conducted in the court’s specialist lists. As all By Lawyers litigation guides emphasise, it is important that practitioners have a sound understanding of the practice notes relevant to any proceedings they propose to commence for a client, or which are already on foot.

The Common Law Division Practice Note applies to all proceedings in the Common Law Division.

In addition, there are practice notes giving instruction on the conduct of cases in specific lists, such as the following which are the subject of the recent updates:

Procedures vary between courts, divisions and specialist lists. Compliance with practice notes is important for timely and efficient case management and will prevent unnecessary applications, save time and avoid the risk of adverse costs orders. The ‘Case management and direction’ sections of the commentaries in all By Lawyers litigation guides provides a valuable resource.

This update to the County Court Civil guides is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to keeping our content current and helping  our subscribers enjoy practice more.

First responders – QLD

by

Workers compensation claims by certain workers, first responders, as defined in the Act, have been streamlined. The onus of proof for certain psychological injury claims has been reversed.

Any valid diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) will now be taken to be an injury for the purposes of the Act. There is an assumption that any such injury was caused by the applicant’s work, with the onus then upon the employer/insurer to show otherwise if they consider it appropriate to do so.

‘First responders’ are workers such as police and other emergency service personnel whose…employment requires the person to respond to incidents… that are life-threatening or otherwise traumatic… and for which time may be critical to prevent actual or potential death or injury to persons, or to prevent or minimise damage to property or the environment.

The definition extends to certain volunteers and other eligible employees, as defined in the Act, such as those whose work requires them to deal with certain traumatic material, or be involved in certain traumatic incidents such as dealing with human remains, investigating child sexual abuse, dealing with serious violence or viewing graphic details of such things.

See: Chapter 1, part 4, division 6, subdivision 3BA of the Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003.

The commentary in the By Lawyers Workers Compensation (QLD) publication has been updated. There are also new and amended precedents, including an Initial letter to client – First responder with PTSD and a corresponding amendment to the Retainer instructions to prompt for relevant details when interviewing such a client.

Remote execution of powers – VIC

by

Victoria has introduced a permanent procedure for remote execution of powers of attorney, revocations and supportive attorney appointments.

The procedure arises from the temporary COVID-19 related remote execution and witnessing laws, that are now repealed.

The procedure requires:

  1. A special witness, who can be an Australian legal practitioner or justice of the peace;
  2. All steps of the procedure to be completed on the same day and within Victoria;
  3. The principal to sign – or direct someone to sign the instrument on their behalf, with that direction being heard by the witnesses – with all witnesses seeing the signature by audio visual link, or a combination of physical presence and audio visual link;
  4. The special witness to be the last person to witness;
  5. The document to be emailed to any witness attending by audio visual link, who must:
    • be reasonably satisfied that the document is the same document they witnessed the principal sign;
    • certify that they witnessed the document by audio visual link in accordance with the procedure;
    • sign the document, with the principal and other witnesses seeing them to do via audio visual link; and
    • in the case of the special witness, certify the document was signed and witnessed in accordance with the procedure, certify that they are a special witness and the type of special witness they are and note whether there is a recording of the process.

The By Lawyers Powers and advance care directives (Vic) guide has been updated accordingly for the new procedures on remote execution of powers. For LEAP users Power of Attorney forms have been updated as noted in the LEAP forms blog.

Remote execution of wills – VIC

by

Victoria has introduced a permanent procedure for remote execution of wills.

The procedure arises from the temporary COVID-19 related remote execution and witnessing laws, that are now repealed.

The remote execution of wills requires:

  1. A special witness, who can be an Australian legal practitioner or justice of the peace;
  2. All steps of the procedure to be completed on the same day and within Victoria;
  3. The testator to sign the will – or to direct someone to sign the will on their behalf, with that direction being heard by the witnesses – with all witnesses seeing the signature by audio visual link, or a combination of physical presence and audio visual link;
  4. The special witness to be the last person to witness the will;
  5. The will to be emailed to any witness attending by audio visual link, who must:
    • be reasonably satisfied that the will is the same document they witnessed the testator sign;
    • ensure that there is a statement on the will noting that the witness witnessed the will being signed by audio visual link in accordance with the procedure;
    • sign the will, with the testator clearly seeing them do so by audio visual link; and
    • in the case of the special witness, check to ensure the will complies with the remote execution procedure and also ensure there is a statement on the will noting that the will was witnessed in accordance with the procedure and that they are a special witness and note whether there is a recording of the remote execution process.

The procedure for remote execution of wills also applies to revoking or altering an existing will.

The By Lawyers Wills (Vic) guide has been updated accordingly. This includes the addition of two new jurat clause precedents to the matter plan: Remote execution procedure – Witness and Remote execution procedure – Special witness.

Casual employment – FED

by

Recent amendments to the Fair Work Act

There is a new statutory definition of ‘casual employee’ from 27 March 2021. There is also an expanded statutory pathway for regular casual employees to convert their employment status to full time. Employers now have an obligation to offer permanent employment in certain circumstances.

Some relief has been granted to employers for underpayment claims from employees incorrectly classified as casual. This addresses instances of ‘double dipping’.

The Fair Work Amendment (Supporting Australia’s Jobs and Economic Recovery) Act 2021 has introduced significant amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 including:

Statutory definition

Section 15A provides that a person is a casual employee if they have been offered and have accepted employment on the basis that the employer gave ‘no firm advance commitment to continuing and indefinite work according to an agreed pattern…’.

Conversion to permanent employment

Additionally, for casual employees who fall outside the modern award framework there is a statutory obligation for employers to offer conversion to full or part-time employment, unless there are reasonable business grounds not to do so. This does not apply to small business employers.

Casual Employment Information Statement

Employers must provide casual employees with a Casual Employment Information Statement, before, or as soon as practicable after, they start their employment. This is additional to the Fair Work Information Statement.

Off-setting casual loading to prevent ‘double-dipping’

Employers are provided with relief for underpayment claims from employees incorrectly classified as casual.

Regular casual employee

The previous definition of ‘long term casual’ is replaced with ‘regular casual employee’. The definition relates to the element of employment on a regular and systematic basis, but without any specific time requirement.

By Lawyers keeps you up to date

For further details see the By Lawyers Employment Law publication which has been updated accordingly.

Connect with us