ByLawyers News and Updates

AI prompts – ALL states

by

AI prompts are transforming legal document drafting. Technical precision in prompting artificial intelligence can significantly improve the utility and credibility of its output, especially when the AI draws exclusively from data contained in client matters and not from outside sources.

A well-drafted AI prompt acts like a clear direction from a senior lawyer to a junior about how to prepare a document. It sets precise parameters for the task, identifies the required information and where it must be drawn from, specifies the document’s form and any legal or procedural rules with which it must comply, and forbids the use of external or unauthorised sources, including invention – or in AI’s case, hallucination.

The outcome of using an AI prompt in a matter that contains sufficient reliable data should be a competent first draft of a document that the lawyer can then refine and perfect, either with or without further input from AI.

Even if sufficient data is not available in the matter to satisfy the prompt’s requirements for the document, the AI will identify the missing data the lawyer needs to obtain via instructions or other means.

By Lawyers is pleased to introduce AI prompts to our publications, helping our subscribers harness the power of LEAP’s Matter AI.

Initially, prompts for letters, affidavits, statutory declarations, and briefs to counsel are being added to the following guides:

  • Sale and Purchase of Real Estate – All states;
  • Mortgages – NSW;
  • Family Provision Claims – QLD;
  • Family Provision Claims – VIC;
  • Probate and Letters of Administration – VIC;
  • Family Law – Divorce, Children, and Property Settlement – FED;
  • Personal Injury – VIC; and
  • Transport Accident Commission Claims – VIC.

By Lawyers will continue adding AI prompts to our publications as part of our regular and ongoing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Like all By Lawyers precedents, AI prompts will be updated as required for any changes in the law and practice.

We welcome feedback and suggestions from our subscribers about AI prompts.

Succession – SA

by

New court rules and practice notes are in effect to reflect the Succession Act 2023 (SA) which extensively reframed South Australian succession law when it commenced on 1 January 2025.

Succession Act

The Succession Act consolidated and amended various legislation relating to:

  • wills;
  • probate and administration;
  • administration of deceased estates;
  • intestacy; and
  • family provision claims.

The Succession Act now contains all legislative provisions relating to those areas, having repealed the following existing Acts:

  • Administration and Probate Act 1919 (SA);
  • Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1972 (SA);
  • Wills Act 1936 (SA).

Succession rules and practice note changes

New and revised court rules for probate, administration, contested wills, and family provision matters have been released to reflect the new legislation.

The rules are contained in the new Chapter 25 – Probate – Supreme Court of the Uniform Civil Rules 2020.

The Supreme Court’s practice notes reflecting the new Act and rules are:

Key changes made by the revised court rules and practice notes include:

  • making the electronic filing of all probate applications and documents mandatory;
  • setting out detailed requirements for scanning and submitting documents;
  • proceedings under Chapter 25 are to be commenced by way of originating application except for:
    • applications for grants of probate or letters of administration;
    • amendments of grants;
    • revocation of grants;
  • required wording in an administrator’s oath when clearing off all persons having a prior entitlement to the grant and for the description of the administrator;
  • required description of assets and liabilities of an estate;
  • required wording to describe the caveator and the person warning the caveat; and
  • 50 new probate forms.

Legislative changes

The key changes under the new legislation include:

  • the right of certain classes of person to inspect a will of a deceased person;
  • the power of the Supreme Court to pass over applicants for a grant of probate or administration and appoint another person it considers appropriate;
  • the removal of the need for a grant to administer smaller estates;
  • additional court powers to hold executors and administrators to account;
  • codification of the application of assets to payment of debts and liabilities in solvent estates;
  • the increase to the preferential legacy for a surviving spouse of an intestate;
  • the addition of the children of first cousins of an intestate to the distribution on intestacy;
  • no entitlement of a spouse or domestic partner of an intestate to any part of an intestate’s estate if they are a party to:
    • a binding financial agreement; or
    • orders for distribution of property under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth);
  • primary consideration of the deceased’s wishes by the court when determining whether to make a family provision order; and
  • narrowing eligibility for family provision claims to:
    • exclude former partners and spouses when financial matters have already been settled;
    • require adult stepchildren to demonstrate they:
      • are disabled and vulnerable;
      • were genuinely dependent on the deceased;
      • cared for or maintained the deceased; or
      • contributed to the estate, or their parent substantially contributed to the estate;
    • require grandchildren to satisfy the court that:
      • their parents died before the deceased; or
      • they were wholly or partly maintained by the deceased.

Publication updates

The following By Lawyers publications have been updated for all these legislative, rules, and practice direction changes, with the new forms added to the matter plans as required:

Succession Act – SA

by

The Succession Act 2023 (SA) extensively reframes South Australian succession law.

The Act commences on 1 January 2025.

It consolidates and amends existing laws relating to:

  • wills;
  • probate and administration;
  • administration of deceased estates;
  • intestacy; and
  • family provision claims.

The Succession Act contains all legislative provisions, including new provisions, relating to those areas. The new Act repeals three existing Acts:

Revised court rules and practice directions for probate, administration, contested wills, and family provision matters will follow the commencement of the new Act.

Key provisions of the new legislation include:

  • the right of certain classes of person to inspect a will of a deceased person;
  • the power of the Supreme Court to pass over applicants for a grant of probate or administration and appoint another person it considers appropriate;
  • the removal of the need for a grant to administer smaller estates;
  • additional court powers to hold executors and administrators to account;
  • codification of the application of assets to payment of debts and liabilities in solvent estates;
  • the increase to the preferential legacy for a surviving spouse of an intestate;
  • the addition of the children of first cousins of an intestate to the distribution on intestacy;
  • no entitlement of a spouse or domestic partner of an intestate to any part of an intestate’s estate if they are a party to:
    • a binding financial agreement; or
    • orders for distribution of property under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth);
  • primary consideration of the deceased’s wishes by the court when determining whether to make a family provision order;
  • narrowing eligibility for family provision claims to:
    • exclude former partners and spouses when financial matters have already been settled;
    • require adult stepchildren to demonstrate they:
      • are disabled and vulnerable;
      • were genuinely dependent on the deceased;
      • cared for or maintained the deceased; or
      • contributed to the estate, or their parent substantially contributed to the estate;
    • require grandchildren to satisfy the court that:
      • their parents died before the deceased; or
      • they were wholly or partly maintained by the deceased.

The By Lawyers Wills (SA), Probate (SA), Letters of Administration (SA), and Family Provision Claims (SA) publications have been updated accordingly. Further updates will follow when the new court rules are available.

Excluded beneficiary – NSW

by

A recent Supreme Court case regarding an excluded beneficiary will be of interest to wills and estates practitioners. The court considered the effect of statements under s 100 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW).

Nikolaos Tsiokanis died in 2019, aged 86. His will appointed two of his children as the executors of his estate. He made only $100  provision for his other daughter. The deceased made a lengthy statement in the will as to his reasons for effectively excluding his daughter.

The daughter brought a family provision claim. The estate was not a large one.

The court held that the relationship the deceased had with the executors was a stable one and they played an important role in caring for the deceased. The court said the deceased was entitled to, and did, take the plaintiff’s behaviour into account and was satisfied that it justified the reduction of the plaintiff’s share in the estate to nominal provision.

The court also held that the deceased was entitled, when considering any claim by an excluded beneficiary, to consider the nature and value of his estate and to consider, and give priority to, the competing claim of each of the executors with whom he had a close, loving, and supportive relationship.

The court noted that statements made by the deceased are admissible pursuant to s 100(2) of the Succession Act, however the court is not required to accept, unquestioningly, the truth, or accuracy, of the statements. This is particularly so if the content is denied by the applicant, or where there is other evidence that casts doubt upon their accuracy. The court needs to consider that the deceased may have made untrue, or inaccurate, statements, either deliberately, or unintentionally, or it may be that their view is misconceived.

Where evidence of a statement of a deceased is admitted under s 100(9), for the purpose of destroying, or supporting, the credibility of the deceased, s 100(10) permits evidence to be given for the purpose of showing that the deceased’s statement is inconsistent with another statement made, at any time, by the deceased.

Georgopoulos v Tsiokanis & Anor [2022] NSWSC 563 (11 May 2022) will be added to the By Lawyers 101 Succession Answers publication.

Family provision cases – VIC

by

Changes have been made to the way family provision cases are managed in the Supreme Court of Victoria.

The latest version of Practice Note SC CL 7 (Second revision) provides guidance on how proceedings in the Testators Family Maintenance List are managed by the court.

Family provision claims made under Part IV of the Administration and Probate Act 1958 are commenced in the Testator’s Family Maintenance List, in accordance with Order 16 of the Supreme Court (Miscellaneous Civil Proceedings) Rules 2018.

The main procedural changes for management of family provision cases from the previous version of the practice note are:

  • an increase in the threshold above which a provision statement, rather than an affidavit, is required to be filed – this will now apply to estates with a valuation of less than $1,00,000 rather than $750,000;
  • introduction of a requirement for the parties to attend at the first directions hearing unless they are otherwise advised by the court;
  • in some circumstances, where position statements or affidavits result in the judge hearing oral evidence, the costs of preparing and responding to position statements and affidavits may be ordered separately to the costs of the overall proceedings;
  • an increase in the threshold below which the court may refer the proceeding to mediation before a judge or a Specified Court Officer, from estates under $750,000 to estates under $1,000,000;
  • communication about proceedings in the list can now be made to the Testator’s Family Maintenance Coordinator via email: tfm@supcourt.vic.gov.au.

Links in the commentary in the By Lawyers Family Provision Claims (VIC) publication have been updated to the new version of the practice note.

Family Property List – VIC

by

New commentary and a link to the VIC County Court Family Property List practice note has been added to the By Lawyers Family Provision Claims guides for Victoria. This applies to both Acting for the plaintiff and Acting for the estate.

The commentary focuses mainly on the Supreme Court where most applications are filed, but the new section suggests that consideration should always be given to whether the plaintiff’s claim is more appropriately filed in the County Court. There is no monetary limit on the County Court’s jurisdiction.

Paragraph 1.3 of the County Court’s Family Property List practice note sets out the factors which make a case suitable for the County Court.

The decision as to which court any proceedings should be commenced in may involve consideration of the obligations upon parties and their legal representatives under Chapter 2 of the Civil Procedure Act 2010 – the ‘overarching obligations’.

If the plaintiff’s decision to file in the Supreme Court is based on a reasonable assessment that the factors in paragraph 1.3 of the Family Property List practice note do not apply it would be very hard to argue that a party, or their lawyer, was in breach of their obligations under Chapter 2 of the Civil Procedure Act 2010 by filing there. However, conversely, a decision by the plaintiff to file in the Supreme Court where those factors do apply might enliven the exercise of the court’s discretionary powers under Part 2.4 of the Act, including as to costs.

These important considerations are now covered in the commentary to assist practitioners, whether acting for a claimant or an estate.

Additionally, the Retainer Instructions have been amended to prompt for this consideration and a new precedent letter has been added to the Acting for the Defendant matter plan. This letter can be used to put the plaintiff’s solicitor on notice when the defendant considers the proceedings have been inappropriately filed in the Supreme Court rather than the County Court.

New succession cases – QLD

by

New succession cases have been added to the By Lawyers 101 Succession Answers (QLD) reference manual. These helpful recent cases fall under the Estates and Family provision claims sections of the publication.

Costs in Family provision claims

Shelly v Prager (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 1553 concerned the court assessing the overall justice of a case when determining whether special provision for costs should be made in a family provision claim. Williams J at [18] stated the following factors may be relevant:

– whether one party has engaged in unreasonable conduct in the commencement or maintenance of the proceedings which has resulted in the other party (or parties) to the proceeding incurring unnecessary costs;

– whether an applicant’s claim for provision out of an estate is frivolous, vexatious or made without reasonable prospects of success;

– whether an applicant’s claim, although unsuccessful, was otherwise reasonable, meritorious or borderline; and

– the relative size of the deceased estate.

Judicial advice for trustees

Re Perpetual Trustee Company Limited as a trustee for the Joseph Banington Davis Settlement [2020] NSWSC 1574 concerned the dual purpose of an application for judicial advice by an executor/ trustee. Robb J at [72] noted that:

It is…not right to see a trustee’s application for judicial advice about whether to sue or defend proceedings as directed only to the personal protection of the trustee. Proceedings for judicial advice have another and no less important purpose of protecting the interests of the trust.

The addition of these recent cases to 101 Succession Answers (QLD) is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

New succession cases – VIC

by

New succession cases have been added to the By Lawyers 101 Succession Answers (VIC) reference manual. These helpful recent cases fall under the Estates and Family provisions claims sections of the publication.

Costs in Family provision claims

Shelly v Prager (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 1553 concerned the court assessing the overall justice of a case when determining whether special provision for costs should be made in a family provision claim. Williams J at [18] stated the following factors may be relevant:

– whether one party has engaged in unreasonable conduct in the commencement or maintenance of the proceedings which has resulted in the other party (or parties) to the proceeding incurring unnecessary costs;

– whether an applicant’s claim for provision out of an estate is frivolous, vexatious or made without reasonable prospects of success;

– whether an applicant’s claim, although unsuccessful, was otherwise reasonable, meritorious or borderline; and

– the relative size of the deceased estate.

Judicial advice for trustees

Re Perpetual Trustee Company Limited as a trustee for the Joseph Banington Davis Settlement [2020] NSWSC 1574 concerned the dual purpose of an application for judicial advice by an executor/trustee. Robb J at [72] noted that:

It is…not right to see a trustee’s application for judicial advice about whether to sue or defend proceedings as directed only to the personal protection of the trustee. Proceedings for judicial advice have another and no less important purpose of protecting the interests of the trust.

The addition of these recent cases to 101 Succession Answers (VIC) is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

New succession cases – NSW

by

New succession cases have been added to the By Lawyers 101 Succession Answers (NSW) reference manual. These helpful recent cases fall under the Estates and Family provision claims sections of the publication.

Proof of death by inference

The Estate of Alan Bruce Beeby [2020] NSWSC 1512 concerned proof of death by inference. A court may declare a missing person dead, without a death certificate and before the seven-year period relating to the presumption of death is met. At [53] Hallen J explained:

…an inferred death is one where, although a body is not found or recovered, the death can be inferred from the surrounding circumstances, and where it can be inferred that it is more probable that the person has died, rather than that he, or she, is living.

Judicial advice for trustees

Re Perpetual Trustee Company Limited as a trustee for the Joseph Banington Davis Settlement [2020] NSWSC 1574 concerned the dual purpose of an application for judicial advice by an executor/trustee. Robb J at [72] noted that:

It is…not right to see a trustee’s application for judicial advice about whether to sue or defend proceedings as directed only to the personal protection of the trustee. Proceedings for judicial advice have another and no less important purpose of protecting the interests of the trust.

Intermeddling by executors

The Victorian case of Re Abat [2020] VSC 560 contains a discussion of when intermeddling in an estate might deprive an executor of the right to renounce. It should be read in conjunction with the NSW case of Mulray v Ogilvie [1987] 9 NSWLR 1 which is already in 101 Succession Answers.

Costs in Family provision claims

Shelly v Prager (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 1553 concerned the court assessing the overall justice of a case when determining whether special provision for costs should be made in a family provision claim. Williams J at [18] stated the following factors may be relevant:

– whether one party has engaged in unreasonable conduct in the commencement or maintenance of the proceedings which has resulted in the other party (or parties) to the proceeding incurring unnecessary costs;

– whether an applicant’s claim for provision out of an estate is frivolous, vexatious or made without reasonable prospects of success;

– whether an applicant’s claim, although unsuccessful, was otherwise reasonable, meritorious or borderline; and

– the relative size of the deceased estate.

The addition of these recent cases to 101 Succession Answers (NSW) is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Family provision claims QLD

by

New precedents have been added to the By Lawyers Family Provision Claims QLD publication.

Following an author review of the guides, there is new content on the matter plans for both Acting for the Estate and Acting for the Claimant.

The new content to assist practitioners acting for clients in relation to claims on a deceased estate under Part 4 ss 40-44 Succession Act 1981 and  Chapter 15 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules includes:

Acting for the Estate – new family provision precedents

  • Letter to beneficiary affected by settlement of claim
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavits for signing
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavits
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing

Acting for the Claimant – new family provision precedents

  • Letter to potential claimant
  • Authority to settle and receive
  • Direction to pay and authority to receive
  • Letter to client enclosing settlement deed
  • Deed of family arrangement
  • Letter to client after filing claim
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavit
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to client enclosing estate affidavits
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – Payment
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – No payment

This review of the Family Provision Claims QLD publication and the addition of these new family provision precedents is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Connect with us