ByLawyers News and Updates

AI prompts – ALL states

by

AI prompts are transforming legal document drafting. Technical precision in prompting artificial intelligence can significantly improve the utility and credibility of its output, especially when the AI draws exclusively from data contained in client matters and not from outside sources.

A well-drafted AI prompt acts like a clear direction from a senior lawyer to a junior about how to prepare a document. It sets precise parameters for the task, identifies the required information and where it must be drawn from, specifies the document’s form and any legal or procedural rules with which it must comply, and forbids the use of external or unauthorised sources, including invention – or in AI’s case, hallucination.

The outcome of using an AI prompt in a matter that contains sufficient reliable data should be a competent first draft of a document that the lawyer can then refine and perfect, either with or without further input from AI.

Even if sufficient data is not available in the matter to satisfy the prompt’s requirements for the document, the AI will identify the missing data the lawyer needs to obtain via instructions or other means.

By Lawyers is pleased to introduce AI prompts to our publications, helping our subscribers harness the power of LEAP’s Matter AI.

Initially, prompts for letters, affidavits, statutory declarations, and briefs to counsel are being added to the following guides:

  • Sale and Purchase of Real Estate – All states;
  • Mortgages – NSW;
  • Family Provision Claims – QLD;
  • Family Provision Claims – VIC;
  • Probate and Letters of Administration – VIC;
  • Family Law – Divorce, Children, and Property Settlement – FED;
  • Personal Injury – VIC; and
  • Transport Accident Commission Claims – VIC.

By Lawyers will continue adding AI prompts to our publications as part of our regular and ongoing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Like all By Lawyers precedents, AI prompts will be updated as required for any changes in the law and practice.

We welcome feedback and suggestions from our subscribers about AI prompts.

Generative AI – NSW

by

Practice Note SC GEN 23 Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence and the associated Judicial Guidelines concerning the use of generative AI in documents that are put before the court apply to all matters in the Supreme Court from 3 February 2025.

The same provisions apply from the same date in the District Court by virtue of a new District Court General Practice Note 2 Generative AI Practice Note and Judicial Guidelines, which adopts the Supreme Court’s practice note and guidelines.

The key provisions of the practice note are:

  • Legal practitioners should be aware of the limits, risks, and shortcomings of any particular generative AI program they use, including the scope for hallucinations.
  • It is impermissible, without the leave of the court, to enter into any generative AI program information to which the implied undertaking, also called the Harman undertaking, applies, such as another party’s affidavits or material produced under subpoena, unless the legal practitioner or person with responsibility for the file is satisfied that the information will remain confidential, will only be used in connection with the proceedings, and will not be used to train the AI program.
  • AI must not be used in generating the content of affidavits, witness statements, character references, or other material intended to reflect a deponent or witness’ evidence or opinion, or any other material tendered in evidence or used in cross-examination.
  • If generative AI has been used in the preparation of written submissions, summaries, or arguments the author must verify in the document that all citations, legal and academic authority, and case law and legislative references exist, are accurate, and are relevant to the proceedings.
  • Affidavits, witness statements, and character references must contain a statement that AI was not used in generating their content.
  • Generative AI must not be used to draft or prepare the content of an expert report, without the prior leave of the court, and parties must bring that requirement to the expert’s attention.
  • There is a procedure for parties to seek leave if an expert proposes to use generative AI for their report, and also imposes disclosure and record-keeping obligations on the expert if leave is granted and AI is used for the report.

The Judicial Guidelines apply to all courts in New South Wales.

The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules have also been amended from 3 February 2025 to reflect these changes.

The following rules have been amended:

  • Rule 31.4: Court may direct party to furnish witness statement
  • Rule 31.27: Experts’ reports
  • Rule 51.12: Party to file and serve White Folder with summons seeking leave
  • Rule 51.13: Opposing party to file a response
  • Rule 51.36: Content of written submissions
  • Rule 51.45: Proceedings in supervisory jurisdiction
  • Rule 59.8: Procedure—Court Book, defendant’s argument and plaintiff’s argument in reply
  • Schedule 7: Expert witness code of conduct

The following new rules have been created:

  • Rule 35.3B: Use of generative artificial intelligence in affidavits
  • Dictionary: Definition of generative artificial intelligence

These amendments to the rules regulate the use of generative AI for:

  • affidavits, witness statements and other evidentiary material;
  • written submissions and summaries of argument; and
  • experts’ reports.

The commentary and precedents in By Lawyers Supreme Court (NSW) and District Court (NSW) guides have been updated in line with these new rules and practice directions. This includes links to the practice notes, and precedents such as letters instructing expert witnesses and clauses for affidavits.

The commentary in By Lawyers Local Court Civil (NSW) guide has been updated in line with the new rules.

Relevant precedents have also been added to the NSW Injuries publications: Personal Injury, Motor Vehicle Accidents, Workers Compensation, and Family Provision Claims.

The Implied undertaking section in By Lawyers 101 Subpoena Answers, available in the Reference Materials folder on all litigation matter plans, has also been updated.

New UCPR Forms 40 and 163 that contain the required disclosure notice that generative AI was not used are also being added to the relevant matter plans.

County Court rules – VIC

by

A second tranche of amendments to the County Court rules commence on 31 January 2022. These relate to mediation.

A new rule 50.07.2 provides for the court to order that matters be referred to a registrar for mediation, at any stage of the proceedings. This new rule is in addition to the existing rule which allows the court to refer matters to mediation by a judicial registrar.

Other amendments to the County Court Civil Procedure Rules 2018 under the County Court (Chapter I Miscellaneous Amendments) Rules 2021 have already commenced. These concern the way affidavits and exhibits are prepared and filed. See Affidavits, Annexures and Exhibits on both the Acting for the plaintiff and Acting for the defendant matter plans in the By Lawyers County Court (VIC) publication for more information.

A third tranche of amendments to the rules will commence on 1 March 2022. These deal with the titles and nature of the lists in the Commercial Division. By Lawyers County Court publication will be further amended to reflect these changes in due course.

COVID measures are here to stay – All states

by

Many temporary COVID measures introduced across Australia during the pandemic are here to stay.

New South Wales and Queensland have now proposed legislation permanently retaining some COVID measures, such as remote witnessing. Victoria have already legislated to retain some COVID measures. The Commonwealth has extended temporary measures for companies.

With other states and territories expected to follow suit, the long-term legal legacy of COVID-19 looks like being significant.

New South Wales

The Electronic Transactions Amendment (Remote Witnessing) Bill 2021 will permanently allow certain documents to be witnessed in real time over an audio-visual link.

Further, for an additional 12 months from the date of assent, the list of people who can witness NSW statutory declarations will be extended to the expanded list of witnesses set out in Schedule 2 of the Statutory Declarations Regulations 2018.

Queensland

The Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 will make permanent some of Queensland’s  temporary COVID measures including:

  • Remote witnessing and electronic signing of affidavits, statutory declarations and some oaths; however electronic signatures on statutory declarations can only be used for a land or water dealing where electronic conveyancing is used.
  • Powers of attorney for corporations, partnerships and unincorporated associations, but not sole traders, can be signed electronically, in counterpart, by split execution and without a witness; however, if a general power of attorney is used for a land or water dealing it must continue to be executed in accordance with the Land Title Act 1994 and Land Act 1994.
  • Advance health directives can be certified as to capacity by nurses, in addition to doctors.
  • Deeds can be made in the form of an electronic document, electronically signed, made in counterpart and by split execution, generally without a witness. The Bill also removes the requirement for deeds to be sealed, requiring the deed to contain a clear statement that it is executed as a deed. However, deeds lodged or deposited in relation to land and water dealings must continue to be executed in accordance with the Land Title Act 1994 and Land Act 1994.
  • Private applications for temporary protection orders in domestic and family violence matters may be filed electronically, with a hearing date allocated and the application served before the application is verified. Verification can occur later, when the magistrate hears the application. The Magistrates Court may hear any part of family and domestic violence proceedings by audio visual link.

South Australia

The Oaths (Miscellaneous) Amendment Act 2021 commencing on 1 December 2021 amends the Oaths Act 1936 (SA) to:

  • Provide continuity following the expiration of the COVID-19 Emergency Response Act 2020 and its associated regulations through the Oaths Regulations 2021.
  • Introduce a Code of Practice – Affidavits to be followed by deponents and witnesses in the making of affidavits.
  • Introduce a Code of Practice – Statutory Declarations to be followed by declarants, and witnesses to ensure statutory declarations are taken in accordance with the Oaths Act 1936.
  • Expand the persons before whom a statutory declaration may be made as stated in the new Schedule 1 to the Oaths Act 1936.
  • Include additional offences for those falsely representing themselves as authorised witnesses to a statutory declaration or affidavit.

By Lawyers keeps you up to date

All relevant By Lawyers guides, including the dedicated guide Dealing with COVID-19 legal issues – Some practical information which appears at the top of all By Lawyers matter plans, have been or will be updated to reflect these changes as and when they take effect.

Affidavits and exhibits – Supreme Court – VIC

by

The way affidavits and exhibits are prepared and filed in the Supreme Court’s Common Law Division and Commercial Court is changing.

From 1 October 2021 the Court will no longer accept affidavits for filing that include multiple exhibits, or which separate the affidavit and any exhibit. Affidavits must be in a single fully text-searchable PDF format file including any bundle exhibit.

Affidavits must be filed as a single, searchable PDF document, with all pages consecutively numbered. This includes the pages of any exhibit – see Exhibits to affidavits and Filing and service of affidavits in the By Lawyers Supreme Court (VIC) commentaries for more information.

There may only be one exhibit to an affidavit, except for confidential affidavits.

Where more than one document is exhibited to an affidavit, the documents must be combined into a single ‘bundle exhibit’, ordered in the sequence they are referred to in the affidavit. The exhibit must be part of the affidavit, in a single fully text-searchable PDF format file, with legible page numbers at the bottom right-hand corner of each page that correspond with the digital display page numbers of the PDF, that commence from the first page of the affidavit to the last page of the bundle exhibit.

See Affidavits and exhibits in the By Lawyers Supreme Court (VIC) publication for more information.

In a separate but related change to procedure, from 1 October 2021 all evidentiary documents filed in proceedings in the Common Law Division and Commercial Court may not be inspected by any non-party until the document has been read or relied upon in open court. This applies to affidavits, exhibits, witness statements, expert reports, written submissions, outlines of argument and chronologies.

See Practice Note SC Gen 20 Inspection of Civil Court Files by Non-Parties and Notice to the Profession (Changes to File Inspections and Affidavits) for more information.

Connect with us