ByLawyers News and Updates

Bail after conviction – NSW

by

Bail after conviction must now be refused for offences where the accused will receive full time imprisonment, unless special or exceptional circumstances exist.

The Bail Amendment Act 2022 (NSW) commenced on 27 June. It adds a new s 22B to the Bail Act 2013.

The new section provides that on an application for bail after conviction of an accused person, before they are sentenced for an offence for which they will receive full-time custody, the court must refuse bail unless the accused can establish special or exceptional circumstances exist to justify the decision to grant or dispense with bail.

The same applies to a detention application brought by the prosecution in the Supreme Court under Section 40 of the Bail Act.

However, if the offence of which the accused person has been convicted is a show cause offence, the requirement for the accused person to establish special or exceptional circumstances to justify a decision to grant bail or dispense with bail applies instead of the requirement that the accused person show cause why their detention is not justified.

The Bail section of the By Lawyers Criminal – Local Court NSW commentary has been updated accordingly.

Disclosure certificates – VIC

by

A requirement for prosecution Disclosure certificates has been introduced for criminal matters.

The new s 41A of the Criminal Procedure Act 2009 requires the informant, or any other officer who prepared a full brief, to complete a Disclosure certificate and file it with the registry within 7 days of the brief being served. This certificate must be provided to the DPP, if they are conducting the matter, and served on the defence.

Disclosure certificates are required to set out anything that is not included in the full brief because it is subject to a claim for privilege, public interest immunity or other statutory immunity or restriction, and the nature of any such claim.

Sections 41-48 of the Criminal Procedure Act set out the ongoing disclosure requirements on the prosecution. The informant, usually a police officer, also has a general and ongoing duty of disclosure to the Director of Public Prosecutions where that office is conducting the prosecution. The informant must provide to the DPP any information, document or thing that is in the possession of, or known by, the informant that is relevant to the alleged offence, subject to any claims for statutory privilege or public interest immunity: s 415A Criminal Procedure Act 2009.

Disclosure certificates apply also to matters in the indictable stream that proceed by way of a hand-up brief.

The commentary in the By Lawyers Criminal – Magistrates’ Court (VIC) publication has been updated accordingly.

See the By Lawyers  101 Subpoena Answers publication for information about public interest immunity, statutory immunity, and other statutory restrictions.

COVID Recovery – VIC

by

Practice Direction No. 3 of 2022 – COVID recovery currently applies to all types of matters in the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria. It overrides any other directions to the extent of any inconsistency.

In general, remote appearances by clients and practitioners are available, encouraged, and in some cases required. However, physical appearances are also possible, mainly by request, and in some cases required.

The practice direction sets out detailed special arrangements for all types of appearances, including:

  • accused on bail or summons;
  • bail applications and other hearings with the accused in custody;
  • criminal mentions and applications;
  • Specialist courts and programs;
  • intervention orders – applications and hearings;
  • civil hearings including oral examinations;
  • counter services.

In some instances it is necessary for practitioners to email the court and request permission to make a physical appearance in a matter.

The By Lawyers commentaries in all publications involving the Magistrates’ Court have been updated with a link to the practice direction.

  • Magistrates’ Court – Criminal
  • Intervention Orders
  • Traffic Offences
  • Magistrates’ Court Civil – Act for the plaintiff
  • Magistrates’ Court Civil – Act for the defendant
  • Enforcement

These COVID recovery arrangements under the practice direction continue indefinitely at this stage.

Criminal procedure – VIC

by

Criminal procedure amendments enacted by the Justice Legislation Amendment (Criminal Procedure and Other Matters) Act 2022 have commenced. Further amendments are pending.

Amendments include:

Prosecution disclosure obligations

Section 41 Criminal Procedure Act 2009 sets out what must be provided in a full brief.  This includes any information, document, or thing on which the prosecution intends to rely at the hearing. The section has been amended to require the prosecution to now include in the brief any information relevant to the credibility of a prosecution witness, including their criminal record if any.

The informant, usually a police officer, also has an ongoing duty of disclosure to the Director of Public Prosecutions where that office is conducting the prosecution. The informant must provide to the DPP any information, document, or thing that is in the possession of, or known by, the informant that is relevant to the alleged offence, subject to any claims for statutory privilege or public interest immunity.

An amendment yet to commence requires detailed disclosure certificates to be prepared by the prosecution to ensure compliance with these disclosure requirements. There are associated tweaks to the pre-trial procedure to accommodate them. These amendments are awaiting proclamation, but have a default commencement date of 1 October 2022.

Remote evidence

The criminal procedure amendments introduce an obligation on the court to direct that the evidence of a witness be given remotely if the witness is a complainant in a proceeding that relates to an offence that constitutes family violence within the meaning of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008. This applies if closed-circuit television or other facilities that enable communication between the courtroom and another place are available and it is practicable to do so.

Appeals

Where the Magistrates’ Court in any given matter is constituted by the Chief Magistrate who is a dual commission holder, meaning also a Supreme Court judge, appeals are now to the Court of Appeal.

Intervention Orders

Declarations of truth are now available for applicants commencing applications for personal safety intervention orders. This is in addition to oaths, affirmations, and affidavits. Declarations of truth were already available for family violence applications.

Under both Acts, special rules apply for the cross-examination of affected family members and children. The amendments have effectively made remote evidence the default position for protected witnesses, which includes children and close family members of the accused. See s 69 (1A) of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 and ss 49 and 52 of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010.

Publication updates

These changes have been reflected as required in the By Lawyers Magistrates’ Court – Criminal publication. When the additional amendments commence our publications will be further updated.

Spent convictions – VIC

by

The Spent Convictions Act 2021 (Vic), along with the Spent Convictions Regulations 2021 (Vic), establishes a legislative scheme for criminal convictions to lapse after a set period automatically.

The commencement of this legislation on 1 December 2021, brought Victoria into line with the other states which already have such a scheme.

Employees and job candidates have rights under the Act, relating to an employer’s access to their criminal records. When particular criminal convictions lapse they may not be used as a basis for making decisions about a person’s employment. This generally applies to less serious offences.

Convictions which have lapsed under the legislation will not appear on a police record check unless the check is for certain types of employment, such as working with children. Specific provisions under some legislation, for example an application for a firearms licence, will still require full criminal histories to be disclosed.

Convictions for offences which are not deemed serious are eligible to be spent automatically after a 10-year crime-free period, for offences committed as an adult. The period is 5 years for offences committed as a minor.

The Spent convictions commentary has been updated in the By Lawyers Employment Law and Magistrates’ Court – Criminal (Vic) guides.

Drink driving – QLD

by

Amendments to drink driving legislation relating to interlock orders and driver education programs commence in Queensland on 10 September 2021.

Interlock program now applies to more drink driving offences

From 10 September 2021 mandatory interlock orders apply upon conviction for any drink driving offence with a BAC of 0.10 or greater. Previously interlock orders only applied to offences with BAC of 0.15 or more.

An interlock device is a breath testing instrument which is connected to the electrical system of a motor vehicle and prevents the engine being started unless the driver passes a breath test. These devices must be installed, by an approved installer at the driver’s expense, if a court order makes it a requirement of being able to obtain a driving licence.

Education programs for drink drivers

From 10 September 2021 conviction for any offence which attracts a mandatory interlock order renders the driver ineligible to obtain a licence for 5 years from the date of their conviction unless they have completed an approved drink driver education program.

First offenders must complete a brief intervention education program (BIEP). Repeat offenders must complete a repeat offender education program (ROEP). These programs are separate to the Queensland Traffic Offenders Program, which is generally completed prior to the offender being sentenced.

Exemptions from completing the required drink driver education programs are available. Applicants must show that requiring them to do the program would be unreasonable or cause severe hardship. However, applications for exemption cannot be made until the end of the applicable licence disqualification period.

Publication updates

The By Lawyers Magistrates Court (QLD) – Traffic Offences guide has been amended accordingly. See Alcohol Ignition Interlock Program in the commentary for more information. The precedent Letter to client finalising the matter and confirming outcome of plea has been amended to incorporate the new provisions.

Drink and drug driving – WA

by

New offences apply for the combined offence of drink and drug driving in Western Australia from 1 July 2021. There are also increased penalties for existing drink and drug driving offences.

Recent amendments to the Road Traffic Act 1974 have commenced. They are contained within the Road Traffic (Impaired Driving and Penalties) Act 2019.

The amending Act implements reforms which will:

  • allow a police officer to immediately prohibit a driver who tests positive to the presence of prescribed illicit drugs at roadside from driving for 24 hours;
  • introduce new offences to target people who drive with an illegal level of both alcohol and prescribed illicit drugs;
  • increase penalties for existing drink and drug driving offences to ensure that they remain an effective deterrent; and
  • enhance and streamline drink and drug driving enforcement processes.

The By Lawyers Magistrates Court (WA) – Traffic Offences commentary has been updated to reflect these changes.

Corresponding amendments have also been made to the Retainer Instructions and initial letters to reflect the updated penalty amounts for each applicable offence.

There are also 20 new precedents. These new initial letters deal with the new category of offence: driving with an illegal level of alcohol and prescribed illicit drugs. These helpful precedent letters contain the relevant penalties, which are dependent upon the BAC level of the offender and whether the incident is a first, second, third or subsequent offence. These letters assist practitioners to quickly and accurately advise and inform their clients.

Intervention orders – SA

by

The By Lawyers Intervention Orders commentary has been reviewed and updated by our author to ensure all content is in line with current law and practice. As part of this regular review process, the following enhancements have been made:

  • Expanded coverage on applications to vary or revoke orders, and the typical procedure involved.
  • New content added regarding the Women’s Domestic Violence Court Assistance Service.
  • Updates to coverage of penalties for contravention of interim or final intervention orders.

Women’s Domestic Violence Court Assistance Service

This service provides pro-bono, specialised assistance to women who need to apply for a private intervention order, to vary a confirmed order, or to end a tenancy agreement due to domestic violence.

Applications to vary or revoke orders

A defendant may apply to have an intervention order varied or revoked only after 12 months have passed since the confirmation of the order, or such longer dated as fixed by the court.

The protected person may make an application to vary or revoke the order at any time. They should expect to be questioned by a magistrate at length on the reasons for the application. If the police are involved they are most likely to oppose such an application, particularly where there has been no apparent change in the parties’ circumstances since the order was made.

Breaches

As the commentary in the Intervention Orders commentary notes:

Breaches of an intervention order will be taken seriously. It does not matter if the protected person says that they consent to the breach, or even actively encourages it. Gaol terms and loss of the presumption in favour of bail is a real possibility for a defendant who breaches an intervention order. 

When acting for clients charged with a breach of an intervention order, subscribers will be assisted by the related By Lawyers guide Criminal – Magistrates Court (SA).

Apprehended violence legislation – NSW

by

Apprehended violence legislation in NSW has been further amended.

Amending legislation

Further provisions of the Stronger Communities Legislation Amendment (Domestic Violence) Act 2020 commenced on 27 March 2021.

Duration of ADVOs

Where a defendant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment which is to be served in a correctional centre, the apprehended violence legislation now requires the court to specify that any related apprehended violence order (ADVO) will be in force for a period of two years longer than the sentence imposed. That does not apply if the court otherwise orders, or if the offender is under 18 years of age.  The term of imprisonment refers to the full sentence imposed by the court, including non-parole and parole periods. The additional two years is calculated with reference to the total sentence imposed by the court at the time that the ADVO is made.

Harming animals

The apprehended violence legislation has also been amended in relation to harming, or threatening to harm, animals belonging to or in the possession of a protected person.

Conduct that causes a reasonable apprehension of harm to animals belonging to or in the possession of the protected person is now within the definition of ‘intimidation’.

A person who engages in that conduct is guilty of an offence that carries a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment or 50 penalty units or both.

The change to the definition of ‘intimidation’ means that harm to animals belonging to or in the possession of the protected person is now included in the mandatory prohibition in every AVO which prohibits damage or destroying property. This amendment was based on evidence that threatening, injuring or killing family pets is a tactic used to control and coerce partners or other family members in the context of domestic violence.

New standard order

There is a consequential amendment under the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Amendment (Standard Orders) Regulation 2021, which also commenced on 27 March 2021. This amends the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Regulation 2019 to include in the standard orders a prohibition on harming any animals owned by or in the possession of the person in need of protection under an order.

By Lawyers Apprehended violence orders (NSW) publication has been updated accordingly.

Mental health provisions – NSW

by

Mental health provisions in the criminal courts have had their first substantive overhaul in 30 years. The Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 commenced on 27 March 2021. Division 2, Part 2 of the new Act applies to criminal offences in the Local Court.

The Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 replaces the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990, including what were previously known as ‘section 32 applications’. This re-set of mental health provisions in the criminal context provides a diversionary scheme for people with mental health and cognitive impairment issues who are charged with offences that may be dealt with summarily.

Under s 12 of the Act, if it appears to a magistrate that a defendant has, or had at the time of the commission of the offence, a mental health impairment or a cognitive impairment, or both, then the magistrate can make an order under s 14 to dismiss the charge either conditionally or unconditionally. The magistrate may also adjourn the proceedings under s 13 for assessment or diagnosis, preparation of a treatment plan or to identify a responsible person for the purpose of making an order.

The main changes from the existing law – apart from the new section numbers – are:

  • ‘mental health impairment’ is now defined’;
  • the existing definition of ‘cognitive impairment’ is slightly amended;
  • the new Act sets out what the magistrate can consider when deciding whether to make an order, although the court retains ultimate discretion; and
  • magistrates can now re-call people who are discharged on conditions under the Act, which they fail to comply with, for a period of 12 rather than 6 months.

These changes should see more people with mental health or cognitive impairments successfully diverted from the criminal justice system.

The By Lawyers Criminal Law publication has been updated accordingly. The existing commentary on section 32 applications has been moved to an Appendix at the end of the commentary, as the previous legislation continues to apply to matters which were already on foot before 27 March 2021.

 

Connect with us