ByLawyers News and Updates

Publication reviews – All states

by

Publication reviews are part of By Lawyers’ commitment to quality and keeping our subscribers up to date with changes in practice and procedure.

Our publication reviews target commentaries, or precedents, or both. The purpose of the reviews is to update and ensure consistency in styles, formatting, hyperlinks, naming protocols and, if necessary, the substantive content.

The results of a review can include new, amended, or deleted commentary, commentary headings, and precedents.

Sometimes the title or location of a precedent will be altered.

Occasionally there are amendments to the sequence of folders, commentary headings, precedents, and hyperlinks on the matter plan.

Any changes applied will be reflected in an amended matter plan.

Practitioners using our guides will not always realise when a publication review has been conducted. However, sometimes the resulting changes will be apparent, and amendments or enhancements might take a moment to get used to.

Lately, our in-house team, in conjunction with our authors in the various jurisdictions around Australia, have been focussed on reviewing the Full Commentaries in the following publications:

Some of these are still a work in progress, so keep an eye out for any changes.

We love to help our subscribers, and we love feedback. If you have any questions or concerns about changes arising from a publication review, do not hesitate to let us know. We are always happy to discuss any change we have made, or consider others. If you can’t find a section of commentary or a precedent, send us an email and we will point you in the right direction.

And, if you like the changes we have made, please take a moment to let us know so we can continue helping you to enjoy practice more.

Our email is: askus@bylawyers.com.au

Transfer duty – NSW

by

A recent case dealing with transfer duty on real property in deceased estates has been added to the By Lawyers wills and estates publications in New South Wales.

A reassessment of duty almost 5 years after the transaction is a cautionary tale for practitioners to ensure compliance with the Duties Act 1997 and relevant transfer duty rulings.

Section 63 of the Duties Act 1997 provides for concessions when dutiable property is transferred pursuant to a will or the laws of intestacy. The concessions apply when a transfer is made to a beneficiary in conformity with the trusts contained in a will, or arising on an intestacy, or as an appropriation of the deceased’s property towards satisfaction of a beneficiary’s entitlement in the estate.

When a transfer is made to a beneficiary under an agreement, whether or not in writing, to vary the trusts contained in the will or arising on intestacy, the dutiable value of the property is reduced by the value of the beneficiary’s entitlement.

However, under s 63 and NSW Revenue Ruling DUT 046, the transfer duty concessions do not apply to a contract of sale, only to a transfer.

This was confirmed in Cohen v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2024] NSWCATAD 136, in this case, Harry Cohen left a property to his three children, Stephen, Peter, and Wendy, in equal shares. The beneficiaries agreed that Stephen could have the property if he paid each of his siblings for their one-third share plus an extra $100,000 each. Rather than a transfer pursuant to a deed of family arrangement, the executors of the estate executed a contract to sell the property to Stephen for the total value.

The contract was submitted to Revenue NSW in 2017, noting that Stephen was beneficially entitled to a one third share of the property from his father’s estate. Duty was assessed and paid on the reduced dutiable value, reflecting Stephen’s one-third interest in the property.

In 2022, the Chief Commissioner issued a Notice of Investigation and ultimately decided that duty had been underpaid. The reassessment stated the dutiable value was the full value of the property as shown on the contract, not two-thirds as initially assessed, resulting in a further duty liability of $29,315.00 plus interest, which was ultimately waived.

The commentary in the By Lawyers Probate (NSW) and Letters of Administration (NSW) guides has been enhanced to cover this situation, and a summary of the case is being added to both 101 Succession Answers (NSW) and 1001 Conveyancing Answers (NSW).

101 Succession Answers – QLD

by

Two new Supreme Court cases have been added to the By Lawyers reference manual 101 Succession Answers (QLD).

In Re Chambers (dec’d) 2023 QSC 230 irregularities with signing a will did not invalidate it. The testator and the witnesses had missed signing parts of a two-page, pre-printed, will form. The court found there was no question that the testator intended the document to be a testamentary instrument. The evidence showed that he signed it, the two witnesses were both present and saw him sign it, and they each signed the will in his presence.

In Re Briggs (dec’d) [2023] QSC 226 the issue of capacity was determined without expert medical evidence. Letters written by two treating doctors shortly before the dates of the relevant will certifying the deceased did not have capacity for decision-making were enough for the court to find she had no testamentary capacity.

Interestingly, both of these cases were determined without oral evidence, under r 489 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (QLD). This can occur in any case, on the application of a party, unless the court thinks it inappropriate. In Briggs the court noted:

Nothing in either r 489 or r 491 expressly defines the notion of disposal without oral hearing being “inappropriate”. The meaning of the term “inappropriate” must be taken from the context and purpose of the rule. Here, the clear purpose of r 489 is the efficient and economical disposal of the Court’s business. The primary aim though of the Court in exercise of any of its jurisdiction is to do justice. It will not be “inappropriate” to exercise the Court’s jurisdiction to determine the application without oral hearing where justice can be done without an oral hearing.

101 Succession Answers (QLD) is available in the Reference Materials folder in Folder A. Getting the matter underway on all succession related matter plans: Probate, Letters of Administration, Family Provision Claim, Wills, Powers of Attorney and Advance Health Directives.

Wills guide reviewed – QLD

by

The continuing commitment of By Lawyers to updating and enhancing our publications has seen the Queensland Wills guide reviewed.

Subscribers using this popular publication will find a re-ordered and extended matter plan, revised and updated commentary and a number of new precedents. Execution is now a top-level heading on the matter plan, with dedicated commentary on issues such as blind witnesses, gifts to witnesses and solicitors as witnesses. The revisions also include:

  • First steps and taking instructions for wills
  • Testamentary capacity and the test in Banks v Goodfellow
  • The formal requirements for a valid will
  • Informal wills
  • Intestacy
  • Executors
  • Execution
  • Challenges to the validity of a will

New and amended precedents

  • Letter to client to confirming instructions
  • To do list
  • Instructions for signing
  • Letter reminding client that will is ready for signing

Other resources in the Wills guide reviewed

Links have been added to the By Lawyers reference materials Other trusted and useful resources. New cases have been added to 101 Succession Answers (QLD).

Both of these resources can be found in the Reference materials folder on the matter plan.

101 Succession Answers – Vic

by

By Lawyers is delighted to release the latest in our 101 Reference Series – the comprehensive reference guide 101 Succession Answers – VIC. This useful resource provides more detailed information than the By Lawyers commentaries on the various areas and issues in succession law. It includes discussion, with links to legislation and cases, on:

  • powers of attorney and supportive attorney appointment;
  • medical treatment decision-making;
  • wills;
  • appointments of guardianship and administration;
  • estates – probate and administration; and
  • family provision.

101 Succession Answers VIC is now a related guide in LEAP – and included for new and existing website subscribers – to these Victorian By Lawyers publications:

  • Wills, Powers of Attorney and Advance Health Directives;
  • Estates; and
  • Family Provision Claims.

This is a must-have, easy-reference, resource providing detailed information in a quickly accessible and searchable format. Tricky questions can be answered quickly using the guide’s alphabetical headings, ‘Ctrl+F’ searchability and plain English format. Practitioners can quickly address specific technical issues as they arise in a matter.

The By Lawyers team will be keeping 101 Succession Answers VIC updated with all relevant new cases and legislation as developments in these areas of law occur.

Connect with us