ByLawyers News and Updates

AI prompts – ALL states

by

AI prompts are transforming legal document drafting. Technical precision in prompting artificial intelligence can significantly improve the utility and credibility of its output, especially when the AI draws exclusively from data contained in client matters and not from outside sources.

A well-drafted AI prompt acts like a clear direction from a senior lawyer to a junior about how to prepare a document. It sets precise parameters for the task, identifies the required information and where it must be drawn from, specifies the document’s form and any legal or procedural rules with which it must comply, and forbids the use of external or unauthorised sources, including invention – or in AI’s case, hallucination.

The outcome of using an AI prompt in a matter that contains sufficient reliable data should be a competent first draft of a document that the lawyer can then refine and perfect, either with or without further input from AI.

Even if sufficient data is not available in the matter to satisfy the prompt’s requirements for the document, the AI will identify the missing data the lawyer needs to obtain via instructions or other means.

By Lawyers is pleased to introduce AI prompts to our publications, helping our subscribers harness the power of LEAP’s Matter AI.

Initially, prompts for letters, affidavits, statutory declarations, and briefs to counsel are being added to the following guides:

  • Sale and Purchase of Real Estate – All states;
  • Mortgages – NSW;
  • Family Provision Claims – QLD;
  • Family Provision Claims – VIC;
  • Probate and Letters of Administration – VIC;
  • Family Law – Divorce, Children, and Property Settlement – FED;
  • Personal Injury – VIC; and
  • Transport Accident Commission Claims – VIC.

By Lawyers will continue adding AI prompts to our publications as part of our regular and ongoing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Like all By Lawyers precedents, AI prompts will be updated as required for any changes in the law and practice.

We welcome feedback and suggestions from our subscribers about AI prompts.

Electronic conveyancing – TAS

by

Electronic conveyancing has arrived in Tasmania, but is not currently mandatory.

The conveyancing process in Tasmania is transitioning away from paper-based conveyancing and the physical lodgment of registry instruments in favour of an electronic process.

Transfers and change of ownership transactions can now be completed electronically, along with mortgages, refinances, and discharges of mortgage.

A certificate of title is still required to be lodged with registry instruments and documents, for both paper and electronic lodgements.

Tasmanian Revenue Online (TRO) platform has been upgraded for payment of duty in electronic conveyancing. Online duty payments are available only to TRO Agents registered with PEXA. See the TRO’s website for more information.

Paper-based transfers of land are still available. The duty and post settlement process remains unchanged for paper-based transfers.

The matter plans, commentary, and precedents in the following By Lawyers conveyancing guides have been updated to cover the electronic conveyancing process:

Sale of Real Property (TAS); and

Purchase of Real Property (TAS).

Conveyancing cases – VIC

by

A selection of recent conveyancing cases has been added to By Lawyers 1001 Conveyancing Answers (VIC) as part of a review by our property author Russell Cocks.

The following conveyancing cases are among those that have been added:

Additional information has also been added about:

  • Deposit or option fee – A preliminary payment pursuant to a contract may be a deposit that is potentially refundable to the purchaser if the contract does not proceed, or an option fee that is not refundable even if the contract does not proceed.
  • Lessee’s right to quiet enjoyment – A lessor’s failure to repair defective premises may constitute a breach of the lessee’s right to quiet enjoyment.

The extensive 1001 Conveyancing Answers (VIC) publication is available in the Reference materials folder on the By Lawyers Conveyancing (VIC), Mortgages (VIC), and Leases (VIC) matter plans to assist property lawyers and conveyancers in understanding more detailed aspects of the conveyancing process and addressing clients’ issues quickly.

Franchises – FED

by

The Franchises commentary in the Purchase and Sale of Business publications in each state has been reviewed and enhanced.

This work is a precursor to the significant remaking of the Franchising Code of Conduct, which will commence on 1 April 2025.

The amendments to the Code, under the Competition and Consumer (Industry Code-Franchising) Regulations 2024, introduce new obligations, stricter rules around restraint of trade, and strengthened protections for franchisees.

The amendments arise out of the Independent Review of the Franchising Code of Conduct Final Report delivered to the Commonwealth Government in December 2023. The Government response to that report has been to…

…take a staged approach, which seeks to implement quicker changes in the short-term whilst undertaking a comprehensive analysis of the legal and regulatory changes to improve fairness and reduce regulatory burden in the longer term. This includes working with the sector to develop best-practice guidance, and simplifying disclosure requirements so that it’s easier for both franchisees and franchisors to understand their roles and obligations. Other measures to improve access to justice include increasing the number of breaches of the Code that attract penalties and publicly naming franchisors that fail to participate meaningfully in alternative dispute resolution.

The key amendments under the 2024 regulations include:

  • a new obligation on franchisors to provide the franchisee with a reasonable opportunity to make a return on investment;
  • changes to termination rights, including compensation to the franchisee for early termination;
  • new franchisee rights to compensation for non-renewal of a franchise agreement;
  • new franchisee rights to opt out of cooling-off and disclosure provisions in some circumstances;
  • consolidation of the franchisor’s pre-contract and annual disclosure obligations;
  • a restriction preventing a franchisor from executing a franchise agreement until the 14-day pre-contract disclosure period has passed; and
  • increased penalties and regulatory investigation powers.

Further statutory amendments are under consideration, including the feasibility of introducing a licensing regime to better regulate most aspects of the franchisee-franchisor relationship.

The enhanced Franchises commentary is found in the If required – Franchises folder on the matter plans for Purchase and Sale of Business in each state, together with relevant franchising precedents.

When the regulatory amendments commence on 1 April, the commentary will be further amended, and the precedents updated as required.

Magistrates’ Court – VIC

by

Two important new practice directions apply in the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria from 10 February 2025.

  1. Practice Direction No. 1 of 2025 governs practice and modes of appearance, in person or online, in proceedings across the criminal and family violence divisions of the Magistrates’ Court. It revokes Practice Direction No. 6 of 2022.
  2. Practice Direction No. 2 of 2025 governs practices in the civil division of the Magistrates’ Court. It revokes 51 previous practice directions.

The following are the key points of each.

Magistrates’ Court criminal and family violence jurisdiction

Practice Direction No. 1 of 2025 sets out the procedure for all appearances, online or in person, except a first remand hearing which is covered by Practice Direction 1 of 2024.

In general, online appearances by clients and practitioners are available, encouraged, and in many cases required. However, physical appearances are also possible, mainly by request, and in some cases required.

The practice direction sets out detailed arrangements for all types of appearances, including:

  • accused on bail or summons;
  • bail applications and other hearings with the accused in custody;
  • contest mention hearings, committal mentions, special mentions, and applications, and matters in Judicial Registrar lists;
  • contested hearings and committal hearings;
  • specialist courts and programs;
  • intervention orders – applications and hearings; and
  • filing materials with the court.

Represented accused and their lawyers are to appear in person or online as provided for in the practice direction, unless the court directs otherwise.

If a represented accused appears in person, their lawyer must also appear in person, unless otherwise directed by the court.

If a practitioner seeks to appear in a mode contrary to that set out in the practice direction, they must apply to do so by contacting the relevant court registry at least 7 days before the date.

When appearing online, it is the practitioner’s responsibility to ensure they and their client have audio-visual capability from an appropriate private location, and their online appearance must not cause delay or interrupt the court.

Magistrates’ Court civil jurisdiction

Practice Direction No. 2 of 2025 applies to all civil proceedings including the WorkCover Division, Industrial Division, and Federal Jurisdiction matters. It excludes matters arising under the Family Violence Protection Act 2008, the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010, and Industrial Division criminal proceedings.

The practice note covers the following for general civil matters:

  • overview and purpose;
  • definitions;
  • jurisdiction;
  • self-represented litigants;
  • issuing proceedings, filing documents and corresponding with the court;
  • attending the court;
  • consent orders;
  • appropriate dispute resolution;
  • applications in open court and directions hearings;
  • call overs for contested matters and open court applications;
  • contested hearings; and
  • inspecting subpoenaed documents.

Specific directions in the WorkCover Division include:

  • medical panel referrals;
  • inspection of medical and other records;
  • subpoenas relating to confidential communications; and
  • dependents’ compensation.

Specific directions in the Industrial Division include:

  • support for self-represented litigants;
  • filing documents;
  • pre-hearing conferences; and
  • contested matters.

Specific directions in the Federal jurisdiction concern the commencement of proceedings.

Appendix A to the practice direction lists the 51 previous Magistrates’ Court practice directions that are revoked.

Publication updates

The commentary and hyperlinks in the following By Lawyers Magistrates’ Court (VIC) guides have been updated accordingly:

Generative AI – NSW

by

Practice Note SC GEN 23 Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence and the associated Judicial Guidelines concerning the use of generative AI in documents that are put before the court apply to all matters in the Supreme Court from 3 February 2025.

The same provisions apply from the same date in the District Court by virtue of a new District Court General Practice Note 2 Generative AI Practice Note and Judicial Guidelines, which adopts the Supreme Court’s practice note and guidelines.

The key provisions of the practice note are:

  • Legal practitioners should be aware of the limits, risks, and shortcomings of any particular generative AI program they use, including the scope for hallucinations.
  • It is impermissible, without the leave of the court, to enter into any generative AI program information to which the implied undertaking, also called the Harman undertaking, applies, such as another party’s affidavits or material produced under subpoena, unless the legal practitioner or person with responsibility for the file is satisfied that the information will remain confidential, will only be used in connection with the proceedings, and will not be used to train the AI program.
  • AI must not be used in generating the content of affidavits, witness statements, character references, or other material intended to reflect a deponent or witness’ evidence or opinion, or any other material tendered in evidence or used in cross-examination.
  • If generative AI has been used in the preparation of written submissions, summaries, or arguments the author must verify in the document that all citations, legal and academic authority, and case law and legislative references exist, are accurate, and are relevant to the proceedings.
  • Affidavits, witness statements, and character references must contain a statement that AI was not used in generating their content.
  • Generative AI must not be used to draft or prepare the content of an expert report, without the prior leave of the court, and parties must bring that requirement to the expert’s attention.
  • There is a procedure for parties to seek leave if an expert proposes to use generative AI for their report, and also imposes disclosure and record-keeping obligations on the expert if leave is granted and AI is used for the report.

The Judicial Guidelines apply to all courts in New South Wales.

The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules have also been amended from 3 February 2025 to reflect these changes.

The following rules have been amended:

  • Rule 31.4: Court may direct party to furnish witness statement
  • Rule 31.27: Experts’ reports
  • Rule 51.12: Party to file and serve White Folder with summons seeking leave
  • Rule 51.13: Opposing party to file a response
  • Rule 51.36: Content of written submissions
  • Rule 51.45: Proceedings in supervisory jurisdiction
  • Rule 59.8: Procedure—Court Book, defendant’s argument and plaintiff’s argument in reply
  • Schedule 7: Expert witness code of conduct

The following new rules have been created:

  • Rule 35.3B: Use of generative artificial intelligence in affidavits
  • Dictionary: Definition of generative artificial intelligence

These amendments to the rules regulate the use of generative AI for:

  • affidavits, witness statements and other evidentiary material;
  • written submissions and summaries of argument; and
  • experts’ reports.

The commentary and precedents in By Lawyers Supreme Court (NSW) and District Court (NSW) guides have been updated in line with these new rules and practice directions. This includes links to the practice notes, and precedents such as letters instructing expert witnesses and clauses for affidavits.

The commentary in By Lawyers Local Court Civil (NSW) guide has been updated in line with the new rules.

Relevant precedents have also been added to the NSW Injuries publications: Personal Injury, Motor Vehicle Accidents, Workers Compensation, and Family Provision Claims.

The Implied undertaking section in By Lawyers 101 Subpoena Answers, available in the Reference Materials folder on all litigation matter plans, has also been updated.

New UCPR Forms 40 and 163 that contain the required disclosure notice that generative AI was not used are also being added to the relevant matter plans.

Succession – SA

by

New court rules and practice notes are in effect to reflect the Succession Act 2023 (SA) which extensively reframed South Australian succession law when it commenced on 1 January 2025.

Succession Act

The Succession Act consolidated and amended various legislation relating to:

  • wills;
  • probate and administration;
  • administration of deceased estates;
  • intestacy; and
  • family provision claims.

The Succession Act now contains all legislative provisions relating to those areas, having repealed the following existing Acts:

  • Administration and Probate Act 1919 (SA);
  • Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1972 (SA);
  • Wills Act 1936 (SA).

Succession rules and practice note changes

New and revised court rules for probate, administration, contested wills, and family provision matters have been released to reflect the new legislation.

The rules are contained in the new Chapter 25 – Probate – Supreme Court of the Uniform Civil Rules 2020.

The Supreme Court’s practice notes reflecting the new Act and rules are:

Key changes made by the revised court rules and practice notes include:

  • making the electronic filing of all probate applications and documents mandatory;
  • setting out detailed requirements for scanning and submitting documents;
  • proceedings under Chapter 25 are to be commenced by way of originating application except for:
    • applications for grants of probate or letters of administration;
    • amendments of grants;
    • revocation of grants;
  • required wording in an administrator’s oath when clearing off all persons having a prior entitlement to the grant and for the description of the administrator;
  • required description of assets and liabilities of an estate;
  • required wording to describe the caveator and the person warning the caveat; and
  • 50 new probate forms.

Legislative changes

The key changes under the new legislation include:

  • the right of certain classes of person to inspect a will of a deceased person;
  • the power of the Supreme Court to pass over applicants for a grant of probate or administration and appoint another person it considers appropriate;
  • the removal of the need for a grant to administer smaller estates;
  • additional court powers to hold executors and administrators to account;
  • codification of the application of assets to payment of debts and liabilities in solvent estates;
  • the increase to the preferential legacy for a surviving spouse of an intestate;
  • the addition of the children of first cousins of an intestate to the distribution on intestacy;
  • no entitlement of a spouse or domestic partner of an intestate to any part of an intestate’s estate if they are a party to:
    • a binding financial agreement; or
    • orders for distribution of property under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth);
  • primary consideration of the deceased’s wishes by the court when determining whether to make a family provision order; and
  • narrowing eligibility for family provision claims to:
    • exclude former partners and spouses when financial matters have already been settled;
    • require adult stepchildren to demonstrate they:
      • are disabled and vulnerable;
      • were genuinely dependent on the deceased;
      • cared for or maintained the deceased; or
      • contributed to the estate, or their parent substantially contributed to the estate;
    • require grandchildren to satisfy the court that:
      • their parents died before the deceased; or
      • they were wholly or partly maintained by the deceased.

Publication updates

The following By Lawyers publications have been updated for all these legislative, rules, and practice direction changes, with the new forms added to the matter plans as required:

Subpoenas – FED

by

A new Practice Direction concerning electronic inspection of material produced under subpoenas has come into force in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.

It applies to family law proceedings filed in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) and replaces the Court’s Special Measures Information Notice – COVID-19 Electronic Subpoena Inspection.

The new practice direction is to be read together with the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021.

When seeking to inspect subpoenaed material, parties and legal practitioners must provide the following information in their request:

  • file number;
  • date and type of court hearing, conference or expert report;
  • specific material that access is being requested to, and whether it is ‘inspection only’ material (see below, as defined in rule 6.37(2)(b) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021);
  • confirmation that a Notice of Request to Inspect has been filed;
  • whether electronic access to the material is sought;
  • a copy of photo identification or confirmation that they are a lawyer acting on behalf of a party, and the law firm at which they work.

Requests can be made by email. Each registry has a subpoena email address, as listed in the practice direction.

If the material to which access is sought is not inspection only material, and photocopy access is permitted, the registry will provide the material electronically if possible directly to the party or practitioner requesting the material, usually by email.

Inspection only material is:

  • child welfare records, criminal records, medical records and police records, as defined in the Rules; and
  • any other material excluded from photocopy access by order of the court.

Electronic access to inspection only material will not be permitted unless there are exceptional circumstances. Instead, the material needs to be inspected in person at a registry.

The practice direction also makes provision for the tendering of subpoenaed material at a hearing.

The By Lawyers Family Law Property Settlement and Children publications have been updated accordingly, along with the information about subpoenas in family law matters in the 101 Subpoena Answers reference materials.

Cash reporting – FED

by

Solicitors no longer have cash reporting obligations under the Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988 (FTR Act). However, changes that commence on 31 March 2026 will place significant new obligations on law firms for initial and ongoing AML/CTF due diligence.

The FTR Act was entirely repealed with effect from 7 January 2025 by Schedule 11 of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing (Amendment) Act 2024 (the Amending Act).

The Amending Act substantially amends the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF Act) to place new obligations on lawyers who perform certain work as reporting entities. However, the relevant amendments to the AML/CTF Act do not commence until 31 March 2026.

From 7 January 2025 solicitors are no longer regulated under the FTR Act, and do not need to report significant cash transactions of $10,000 or more, or the equivalent in foreign currency, to AUSTRAC. See AUSTRAC’s webpage Repeal of the Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988 for more information.

In the interim, solicitors still have professional obligations that can in some circumstances require cash reporting. See the The Law Council of Australia’s National Legal Profession Anti-Money Laundering & Counter-Terrorism Financing Guidance Note 2 for more information.

The By Lawyers Practice Management publication has been updated in line with the repeal of the FTR Act.

The changes that commence on 31 March 2026 will be significant for most law firms, with new due diligence and reporting obligations. By Lawyers will be updating our publications with information and guidance about these requirements when they commence.

Professional bodies for lawyers and conveyancers around the country already have substantial information available about these changes on their websites. Practitioners can expect professional legal education providers to focus on the topic in the coming 12 months, and legal software providers such as LEAP to provide efficient application-based solutions.

County Court costs – VIC

by

New rules provide for County Court costs to be taxed in the Costs Court under the Supreme Court Scale of Costs that operates by reference to hourly rates from 1 January 2025.

Costs in the County Court are dealt with under Order 63 of the County Court Civil Procedure Rules 2018, which now adopts the Scale of Costs in Schedule 1 of Appendix A to the Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015.

In most cases, the parties will agree on the amount of costs to be paid. If they do not agree, the dispute is referred to the Costs Court.

The scale is based principally on time costing. If a client has been charged on the basis of hourly rates for work done, Section 1 of the Scale applies and provides that the costs payable to the entitled party are to be allowed on the basis of reasonable hourly rates, up to the maximum hourly rate set out in the scale. There are 3 tiers of maximum rates according to a practitioner’s years of post-admission experience. There are no minimum rates.

Section 1 also sets out maximum hourly rates for work done by employees of a law practice who are not legal practitioners. The maximum rates for those employees depend on whether their work required legal skill or knowledge.

All claims must be reasonable. In setting rates to be charged to clients, and in making costs claims, practitioners must observe their overarching obligation to ensure that costs are reasonable and proportionate under s 24 of the Civil Procedure Act 2010.

The time-based model does not mean that a law practice must charge their clients on an hourly basis. The scale also provides for assessment of costs where the entitled party has not been charged on the basis of hourly rates. In such a case, the Costs Court will allow a reasonable amount for the work.

See the By Lawyers County Court (VIC) and Supreme Court (VIC) publications for more information.

Connect with us