A McKenzie Friend (MF) is someone who assists an unrepresented person in court. They can be a lawyer, but they are not a substitute for a lawyer. So lawyer or not, when acting as a MF they may not address the court; they can take notes, organise papers, whisper quietly to and generally assist the litigant. McKenzie v McKenzie (1970) 3 W.L.R 472 was a family law case and MFs are more common in family and guardianship matters, but they may be permitted in any court where an unrepresented person needs assistance to ensure fairness. However, some MFs are overbearing do-gooders, or bush lawyers, who cause disruption and delay rather than actually assist and will not be permitted to remain. In guardianship hearings where there is no right of representation, a lawyer can act as a MF.
Estates NSW – Transfer of dutiable property
The commentary now deals with the duty payable on the transfer of dutiable property from the executor/administrator to a beneficiary:
- in accordance with the will or rules of intestacy; and
- where there is an agreement to vary the trusts in the will of a deceased or arising on intestacy.
A NSW Revenue example has been added to the commentary to illustrate when property is dutiable where there has been a variation of entitlement under a will.
VIC – Estates – Effect of marriage and divorce on will beneficiaries
Our commentary on the effects of marriage and divorce on wills has been added to. While a will is revoked by the marriage of the testator a number of exceptions apply, as per s 13 of the Wills Act. The commentary on the impact of divorce on a will is also enriched.
Estate planning – An exciting opportunity for small law firms
The usual wills versus a will with estate planning
For most clients a will is a straightforward document that appoints an executor, an alternate executor, perhaps makes some specific bequests of personal items to certain family members, then leaves the balance of the estate to their spouse then their children with a default clause if none of these beneficiaries survive.
The fees charged by most firms are modest and reflect the reality that most clients do not wish to pay a great deal for something that they only reluctantly accept that they need and know they will never personally use and can prepare themselves using a form bought from the post office.
Wills have traditionally been seen as valuable because they eventually bring the firm estate work, rather than valued for the fees associated with the wills themselves. There is an old adage that the goodwill of a practice are the good wills in safe custody.
However, estate planning is a different thing and many firms are now taking a far more comprehensive approach, with a far more profitable result.
Estate planning is an area where small firms can grow their offering to existing clients and attract new, high net worth clients who require and appreciate professional expertise and assistance in this important area of practice.
It is far easier to offer this expertise than many small firms realise. The By Lawyers suite of testamentary trusts and wills clauses, together with the extensive commentary on wills and estate planning, means that firms can confidently advise clients who may have substantial assets including business interests held in company, partnership, trust structures or self-managed superannuation funds.
Whereas a firm might charge few hundred dollars for ‘husband and wife’ wills, the comprehensive succession planning required by a family with substantial assets and interests, including a review of existing structures and documents, preparation of wills which incorporate testamentary trusts, plus other appropriate documents such as powers of attorney and appointments of enduring guardian, is likely to involve fees of many thousand dollars, as well as extending the relationship between the firm and the family to other areas and members. Clients who have such assets and need such advice are mostly very happy to pay for it because they realise the value of the exercise and are as dedicated to retaining their assets for their family as they were to building up those assets in the first place.
Why testamentary trusts?
For clients with substantial assets, complicated families or family members who have medical or personal problems, the use of testamentary trusts has multiple benefits over usual wills, summarised below.
Creditor protection
To protect a bequest from being accessed by creditors of a beneficiary, including guarantees for a business venture.
Divorce of a child
To avoid family assets being redistributed by the Family Court. Assets held in trust are not assets of any individual and the Family Court cannot make an order requiring the distribution of those funds.
Education
Bequests via testamentary trust for payment of school and tuition fees for grandchildren is more tax efficient than simply leaving money to the child’s parents.
High risk beneficiaries
Where one of the beneficiaries is in a high-risk business or has personal issues with drugs or gambling which warrant strict controls being placed on access to any estate funds.
Remarriage of spouse
To limit access to existing family assets by a new family or spouse.
Tax benefits
To minimise tax payable, facilitate income splitting and distribute tax free to children under 18 on marginal rates with the no tax threshold.
Will challenges
Keeping estate assets in trust means they are not in the beneficiaries’ estates and therefore not subject to challenge when they die.
Disabled children
To ensure that any disabled or intellectually impaired children are provided for in the most effective way. A Special Disability Trust can provide a substantial bequest to a disabled child without impacting on any Centrelink benefits.
Identifying the right clients for complex estate planning
Although most clients potentially would benefit from a testamentary trust, their present circumstances do not suggest that one is necessary. In contrast estate planning is essential for clients with high net worth, multiple assets and asset types, business interests, complex business structures, existing family trusts, self-managed superannuation funds, complicated family arrangements and relationships and potential beneficiaries with special needs or personal problems.
Many clients have not considered the need for estate planning which with the aid of By Lawyers commentary and precedents can be offered by practitioners.
The benefits of testamentary trusts
- The fundamental advantage of a testamentary discretionary trust is that the assets are held by the trustee for the beneficiaries, not by the beneficiaries themselves. This allows the protection of assets from claims against beneficiaries and from misuse.
- Separate fixed trusts can be established for separate people or purposes, with conditions. For example, if one child has a drug addiction, a bequest could be left in trust for that child to receive appropriate maintenance and treatment, without them having access to the capital.
- If a beneficiary faces bankruptcy, an inheritance for that beneficiary through a testamentary discretionary trust will not form part of the beneficiary’s bankrupt estate.
- Assets held within a testamentary discretionary trust are not part of the matrimonial pool to be divided up in any family law property settlement in the event of divorce.
- Testamentary trusts also provide an opportunity for testators to control assets after their death, by way of conditional access to trust assets. While not desirable for the beneficiaries, this can certainly be seen by many testators as an advantage.
- Testamentary trusts can be very tax effective – income, capital gains and franked dividends can be distributed among all beneficiaries each year in the most tax-efficient way.
By Lawyers precedents and commentary
Using By Lawyers publications gives your firm the tools and confidence to assist clients with their estate planning, bringing profitable new work and quality new clients into your firm.
VIC – Changes affecting how executors claim commission
The Victorian Legal Services Board has released a news update relating to the recent changes affecting how executors claim commission.
RPA News Bulletin #376 issued November 2017 may be accessed here.
VIC – Administration and Probate and Other Acts Amendment (Succession and Related Matters) Act 2017 – commenced
ALERT: The Administration and Probate and Other Acts Amendment (Succession and Related Matters) Act 2017 commenced on 1 November. Changes are made to ademption, executor commission and distribution on intestacy.
TAS – Probate Rules 2017 commence 8 November
ALERT: From 8 November 2017 Probate Rules 2017 commence and Probate Rules 1936 are revoked. Circular No 14 of 2017 Probate Practice and Procedure details transition periods, the 2017 forms, how to submit queries and changes to practice and procedure affecting, for example, notice of intention and search requests.
QLD, Wills
The end of a de facto relationship with a testator has the same effect as a divorce, namely, it revokes the ex-de facto’s appointment as executor of the will and revokes any benefits the testator gave to the former de facto partner under the will: new s 15B of the Succession Act 1981.
VIC, Power of Attorney
From 1 November 2017 provisions of the Administration and Probate and Other Acts Amendment (Succession and Related Matters) Act 2017 commence including changes to ademption.
QLD, Estates
1. Notice of intention to apply for grant – Advertising changes From 24 November 2017 notices of intention to apply for grant need only be advertised in the Queensland Law Reporter and not in a newspaper: Supreme Court Practice Direction 14 of 2017.
2. End of de facto relationship – Revocation of executor The end of a de facto relationship with a testator has the same effect as a divorce, namely, it revokes the ex-de facto’s appointment as executor of the will and revokes any benefits the testator gave to the former de facto partner under the will: new s 15B of the Succession Act 1981.
3. Stepchild includes child of party to de facto relationship The definition of a stepchild has been extended to include the child of a party to a de facto relationship, so a stepchild of the de facto testator is capable of bringing a claim against the testator’s estate as the deceased step-parent: s 40A Succession Act 1981.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- …
- 16
- Next Page »