ByLawyers News and Updates

1 January updates – All states

by

1 January updates are always a big focus for By Lawyers. While the profession takes a well-earned break By Lawyers remains hard at work ensuring our publications are updated for legislative and regulatory changes that take effect from the new year.

This year’s 1 January updates for relevant jurisdictions include:

Land tax

In New South Wales and Victoria, land tax is calculated for the calendar year. Threshold values increase annually.

In New South Wales, the 2022 threshold combined land value has increased to $969,000 for all liable land. Special trusts and non-concessional companies are excepted. A marginal tax rate of 1.6% of the aggregate taxable value above the tax-free threshold, plus $100 applies from 1 January. If the aggregate taxable value exceeds the premium rate threshold of $5,925,000 then $79,396 is payable, plus a marginal tax rate of 2% over that amount.

In Victoria, the tax-free threshold for general land tax remains at $300,000. The trust surcharge threshold remains at $25,000.

All relevant commentary and precedents in the By Lawyers Conveyancing and Property and Trusts guides for each relevant state will be updated for these new threshold amounts from 1 January.

By Lawyers Contract of sale of land

The 2023 edition of the By Lawyers contract will be available 1 January in the Sale of real property publications for Victoria and New South Wales. The contract is located in the Contract folder on the matter plan.

Leases and subleases

In New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia the 2023 editions of our lease and sub-lease precedents are available from 1 January. These are found in the Leases – Act for Lessor section of each Leases publication.

Keeping up to date

In addition to our 1 January updates, By Lawyers updates our publications for 1 June and other regulated adjustments when necessary.

Of course, we also update our content for relevant legislative amendments and other legal developments throughout the year, in all jurisdictions, as required.

Keeping up to date is one of the ways By Lawyers help our subscribers enjoy practice – and holidays – more!

The team at By Lawyers wishes everyone a prosperous and safe 2023.

Family law rules – FED

by

Changes to the family law rules from 28 November include the abolition of the need to file a parenting or financial questionnaire with an initiating application. Parties now only file a questionnaire if they have not filed an affidavit with their application or response.

Other amendments to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 include:

  • Rule 1.09: Changing the form for seeking rescission of a divorce order from an Application for Review to an Application in a Proceeding;
  • Rule 2.01: Requiring that an application must concisely state the orders sought;
  • Part 2.6: Making the rules on service of documents in Australia apply to service generally;
  • Part 5.6: Inserting new rules 5.28 and 5.29 requiring that the Annexure to Proposed Consent Parenting Orders be attached to an application for interim parenting orders proposed to be made in chambers, as was already required for final orders;
  • Rule 5.28 and rule 10.04: Allowing draft consent orders to be signed by a party’s legal representative;
  • Rule 6.06 and rule 8.09: Removing the requirement to file parenting or financial questionnaires with an initiating application if the party has filed an affidavit;
  • Rule 7.35: Providing for the court to accept the opinion of a court-appointed assessor unless there are exceptional circumstances; and
  • Rule 14.07: Allowing the court to consider an Application for Review in chambers if the parties consent, and requiring parties to seek leave for any further evidence to be filed in support of an Application for Review.

Amendments to the costs schedule in the rules commence on 1 January 2023.

Amendments have also been made to the delegations table in Schedule 4 to the Rules, with effect from 28 November 2022.

The amended delegations increase the powers of Senior Judicial Registrars and Judicial Registrars in dealing with aspects of case management, including allowing the registrars to:

  • deal with an application for an interlocutory consent order under the new part 5.6 of the Rules;
  • apply on a limited basis the court’s power under s 69ZR of the Family Law Act 1975 to make a finding of fact, determine a matter, or make an order in relation to an issue arising, at any time before final orders are made in child-related proceedings;
  • order a party to undergo drug or alcohol screening or testing;
  • make spousal or de facto maintenance orders on a limited basis;
  • make an order for child maintenance – Senior Judicial Registrars only;
  • make an injunction under s 114 against a third party – Senior Judicial Registrars only;
  • make orders in relation to costs, costs estimates, and assessment of costs under s 117;
  • grant leave to institute proceedings out of time – Senior Judicial Registrars only;
  • grant leave for joinder of a party to a proceeding after the first court date;
  • issue a subpoena, order the production and inspection of documents, and hear subpoena objections;
  • summarily dismiss an application that has no reasonable prospects of success;
  • make summary orders in response to a claim by a party that an application or response is frivolous, vexatious, or an abuse of process, or that an application has no reasonable likelihood of success;
  • make certain case management orders or directions under r 10.11;
  • make orders varying or setting aside orders under the slip rule if the original orders were made by a Senior Judicial Registrar or Judicial Registrar;
  • make declarations regarding the costs of a child, and amend administrative assessments that are more than 18 months old under the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989; and
  • grant a stay under s 111C of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988.

Lighthouse project expands – FED

by

From 28 November the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia’s Lighthouse Project expands to include all major registries. This follows additional funding provided in the recent federal budget.

The Lighthouse Project is a family-violence and risk-screening initiative for parenting and parenting/financial matters. The legislative framework was provided by the Family Law Amendment (Risk Screening Protections) Act 2020.

The project was initially available in the Adelaide, Brisbane, and Parramatta registries. It now expands to include Cairns, Canberra, Dandenong, Darwin, Hobart, Launceston, Melbourne, Newcastle, Rockhampton, Sydney, Townsville, and Wollongong registries.

The Lighthouse Project’s key points are:

  • early risk screening through a secure online platform;
  • early identification and management of safety concerns; and
  • assessment and triage of cases by a specialised team, who will provide resources and safe and suitable case management.

All cases identified as high-risk following the screening process are referred to a dedicated list in the court, known as the Evatt List. This is a judge-managed list that focuses on early information gathering and intervention through a dedicated support team in appropriate cases.

When commencing or responding to proceedings in the applicable registries, parties will be asked to provide an email and mobile number to enable risk screening. Parties will then receive an email with a secure link and login details to complete the risk screening process.

See the FCFCOA’s Lighthouse expansion – General fact sheet for more information.

The By Lawyers Family Law Children guide has information on The Lighthouse Project under Pre-action procedures in the commentary.

Practitioners are also reminded of the related information on family violence and cross-examination of parties in the Going to court folders, and the separate By Lawyers guides covering apprehended violence, intervention, and restraining orders for family and personal violence under various state laws.

Central Practice Direction – FED

by

The Central Practice Direction: Family Law Case Management outlines the core principles applicable to family law proceedings and establishes a consistent national case management system in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.

The practice direction requires that before filing an Initiating Application or a Response to an Initiating Application, lawyers give their clients a copy of the practice direction. There is a brochure on the matter plans in the By Lawyers family law publications, being a convenient PDF version of the practice direction, for this purpose.

A new precedent letter to the client has been added to the matter plans, enclosing the brochure and summarising its key points. This assists the practitioner to both comply with their obligations and explain the importance of the practice direction to their clients.

The Central Practice Direction incorporates the overarching purpose, enshrined in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021 under which the court was created, to facilitate the just resolution of disputes as quickly, inexpensively, and efficiently as possible.

The ten core principles by which the overarching purpose is to be achieved are in summary:

  1. assessment of risk to vulnerable parties;
  2. rapid and inexpensive agreements;
  3. efficient use of the court’s resources;
  4. effective case management;
  5. active dispute resolution;
  6. adverse consequences for non-compliance;
  7. costs obligations;
  8. full disclosure between parties of all relevant information and focus on the real issues;
  9. hearing preparation; and
  10. resolution or determination of all cases promptly.

Following the principles, the Central Practice Direction makes it clear that the court expects parties and their lawyers to always:

  • minimise costs;
  • promptly give full and frank disclosure of information;
  • communicate productively; and
  • identify and seek to resolve the issues genuinely in dispute.

The Practice Direction prohibits aggressive and unnecessarily adversarial conduct. The safety of parties and children is a priority. Parties are not required to put themselves or their children at risk or compromise if they feel unsafe or believe abuse or violence affects their ability to negotiate fair or reasonable outcomes. The interests of children are always the court’s paramount concern.

Family Court Act – WA

by

The Family Court Act 1997 (WA) has been amended to reflect recent changes to Commonwealth family law legislation and facilitate the exercise of federal jurisdiction by the Family Court of Western Australia.

The combined WA and Federal amendments provide for the exercise by the Family Court of Western Australia of federal jurisdiction in family law property proceedings to:

  • determine the superannuation interests of separating de facto couples; and
  • hear bankruptcy proceedings concurrently with family law proceedings, where appropriate.

Superannuation splitting

The Commonwealth family law legislation has allowed the superannuation interests of married parties in proceedings before the previous Family Court of Australia, now the Federal Family and Circuit Court of Australia, to be treated as property for distribution since 2001. However, this was restricted to parties to the breakdown of a marriage.

The Family Court Amendment (Western Australia De Facto Superannuation Splitting and Bankruptcy) Act 2020 (Cth) inserts a new Part VlllC into the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). This section provides for the distribution of superannuation entitlements between separating de facto couples in the Family Court of Western Australia. It allows superannuation matters under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) to be heard concurrently with other matters under the property provisions of the Family Court Act 1997 (WA).

Bankruptcy jurisdiction

The Family Court Amendment (Western Australia De Facto Superannuation Splitting and Bankruptcy) Act 2020 (Cth) also amends the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) to enable bankruptcy matters related to de facto couples to be heard by the Family Court of Western Australia in conjunction with family law proceedings. This is possible where:

(a) a party to a marriage or de facto relationship is bankrupt, and the trustee of the bankrupt’s estate is a party or an applicant in property settlement or spousal maintenance proceedings; or

(b) proceedings before the Federal Court or the Federal Circuit Court are transferred to the Family Court of Western Australia.

The Commonwealth Act also provides that appeals about concurrent family law and bankruptcy proceedings for Western Australian de facto couples will mirror existing appeal pathways for married and de facto couples in other jurisdictions.

The By Lawyers Family Law publications have been amended accordingly.

Bail amendments – WA

by

Bail amendments under the Bail Amendment Act 2022 received assent and commenced on 3 September 2022.

The Bail Act 1982 has been amended in a number of small but important respects, aimed mainly at better protecting the safety and welfare of victims of child sexual offences.

These latest bail amendments include:

  • provision ensuring that a person charged with a serious offence cannot be released without bail;
  • deleting the definition of serious offence under s 6A of the Act, so that the definition of serious offence in s 3 applies throughout the Act. This means that all serious offences are now listed in Schedule 2 of the Act, with the sole exception of the offence of breaching bail under s 51(2a) of the Act;
  • highlighting the capacity of bail decision makers to defer bail under s 9 to inform protective bail conditions in cases involving alleged sexual offences against children;
  • requiring bail decision makers to consider the conduct of the accused towards any alleged victim of the current offences and any victim of an offence the accused has previously been convicted of including any conduct towards the victim’s family;
  • requiring bail decision makers to take into account specific additional considerations that are specific to bail in cases involving alleged sexual offences against child victims;
  • requiring judicial officers to consider the fact that a person has been convicted of an offence and any sentence that is likely to be imposed when determining bail for an accused awaiting sentencing; and
  • expanding the list of serious offences under Schedule 2 to the Act. This means that a broader category of accused persons charged with serious offences while already on bail or on early release for another serious offence will bear the onus of satisfying the court
    that there are exceptional reasons why they should not be kept in custody.

The commentary on bail and the Retainer instructions – Bail precedent in the By Lawyers Magistrates Court (WA) – Criminal publication have been updated to reflect these bail amendments.

Legal Profession Uniform Law – WA

by

The Legal Profession Uniform Law applies in Western Australia from 1 July 2022.

Overview

The Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2022 applies the existing national Legal Profession Uniform Law (LPUL) in WA, together with subordinate legislation. it is intended to simplify and standardise regulation for legal practitioners. It brings WA into line with New South Wales and Victoria. The Uniform Law replaces the Legal Profession Act 2008 (WA).

The Uniform Law is governed by the Legal Services Council and the office of the Commissioner for Uniform Legal Services Regulation. Each participating jurisdiction has a representative on the council.

The council establishes the rules and policies that underpin the Uniform Law. The Commissioner oversees the dispute resolution and compliance functions of the Uniform Law.

The WA Legal Services and Complaints Committee and the Legal Practice Board continue to carry out complaint and investigation functions, grant practising certificates, and provide professional development.

While the Uniform Law makes many sweeping changes, the main effects on everyday practice concern costs disclosure and billing.

Costs disclosure

Disclosure obligations vary depending on the estimated legal costs in a matter.

Disclosure is not required where the total legal costs are not expected to exceed $750 excluding GST and disbursements. Where the total legal costs are not expected to exceed $3,000 excluding GST and disbursements, a law practice may use the prescribed uniform standard disclosure form contained in Schedule 1 of the Legal Profession Uniform General Rules.

Costs disclosure must be in writing and given to the client when instructions are taken, or as soon as reasonably practical after. It must include the basis on which legal costs will be calculated and an estimate of the total legal costs. It must include information about the client’s rights to negotiate the costs agreement, receive a bill, request an itemised bill, negotiate the billing method, and whether the costs are subject to a costs determination.

If there is any significant change the disclosure must be updated.

If a law practice fails to meet its disclosure obligations any cost agreement is void and the client is not required to pay the costs. The law practice cannot then commence or maintain any proceedings for recovery of costs until they are assessed, or any dispute determined by the Legal Practice Board. A contravention can also result in disciplinary action.

Where disclosure is made under the main disclosure requirements of the Uniform Law, a law practice must take all reasonable steps to satisfy itself that the client has understood and given consent to the proposed course of action for the conduct of the matter and the proposed costs.

Billing

The billing provisions of the Uniform Law do not apply if the client is a commercial organisation or government authority.

A bill may be expressed as a lump sum, or itemised. A client receiving a lump sum bill may request an itemised bill. The request must be made within 30 days after the date on which the legal costs became payable, and must be complied with within 21 days after receiving the request.

If the total amount of legal costs specified in an itemised bill is higher than the amount previously specified in a lump sum bill, the additional costs are only recoverable if the law practice previously told the client in writing that could be the case.

Each bill or covering letter accompanying each bill must be signed by a principal of the law practice, or nominate a principal of the law practice as the responsible principal for the bill.

A client may request progress reports on costs which must be provided within a reasonable period.

Lawyers may not charge for preparing or giving a bill or a progress report.

Bills must include a written statement setting out the client’s options to dispute the legal and the time limits applicable.

Interest may be charged on unpaid costs 30 days after a complying bill has been given if the bill contains a statement that interest will be payable and the rate chargeable. The maximum rate is prescribed, currently 2% above the cash rate target specified by the Reserve Bank of Australia at the time the bill was given.

By Lawyers updates

By Lawyers have made the introduction of the Legal Profession Uniform Law easy for our WA subscribers. Changes to By Lawyers publications to cover the LPUL include:

  • New costs agreements and short form costs disclosure for all WA guides and Federal guides. These are also available in 101 Costs Answers.
  • Updates to the Example Invoice Incorporating Notification of Client’s Rights – WA and the stand-alone Notification of Client’s Rights – WA precedents available on all WA and Federal matter plans.
  • Updates to the commentary on the requirements for professional executors in the Probate and Letters of Administration publications for WA.
  • Updates to the costs section in the Wills commentary including the Conflicts concerning practitioner’s own interests section and the Solicitors as executors section.
  • Updates to the WA trusts accounting section in the Practice Management guide
  • Relevant updates to 101 Costs Answers.

1 July updates – All states

by

1 July updates are always a big focus for By Lawyers. Many Commonwealth and state legislative instruments provide for the scheduled indexing of relevant monetary amounts and adjustments – usually increases – in government fees and charges. These regular updates occur at the start of every financial year impacting many different areas of law, and therefore numerous By Lawyers publications.

These updates include court filing fees, lodgment fees for property dealings, land tax thresholds, minimum weekly compensation amounts for Workers Compensation, and penalty units for fines for various criminal offences and civil penalty provisions.

By Lawyers always monitor and apply these changes for our subscribers. Each year we ensure our publications are amended where necessary to reflect 1 July updates.

We also monitor and update for similar legislative indexing and increases which occur regularly at other times of the year. These include 1 January changes and other specific dates for various areas of law as prescribed by some statutes.

The 1 July updates have been applied this year, or are in the process of being applied as they get released, to the following By Lawyers publications:

  • Conveyancing and Property;
  • Business and Franchise;
  • Criminal;
  • Litigation;
  • Estates;
  • Injuries; and
  • Employment.

Quite separately, there is also usually a raft of new and amending legislation from both Commonwealth and state parliaments which is set to commence on 1 July. This year is no different in that regard. By Lawyers have made various substantive amendments to a number of publications to account for the commencement of such legislation. Please see the various other By Lawyers News and Updates posts dealing with those updates.

By Lawyers always keep our content – and our subscribers – up to date!

Comparative CPD requirements

by

In all states and territories of Australia legal practitioners are required, as a condition of their practising certificates, to participate in compulsory professional development and training. Although the requirements are reasonably uniform, the terminology differs. In some states the requirement is known as Continuing Legal Education (CLE), or Mandatory Continuing Legal Education (MCLE). In others it is known as Compulsory Professional Development (CPD). There are also different requirements for barristers and solicitors.

For consistency, Continuing Professional Development (CPD) is used in this guide.

In each jurisdiction, the relevant one-year period begins on 1 April and ends on 31 March.

The CPD requirements in each state and territory are summarised below:

AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) = 10 units

Core Areas

A minimum of one CPD unit from each of the following areas:

  • Legal ethics and professional responsibility;
  • Practice management and business skills;
  • Professional skills; and
  • Substantive law and procedural law.

Section 47 of the Legal Profession Act 2006 (ACT) and the Law Society of the ACT CPD Guidelines.

NEW SOUTH WALES

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development = 10 units

Compulsory Fields

A minimum of one unit per year from each of the following fields:

  • Ethics and Professional Responsibility;
  • Practice Management and Business Skills;
  • Professional Skills; and
  • Substantive Law.

Legal Profession Uniform Continuing Professional Development (Solicitors) Rules 2015 and s 52 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW).

NORTHERN TERRITORY

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) = 10 points

Core Competencies

A minimum of one point per year from each of the following mandatory competency areas:

  • Ethics and professional responsibility;
  • Practice management and business skills; and
  • Professional Skills in legal practice.

Schedule 2 of the Legal Profession Regulations 2007.

QUEENSLAND

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) = 10 units

Mandatory Core areas

A minimum of one unit per year in each of the following mandatory core areas:

  • Practical legal ethics;
  • Practice management and business skills; and
  • Professional skills.

Part 6 of the Queensland Law Society Administration Rule 2005.

SOUTH AUSTRALIA

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (MCPD) = 10 units

Required Areas

A minimum of one unit per year from each of the following required areas:

  • Practical legal ethics;
  • Practice management and business skills; and
  • Professional skills.

Legal Practitioners Education and Admission Council Rules 2018.

TASMANIA

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) = 10 units

Mandatory Core Competency Areas

A minimum of one unit per year from each of the following mandatory competency areas:

  • Practical legal ethics;
  • Practice management and business skills; and
  • Professional skills; and
  • Substantive law.

Law Society of Tasmania’s Practice Guideline 4 – Continuing Professional Development Scheme and s 56 of the Legal Profession Act 2007.

VICTORIA

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) = 10 units

Compulsory Fields

A minimum of one unit per year from each of the following compulsory fields:

  • Ethics and Professional Responsibility;
  • Professional Skills;
  • Substantive Law; and
  • Practice Management and Business Skills.

Legal Profession Uniform Continuing Professional Development (Solicitors) Rules 2015 and s 52 Legal Profession Uniform Law.

WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) = 10 points

Mandatory Competency Areas

A minimum of one point per year from each of the following mandatory competency areas:

  • Practice management;
  • Professional skills;
  • Ethics and professional responsibility; and
  • Substantive law.

Legal Profession Act 2008, Legal Profession Rules 2009 and Legal Profession Regulations 2009.

Summary of continuing professional development activities

CPD Activity Activity format Formula
Max CPD Maximum number of CPD units that can be completed in a day.

  • TAS maximum = 6.
 N/A
Attendance Course, seminar, workshop, lecture, conference, discussion group, multimedia or web-based program.

  • TAS maximum = 3
  • WA maximum = 6
  • All other Jurisdictions = No limit.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
Study Private study of audio/visual material recording of an event that occurred in the CPD year.

  • NT maximum = 5
  • QLD, VIC, ACT = No limit.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
View View or listen multimedia or web-based program.

  • ACT – No limit
  • NT maximum =5
  • SA maximum = 5
  • TAS maximum = 5
  • WA maximum = 4.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
Private Private study of audio/visual material update solicitor’s knowledge and skills.

  • ACT – No limit
  • NSW maximum = 5
  • NT maximum =5
  • QLD maximum = 5
  • VIC maximum = 5.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
Research Research, preparation or editing of a legal article.

  • ACT maximum = 5
  • NSW maximum = 5
  • NT maximum =5
  • QLD maximum = 5
  • SA maximum =5
  • TAS maximum = 3
  • VIC maximum = 5
  • WA maximum = 5.
 1,000 words = 1 CPD
Activity preparation Preparation of CPD activities.

  • ACT maximum = 5
  • NSW maximum = 5
  • NT maximum =5
  • QLD maximum = 5
  • SA maximum =4
  • TAS maximum = 4
  • VIC maximum = 5.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
Presenting. Presentation of a CPD activity.

  • ACT maximum = 5
  • NT maximum =5
  • QLD maximum = 5
  • SA maximum =4
  • VIC maximum = 5.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
Present WA Presentation of a CPD activity and commentator.

  • WA maximum = 6.
 1 hour – 2 CPD
Membership actives Membership of legal committee, taskforce or practice section of a law association or similar body.

  • ACT maximum = 3
  • NSW maximum = 3
  • NT maximum =3
  • QLD maximum = 3
  • SA maximum =5
  • TAS maximum = 3
  • VIC maximum = 3.
 2 hours = 1 CPD
Graduate study Post graduate study.

  • NT maximum = 5
  • TAS maximum =5.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
Specialist Completion of a specialist accreditation program. 10 points incl compulsory
Practice Management Completion of practice management course. 10 points incl compulsory

Adverse action – FED

by

The recent employment law case of Qantas Airways Ltd v Transport Workers’ Union of Australia [2022] FCAFC 71 considered adverse action under the Fair Work Act 2009 and the obligation on an employer to establish that a decision affecting a worker is not contrary to the prohibitions in the Act.

Adverse action is covered in the By Lawyers Employment Law guide.

Sections 340 to 345 of the Fair Work Act prevent an employer from taking adverse action, as defined in s 342, against an employee who exercises a workplace right, defined in s 341.

For example, if an employee is dismissed, which constitutes adverse action being taken against them, because they made a complaint against their employer, which constitutes their exercise of a workplace right, then the employee may be able to bring a general protections claim against the employer.

In the recent case Qantas made a decision, while its fleet was grounded for the pandemic, to outsource ground handling operations at Australian airports. That resulted in Qantas employees losing their jobs to external providers. The union sought reinstatement of the employees on the basis that Qantas’ decision constituted adverse action on a number of bases. Qantas denied this and argued that the decision was made for operational business reasons.

The court found for the employees on one of the adverse action grounds, namely that the real reason for Qantas’ action in standing down employees was to prevent the exercise of a workplace right, being their right to negotiate a new Enterprise Bargaining Agreement which fell due shortly afterwards. Interestingly, that meant the court upheld the adverse action claim on the basis of a workplace right that did not exist at the time of the decision, but may exist at some future point in time.

The court looked in detail at how the decision was made, what the company took into account, and its knowledge of the future workplace right. The court found that Qantas knew it was circumventing the future right, whereas if it had no such knowledge the outcome may have been different.

The case may go on appeal, but it serves to remind workers of the robust nature of their rights under the Act and employers of the extent of their obligations.

This case will be added to the By Lawyers 101 Employment Law Answers publication and any developments on any appeal will be monitored.

Connect with us