ByLawyers News and Updates

Wills – Special disability trusts

by

A special disability trust can be established to specifically provide for the care and accommodation of a family member with a severe disability. If compliant with the statutory requirements it will allow the disabled beneficiary of the trust to retain their full pension entitlement. There are also generous concessions for contributions to a compliant special disability trust.

Along with the recent addition of special disability trusts to By Lawyers Companies, Trusts and Partnerships guide, our Wills guide now also includes detailed commentary and precedents covering special disability trusts.

A special disability trust can either be established in the will, or a direction can be given in the will for the executor to establish a special disability trust from the estate as required. Which option is chosen will depend on the client’s wishes and family circumstances. The Library of discretionary trust and special disability trust clauses in the By Lawyers Wills matter plan contains appropriate clauses for insertion in the will.

It also includes the By Lawyers Special Disability Trust Deed, which fully complies with the legislative requirements.

The new commentary covers everything a practitioner needs to know about establishing a special disability trust for their clients, including:

  • beneficiary eligibility requirements;
  • contribution and concession guidelines;
  • the permitted use of special disability trust funds; and
  • three ways the testator can provide for a disabled beneficiary via a special disability trust:
    • establish the trust inter vivos by deed and provide in the will for a bequest to the trust;
    • establish the special disability trust in the will; or
    • direct the executor of the will to establish the special disability trust, either with or without separate testamentary discretionary trusts.

 

Electronic conveyancing – Are you ready?

by

As the timeline towards mandatory electronic conveyancing marches on, By Lawyers continues to make changes to our matter plans and precedents to make sure that you are ready and that completing your matters electronically is as easy as possible.

Our matter plans have been split after ‘Mid transaction’ into ‘Paper transaction – Through to settlement’ and ‘Electronic transaction – Through to settlement’.

Precedent letters have been updated and where necessary new precedents included to cover electronic transactions.

By Lawyers helps you make a seamless transition to the new regime.

Wills – Additional clause – direction to executor regarding disposal of body

by

All By Lawyers wills precedents have been updated to include a clause that directs the executor on the testator’s wishes for their remains. This clause is automated  for LEAP users.

Where the instructions are more detailed, the Burial, Cremation, Medical Research Provisions clauses from the Library of Clauses, Deeds, Contracts and Codicils are also available.

Our Retainer Instructions already include a section for burial, cremation and medical research, so that the testator’s wishes can be discussed and recorded.

VIC – Magistrates’ Court Civil – New commentary on Substituted service

by

Some practical commentary on substituted service has been added to the By Lawyers Acting for the Plaintiff – Magistrates’ Court Guide.

To accompany this new commentary, we have also added the following precedents to the Acting for the Plaintiff matter plan:

  • Example content – Summons – Substituted Service;
  • Example content – Affidavit by solicitor in support of an application for substituted service.

VIC – Intervention orders – Relationship with bail conditions

by

The By Lawyers commentaries have been updated to deal with recent amendments to the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 by the Bail Amendment (Stage One) Bill 2017.

These changes, regarding the relationship between bail conditions, safety notices and intervention orders, are now covered in the VIC Criminal Magistrates’ Court Commentary and the Intervention Orders Commentary.

 

Planning certificates – Accuracy

by

Can this be right?

By Russell Cocks, Solicitor

First published in the Law Institute Journal

Can lawyers rely on certificates provided by authorities?

Property lawyers rely on certificates from authorities, such as local councils, all the time. Acting for a vendor, our clients have an obligation to disclose, prior to contract, certain information to prospective purchasers about the property to be sold and often rely upon certificates to reveal that information. Indeed, s.32J Sale of Land Act envisages that such certificates may be attached to the Vendor Statement. When acting for a purchaser, it is common practice to rely on certificates attached to the Vendor Statement as proof of the information contained therein.

This is particularly relevant to the town planning status of the property, a consideration that can have a huge impact on the value of the property. It is fair to say that the average lawyer would unconditionally accept that if a planning certificate was annexed to a Vendor Statement, the zoning of the property would comply with that certificate and that the purchaser can rely on that information. It is therefore likely to come as somewhat of a shock that the Court of Appeal in Queensland appears to have thrown doubt on this expectation and, if that decision were to be followed in Victoria, lawyers would become liable to their purchaser clients if the information in the certificate proved to be incorrect.

Central Highlands Regional Council v Geju P/L [2018] QCA 38 was an appeal by the Council against the decision in Geju P/L v Central Highlands Regional Council [2016] QSC 279. At first instance McMeekin J held the Council responsible for an incorrect town planning certificate that described land as zoned ‘industrial’ when it was in fact zoned ‘rural’ and found in favour of a purchaser who, relying on the certificate, had paid too much for the land. The purchaser’s claim had been based on the negligence of Council in providing the incorrect certificate to the vendor, who in turn provided it to the purchaser, and the Court was satisfied that the Council owed a duty of care to the purchaser, had breached that duty and the purchaser had suffered loss as a result. Most lawyers would agree with that decision and take comfort in the knowledge that an authority is responsible not only to the party who obtains the certificate, but third parties who might be expected to rely on the certificate.

But that decision was overturned on appeal. The Court of Appeal followed a similar line of analysis to McMeekin J but diverted, dramatically, at the question of duty of care. McMeekin J was satisfied that the Council owed a general duty of care in respect of the provision of certificates and described the purchaser as being a member of a class of people who might reasonably be expected to rely on the certificate – a potential purchaser of the property. However, the Court of Appeal rejected this view and concluded that “there was no rational way to define a class of which (the purchaser) was a member other than in very broad terms” and went on to suggest that tenants, lenders or investors might also be interested in the information contained in the certificate and that the Council’s liability should not extend to such a wide class of people. Thus, the Council owed no duty of care to the prospective purchaser.

Can this be right?

Since Mid Density Developments P/L v Rockdale Municipal Council [1993] FCA 408 there has been a widely held belief that municipal Councils are responsible for the accuracy of certificates provided to applicants for certificates AND third parties who deal with the applicant and might be reasonably expected to rely on such certificates. Prospective purchasers certainly fall within such a class, particularly when the certificate is relied upon by the applicant vendor to satisfy the vendor’s statutory disclosure obligation to prospective purchasers. That other classes of people might also interact with the applicant for the certificate hardly seems a valid reason to exclude that smaller class of people who interact as prospective purchasers.

The law relating to negligence causing pure economic loss is arcane. The High Court has had cause to consider the issue on a number of occasions and Central Highlands might provide the opportunity for it to do so again. In the meantime it is hoped that the previously understood liability imposed on council charged with the responsibility of administering planning schemes to provide correct certificates in respect of those schemes will continue, in Victoria at least.

Tip Box

•authorities provide certificates relating to properties

•the applicant for the certificate can rely on it

•there is now some doubt as to whether a third party can rely

Wills – Testamentary discretionary trusts

by

The commentary on testamentary discretionary trusts in our Wills publications now has a more in depth discussion of:

  • the benefits of testamentary discretionary trusts;
  • when a testamentary discretionary trust is appropriate;
  • family trust elections.

There are several By Lawyers precedent wills which create testamentary discretionary trusts for individuals and spouses, as well as a library of testamentary discretionary trust clauses. These precedents can be used to establish a single testamentary discretionary trust for all assets and beneficiaries of the estate, or multiple testamentary discretionary trusts for specific beneficiaries. They can also be used to establish additional testamentary discretionary trusts to provide protection for specific assets such as quarantining a family business or to allow for the particular needs of an individual beneficiary due to say drug addiction.

Connect with us