ByLawyers News and Updates

Transfer by direction – SA

by

Requirements for a transfer by direction have been relaxed in SA.

A recent Revenue Ruling SDA009[V2] states that, unless additional consideration is being paid by the transferee, a Deed of Assignment or Nomination is no longer necessary for any purchaser to direct the vendor to transfer the property to any other person or entity – whether related or not.

The Ruling states that Revenue SA:

  • acknowledges that a purchaser named in a contract has a common law right to direct the vendor to transfer the land to any party the purchaser chooses. This common law right to a transfer by direction exists whether or not the purchaser executes the contract with “and/or nominee”; and
  • no longer requires a letter of agency/nomination, nor any formal assignment, where a purchaser named in a contract and the person named in the transfer pursuant to that contract are not the same.

However, stamp duty will still be payable where an assignment document is prepared and executed, or when Section 68 of the Stamp Duties Act 1923 applies.

The ruling contains an example direction to the vendor.

The Sale and Purchase commentaries in the by Lawyers SA Conveyancing publication have been updated accordingly.

Companies – FED

by

Following an extensive author review, the By Lawyers Companies guide has been substantially enhanced. Users will find new commentary and a number of helpful new precedents.

The commentary now includes sections on Running a company and Company disputes.

With trademark By Lawyers practicality, the new sections of commentary assist practitioners to advise clients about most of the common issues which arise in the operation of small private companies, from managing company business, conducting meetings, issuing new shares and dealing with various types of company disputes, to negotiating share sales, handling insolvency events and participating in voluntarily winding up. Some aspects of the existing commentary on Setting up a company have also been enhanced and new precedents added.

Users will find the following new precedents have been added to the By Lawyers Companies Guide:

  • Retainer instructions – Company disputes;
  • Initial letter to company which has received a statutory demand;
  • Letter to the client  to make an appointment to sign documentation required for incorporation;
  • Letter to the client advising that the company has been incorporated;
  • Letter to the client with draft shareholder’s agreement;
  • New letters gathering information relevant to company disputes:
    • Letter to client requesting relevant documents;
    • Letter to director requesting inspection of company minutes;
    • Letter to director requesting company records; and
    • Letter to director advising of intention to seek a s 247A order to inspect company records;
  • New option precedents:
    • Notice of exercise of call option;
    • Notice of exercise of option to purchase
    • Notice of exercise of put option;
    • Notice of appointment of nominee;
    • Letter to seller’s solicitor exercising option; and
    • Letter to buyer’s solicitor exercising option;
  • Company resolution; and
  • Minutes of meeting – Directors.

These substantial enhancements to this already popular publication are part of By Lawyers commitment to constantly add value for our users and keep our content updated.

We invite you to peruse the new commentary and precedents in the Companies Guide, located in the Companies, Trusts, Partnerships and Superannuation publication. Also available in the Reference materials folder on each of these matter plans is the helpful reference manual Business structures and comparative table, which compares and contrasts the different types of business structures and considers their advantages and disadvantages, including from a taxation point of view.

 

 

 

Powers of Attorney – All states

by

The By Lawyers Powers of Attorney Guides have been updated. Amendments address the issue of attorneys who require access to the principal’s will to enable them to make informed decisions.

Generally, attorneys are not entitled to access their principal’s will. However, in some cases it is important that the attorney reviews the principal’s will, to ensure the attorney acts in accordance with the best interests and the wishes of the principal.

For example, the attorney may need to sell one of the principal’s assets to fund medical care of the principal. By reviewing the principal’s will, the attorney can learn that a particular asset has been specifically bequeathed. The attorney may therefore decide not to sell the bequeathed asset and instead sell an asset that will form part of the residue of the principal’s estate.

The following changes have been made to the Powers of Attorney publications in each state:

  1. New sections of Commentary discussing the issue;
  2. A new question in the Retainer Instructions to prompt consideration of the issue; and
  3. A new precedent clause Access to will has been added in the Library of Clauses for Power of Attorney.

Family provision claims – SA

by

The new By Lawyers Family Provision claims – SA Guide has received its first update. A recent Supreme Court case on joinder has been added.

A solicitor might receive instructions from a potential claimant after the client receives notice, as a person with an interest in the estate, from another claimant who has already commenced proceedings. Plaintiffs in Family Provision claims are required under the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1972 to serve other potential claimants with the proceedings.

Those potential claimants may then make an interlocutory application within 28 days of service, seeking to be joined as a plaintiff under s 8(7) of the Act. That section provides that the court may, ‘if satisfied that it is just and expedient to do so’, permit joinder of further claimants at any time prior to the final determination of the proceedings.

The recent Supreme Court case of Columbus v Efstathis & Ors [2019] SASC 149 makes it clear that in considering such an application, the court will in effect need to be satisfied that the applicant has reasonable prospects of success.

In that case the court found there was no reasonable prospect of the applicant, a grandchild of the deceased, establishing any moral obligation on the part of the deceased to have made provision for the applicant out of the estate. Leave for the applicant to be joined as a claimant was therefore refused.

In the course of its determination, the court reviewed the case law on the status of grandchildren with Family Provision claims, affirming the NSW Supreme Court decision of Bowditch v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2012] NSWSC 275 in finding that ‘as a general rule a grandparent does not have a responsibility to make provision for a grandchild in his or her testamentary disposition’.

This useful case has been added to the Family Provision claims – SA Commentary on page 25 under Acting for a potential claimant.

Letter to client after exchange – All states

by

A precedent update has followed recent user feedback. Significant amendments have been made to the Letter to client after exchange in the Purchase of Real Property Guide, for all states.

This useful precedent letter now includes headings and better reflects the process of payment of duty.

The areas covered, now organised under the new headings, are as follows:

  • GST
  • Investigation of title
  • Duty and concessions
  • Insurance
  • Pre-settlement

At By Lawyers we love to receive feedback from our users and they are often the reason that we update our precedents.

New guide – Family Provision Claims – SA

by

South Australian subscribers are invited to explore By Lawyers new publication, Family Provision Claims (SA).

This practical guide contains matter plans, commentaries and precedents for Acting for the Plaintiff and Acting for the Defendant.

Precedents in Acting for the Plaintiff guide include:

  • Retainer instructions;
  • Letter to client with initial advice;
  • Initial letter to estate or their solicitor;
  • Deed of settlement;
  • Deeds of family arrangement;
  • Brief to counsel;
  • Initiating application;
  • Affidavit in support;
  • Outline of submissions;
  • Example court book index;
  • Letter to plaintiff finalising the matter.

Precedents in Acting for the Defendant guide include:

  • Retainer instructions;
  • Letter to estate with initial advice;
  • Letter to claimant’s solicitor in response to their initial letter;
  • Letter reporting to estate on settlement;
  • Rule 315 affidavit of executor or administrator;
  • Defendant’s position paper for mediation;
  • Example formal offer;
  • Letter to defendant finalising the matter.

The commentaries in both Acting for the Plaintiff and Acting for the Defendant include:

  • Overview and time limits;
  • Managing the lawyer-client relationship and client identification;
  • Time and costs estimates;
  • Taking instructions and advising on the claim;
  • Assessing the merits of a claim;
  • When the court can make an order;
  • Assessing and calculating adequate provision;
  • Considering competing interests;
  • When to negotiate and tips for effective negotiation;
  • Mediation;
  • Commencing the claim
  • The first directions hearing date;
  • Costs and the supervisory approach taken by the court to costs;
  • The procedure following an order.

The By Lawyers South Australian Family Provision Claims publication is a comprehensive and practical resource for practitioners who are advising and representing either claimants or estates.

Suspicious circumstances – Wills – All states

by

Suspicious circumstances surrounding the drafting and execution of a will were considered in a recent NSW Court of Appeal case.

The validity of a will can be challenged by those who have standing. These include the people who are affected by it or a previous will. They may suspect the testator lacked the capacity to make the will, or that it was executed under duress, or other suspicious circumstances.

Where a will is executed under apparently suspicious circumstances the onus of proving that nothing untoward occurred is borne by the person propounding the will. Probate will not be granted unless the propounder allays those suspicions.

In Mekhail v Hana; Mekhail v Hana [2019] NSWCA 197 at [147] the Court of Appeal considered the onus had not been discharged, despite the primary judge having granted probate of the will.

The suspicious circumstances in that case included the instructions for the will and a power of attorney having not come from the testator/principal, an unexplained variation of the instructions, the description of the executor/beneficiary as the testator’s ‘daughter’ when they were in fact unrelated, the unwarranted urgency and the subsequent transfer of the testator/principal’s residential property to the attorney for nominal consideration. The case was also complicated by the attending solicitor’s decision to destroy an original file note and create a more detailed version some months later, after having also acted for the attorney regarding the transfer of the property.

The mechanical treatment of the suspicious circumstances doctrine by the first instance judge in this case led the Court of Appeal to suggest ‘a preferred approach’ at [164]-[173], although the court observed that the limits of the doctrine ‘can scarcely be regarded as settled’.

Practitioners should take care to observe and inquire about any apparently suspicious circumstances surrounding the instructions for and the execution of wills and other personal documents. Properly identifying the client is a basic precaution, but enquiring about relationships and motivations may also be warranted. Confirming instructions with the client in the absence of those who might benefit from the documents is also prudent. Clear, accurate, detailed and contemporaneous file notes are always advisable.

This interesting case has been added to the By Lawyers 101 Succession Answers (NSW) publication.

Condition and finding – All states

by

A new precedent with example content has been added to all By Lawyers Estates guides. The example content is for an affidavit regarding the condition and finding of a will.

Such an affidavit may be required to satisfy the court as to any issues surrounding the condition an original will is in, or the circumstances by which it was found. This affidavit may be lodged either with an application or in response to a requisition when applying for a grant of probate, or a grant of letters with the will annexed.

This new precedent provides extensive example wording addressing the issues of the will’s condition and finding. The content encompasses evidence to be given by an employee of the firm, the executor, a subscribing witness, or another person who has knowledge of how, for example, marks upon the will are not an indication of revocation.

As with all By Lawyers ‘example content’ precedents, the relevant form can be found immediately above the new precedent on the matter plan. The example content can be modified as required and pasted into the appropriate place in the form.

Conveyancing – supplier notification – All states

by

Supplier notification obligations for GST withholding

By Lawyers frequently receive questions from subscribers about supplier notification and GST withholding obligations for residential conveyancing. Commentary on GST withholding requirements for residential properties can be found in all By Lawyers Sale and Purchase Guides.

A vendor/supplier will have a notification obligation if supplying, by way of sale or long-term lease, either existing or new residential premises or potential residential land where the purchaser is not a registered entity acquiring the land for a creditable purpose. There is no requirement that the supply be a taxable supply.

Where a notification obligation exists, the vendor/supplier is required to provide the purchaser with a written notice, called a Supplier notification, containing information to help the purchaser comply with their GST withholding obligations.

The notice must state whether or not the purchaser has a withholding obligation. If the purchaser does not have a withholding obligation, the notice must make it clear that ‘no withholding is required‘.

If the purchaser does have a withholding obligation then the notice must include additional information. The requirements are set out in Schedule 1 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 – section 14-255.

The By Lawyers Contract for the sale of land includes a clause satisfying supplier notification obligations.

A Supplier notification precedent is available in all By Lawyers Conveyancing – Sale matter plans, in ‘The contract’ folder.

 

Subpoena objections – FED and All states

by

A new case on subpoena objections has been added to the By Lawyers Reference Guide 101 Subpoena Answers.

In Weeks v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2019] WASC 268, the court considered whether a subpoena in a defamation case should be set aside for lack of  a legitimate forensic purpose (LFP).

The court succinctly stated the law on LFP, to the effect that The issuing party must identify expressly and with precision the legitimate forensic purpose for which they seek access to the documents. The issuing party must then satisfy the court that it is ‘on the cards’ that the documents would materially assist the issuing party in their defence‘.

In this regard the Court followed the leading LFP cases of R v Saleam (1989) 16 NSWLR 14 and Alister v R (1984) 154 CLR 404, 414. The Court also followed the earlier Western Australian full court decision of Stanley v Layne Christensen Co [2004] WASCA 50 regarding legitimate forensic purpose. The subpoena in this case was set aside.

This Western Australian decision has been added to 101 Subpoena Answers under the section on Legitimate forensic purpose in civil cases. This publication is an excellent resource for practitioners conducting litigation and dealing with subpoenas in all courts, whether issuing or responding, and including subpoena objections.

101 Subpoena Answers is available in all By Lawyers state court Litigation publications, as well as our Family Law, Family Provision, Injuries, Employment Law and Defamation guides.

 

Connect with us