ByLawyers News and Updates

Publication Updates

Updates to Motor Vehicle Accidents NSW Guide

by

Some helpful additions have been made to the commentary:

  • Effect of any settlement or award of damages on income protection policies;
  • Enhanced commentary on statutory benefits under the post-December 2017 scheme, including the critical definition of ‘minor injuries’, with further headings and content for improved readability;
  • Direct link to the ‘Apply for personal injury benefits’ page on the SIRA website, including SIRA’s simple ‘how-to’ video on claiming statutory benefits.

Family Law – Divorce publication review

by

The By Lawyers Family Law author has reviewed the Divorce publication covering commentary, matter plan and precedents.

Commentary updates include the following additions:

  1. Application without marriage certificate – If the parties do not have a copy of the marriage certificate, an application should be made at the relevant state Births, Deaths and Marriages. In the case of an overseas marriage, if a copy of the marriage certificate cannot be obtained, the applicant may be able to file an affidavit pursuant to r 25.01(3) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules addressing the reasons for the failure to file the marriage certificate.
  2. Appealing a divorce order – In Price & Underwood (Divorce Appeal) [2009] FamCAFC 127, the Full Court addressed the issue of whether an appeal may be filed after a divorce order has taken effect. The court was split on the issue, with Boland and Ryan JJ finding that s 93 of the Family Law Act is clear and unambiguous – no appeal lies from a divorce order which has become final. Where a divorce order which has become final the only relief available is a declaration under s 113 that the divorce order is void. May J took the view that a divorce order could be subject to an appeal even if it is of effect, on the basis of a miscarriage of justice.

As there have not been any changes in terms of significant case law or legislative changes in the last 12 months, no changes were made to precedents or the matter plan.

Conveyancing – GST withholding – additional commentary, amendments to contracts and precedents

by

The requirement for purchasers to withhold and remit GST on taxable supplies of certain real property under subdivision 14-E Schedule 1 Taxation Administration Act 1953 comes into force on 1 July 2018. This applies to all contracts that settle after 1 July. The transitional arrangements are that contracts entered into prior to 1 July 2018 and settle before 1 July 2020 are exempt from the withholding regime.

The sale and purchase commentaries in all states have been updated, the By Lawyers contracts in NSW and VIC have appropriate new provisions and precedent letters are being updated.

QLD – Online transmission applications – Updated forms, new Trust Details form and updated commentaries

by

From May 2018 transfers recording a transferee  – that is, the executor – as trustee can be lodged electronically. To do this only details of the trust will be required – that is, as executor pursuant to grant of probate.

For consistency in paper the Titles Registry introduced the Trust Details form, on which the basis of the trustee transfer can be noted. Transmission applications that are supported by a grant from a foreign jurisdiction that is eligible for re-seal in Queensland under the British Probates Act 1898 (a Queensland recognised grant) that have not been resealed in Queensland are now made on a form 5.

While a form 1 Transfer is available through PEXA and eLodgement, transmission application forms 5 and 5A can only be lodged through eLodgement. See Electronic lodgement of title transactions (eLodgement) for details of what forms can be lodged and how to use eLodgement.

Transitional provisions for forms 5 and 5A are in place until 30 September.

Forms 5 and 5A have been updated to the latest version. The new Trust Details form has been added to the matter plan. Also our Probate and Letters of Administration commentaries have been updated to reflect these changes.

Family Law – Financial agreements publication review

by

The By Lawyers Family Law author has reviewed the Financial Agreements publication covering commentary, matter plan and precedents.

Commentary updates include the following additions:

  1. Child support agreements and financial agreements: Whilst a financial agreement may also be a binding child support agreement if it complies with the requirements in the child support legislation, it is recommended that child support ought to be provided for in a Binding Child Support Agreement or a Limited Child Support Agreement; and
  2. Enforcement procedure when a case has not been on foot: i.e. to seek a declaration as to the enforceability of the binding financial agreement under 90KA or 90UN, an initiating application would need to be filed, seeking both a declaration and the orders in relation to enforcement. The practical reality is in most applications seeking enforcement of a binding financial agreement, an initiating application is filed seeking both the declaration and enforcement orders at once.

The new requirements for affidavits in the Family Court has led to a new Exhibit page to Affidavit form being created by LEAP. This has been linked where necessary in the matter plan.

Letter submitting financial agreement to other side acting for themselves has been amended by adding the following paragraph:

The agreement cannot be signed without you obtaining independent legal advice and the solicitor needs to sign where indicated on the document to confirm you have been provided with this advice.

Reference Manual – 101 Family Law Answers – additional commentary

by

Stamp duty and other charges

Whilst stamp duty is the common duty parties seek an exemption from, s 90(1) does not only provide an exemption from stamp duty. It provides that certain agreements/orders are not subject to any duty or charge under any law of a State or Territory. This may include land titles office fees on a discharge of mortgage, withdrawal of caveat and/or registration of mortgage.

Practitioners need to be mindful when drafting orders to ensure their orders specify what is required: for example, whether a refinance is required, or whether a withdrawal of caveat is provided.

Family Law – Property Settlement publication review

by

The By Lawyers Family Law author has reviewed the Property Settlement publication covering commentary, matter plan and precedents.

Commentary updates include the following additions:

  1. Evidentiary issues with spousal maintenance – the best evidence for the effect of health issues on the earning capacity of the applicant is usually that of a medical practitioner; and regarding the attempts made by the applicant to secure paid employment, if acting for the respondent, evidence from a recruitment expert as to the applicant’s employability and likely salary may be useful;
  2. It is best practice to advise clients, even in consent matters, to provide and request disclosure of at least the basic documents. If they do not want to do so, advising them of the risks for an agreement or orders to be set aside on the basis of non disclosure is recommended;
  3. Consent orders and the registrar seeking further clarification – a requisition may be avoided by providing a covering letter or statement of agreed facts along with the documents to be filed, explaining the orders and background which gives rise to what otherwise may appear unjust;
  4. Federal Circuit Court Practice Direction No. 2 of 2017 providing strict directions for affidavits in interim matters;
  5. Section 79(9) and s 90SM(9) of the Family Law Act provides that the court shall not make an order in a property settlement proceedings, other than an interim order or a consent order, unless the parties have attended a conference with a Registrar or Deputy Registrar, i.e. a conciliation conference. If the matter is urgent or there is another special circumstance, the court may make an order notwithstanding parties have not attended a conference; and
  6. If a party seeks to amend their application or response refer to Federal Circuit Rule 7.01 and Family Law Rule 11.10.

The new requirements for affidavits in the Family Court has led to a new Exhibit page to Affidavit form being created by LEAP. This has been linked where necessary in the matter plan.

There were only minor amendments to several letters regarding use of the term “initiating applications” as opposed to “application for final orders”.

 

Connect with us