ByLawyers News and Updates
  • Publication updates
    • Federal
    • New South Wales
    • Victoria
    • Queensland
    • South Australia
    • Western Australia
    • Northern Territory
    • Tasmania
    • Australian Capital Territory
  • By area of law
    • Bankruptcy and Liquidation
    • Business and Franchise
    • Companies, Trusts, Partnerships and Superannuation
    • Conveyancing and Property
    • Criminal Law
    • Defamation and Protecting Reputation
    • Employment Law
    • Family Law
    • Immigration
    • Litigation
    • Neighbourhood Disputes
    • Personal injury
    • Personal Property Securities
    • Practice Management
    • Security of Payments
    • Trade Marks
    • Wills and Estates
  • Legal alerts
  • Articles
  • By Lawyers

Sexual harassment – FED

6 March 2023 by By Lawyers

From 6 March 2023 sexual harassment in connection with work is prohibited by the Fair Work Act 2009. Aggrieved persons have rights to apply to the Fair Work Commission and, with some limitations, the Federal Courts.

Part 3-5A of the Fair Work Act 2009 prohibits sexual harassment of workers, persons seeking to become workers, and persons conducting businesses or undertakings, and provides for the granting of remedies when that happens.

An employer may be vicariously liable for sexual harassment of their employee or agent unless the employer can show that they took all reasonable steps to prevent it.

An aggrieved person who alleges they have been sexually harassed in connection with work, or an industrial association entitled to represent the industrial interests of an aggrieved person, may apply to either:

  1. the Fair Work Commission under s 527J of the Act to either make a Stop Sexual Harassment Order (SSHO) , or to otherwise deal with the dispute, or both;
  2. a Federal Court for orders for contravention of civil remedy provisions, under Division 2 of Part 4-1.

However, a court application can only be made if the parties have first attempted to resolve the matter through the Fair Work Commission, and the Commission has issued a certificate to that effect, unless the application seeks an interim injunction.

These provisions of the Act are in addition to, and do not exclude or limit, any rights a person may have under any state or territory law in connection with sexual harassment.

If the application is not solely for a SSHO, the Commission must deal with the dispute according to its powers under s 595 (2), other than by arbitration – namely via mediation or conciliation, or making a recommendation or expressing an opinion.

Stop Sexual Harassment Order

Where an application seeks a SSHO, if the Commission is satisfied that the aggrieved person has been sexually harassed and there is a risk of the harassment continuing, the Commission may make any orders it considers appropriate to prevent the harassment, except for a pecuniary order: s 527J(i).

In considering the terms of its orders, the Commission must take into account the outcomes of any investigation into the matter, any other procedures available to the aggrieved person and the outcomes if any, and anything else the Commission considers relevant.

Time limits

Any application to the Fair Work Commission under Part 3-5A of the Fair Work Act 2009 may be dismissed if it is made more than 24 months after the alleged contravention, or after the last of a series of contraventions is alleged to have occurred: s 527G of the Act, or such longer time as the Commission allows upon application.

A sexual harassment court application must be brought within 60 days of the s 527R(3)(a) certificate being issued by the Fair Work Commission, or such longer time as the court may allow upon application.

These amendments are under the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022. The By Lawyers Employment Law guide has been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Practice Management, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: employee, employer, Employment law, sexual harassment

CTP claims costs – NSW

28 February 2023 by By Lawyers

Reporting of CTP claims costs by legal practitioners in NSW is now lodged via an online portal.

The State Insurance Regulatory Authority (SIRA) has launched a new Claims Costs Disclosure (CCD) portal to capture settlement costs data relating to Compulsory Third Party (CTP) damages claims made under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (MAIA).

Legal practitioners representing a CTP claimant must provide SIRA with a breakdown of costs related to the settlement of the claim, including:

  • the total amount for which the claim was resolved;
  • all deductions, including all legal costs and disbursements;
  • the total amount paid to the claimant.

CTP claims costs for damages claims settled on or after 1 March 2023 need to be lodged via the new portal. Retrospective disclosure prior to 1 March 2023 is not required. Registration for the portal has been available since 8 February 2023.

The By Lawyers Motor Vehicle Accident – From 1 December 2017 (NSW) guide has been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Legal Alerts, Litigation, Motor Vehicle Accidents, New South Wales, Personal injury, Publication Updates Tagged With: costs disclosure, CTP claims, Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017, motor accidents

Surcharge purchaser duty – NSW

27 February 2023 by By Lawyers

From 21 February 2023 some foreign purchasers are no longer required to pay surcharge purchaser duty, or surcharge land tax, on residential property in New South Wales.

Citizens of New Zealand, Finland, Germany, and South Africa are exempt for purchases of residential related property or land. International tax treaties exist between Australia and each of  these countries that have the force of federal law and override inconsistent state-based revenue provisions.

Current purchasers and existing landowners from these countries may seek a refund of any surcharge purchaser duty and surcharge land tax paid in NSW on or after 1 July 2021. See the Revenue NSW website for the eligibility criteria for refunds, and a list of common questions and scenarios stemming from international tax treaties.

The exemptions relate only to natural persons. Where a trust relationship exists, or a non-individual entity such as a corporation or partnership is involved, and the entity or trustee is associated with these nations, the international tax treaties and the exemption may also be enlivened but is not automatic.

The relevant By Lawyers New South Wales conveyancing publications have been updated accordingly. The Purchase of Real Property (NSW), Sale of Real Property (NSW), and 1001 Conveyancing Answers (NSW) guides already contain extensive sections of commentary on surcharge purchaser duty and surcharge land tax regimes.

Filed Under: Conveyancing and Property, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Publication Updates Tagged With: conveyancing NSW, Surcharge duty and land tax

Electronic lodgment – QLD

21 February 2023 by By Lawyers

Mandatory electronic lodgment applies for conveyancing in Queensland from 20 February 2023.

Section 4 of the Land Title Regulation 2022 requires legal practitioners and licensed conveyancers to draft and lodge the following required instruments via an Electronic Lodgment Network (ELN):

  • transfer;
  • mortgage;
  • release of mortgage;
  • caveat;
  • request to withdraw a caveat;
  • priority notice;
  • request to extend a priority notice;
  • request to withdraw a priority notice; and
  • application to be registered as a personal representative for a deceased owner.

There are some exceptions to the electronic lodgment of these required instruments, including where:

  • the ELN does not have the functionality to draft and lodge the instrument;
  • a required instrument, such as a transfer or mortgage, for example, was executed in a hard copy form before 20 February 2023: s 6;
  • the required instrument needs to be lodged with another instrument that cannot be lodged using an ELN; or
  • a party to the instrument is a self-represented natural person who is not subscribed to an ELN.

Section 5(2) of the Land Title Regulation 2022 provides the full list of exemptions to electronic lodgment.

Electronic conveyancing is already the preferred method for the lodgment of title instruments by lawyers and licensed conveyancers, having been introduced in Queensland in 2013. The two Electronic Lodgment Network Operators (ELNOs), Property Exchange Australia Limited (PEXA), and Sympli Australia Pty Ltd (Sympli).

The By Lawyers Queensland Conveyancing publications have been updated to reflect this change. For more information see:

  • E-Conveyancing – Required instruments in the Purchase of Real Estate (QLD), Sale of Real Estate (QLD), and Mortgage (QLD) guides;
  • A brief explanation of the transition to E-conveyancing,  on the matter plan in all By Lawyers Conveyancing Guides, which includes information on how to get connected and the full timeline for implementation.

Filed Under: Conveyancing and Property, Legal Alerts, Publication Updates, Queensland Tagged With: econveyancing, electronic conveyancing, ELNOs, transition to electronic conveyancing

Recent property cases – VIC

7 February 2023 by By Lawyers

Recent property cases have been added to the By Lawyers reference manual 1001 Conveyancing Answers (VIC).

This publication has been extensively reviewed and updated by our esteemed author Russell Cocks.

Helpful recent property cases added to the publication in this review include:

  • APM Group (Aust) Pty Ltd v Centurion Australia Investments Pty Ltd [2022] VSC 637 – to the effect that construction of student accommodation is domestic building work;
  • Ripani v Century Legend Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 242 – changes to a plan that materially affect a property may justify avoidance;
  • Huang & Anor v Kotsias & Ors [2022] VCC 470 – a joint tenant acting as an attorney for the other joint tenant may sever the joint tenancy;
  • GLP Batesford Holdings Pty Ltd v 68 Bridge Road Land Pty Ltd [2022] VSC 614 – held that a condition that requires the purchaser to release the deposit within five days of being provided with particulars is invalid;
  • Garlick v Kerbaj & Ors [2022] VSC 336 – relying on the advice of counsel is rarely a defence for a solicitor;
  • Owners Corporation 1 Plan No. PS735439F v Singh (Owners Corporations) [2022] VCAT 389 – owners corporations may not be able to recover all of the costs associated with fee recoveries;
  • Corngate Investments Pty Ltd v Lukewood Pty Ltd & Anor [2022] VSC 289 – considered section 32C(c) of the Sale of Land Act 1962 in the context of road access to a property across a rail crossing;
  • Re Maddock; Bailey v Maddock [2022] VSC 346 – consideration of the issue of capacity for making a will; and
  • Grabovic v Yang [2022] VSC 417 – treatment of an overseas will.

1001 Conveyancing Answers (VIC) is available in all By Lawyers Victorian property law guides – Sale of real property, Purchase of real property, Leases, and Mortgages.

This comprehensive publication assists property practitioners to understand deeper issues in conveyancing and solve problems for clients when they arise.

Filed Under: Conveyancing and Property, Legal Alerts, Publication Updates, Victoria Tagged With: 1001 Conveyancing Answers Victoria, conveyancing, property

Family and domestic violence leave – FED

31 January 2023 by By Lawyers

Family and domestic violence leave entitlements change for many employees from 1 February 2023, with paid leave replacing the previous entitlement to unpaid leave.

Full-time, part-time, and casual employees of non-small business employers, being those with 15 or more employees on 1 February 2023, are entitled to 10 days of paid family and domestic violence leave in every 12-month period of employment. It is not calculated on a pro-rata basis for casual employees and is all available up-front, which means a new employee has an immediate entitlement to the full ten days. The leave does not accumulate if not taken.

The same entitlement will apply to employees of small business employers, being those with less than 15 employees on 1 February 2023, from 1 August 2023. Until then, employees of small businesses remain eligible for the existing entitlement of 5 days of unpaid family and domestic violence leave.

The leave can be taken for any purpose relating to the impact of family and domestic violence, which might include relocating, attending court, or attending medical, legal, counselling, and financial advice appointments.

Employers cannot include information in an employee’s pay slip identifying they type of leave paid.

Family and domestic violence is defined as violent, threatening, or other abusive behaviour by an employee’s close relative, current or former intimate partner, or a member of their household that both seeks to coerce or control them and causes them harm or fear.

The leave can be taken during a period of personal or carer’s leave, or annual leave.

The notice and evidence requirements of s 107 of the Fair Work Act 2009 apply, including the requirement for the employer to maintain confidentiality: s 106C.

See the Fair Work Ombudsman website for more information.

The By Lawyers Employment Law commentary has been updated accordingly. Further updates will be applied when the entitlement extends to all employees in August.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Practice Management, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: Domestic and Family Violence, employee, employees, employer, employers, Employment law

Commercial List – QLD

30 January 2023 by By Lawyers

Supreme Court Practice Direction 1 of 2023 introduces new procedures for the Court’s Commercial List from 30 January 2023.

The Court has also issued supporting Notes that provide guidance about some practical aspects of the Commercial List, including parties, practitioners, directions, expert evidence, electronic filing and document management.

The key point of the new arrangements is that cases will be managed by a specific judge from start to finish. This includes interlocutory applications. Where the allocated judge is not available another Commercial List judge will step in.

The Practice Direction applies to existing and future commercial matters commenced in, or transferred to, the Brisbane registry. Commercial matter filed in another region will be subject to case management as appropriate in that region.

Matters can be put on the list by a party, or assigned by the court. The criteria is that the real issues involved in the matter are of a general commercial character, or arise out of trade and commerce, including e-commerce. The Practice Direction provides a non-exhaustive list of such issues:

  • the construction of a business contract, smart contract or other commercial
    instrument;
  •  insurance and reinsurance;
  • banking and financial services, including dealings in cryptocurrency;
  • the provision and enforcement of securities of any kind;
  • the conduct of business and commercial agents;
  • rights in, to, or concerning technology, including blockchain technology;
  • intellectual property;
  • partnership and joint venture relationships;
  • the export or import of goods or services;
  • the provision of goods or services by land, sea, air, cable, pipeline or through use
    of the internet for commercial purposes;
  • arbitral proceedings under the Commercial Arbitration Act 2013 (Qld);
  • the exploitation of natural resources;
  • conduct in and/or the operation of financial markets and exchanges;
  • data ownership, storage and security;
  • an appeal or judicial review relating to a tax, levy or royalty; and
  • directors’ duties, shareholder rights, capital raising, takeovers, compulsory
    acquisitions, buy-outs and windings up under part 5.4A of the Corporations Act
    2001 (Cth).

The By Lawyers Supreme Court (QLD) publications have been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Legal Alerts, Litigation, Publication Updates, Queensland Tagged With: commercial litigation, litigation, practice directions, Queensland Supreme Court

1 January updates – All states

23 January 2023 by By Lawyers

1 January updates are always a big focus for By Lawyers. While the profession takes a well-earned break By Lawyers remains hard at work ensuring our publications are updated for legislative and regulatory changes that take effect from the new year.

This year’s 1 January updates for relevant jurisdictions include:

Land tax

In New South Wales and Victoria, land tax is calculated for the calendar year. Threshold values increase annually.

In New South Wales, the 2022 threshold combined land value has increased to $969,000 for all liable land. Special trusts and non-concessional companies are excepted. A marginal tax rate of 1.6% of the aggregate taxable value above the tax-free threshold, plus $100 applies from 1 January. If the aggregate taxable value exceeds the premium rate threshold of $5,925,000 then $79,396 is payable, plus a marginal tax rate of 2% over that amount.

In Victoria, the tax-free threshold for general land tax remains at $300,000. The trust surcharge threshold remains at $25,000.

All relevant commentary and precedents in the By Lawyers Conveyancing and Property and Trusts guides for each relevant state will be updated for these new threshold amounts from 1 January.

By Lawyers Contract of sale of land

The 2023 edition of the By Lawyers contract will be available 1 January in the Sale of real property publications for Victoria and New South Wales. The contract is located in the Contract folder on the matter plan.

Leases and subleases

In New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia the 2023 editions of our lease and sub-lease precedents are available from 1 January. These are found in the Leases – Act for Lessor section of each Leases publication.

Keeping up to date

In addition to our 1 January updates, By Lawyers updates our publications for 1 June and other regulated adjustments when necessary.

Of course, we also update our content for relevant legislative amendments and other legal developments throughout the year, in all jurisdictions, as required.

Keeping up to date is one of the ways By Lawyers help our subscribers enjoy practice – and holidays – more!

The team at By Lawyers wishes everyone a prosperous and safe 2023.

Filed Under: Conveyancing and Property, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: 1 January updates, conveyancing, Conveyancing & Property

District Court – NSW

16 December 2022 by By Lawyers

The jurisdictional limit of the District Court increased on 16 December 2022. The limit as defined in s 4 of the District Court Act 1970 went from $750,000 to $1,250,000.

The jurisdictional limit may still be exceeded if the parties consent as provided under s 51. There remains no jurisdictional limit for motor accident claims.

Additionally, the monetary limit for the court to deal with and order interlocutory injunctions has increased from $20,000 to $100,000.

The District Court also has limited jurisdiction to hear:

  • small equitable disputes involving property – including estates administration – of a value up to $100,000: s 134(1);
  • claims under the Property (Relationships) Act 1984 where the adjustment sought is up to $250,000: s 134(3). See the Family Law publication;
  • claims under Chapter 3 of the Succession Act 2006 where the adjustment sought is to a value of $250,000: s 134(2). See the Family Provision Claims (NSW) publication;
  • claims under the Frustrated Contracts Act 1978, to the court’s jurisdictional limit: s 134A;
  • claims for relief under the Contracts Review Act 1980, but subject to restrictions: s 134B; and
  • claims under the Fair Trading Act 1987: s 135.

Unchanged is the jurisdiction of the District Court in proceedings for possession of land. The court can only deal with such proceedings where the land value does not exceed $20,000: s 133.

There are no corresponding changes to the jurisdictional limit of the Local Court. The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is unlimited.

By Lawyers District Court Civil (NSW) guides have been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Legal Alerts, Litigation, New South Wales, Personal injury, Publication Updates Tagged With: District Court, Litigation; debt recovery

First home buyers – NSW

6 December 2022 by By Lawyers

Eligible first home buyers who exchanged contracts from 11 November 2022 on properties valued up to $1.5 million can now choose to pay an annual property tax instead of transfer duty.

For properties settling on or before 15 January 2023, purchasers pay transfer duty and apply for a refund after 16 January 2023.

Settlements occurring after 16 January 2023 do not require transfer duty to be paid if the property tax option is chosen.

The Property Tax (First Home Buyer Choice) Act 2022 (NSW) received assent on 11 November 2022.

The existing first home buyer duty concessions still apply.

The property tax is indexed annually, capped at 4% per year.

Eligible first home buyers who are not Australian citizens can still be liable for surcharge purchaser duty, even after opting into the property tax.

A residence requirement of 6 continuous months within the 12 months after settlement applies. Purchasers who then use the property as an investment face a higher rate of property tax.

See the By Lawyers Conveyancing (NSW) guides and the Revenue NSW website for more information.

Filed Under: Conveyancing and Property, Legal Alerts, Miscellaneous, New South Wales, Publication Updates

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • …
  • 28
  • Next Page »

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Preferred State

Connect with us

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 · Privacy Policy
Created and hosted by LEAP · Log in