ByLawyers News and Updates
  • Publication updates
    • Federal
    • New South Wales
    • Victoria
    • Queensland
    • South Australia
    • Western Australia
    • Northern Territory
    • Tasmania
    • Australian Capital Territory
  • By area of law
    • Bankruptcy and Liquidation
    • Business and Franchise
    • Companies, Trusts, Partnerships and Superannuation
    • Conveyancing and Property
    • Criminal Law
    • Defamation and Protecting Reputation
    • Employment Law
    • Family Law
    • Immigration
    • Litigation
    • Neighbourhood Disputes
    • Personal injury
    • Personal Property Securities
    • Practice Management
    • Security of Payments
    • Trade Marks
    • Wills and Estates
  • Legal alerts
  • Articles
  • By Lawyers

GST withholding

1 January 2018 by By Lawyers

By Russell Cocks, Solicitor

First published in the Law Institute Journal

Six months after the ATO introduced new GST Withholding obligations on purchasers of real estate, those changes are starting to have an effect.

In an attempt to reduce avoidance of GST obligations by vendors arising from the practice of illegal phoenix activity, the ATO introduced a GST Withholding obligation on 1 July 2018. The intent of these changes is to require purchasers of certain types of real estate to withhold a portion of the purchase price from the vendor and pay that money to the ATO, to be applied as a credit towards the vendor’s GST liability. This is not a new tax, just a new method of collecting an existing tax. However, as is usually the case when the ATO seeks to transfer responsibility for tax collection, unintended consequences may result in the ‘innocent’ tax collector facing unexpected consequences.

Notice

Unfortunately, the introduction of the Withholding obligation has been complicated by the introduction of a parallel NOTICE obligation on vendors. It is logical in a transaction that generates a purchaser Withholding obligation to require the vendor to notify the purchaser that the obligation exists, but the vendor NOTICE obligation does not mirror the Withholding obligation and applies to a wider set of transactions than the Withholding obligation applies to. By way of example, one of the categories where the purchaser must Withhold is the sale of NEW residential premises but ALL vendors of ALL residential premises are obliged to give a NOTICE. In the case of not-new residential premises, the NOTICE states that the purchaser is NOT obliged to Withhold and given that the vast majority of residential sales are of existing (as opposed to new) properties the effect of the legislation is to require a vast number of vendors to advise the purchaser that no Withholding is required. This obligation appears to be counter-intuitive and has resulted in considerable misunderstanding in relation to the application of the Withholding obligation. It is difficult to glean the motivation behind this wider NOTICE obligation and perhaps this anomaly might be rectified in any review of the legislation.

The most efficient way to deal with the NOTICE obligation when no Withholding is required is to include the NOTICE in the contract with the statement that no Withholding is required. If Withholding is required, the NOTICE must provide the vendor’s name, vendor’s ABN, specify the Withholding amount and when it is payable (at settlement) and may be provided in the contract, or subsequently.

Obligation

In summary, the purchaser must Withhold if the contract relates to:

  1. new residential premises.

This category can be seen to apply to apartment and townhouse sales where there was a perception of illegal phoenix activity.

  1. potential residential land.

This category applies to greenfield subdivision sales, again a potential phoenix scenario.

However, this category is wider than lots on a proposed plan. It applies to potential residential land that is included in a (registered) plan of subdivision. It therefore applies to sales of residential lots off-the-plan (because the plan is registered prior to settlement) but also applies to the sale of ANY residential land that is a lot on a plan of subdivision – effectively ALL vacant residential land.

However, Withholding is only required where the vendor makes a taxable supply. Off-the-plan sales by land developers will be in the course of an enterprise and therefore taxable supplies attracting Withholding, but most sales of one-off vacant residential lots will NOT be in the course of an enterprise and therefore will not be a taxable supply and will not attract Withholding. Notwithstanding that no Withholding is required, the vendor must still give the purchaser NOTICE that Withholding does not apply.

Again, this seems counter-intuitive and restricting the obligation to off-the-plan sales might be a future improvement.

Payment

If the vendor gives NOTICE that Withholding applies the purchaser must lodge a form of Withholding notification with the ATO and will then receive a lodgement reference number (LRN) acknowledging the notification and a payment reference number (PRN) to be used when lodging a settlement date confirmation form at the time of payment to the ATO.

Tip Box

•GST Withholding applies to new residential premises and vacant residential land.

•Withholding NOTICE must be given with ALL residential sales.

Filed Under: Articles, Conveyancing and Property, Victoria Tagged With: conveyancing, Conveyancing & Property, property

Family Law – Grandparents order and commentary

19 December 2017 by By Lawyers

New commentary on parenting orders in relation to grandparents has been added to the Children publication … Grandparents are entitled to apply for parenting orders pursuant to s 65C, which provides: A parenting order in relation to a child may be applied for by … (ba)  a grandparent of the child; or … Whilst grandparents specifically have standing to make an application under the Family Law Act, it does not automatically mean orders will be granted.  As with any parenting order, the court will always consider an application by the grandparents through the prism of what is in the best interests of the child: s 60CC.

Also, a new draft order has been added to the library of Children Orders: “Spending time with grandparents”.

Filed Under: Family Law, Federal, Publication Updates Tagged With: children, children orders, family law, grandparents, orders, parenting orders

Family Law – Updated Costs Agreements

19 December 2017 by By Lawyers

The Costs Agreements for the Family Law publications – Property Settlement, Children, Financial Agreements and Divorce – have all been updated for each State and Territory to include the amended Itemised Scale of Costs that takes effect on 1 January 2018.

Filed Under: Family Law, Federal, Publication Updates Tagged With: costs, costs agreements, family law, family law rules, Itemised scale of costs, scale of costs

Family Law – New Federal Circuit Court practice direction

18 December 2017 by By Lawyers

New Federal Circuit Court practice direction for the management of family law interim proceedings commences 1 January 2018.

Filed Under: Family Law, Federal, Legal Alerts Tagged With: family law, federal circuit court, interim proceedings, jurisdiction, practice direction

QLD conveyancing – Priority notices

11 December 2017 by By Lawyers

From 1 January 2018 priority notices will replace settlement notices.

Settlement notices will not be accepted at the titles Registry after 4.30 pm on 22 December 2017. If lodgement is anticipated after this date prepare a priority notice. Priority notices may be signed prior to 1 January 2018.

The publication has been updated to include precedents and commentary on priority notices.

Filed Under: Conveyancing and Property, Legal Alerts, Publication Updates, Queensland Tagged With: conveyancing, Conveyancing & Property, priority notice, settlement notice

Family Law – Reference Manual – 101 Family Law Answers

11 December 2017 by By Lawyers

The Reference Manual – 101 Family Law Answers is the first of the By Lawyers reference manuals to be updated to the new stylish format.

As well as the new format, two commentaries have been added in the Enforcement chapter.

Court enforcement of a child support debt: A child support debt, a debt occasioned due to non payment of a registered maintenance liability, is a debt to the Commonwealth, as opposed to the payer, and is recoverable by action taken by the Child Support Registrar: s 113; or by the payee: s 113A. …

Property orders – Enforcement and the overseas factor: Unlike parenting orders, the Family Law Act, Rules or Regulation make no provision for the registration of property orders in overseas jurisdictions, or the registration and enforcement of overseas property orders in Australia. Furthermore, Australia is not party to any international conventions which provide for the reciprocal recognition of property orders overseas. …

 

Filed Under: Family Law, Federal, Publication Updates Tagged With: child support, enforcement, family law, family law act, overseas, property orders

Foreign resident capital gains withholding clearance certificates

11 December 2017 by By Lawyers

Clearance certificates will not be issued during the ATO’s Christmas closure – 22/12/17 to 2/1/18.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Conveyancing and Property, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: ATO, Australian Taxation Office, Capital gains tax, CGT, Clearance certificate, conveyancing, Conveyancing & Property, Foreign Resident Capital Gains Withholding Payment, FRCGWP

Family Law – The Harman Undertaking – Information obtained on discovery or subpoena

8 December 2017 by By Lawyers

Commentary has been added to the Children and Property Settlement publications regarding the Harman undertaking:

Information obtained on discovery, subpoena or included within an affidavit cannot be used for a collateral or ulterior purpose unrelated to the proceedings in which that production occurs. This is called an implied or ‘Harman’ undertaking after Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280. It is a substantive legal obligation owed to the party who produces the documents and to the court: Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36 (6 August 2008) at [107]-[108].

Filed Under: Family Law, Federal, Publication Updates Tagged With: disclosure, discovery, family court, family law, federal circuit court, harman, Harman obligation, Harman undertaking, subpoenas

Family Law – Binding Child Support Agreements

8 December 2017 by By Lawyers

The Children’s commentary has been enhanced by adding further information regarding the binding nature of Binding Child Support Agreements and the discretion the Court may exercise to set an agreement aside. The Full Court of the Family Court decision in Masters & Cheyne [2016] FamCAFC 255 (2 December 2016) looks at what changes may be sufficient to enliven the Court’s discretion, and they are extremely limited. The Court’s view is that binding agreements are meant to be binding and possible changes in parental arrangements should be considered before executing the agreement.

Filed Under: Family Law, Federal, Publication Updates Tagged With: agreement, Binding Child Support Agreements, children, family law

NSW – Security of Payments publication

8 December 2017 by By Lawyers

The Security of Payments (NSW) publication has been reviewed.

Filed Under: New South Wales, Publication Updates, Security of Payments Tagged With: building, construction, security of payments, update

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • …
  • 103
  • Next Page »

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Preferred State

Connect with us

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 · Privacy Policy
Created and hosted by LEAP · Log in