ByLawyers News and Updates
  • Publication updates
    • Federal
    • New South Wales
    • Victoria
    • Queensland
    • South Australia
    • Western Australia
    • Northern Territory
    • Tasmania
    • Australian Capital Territory
  • By area of law
    • Bankruptcy and Liquidation
    • Business and Franchise
    • Companies, Trusts, Partnerships and Superannuation
    • Conveyancing and Property
    • Criminal Law
    • Defamation and Protecting Reputation
    • Employment Law
    • Family Law
    • Immigration
    • Litigation
    • Neighbourhood Disputes
    • Personal injury
    • Personal Property Securities
    • Practice Management
    • Security of Payments
    • Trade Marks
    • Wills and Estates
  • Legal alerts
  • Articles
  • By Lawyers

Commercial List – QLD

30 January 2023 by By Lawyers

Supreme Court Practice Direction 1 of 2023 introduces new procedures for the Court’s Commercial List from 30 January 2023.

The Court has also issued supporting Notes that provide guidance about some practical aspects of the Commercial List, including parties, practitioners, directions, expert evidence, electronic filing and document management.

The key point of the new arrangements is that cases will be managed by a specific judge from start to finish. This includes interlocutory applications. Where the allocated judge is not available another Commercial List judge will step in.

The Practice Direction applies to existing and future commercial matters commenced in, or transferred to, the Brisbane registry. Commercial matter filed in another region will be subject to case management as appropriate in that region.

Matters can be put on the list by a party, or assigned by the court. The criteria is that the real issues involved in the matter are of a general commercial character, or arise out of trade and commerce, including e-commerce. The Practice Direction provides a non-exhaustive list of such issues:

  • the construction of a business contract, smart contract or other commercial
    instrument;
  •  insurance and reinsurance;
  • banking and financial services, including dealings in cryptocurrency;
  • the provision and enforcement of securities of any kind;
  • the conduct of business and commercial agents;
  • rights in, to, or concerning technology, including blockchain technology;
  • intellectual property;
  • partnership and joint venture relationships;
  • the export or import of goods or services;
  • the provision of goods or services by land, sea, air, cable, pipeline or through use
    of the internet for commercial purposes;
  • arbitral proceedings under the Commercial Arbitration Act 2013 (Qld);
  • the exploitation of natural resources;
  • conduct in and/or the operation of financial markets and exchanges;
  • data ownership, storage and security;
  • an appeal or judicial review relating to a tax, levy or royalty; and
  • directors’ duties, shareholder rights, capital raising, takeovers, compulsory
    acquisitions, buy-outs and windings up under part 5.4A of the Corporations Act
    2001 (Cth).

The By Lawyers Supreme Court (QLD) publications have been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Legal Alerts, Litigation, Publication Updates, Queensland Tagged With: commercial litigation, litigation, practice directions, Queensland Supreme Court

Shared equity scheme – NSW

24 January 2023 by By Lawyers

The NSW Government Shared Equity Home Buyer Helper scheme launched on 23 January 2023. It allows eligible applicants to purchase a home with as little as a 2% deposit.

The scheme applies to residential property only and is currently only available through one lender, Bendigo Bank. Other lenders will have the opportunity to join later in the year.

Under the scheme the government can contribute equity up to 30% of the price of an existing home, or up to 40% of a new build, lowering both the loan amounts and repayments of eligible applicants.

The Shared Equity Scheme is limited to 3,000 purchasers per financial year. Applications will be accepted during the 2022 – 2023 and 2023 – 2024 financial years. Eligible applicants for the scheme are:

  • single parents with dependent children
  • single people who are 50 years or older
  • first home buyers employed as key workers: nurses, midwives, paramedics, teachers, early childhood educators, and police officers.

Applicants must be Australian citizens or permanent residents over the age of 18 and have at least a 2% deposit. They cannot own any other land or property in Australia or overseas at the time of application.

Purchase prices for homes under the scheme are capped at $950,000 for Sydney and major regional areas, and at $600,000 for other areas.

Gross annual income tests of $90,000 for singles and $120,000 for couples apply, as well as asset tests.

Shared equity means the Government has a percentage share of the home, equivalent to what the applicant has contributed, secured by a registered second mortgage. There is no interest or rental payment required, but the expectation is that the government’s equity share is repaid over time or, when the property is sold.

The By Lawyers Conveyancing (NSW) guides have been updated to reflect the detailed eligibility criteria for the Shared Equity scheme and links to the Revenue NSW online assessment tool.

Filed Under: Conveyancing and Property, Miscellaneous, New South Wales, Publication Updates Tagged With: conveyancing NSW, shared equity

1 January updates – All states

23 January 2023 by By Lawyers

1 January updates are always a big focus for By Lawyers. While the profession takes a well-earned break By Lawyers remains hard at work ensuring our publications are updated for legislative and regulatory changes that take effect from the new year.

This year’s 1 January updates for relevant jurisdictions include:

Land tax

In New South Wales and Victoria, land tax is calculated for the calendar year. Threshold values increase annually.

In New South Wales, the 2022 threshold combined land value has increased to $969,000 for all liable land. Special trusts and non-concessional companies are excepted. A marginal tax rate of 1.6% of the aggregate taxable value above the tax-free threshold, plus $100 applies from 1 January. If the aggregate taxable value exceeds the premium rate threshold of $5,925,000 then $79,396 is payable, plus a marginal tax rate of 2% over that amount.

In Victoria, the tax-free threshold for general land tax remains at $300,000. The trust surcharge threshold remains at $25,000.

All relevant commentary and precedents in the By Lawyers Conveyancing and Property and Trusts guides for each relevant state will be updated for these new threshold amounts from 1 January.

By Lawyers Contract of sale of land

The 2023 edition of the By Lawyers contract will be available 1 January in the Sale of real property publications for Victoria and New South Wales. The contract is located in the Contract folder on the matter plan.

Leases and subleases

In New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia the 2023 editions of our lease and sub-lease precedents are available from 1 January. These are found in the Leases – Act for Lessor section of each Leases publication.

Keeping up to date

In addition to our 1 January updates, By Lawyers updates our publications for 1 June and other regulated adjustments when necessary.

Of course, we also update our content for relevant legislative amendments and other legal developments throughout the year, in all jurisdictions, as required.

Keeping up to date is one of the ways By Lawyers help our subscribers enjoy practice – and holidays – more!

The team at By Lawyers wishes everyone a prosperous and safe 2023.

Filed Under: Conveyancing and Property, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: 1 January updates, conveyancing, Conveyancing & Property

District Court – NSW

16 December 2022 by By Lawyers

The jurisdictional limit of the District Court increased on 16 December 2022. The limit as defined in s 4 of the District Court Act 1970 went from $750,000 to $1,250,000.

The jurisdictional limit may still be exceeded if the parties consent as provided under s 51. There remains no jurisdictional limit for motor accident claims.

Additionally, the monetary limit for the court to deal with and order interlocutory injunctions has increased from $20,000 to $100,000.

The District Court also has limited jurisdiction to hear:

  • small equitable disputes involving property – including estates administration – of a value up to $100,000: s 134(1);
  • claims under the Property (Relationships) Act 1984 where the adjustment sought is up to $250,000: s 134(3). See the Family Law publication;
  • claims under Chapter 3 of the Succession Act 2006 where the adjustment sought is to a value of $250,000: s 134(2). See the Family Provision Claims (NSW) publication;
  • claims under the Frustrated Contracts Act 1978, to the court’s jurisdictional limit: s 134A;
  • claims for relief under the Contracts Review Act 1980, but subject to restrictions: s 134B; and
  • claims under the Fair Trading Act 1987: s 135.

Unchanged is the jurisdiction of the District Court in proceedings for possession of land. The court can only deal with such proceedings where the land value does not exceed $20,000: s 133.

There are no corresponding changes to the jurisdictional limit of the Local Court. The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is unlimited.

By Lawyers District Court Civil (NSW) guides have been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Legal Alerts, Litigation, New South Wales, Personal injury, Publication Updates Tagged With: District Court, Litigation; debt recovery

First home buyers – NSW

6 December 2022 by By Lawyers

Eligible first home buyers who exchanged contracts from 11 November 2022 on properties valued up to $1.5 million can now choose to pay an annual property tax instead of transfer duty.

For properties settling on or before 15 January 2023, purchasers pay transfer duty and apply for a refund after 16 January 2023.

Settlements occurring after 16 January 2023 do not require transfer duty to be paid if the property tax option is chosen.

The Property Tax (First Home Buyer Choice) Act 2022 (NSW) received assent on 11 November 2022.

The existing first home buyer duty concessions still apply.

The property tax is indexed annually, capped at 4% per year.

Eligible first home buyers who are not Australian citizens can still be liable for surcharge purchaser duty, even after opting into the property tax.

A residence requirement of 6 continuous months within the 12 months after settlement applies. Purchasers who then use the property as an investment face a higher rate of property tax.

See the By Lawyers Conveyancing (NSW) guides and the Revenue NSW website for more information.

Filed Under: Conveyancing and Property, Legal Alerts, Miscellaneous, New South Wales, Publication Updates

Motor accident claims – NSW

5 December 2022 by By Lawyers

From 28 November 2022 there are some important changes to the legislation for motor accident claims in NSW. Further amendments are scheduled for later commencement.

The Motor Accident Injuries Amendment Act 2022 amends the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017, which applies to all motor vehicle claims in NSW where the accident occurred on after 1 December 2017.

The amending Act has been informed by a statutory review of the 2017 Act and the motor accident claims scheme it established. The review assessed whether the policy objectives of the Act remain valid and whether the terms of the Act, the Motor Accidents Injuries
Regulation 2017 and the Motor Accidents Guidelines are appropriate for those objectives.

Provisions of the amending Act commencing now include:

  • a new regulation-making power that can allow payment of statutory benefits in the period between the accident and when the claim is made even if the claim is made outside the required 28 days;
  • removing the requirement for internal review by the insurer before a dispute can be referred to the Personal Injury Commission for medical assessment for disputes about the degree of permanent impairment caused as a result of the injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident;
  • removal of the 20 month waiting period to bring a claim for damages for certain types of claim;
  • removal of the three year time limit on referring damages claims to the Personal Injury Commission without a full and satisfactory explanation of the delay;
  • removal of the bar to claimants with less than 10% whole person impairment settling a claim within two years of the accident; and
  • clarifying that the liability of the nominal defendant and the legislative provisions for claiming against the nominal defendant apply to statutory benefits claims as well as damages claims.

The By Lawyers Motor Vehicle Accidents (NSW) – Accidents from 1 December 2017 guide has been updated accordingly.

Other amendments in the Act remain pending, scheduled for commencement on 23 April 2024 unless proclaimed earlier. These include provisions for:

  • further regular statutory reviews of the 2017 Act;
  • changing the defined term minor injury to threshold injury;
  • extending weekly payments and statutory benefits for treatment and care expenses from 26 to 52 weeks for injured persons with a threshold injury who are wholly or partly at fault for the accident.

By Lawyers are monitoring the progress of these additional amendments and the guide will be further updated when they commence.

Filed Under: Legal Alerts, Litigation, New South Wales, Personal injury, Publication Updates Tagged With: Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017, motor vehicle accident claims, personal injury commission

Family law rules – FED

28 November 2022 by By Lawyers

Changes to the family law rules from 28 November include the abolition of the need to file a parenting or financial questionnaire with an initiating application. Parties now only file a questionnaire if they have not filed an affidavit with their application or response.

Other amendments to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 include:

  • Rule 1.09: Changing the form for seeking rescission of a divorce order from an Application for Review to an Application in a Proceeding;
  • Rule 2.01: Requiring that an application must concisely state the orders sought;
  • Part 2.6: Making the rules on service of documents in Australia apply to service generally;
  • Part 5.6: Inserting new rules 5.28 and 5.29 requiring that the Annexure to Proposed Consent Parenting Orders be attached to an application for interim parenting orders proposed to be made in chambers, as was already required for final orders;
  • Rule 5.28 and rule 10.04: Allowing draft consent orders to be signed by a party’s legal representative;
  • Rule 6.06 and rule 8.09: Removing the requirement to file parenting or financial questionnaires with an initiating application if the party has filed an affidavit;
  • Rule 7.35: Providing for the court to accept the opinion of a court-appointed assessor unless there are exceptional circumstances; and
  • Rule 14.07: Allowing the court to consider an Application for Review in chambers if the parties consent, and requiring parties to seek leave for any further evidence to be filed in support of an Application for Review.

Amendments to the costs schedule in the rules commence on 1 January 2023.

Amendments have also been made to the delegations table in Schedule 4 to the Rules, with effect from 28 November 2022.

The amended delegations increase the powers of Senior Judicial Registrars and Judicial Registrars in dealing with aspects of case management, including allowing the registrars to:

  • deal with an application for an interlocutory consent order under the new part 5.6 of the Rules;
  • apply on a limited basis the court’s power under s 69ZR of the Family Law Act 1975 to make a finding of fact, determine a matter, or make an order in relation to an issue arising, at any time before final orders are made in child-related proceedings;
  • order a party to undergo drug or alcohol screening or testing;
  • make spousal or de facto maintenance orders on a limited basis;
  • make an order for child maintenance – Senior Judicial Registrars only;
  • make an injunction under s 114 against a third party – Senior Judicial Registrars only;
  • make orders in relation to costs, costs estimates, and assessment of costs under s 117;
  • grant leave to institute proceedings out of time – Senior Judicial Registrars only;
  • grant leave for joinder of a party to a proceeding after the first court date;
  • issue a subpoena, order the production and inspection of documents, and hear subpoena objections;
  • summarily dismiss an application that has no reasonable prospects of success;
  • make summary orders in response to a claim by a party that an application or response is frivolous, vexatious, or an abuse of process, or that an application has no reasonable likelihood of success;
  • make certain case management orders or directions under r 10.11;
  • make orders varying or setting aside orders under the slip rule if the original orders were made by a Senior Judicial Registrar or Judicial Registrar;
  • make declarations regarding the costs of a child, and amend administrative assessments that are more than 18 months old under the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989; and
  • grant a stay under s 111C of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988.

Filed Under: Family Law, Federal, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: family law, family law rules, Financial settlement, parenting

Lighthouse project expands – FED

21 November 2022 by By Lawyers

From 28 November the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia’s Lighthouse Project expands to include all major registries. This follows additional funding provided in the recent federal budget.

The Lighthouse Project is a family-violence and risk-screening initiative for parenting and parenting/financial matters. The legislative framework was provided by the Family Law Amendment (Risk Screening Protections) Act 2020.

The project was initially available in the Adelaide, Brisbane, and Parramatta registries. It now expands to include Cairns, Canberra, Dandenong, Darwin, Hobart, Launceston, Melbourne, Newcastle, Rockhampton, Sydney, Townsville, and Wollongong registries.

The Lighthouse Project’s key points are:

  • early risk screening through a secure online platform;
  • early identification and management of safety concerns; and
  • assessment and triage of cases by a specialised team, who will provide resources and safe and suitable case management.

All cases identified as high-risk following the screening process are referred to a dedicated list in the court, known as the Evatt List. This is a judge-managed list that focuses on early information gathering and intervention through a dedicated support team in appropriate cases.

When commencing or responding to proceedings in the applicable registries, parties will be asked to provide an email and mobile number to enable risk screening. Parties will then receive an email with a secure link and login details to complete the risk screening process.

See the FCFCOA’s Lighthouse expansion – General fact sheet for more information.

The By Lawyers Family Law Children guide has information on The Lighthouse Project under Pre-action procedures in the commentary.

Practitioners are also reminded of the related information on family violence and cross-examination of parties in the Going to court folders, and the separate By Lawyers guides covering apprehended violence, intervention, and restraining orders for family and personal violence under various state laws.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Domestic Violence Orders, Family Law, Federal, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, Restraining orders, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: family law, FCFCOA, Lighthouse Project

Advance care directives – TAS

21 November 2022 by By Lawyers

A legal framework for advance care directives has been introduced in Tasmania. This brings Tasmania into line with the mainland states.

The Guardianship and Administration Amendment (Advance Care Directives) Act 2021 commenced on 21 November 2022. It amends the Guardianship and Administration Act 1995.

The purpose of the act and advance care directives for which it provides is to:

  • enable persons with decision-making ability to give directions about their future health care;
  • enable persons with decision-making ability to express their preferences and values in respect of their future health care, including by specifying outcomes or interventions they wish to avoid;
  • ensure that health care accords with a person’s directions, preferences and values; and
  • protect health practitioners and others giving effect to the directions, preferences and values of the person receiving care.

Amendments have been made to the By Lawyers Powers of attorney, enduring guardianship, and advance care planning (TAS) publication, including:

  • New commentary on advance care directives covering:
    • a summary of the legal framework and general principles;
    • the formal requirements, including witnessing and execution;
    • registration with the Tasmanian Civil and Administrative Tribunal; and
    • amendments and revocation;
  • Advance care directive statutory form added to the matter plan;
  • New Revocation of advance care directive and letters notifying relevant parties of the revocation;
  • Amended Retainer instructions to record the client’s instructions;
  • Amended Enclosure – Instructions for signing to add advance care directive signing requirements; and
  • Amended Appointment of enduring guardian to reflect the changes to s 32 of the Guardianship and Administration Act 1995 relating to the endorsement of guardians. This applies to all appointments made from 21 November 2022.

Filed Under: Legal Alerts, Publication Updates, Tasmania, Wills and Estates Tagged With: advance care directives, advance care planning

Central Practice Direction – FED

8 November 2022 by By Lawyers

The Central Practice Direction: Family Law Case Management outlines the core principles applicable to family law proceedings and establishes a consistent national case management system in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.

The practice direction requires that before filing an Initiating Application or a Response to an Initiating Application, lawyers give their clients a copy of the practice direction. There is a brochure on the matter plans in the By Lawyers family law publications, being a convenient PDF version of the practice direction, for this purpose.

A new precedent letter to the client has been added to the matter plans, enclosing the brochure and summarising its key points. This assists the practitioner to both comply with their obligations and explain the importance of the practice direction to their clients.

The Central Practice Direction incorporates the overarching purpose, enshrined in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021 under which the court was created, to facilitate the just resolution of disputes as quickly, inexpensively, and efficiently as possible.

The ten core principles by which the overarching purpose is to be achieved are in summary:

  1. assessment of risk to vulnerable parties;
  2. rapid and inexpensive agreements;
  3. efficient use of the court’s resources;
  4. effective case management;
  5. active dispute resolution;
  6. adverse consequences for non-compliance;
  7. costs obligations;
  8. full disclosure between parties of all relevant information and focus on the real issues;
  9. hearing preparation; and
  10. resolution or determination of all cases promptly.

Following the principles, the Central Practice Direction makes it clear that the court expects parties and their lawyers to always:

  • minimise costs;
  • promptly give full and frank disclosure of information;
  • communicate productively; and
  • identify and seek to resolve the issues genuinely in dispute.

The Practice Direction prohibits aggressive and unnecessarily adversarial conduct. The safety of parties and children is a priority. Parties are not required to put themselves or their children at risk or compromise if they feel unsafe or believe abuse or violence affects their ability to negotiate fair or reasonable outcomes. The interests of children are always the court’s paramount concern.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Family Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: Central Practice Direction - Family Law Case Management, family law, FCFCOA, practice direction

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • …
  • 103
  • Next Page »

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Preferred State

Connect with us

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 · Privacy Policy
Created and hosted by LEAP · Log in