ByLawyers News and Updates
  • Publication updates
    • Federal
    • New South Wales
    • Victoria
    • Queensland
    • South Australia
    • Western Australia
    • Northern Territory
    • Tasmania
    • Australian Capital Territory
  • By area of law
    • Bankruptcy and Liquidation
    • Business and Franchise
    • Companies, Trusts, Partnerships and Superannuation
    • Conveyancing and Property
    • Criminal Law
    • Defamation and Protecting Reputation
    • Employment Law
    • Family Law
    • Immigration
    • Litigation
    • Neighbourhood Disputes
    • Personal injury
    • Personal Property Securities
    • Practice Management
    • Security of Payments
    • Trade Marks
    • Wills and Estates
  • Legal alerts
  • Articles
  • By Lawyers

Right to disconnect – FED

27 August 2024 by By Lawyers

The right to disconnect under the Fair Work Act 2009 applies from 26 August 2024 for non-small business employers and from 26 August 2025 for small business employers.

Section 333M of the Act provides that an employee can refuse to monitor, read, or respond to contact, or attempted contact, from their employer or a third party if the contact relates to their work and is outside their working hours, unless the refusal is unreasonable.

Sub-section 333M(3) sets out a non-exclusive list of matters that can be taken into account to determine whether the refusal is unreasonable, including:

  • The reason for the contact;
  • How the contact is made and how disruptive it is to the employee;
  • The extent to which the employee is compensated to be available or to work outside their normal hours;
  • The nature of the employee’s role and their level of responsibility;
  • The employee’s personal circumstances including any family or caring responsibilities.

All modern awards  are required to include a right to disconnect provision. See the Fair Work Commission‘s webpage for more information on variations to awards.

The right to disconnect is a workplace right for the purpose of s 341 of the Act, which means the adverse action protections apply.

The Fair Work Commission can deal with disputes about the right to disconnect, including by making orders to stop an employee refusing contact or an employer requiring it. Contravention of an order is a civil remedy provision under Part 4-1 of the Act for which fines apply.

The commentary and precedents in the By Lawyers Employment Law guide have been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Federal, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: employees, employers, Employment law, Fair Work Act

Closing loopholes – FED

8 January 2024 by By Lawyers

A raft of amendments closing loopholes in the Fair Work Act 2009 commenced on 15 December 2023.

Changes introduced by the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act 2023 include:

Redundancy

Entitlement to a redundancy payment is extended to employees of a small business, being one with fewer than 15 employees, in certain circumstances. Generally, such businesses are exempt from the requirement to pay redundancy. However, under the amended provisions employees may be entitled if the employer is bankrupt or in liquidation and the  only reason the exemption applies is that the trustee in bankruptcy or liquidator has reduced the number of employees to less than 15.

Labour Hire

New provisions in Part 2-7A of the Fair Work Act restrict labour hire arrangements and allow employees or unions to apply to the Fair Work Commission for regulated labour hire arrangement orders prescribing the rates of pay that employees under a labour hire arrangement must receive. However, any such orders made by the Commission have no effect until at least 1 November 2024. The new provisions also introduce strict anti-avoidance provisions and civil penalties. There are some exceptions to the Commission’s ability to make orders, including for small business employers.

Unlawful dismissal

Prohibited grounds for dismissal are extended to include the fact that an employee is subject to domestic or family violence.

Right of entry

The amending Act removes the requirement for state or territory work health and safety representatives to hold an entry permit before entering a workplace. However that innovation is a subject to review after 9 months.

Further amendments

The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act 2023 includes additional provisions criminalising the intentional underpayment of wages by employers. Those provisions do not commence until 1 January 2025.

Publication updates

The By Lawyers Employment Law commentary has been updated accordingly. The amending Act’s further provisions will be the subject of additional publication updates in due course, as required.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: employees, employers, Employment law, Fair Work Act, fair work commission

Domestic violence leave – FED

31 July 2023 by By Lawyers

Family and domestic violence leave entitlements are extended to small business employees from 1 August 2023.

Under the Fair Work Amendment (Paid Family and Domestic Violence Leave) Act 2022 paid leave replaced the previous entitlement to unpaid leave for all non-small business employees from 1 February 2023. That entitlement is now extended to small business employees, so it covers everyone. A small business is one with less than 15 employees.

Full-time, part-time, and casual employees are entitled to 10 days of paid family and domestic violence leave in every 12-month period of employment. It is not calculated on a pro-rata basis for casual employees and is all available up-front, which means a new employee has an immediate entitlement to the full ten days. The leave does not accumulate if not taken.

The leave can be taken for any purpose relating to the impact of family and domestic violence, which might include relocating, attending court, or attending medical, legal, counselling, and financial advice appointments.

Employers cannot include information in an employee’s pay slip identifying the type of leave paid.

Family and domestic violence is defined as violent, threatening, or other abusive behaviour by an employee’s close relative, current or former intimate partner, or a member of their household that both seeks to coerce or control them and causes them harm or fear.

The leave can be taken during a period of personal or carer’s leave, or annual leave.

The notice and evidence requirements of s 107 of the Fair Work Act 2009 apply, including the requirement for the employer to maintain confidentiality: s 106C.

See the Fair Work Ombudsman website for more information.

The By Lawyers Employment Law publication has been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Practice Management, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: employees, employers, Employment law, family and domestic violence

Employment Law – FED

18 April 2023 by By Lawyers

The By Lawyers Employment Law guide has been extensively reviewed, with enhanced content including:

  • A new section on employment disputes, covering employee conduct and performance, unfair dismissal claims, general protections claims, unlawful termination, underpayment of wages, and disputes about contracts and employment status.
  • Expanded coverage of employment relationships, especially casual work and the complicated interplay between the common law position and the casual conversion provisions under the Federal employment legislation.
  • A new section on Paid Parental Leave, following legislative amendments that make payments more accessible, flexible, and gender-neutral for Federal system employees – see our previous News & Updates post for further details.

This review has been conducted in the context of significant and ongoing legislative changes. The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 passed Federal parliament in December 2022, making many changes to the Fair Work Act 2009.

These amendments commence in phases over the course of several years and include:

  • Expansion of the objects of the Fair Work Act;
  • Equal pay provisions to address gender inequality;
  • Prohibition of pay secrecy – designed to augment the equal pay provisions;
  • Prohibition of sexual harassment in the workplace, including Stop Sexual Harassment Orders via the Fair Work Commission. These provisions commenced on 6 March 2023 – see our previous News & Updates post;
  • Additional grounds for anti-discrimination in the workplace;
  • Fixed-term contracts are generally no longer permitted;
  • Expanded availability of flexible work arrangements;
  • A new small claims process for unpaid entitlement recovery.

The By Lawyers Employment Law guide and 101 Employment Law Answers will be updated as these relevant provisions commence.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: employee, employees, employment, employment agreement, employment dispute, Employment law, Fair Work Act

Paid parental leave – FED

3 April 2023 by By Lawyers

Recent amendments to the Paid Parental Leave Act 2010 (Cth) make payments more accessible, flexible, and gender-neutral for Federal system employees.

Under the current scheme, either parent and other eligible carers can claim up to a total of 18 weeks of paid parental leave. This increases to 20 weeks from 1 July 2023. Payments can only be claimed in the first two years after the child’s birth or adoption. The scheme is funded by the Commonwealth, so a claim for payments is made to Centrelink, not the employer. The entitlement extends to employees who are full-time, part-time, casual, seasonal, contractors, or self-employed.

The amendments:

  • Enable families to decide which parent will claim first and how they will share the entitlement and are not limited to a small class of claimants. Allowing households to decide how best to care for a child.
  • Provide greater flexibility, with claimants allowed to take the available leave in multiple blocks of as little as a day at a time with no requirement to return to work to be eligible.
  • Impose a new $350,000 family income limit for eligibility, under which families can be assessed if an individual applicant does not meet the individual income test.
  • Expand the eligibility requirements to allow a father or partner to receive paid parental leave, regardless of whether the birth parent meets the income test or residency requirements, or is serving a newly arrived resident’s waiting period.

Payments are at the rate of the national minimum wage. Employers are not obliged to make superannuation contributions during the leave period. Paid parental leave does not count as paid leave for the purposes of the National Employment Standards (NES) and, therefore, does not count as service for the purposes of other entitlements.

The By Lawyers Employment Law publication has been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Employment Law, Federal, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Practice Management, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: employee, employees, employer, employers, employment, employment agreement, employment dispute, Employment law, paid parental leave

Family and domestic violence leave – FED

31 January 2023 by By Lawyers

Family and domestic violence leave entitlements change for many employees from 1 February 2023, with paid leave replacing the previous entitlement to unpaid leave.

Full-time, part-time, and casual employees of non-small business employers, being those with 15 or more employees on 1 February 2023, are entitled to 10 days of paid family and domestic violence leave in every 12-month period of employment. It is not calculated on a pro-rata basis for casual employees and is all available up-front, which means a new employee has an immediate entitlement to the full ten days. The leave does not accumulate if not taken.

The same entitlement will apply to employees of small business employers, being those with less than 15 employees on 1 February 2023, from 1 August 2023. Until then, employees of small businesses remain eligible for the existing entitlement of 5 days of unpaid family and domestic violence leave.

The leave can be taken for any purpose relating to the impact of family and domestic violence, which might include relocating, attending court, or attending medical, legal, counselling, and financial advice appointments.

Employers cannot include information in an employee’s pay slip identifying they type of leave paid.

Family and domestic violence is defined as violent, threatening, or other abusive behaviour by an employee’s close relative, current or former intimate partner, or a member of their household that both seeks to coerce or control them and causes them harm or fear.

The leave can be taken during a period of personal or carer’s leave, or annual leave.

The notice and evidence requirements of s 107 of the Fair Work Act 2009 apply, including the requirement for the employer to maintain confidentiality: s 106C.

See the Fair Work Ombudsman website for more information.

The By Lawyers Employment Law commentary has been updated accordingly. Further updates will be applied when the entitlement extends to all employees in August.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Practice Management, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: Domestic and Family Violence, employee, employees, employer, employers, Employment law

Adverse action – FED

26 May 2022 by By Lawyers

The recent employment law case of Qantas Airways Ltd v Transport Workers’ Union of Australia [2022] FCAFC 71 considered adverse action under the Fair Work Act 2009 and the obligation on an employer to establish that a decision affecting a worker is not contrary to the prohibitions in the Act.

Adverse action is covered in the By Lawyers Employment Law guide.

Sections 340 to 345 of the Fair Work Act prevent an employer from taking adverse action, as defined in s 342, against an employee who exercises a workplace right, defined in s 341.

For example, if an employee is dismissed, which constitutes adverse action being taken against them, because they made a complaint against their employer, which constitutes their exercise of a workplace right, then the employee may be able to bring a general protections claim against the employer.

In the recent case Qantas made a decision, while its fleet was grounded for the pandemic, to outsource ground handling operations at Australian airports. That resulted in Qantas employees losing their jobs to external providers. The union sought reinstatement of the employees on the basis that Qantas’ decision constituted adverse action on a number of bases. Qantas denied this and argued that the decision was made for operational business reasons.

The court found for the employees on one of the adverse action grounds, namely that the real reason for Qantas’ action in standing down employees was to prevent the exercise of a workplace right, being their right to negotiate a new Enterprise Bargaining Agreement which fell due shortly afterwards. Interestingly, that meant the court upheld the adverse action claim on the basis of a workplace right that did not exist at the time of the decision, but may exist at some future point in time.

The court looked in detail at how the decision was made, what the company took into account, and its knowledge of the future workplace right. The court found that Qantas knew it was circumventing the future right, whereas if it had no such knowledge the outcome may have been different.

The case may go on appeal, but it serves to remind workers of the robust nature of their rights under the Act and employers of the extent of their obligations.

This case will be added to the By Lawyers 101 Employment Law Answers publication and any developments on any appeal will be monitored.

Filed Under: Employment Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: adverse action, employees, employers, Employment law

Criminal records – Employment – FED

31 August 2020 by By Lawyers

Commentary on the disclosure of criminal records by job seekers has been added to the By Lawyers Employment guide. This useful enhancement covers ‘spent’ convictions in all Australian jurisdictions.

Employees and job candidates have rights under state legislation except in Victoria, and also under federal legislation, relating to their employer or prospective employer accessing their criminal records.

Employers normally have the right to conduct criminal record checks on current and prospective employees. This generally does not include ‘lapsed’ or ‘spent’ convictions.

All states, except Victoria, have different legislative schemes for convictions that lapse, commonly known as ‘spent’ convictions. Commonwealth crimes fall under federal legislation which also covers the ACT and the Northern Territory.

These legislative schemes prescribe when certain criminal convictions lapse, after which time they may not be used as a basis for making decisions about a person’s employment. This allows offenders to put their past behind them, provided they have had the required law-abiding period.

For example, under s 85ZV of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), an organisation is prohibited from taking into account or disclosing to others an individual’s past criminal conviction under federal law if it is defined as having lapsed. An individual is not required to disclose such a conviction when applying for employment. A lapsed conviction is defined as an adult conviction more than ten years old, or a juvenile conviction more than five years old. The maximum penalty for the original offence cannot exceed 30 months imprisonment.

There are exceptions, such as where people are applying for jobs that involve working with children.

For further information on ‘spent’ convictions and employment applications see the By Lawyers Employment guide.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: criminal record, employees, employment, Employment law

Employment and the Coronavirus – FED

26 March 2020 by By Lawyers

Many questions arise at the moment about Employment and the Coronavirus. The By Lawyers Employment Law Guide and the 101 Employment Law Answers reference manual located within that publication can assist subscribers to advise their clients, whether employers or employees.

In addition, our author Brad Petley, an accredited specialist in Workplace Relations, has prepared a timely article on the issues that practitioners and their clients need to consider. This article has been added to the By Lawyers Employment Law Guide, under the Reference Materials folder. The text of Mr Petley’s article is reproduced here for general assistance:

Employer obligations

Employers have legal obligations to ensure the health and safety of their employees and contractors, and also to ensure that the health and safety of members of the public is not put at risk from the conduct of their business or undertaking. This includes managing the risk of exposure to and spread of Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the workplace.

Health risks such as Coronavirus need to be carefully and sensitively managed, as they can give rise to a risk of claims of discrimination, unfair treatment and even unfair dismissal.

Therefore, employers should ensure they act fairly and on the basis of reliable and current medical information. Similarly, employers should not permit or encourage their employees to target or treat adversely any particular demographic in the workplace.

There are legal protections against discrimination or adverse action based on race, ethnicity, national origin or impairment – which can include disease or illness.  In an atmosphere of heightened anxiety due to the impact of Coronavirus, it important that employees’ emotions and conduct are managed by clear and open commu­nication from senior manage­ment.

The rapidly changing situation with the Coronavirus pandemic means that many employers will be focused on reducing their labour costs in the current business climate.  To reduce labour costs employers may consider options such as:

  • Asking employees to take their accrued paid leave such as annual leave and long service leave;
  • Implementing stand-downs pursuant to s 524 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth); or
  • Implementing redundancies.

Leave

Under the Fair Work Act full-time and part-time national system employees are entitled to 10 days personal/carer’s leave each year of service. The entitlement accumulates progressively.

Employees who access their accrued personal/carer’s leave due to injury or illness such as Coronavirus, are considered to be temporarily absent from work and, as such, are protected from dismissal because of their illness or injury: see s 352.

That does not mean that an employee on personal/carer’s leave, who is suffering from Coronavirus, cannot be required to obey reasonable and lawful OHS based instructions intended to minimise the risk of the person spreading disease in the workplace.  For example, an employee diagnosed with COVID-19 who disobeyed an instruction not to attend the workplace unless cleared medically would risk disciplinary action.

Stand-down

An employer may stand down an employee during a period in which the employee cannot usefully be employed due to circumstances for which the employer cannot reasonably be held responsible.

The employer does not pay wages for the period of a stand down. This is not a deferment but a pause during the stand-down in the obligation to pay wages.

An employee stood down continues to accrue entitlements to annual leave and personal/carer’s leave under the National Employment Standards, as well as an entitlement to a public holiday that falls on a day the employee would ordinarily work during the stand-down period: see. s 524.

Redundancy

For a redundancy-based dismissal, employees who are dismissed on the grounds of a ‘genuine redundancy’ are not eligible to bring an unfair dismissal application: see s 385(d).

A genuine redundancy occurs where:

  • the person’s employer no longer required the person’s job to be performed by anyone because of changes in the operational requirements of the employer’s enterprise; and
  • the employer has complied with any obligation in a modern award or enterprise agreement that applied to the employment to consult about the redundancy.

A genuine redundancy does not occur if it would have been reasonable in all the circumstances for the person to be redeployed within:

  • the employer’s enterprise; or
  • the enterprise of an associated entity of the employer.

Dismissal

When interviewing a client who claims to have been dismissed due to the Coronavirus, it is important to ascertain the basis of the client’s belief.

If there is evidence supporting the claim that the virus was the reason for the dismissal, then a claim for unfair dismissal or breach of general protections provisions may be available.

 

– Brad Petley solicitor is the main author of the By Lawyers Employment Law guides. He will continue to update our subscribers regarding Employment and the Coronavirus as circumstances demand.

 

Keep up-to-date with our latest COVID-19 News & Updates

Filed Under: Articles, Employment Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: Corona virus, employees, employer, Employment law, workplace

Annualised salaries – Employment- FED

1 March 2020 by By Lawyers

From 1 March 2020, new clauses for annualised salaries commence in 21 modern awards. These have broad coverage, including for white-collar industries, such as the Clerks – Private Sector Award 2010, Legal Services Award 2010 and the Banking, Finance and Insurance Industry Award 2010. The commentary in the By Lawyers Employment law guide has been updated accordingly.

An annualised salaries clauses enables an ‘annualised wage arrangement’ to be made in a modern award. Employers can choose to annualise an employee’s wages over a 12 month period. This means they pay a fixed amount in satisfaction of the modern award requirements. The fixed amount includes all entitlements such as weekly pay, allowances, overtime rates, other penalty rates and annual leave loading.

Not all modern awards contain arrangements for annualised salaries. For those that do, an annualised payment clause applies with some variation depending on the industry.

Annualised salary clauses apply only to full-time employees. However they have no effect where a full‑time employee is being paid standard wages and benefits in accordance with the applicable award. They only apply to an ‘annualised wage arrangement’.

The annualised wage must be no less than the amount the employee would have received under the award for the work performed over the year for which the wage is paid.

When making arrangements for annualised salaries under the applicable modern awards, employers are required to comply with requirements for notification, record keeping and wage reconciliation.

See the By Lawyers Employment law guide for more information on the new clauses, the modern awards to which they apply and the employer requirements.

By Lawyers are committed to always keeping our subscribers up-to-date.

Filed Under: Employment Law, Federal, Legal Alerts, Publication Updates Tagged With: employees, employers, employment, modern award

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Preferred State

Connect with us

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 · Privacy Policy
Created and hosted by LEAP · Log in