ByLawyers News and Updates
  • Publication updates
    • Federal
    • New South Wales
    • Victoria
    • Queensland
    • South Australia
    • Western Australia
    • Northern Territory
    • Tasmania
    • Australian Capital Territory
  • By area of law
    • Bankruptcy and Liquidation
    • Business and Franchise
    • Companies, Trusts, Partnerships and Superannuation
    • Conveyancing and Property
    • Criminal Law
    • Defamation and Protecting Reputation
    • Employment Law
    • Family Law
    • Immigration
    • Litigation
    • Neighbourhood Disputes
    • Personal injury
    • Personal Property Securities
    • Practice Management
    • Security of Payments
    • Trade Marks
    • Wills and Estates
  • Legal alerts
  • Articles
  • By Lawyers

1 July updates – All states

4 July 2023 by By Lawyers

1 July updates are always a big focus for By Lawyers. Many Commonwealth and state legislative instruments provide for the scheduled indexing of relevant monetary amounts and adjustments – usually increases – in government fees and charges. These regular updates occur at the start of every financial year impacting many different areas of law, and therefore numerous By Lawyers publications.

These updates include court filing fees, lodgment fees for property dealings, land tax thresholds, minimum weekly compensation amounts for Workers Compensation, and penalty units for fines for various criminal offences and civil penalty provisions.

By Lawyers always monitor and apply these changes for our subscribers. Each year we ensure our publications are amended where necessary to reflect 1 July updates.

We also monitor and update for similar legislative indexing and increases which occur regularly at other times of the year. These include 1 January changes and other specific dates for various areas of law as prescribed by some statutes.

The 1 July updates have been applied this year, or are in the process of being applied as they get released, to the following By Lawyers publications:

  • Conveyancing and Property;
  • Business and Franchise;
  • Criminal;
  • Wills;
  • Estates; and
  • Injuries.

Quite separately, there is also usually a raft of new and amending legislation from both Commonwealth and state parliaments which is set to commence on 1 July. This year is no different in that regard. By Lawyers have made various substantive amendments to a number of publications to account for the commencement of such legislation. Please see the various other By Lawyers News & Updates posts dealing with those updates.

By Lawyers always keep our content – and our subscribers – up to date!

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Conveyancing and Property, Criminal Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia, Wills and Estates, Workers Compensation Tagged With: 1 July 2023

Employment Law – FED

2 July 2023 by By Lawyers

The By Lawyers Employment Law guide has been updated for the latest legislative amendments.

From 1 July 2023 the maximum amount that can be ordered under the civil remedy provisions of the Fair Work Act in small claims proceedings increased from $20,000 to $100,000.

Failure to pay wages and entitlements can give rise to civil remedies for contravention of statutory obligations. Chapter 4 – Part 4.1 of the Fair Work Act 2009 deals with civil remedies.

An offending employer can be ordered to pay a pecuniary penalty on top of the wages and contractual or statutory entitlements unpaid or underpaid, plus interest up to judgment.

Division 3 of Part 4.1 provides that applications for most contraventions of civil remedy provisions under the Fair Work Act, although not pecuniary penalty orders, may be dealt with as small claims proceedings in a state magistrates court or the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2), with awards limited to $100,000 or any higher amount prescribed by the regulations.

The section on Underpaid and unpaid wages and entitlements in the By Lawyers Employment Law commentary has been updated accordingly.

These amendments are under the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 which makes numerous changes to the Fair Work Act 2009. These amendments commence in phases over the course of several years and include:

  • expansion of the objects of the Fair Work Act;
  • equal pay provisions to address gender inequality;
  • prohibition of pay secrecy – designed to augment the equal pay provisions;
  • prohibition of sexual harassment in the workplace, including Stop Sexual Harassment Orders via the Fair Work Commission. These provisions commenced on 6 March 2023 – see our previous News & Updates post;
  • additional grounds for anti-discrimination in the workplace;
  • fixed-term contracts are generally no longer permitted;
  • expanded availability of flexible work arrangements.

See our previous News & Updates post for further details.

The By Lawyers Employment Law guide and 101 Employment Law Answers will be updated as these relevant provisions commence.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Federal, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: employee, employer, Employment law, Fair Work Act, small claims

Windfall gains tax – VIC

2 July 2023 by By Lawyers

A new tax on windfall gains arising from rezoned land applies in Victoria from 1 July 2023 under the Windfall Gains Tax Act 2021 (Vic).

Rezoning

This tax captures the increased value from a significant uplift in a property’s worth from government decisions to rezone land. Revenue raised is intended to fund the construction of infrastructure to complement development from a rezoning.

Land that is rezoned, resulting in an increase of more than $100,000, will have the tax applied: s 9 of the Windfall Gains Tax 2021. The owner of the rezoned land pays the tax, with liability arising when the rezoning occurs.

A tax assessment containing a due date for payment will issue to the owner.

Section 3 creates exclusions, including land zoned for public places or land subject to the Growth Areas Infrastructure Contribution. Residential land not exceeding 2 hectares is also exempt, as are rezonings underway before 15 May 2021.

Rate

If the increase in value is more than $100 000 but less than $500 000, the tax is applied at 62·5% of the part of the taxable value uplift that exceeds $100 000.

If the gain is $500 000 or more the tax is 50% of the taxable value uplift.

Deferral

Owners can defer some or all their liability until the earlier of:

  • a dutiable transaction occurring with the land, for instance a sale and purchase;
  • the landowner being the subject of a relevant acquisition;
  • 30 years after the rezoning event.

Interest accrues on deferred windfall gains tax liability at the 10-year Treasury Corporation of Victoria bond rate.

For a deferral not to cease when a dutiable transaction occurs, the purchaser or transferee must elect to assume the windfall gains tax liability including any accrued interest. If so, the deferral continues and the tax liability rolls over to the new owner.

Full payment is due within 30 days of a deferral ceasing. A form available from the State Revenue Office website needs to be completed to request a deferral. A part payment can be made at any time before the deferral period ends.

The relevant By Lawyers Victorian conveyancing publications have been updated accordingly. The Purchase of Real Property (VIC), Sale of Real Property (VIC), and 1001 Conveyancing Answers (VIC) guides contain extensive coverage of windfall gains tax.

Filed Under: Conveyancing and Property, Legal Alerts, Publication Updates, Victoria Tagged With: rezoning, tax, VIC Conveyancing update, windfall gains tax

Duty concessions – VIC

2 July 2023 by By Lawyers

The Victorian state budget contains provisions commencing on 1 July 2023 that affect transfer duty concessions and exemptions for special disability trusts and pensioners.

From 1 July 2023, pensioners purchasing real property for up to $600,000 are exempted from duty. These purchasers buying property valued between $600,001 and $750,000 pay a concessional rate of land transfer duty. The exemption and concession caps mirror the thresholds for first home buyers. Eligibility is assessed on the total value of the purchase.

From 1 July 2023, the special disability trust transfer duty deduction threshold will be increased from $500,000 to $1,500,000 for transfers of a principal place of residence. A new land transfer duty exemption will apply for the transfer of a home by an immediate family member to an individual eligible to be a beneficiary of a special disability trust. The property can be valued at up to $1,500,000. This new exemption is designed to complement the duty concessions and exemptions in s 38A of the Duties Act 2000. The exemption is intended to assist families who wish to provide a home for a severely disabled family member, but consider the process of creating and managing a special disability trust to be too expensive and complex.

The relevant By Lawyers Victorian conveyancing publications have been updated accordingly. The commentary in the Purchase of Real Property (VIC), Sale of Real Property (VIC), and 1001 Conveyancing Answers (VIC) guides contain extensive coverage of land transfer duty and land transfer duty exemptions.

Filed Under: Conveyancing and Property, Legal Alerts, Publication Updates, Victoria Tagged With: concession, exemption, transfer duty, Victoria state budget

Trade Marks – FED

6 June 2023 by By Lawyers

The By Lawyers Trade Marks publication has been reviewed.

Helpful new headings on the matter plan include:

  • Pre-application searches; and
  • Use, assignment, licensing, and enforcement.

Commentary amendments include:

  • A simplified Overview section, focusing on the importance of registration;
  • Updated hyperlinks to legislation and useful online government resources;
  • New and enhanced coverage of the pre-application procedure available through IP Australia, including Headstart applications;
  • New and enhanced coverage of availability searches, including TM Tracker and international searching via the World Intellectual Property Organisation;
  • More detailed commentary on filing the application, considering examination reports, and dealing with opposition;
  • Enhanced commentary on amending or withdrawing an application, and cancelling a registration; and
  • Enhanced coverage of international applications for both Madrid Protocol and Non-Madrid Protocol countries.

New and enhanced precedents on the matter plan include:

  • To do list;
  • Letter to client with search results and advice;
  • Letter to client advising application lodged;
  • Letter to client advising application accepted for publication;
  • Letter to client advising notice of early acceptance;
  • Letter to client advising problems with application;
  • Final letter to client advising trade mark registered; and
  • Final letter to client advising trade mark not registered.

This review by our authors has focused on the application process. Further review of the commentary on enforcement of trade marks, and intellectual property rights generally, is ongoing.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Business and Franchise, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Trade Marks, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: Intellectual Property, Trade Marks

Intervention orders – VIC

11 May 2023 by By Lawyers

Appeals against intervention orders made by magistrates are no longer considered de novo hearings, following a recent Supreme Court case.

Previously, appeals to the County Court under both the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010 and the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 were conducted as hearings de novo.  That is, the County Court conducted the trial of the application for an intervention order afresh and gave a decision based on the evidence before it. This meant the parties had to give their evidence and be cross-examined again.

In AAA v County Court of Victoria [2023] VSC 13 the Supreme Court held that an appeal to the County Court against an intervention order, or a refusal to make an order, is not an appeal de novo. It is a broad appeal by rehearing that allows for new evidence. It is not a hearing in which the applicant begins again with the magistrate’s decision being disregarded. The parties may adduce new evidence on appeal, but are not required to.  The County Court determines the appeal based on both the evidence at first instance and any new evidence before it.  The court’s task on appeal is to identify factual, legal, or discretionary error in light of all of the evidence before the court, including any new evidence.

Whilst the focus is on the identification of error, the error may be a factual one. As the County Court reconsiders the application, the error may be that the magistrate made erroneous findings of fact on the evidence available, or reached an erroneous conclusion on the ultimate question of whether the statutory criteria for making the order are satisfied.  Further, as the County Court determines the appeal at the time of the appeal, and new evidence may be adduced, it is not necessary to establish that the magistrate made an error based on the evidence before them at the time. It is open to the County Court to find error even if, had it been limited to the evidence before the magistrate, it would have reached the same conclusion as the magistrate.

The decision suggests that the conduct of final hearings in intervention order matters in the Magistrates’ Court will now be open to close examination and scrutiny on appeal.

The commentary in the By Lawyers Intervention Order (VIC) guide has been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Domestic Violence Orders, Legal Alerts, Publication Updates, Victoria Tagged With: Intervention orders, VIC County Court, VIC magistrates court

Retail Leases – VIC

18 April 2023 by By Lawyers

The Retail Leases Regulations 2023 (Vic) came into operation on 15 April 2023. They are made under s 99 of the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) and prescribe certain matters that are required to be prescribed under the Act. They repeal the Retail Leases Regulations 2013 (Vic) and the Retail Leases Amendment Regulations 2022 (Vic).

The provisions of the new regulations largely replicate those of the previous regulations, while:

  • making updated provisions for the monetary amounts of occupancy costs for the purpose of excluding certain retail premises from the disclosure obligations under the Act;
  • prescribing the outgoings payable by a tenant, by reference to a percentage of the rent; and
  • updating the forms for the disclosure statements that must be issued under the Act. Disclosure obligations apply to new leases, renewals of leases, and assignments of leases.

The prescribed forms are now contained in Schedules 1 to 4 of the 2023 regulations.

From 15 April landlords and their agents need to be aware of the changes to the prescribed forms and only issue disclosure statements in the new form for leases that fall under the provisions of the Act.

The By Lawyers Lease (VIC) and 1001 Conveyancing Answers (VIC) publications have been updated accordingly. They include the prescribed forms of disclosure statement for all retail leasing scenarios, as well as commentary about time frames for landlords issuing disclosure statements to tenants, and the consequences of non-compliance.

Filed Under: Conveyancing and Property, Legal Alerts, Publication Updates, Victoria Tagged With: 1001 Conveyancing Answers Victoria, Retail Lease, Retail Lease disclosure

Employment Law – FED

18 April 2023 by By Lawyers

The By Lawyers Employment Law guide has been extensively reviewed, with enhanced content including:

  • A new section on employment disputes, covering employee conduct and performance, unfair dismissal claims, general protections claims, unlawful termination, underpayment of wages, and disputes about contracts and employment status.
  • Expanded coverage of employment relationships, especially casual work and the complicated interplay between the common law position and the casual conversion provisions under the Federal employment legislation.
  • A new section on Paid Parental Leave, following legislative amendments that make payments more accessible, flexible, and gender-neutral for Federal system employees – see our previous News & Updates post for further details.

This review has been conducted in the context of significant and ongoing legislative changes. The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 passed Federal parliament in December 2022, making many changes to the Fair Work Act 2009.

These amendments commence in phases over the course of several years and include:

  • Expansion of the objects of the Fair Work Act;
  • Equal pay provisions to address gender inequality;
  • Prohibition of pay secrecy – designed to augment the equal pay provisions;
  • Prohibition of sexual harassment in the workplace, including Stop Sexual Harassment Orders via the Fair Work Commission. These provisions commenced on 6 March 2023 – see our previous News & Updates post;
  • Additional grounds for anti-discrimination in the workplace;
  • Fixed-term contracts are generally no longer permitted;
  • Expanded availability of flexible work arrangements;
  • A new small claims process for unpaid entitlement recovery.

The By Lawyers Employment Law guide and 101 Employment Law Answers will be updated as these relevant provisions commence.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: employee, employees, employment, employment agreement, employment dispute, Employment law, Fair Work Act

Paid parental leave – FED

3 April 2023 by By Lawyers

Recent amendments to the Paid Parental Leave Act 2010 (Cth) make payments more accessible, flexible, and gender-neutral for Federal system employees.

Under the current scheme, either parent and other eligible carers can claim up to a total of 18 weeks of paid parental leave. This increases to 20 weeks from 1 July 2023. Payments can only be claimed in the first two years after the child’s birth or adoption. The scheme is funded by the Commonwealth, so a claim for payments is made to Centrelink, not the employer. The entitlement extends to employees who are full-time, part-time, casual, seasonal, contractors, or self-employed.

The amendments:

  • Enable families to decide which parent will claim first and how they will share the entitlement and are not limited to a small class of claimants. Allowing households to decide how best to care for a child.
  • Provide greater flexibility, with claimants allowed to take the available leave in multiple blocks of as little as a day at a time with no requirement to return to work to be eligible.
  • Impose a new $350,000 family income limit for eligibility, under which families can be assessed if an individual applicant does not meet the individual income test.
  • Expand the eligibility requirements to allow a father or partner to receive paid parental leave, regardless of whether the birth parent meets the income test or residency requirements, or is serving a newly arrived resident’s waiting period.

Payments are at the rate of the national minimum wage. Employers are not obliged to make superannuation contributions during the leave period. Paid parental leave does not count as paid leave for the purposes of the National Employment Standards (NES) and, therefore, does not count as service for the purposes of other entitlements.

The By Lawyers Employment Law publication has been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Employment Law, Federal, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Practice Management, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: employee, employees, employer, employers, employment, employment agreement, employment dispute, Employment law, paid parental leave

Sexual harassment – FED

6 March 2023 by By Lawyers

From 6 March 2023 sexual harassment in connection with work is prohibited by the Fair Work Act 2009. Aggrieved persons have rights to apply to the Fair Work Commission and, with some limitations, the Federal Courts.

Part 3-5A of the Fair Work Act 2009 prohibits sexual harassment of workers, persons seeking to become workers, and persons conducting businesses or undertakings, and provides for the granting of remedies when that happens.

An employer may be vicariously liable for sexual harassment of their employee or agent unless the employer can show that they took all reasonable steps to prevent it.

An aggrieved person who alleges they have been sexually harassed in connection with work, or an industrial association entitled to represent the industrial interests of an aggrieved person, may apply to either:

  1. the Fair Work Commission under s 527J of the Act to either make a Stop Sexual Harassment Order (SSHO) , or to otherwise deal with the dispute, or both;
  2. a Federal Court for orders for contravention of civil remedy provisions, under Division 2 of Part 4-1.

However, a court application can only be made if the parties have first attempted to resolve the matter through the Fair Work Commission, and the Commission has issued a certificate to that effect, unless the application seeks an interim injunction.

These provisions of the Act are in addition to, and do not exclude or limit, any rights a person may have under any state or territory law in connection with sexual harassment.

If the application is not solely for a SSHO, the Commission must deal with the dispute according to its powers under s 595 (2), other than by arbitration – namely via mediation or conciliation, or making a recommendation or expressing an opinion.

Stop Sexual Harassment Order

Where an application seeks a SSHO, if the Commission is satisfied that the aggrieved person has been sexually harassed and there is a risk of the harassment continuing, the Commission may make any orders it considers appropriate to prevent the harassment, except for a pecuniary order: s 527J(i).

In considering the terms of its orders, the Commission must take into account the outcomes of any investigation into the matter, any other procedures available to the aggrieved person and the outcomes if any, and anything else the Commission considers relevant.

Time limits

Any application to the Fair Work Commission under Part 3-5A of the Fair Work Act 2009 may be dismissed if it is made more than 24 months after the alleged contravention, or after the last of a series of contraventions is alleged to have occurred: s 527G of the Act, or such longer time as the Commission allows upon application.

A sexual harassment court application must be brought within 60 days of the s 527R(3)(a) certificate being issued by the Fair Work Commission, or such longer time as the court may allow upon application.

These amendments are under the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022. The By Lawyers Employment Law guide has been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Practice Management, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: employee, employer, Employment law, sexual harassment

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • …
  • 48
  • Next Page »

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Preferred State

Connect with us

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 · Privacy Policy
Created and hosted by LEAP · Log in