ByLawyers News and Updates

HomeBuilder – FED

by

The Federal Government has announced an extension to the HomeBuilder scheme to 31 March 2021, however the grant amount has been reduced to $15,000. The $25,000 grant is still available, with amended eligibility criteria, for building contracts signed on or before 31 December 2020.

HomeBuilder $25,000 grant

For building contracts signed between 4 June 2020 and 31 December 2020, a $25,000 grant is available to certain individuals who build a new home or buy an off the plan home, or substantially renovate an existing home. The grant cannot be used to buy an existing house and is limited to Australian citizens earning less than $125,000 or couples earning less than $200,000.

The value of new builds is capped at $750,000. For renovations, the home must be worth less than $1.5 million before the renovation, and projects must cost between $150,000 and $750,000.

The building contract must be signed between 4 June 2020 and 31 December 2020, and work must commence within six months of the contract date.

Applications must be submitted by 14 April 2021.

HomeBuilder $15,000 grant

For building contracts signed between 1 January 2021 to 31 March 2021, a $15,000 grant is available to certain individuals who build a new home or buy an off the plan home, or substantially renovate an existing home. The grant cannot be used to buy an existing house and is limited to Australian citizens earning less than $125,000 or couples earning less than $200,000.

The value of new builds is capped at $950,000 for NSW, $850,000 for VIC and $750,000 for all other States and Territories. For renovations, the home must be worth less than $1.5 million before the renovation, and projects must cost between $150,000 and $750,000.

The building contract must be signed between 1 January 2021 and 31 March 2021, and work must commence within six months of the contract date.

Applications must be submitted by 14 April 2021.

State-based grants

On top of the HomeBuilder scheme, some states are offering related payments in addition to the Federal grant. See the relevant By Lawyers Conveyancing – Purchase Guide for further information and relevant application forms or links where applications are made online.

All By Lawyers Conveyancing – Purchase Retainer instructions precedents now also include these grant details.

Estate cases – QLD

by

New estate cases have been added to the By Lawyers 101 Succession Answers (QLD) reference manual.

The new cases under the Estates section of the publication relate to:

Vesting of interest in beneficiaries – Rule in Saunders v Vautier

A beneficiary can apply to the court to have their interest vest earlier than provided for in the will. The rule in Saunders v Vautier possibly provides such a mechanism.

The High Court set out the modern formulation of the rule in Saunders v Vautier in CPT Custodian Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2005] HCA 53 at [47]:

Under the rule in Saunders v Vautier, an adult beneficiary (or a number of adult beneficiaries acting together) who has (or between them have) an absolute, vested and indefeasible interest in the capital and income of property may at any time require the transfer of the property to him (or them) and may terminate any accumulation.

In Re Tracey [2016] QCA 194 the Court of Appeal at [10] stated that:

The context of that reference makes it clear that the rule may be invoked only by a beneficiary who is sui juris. The expression sui juris connotes in law “a person who can validly contract and bind himself by legal obligation uncontrolled by another person”.

For a case where the rule was not upheld due to the beneficial interest being classed as contingent, see Arnott v Kiss [2014] NSWSC 1385. This case also suggests that a gift over clause may defeat application of the rule.

Accordingly, whether there is any reason for the executor to resist the application would depend upon there being any terms of the will that might support such a position. If the executor is in any doubt then the trustee can and should seek judicial advice.

The addition of these new estate cases to 101 Succession Answers (QLD) is part of our continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

New succession cases – QLD

by

New succession cases have been added to the By Lawyers 101 Succession Answers (QLD) reference manual. These helpful recent cases fall under the Estates and Family provision claims sections of the publication.

Costs in Family provision claims

Shelly v Prager (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 1553 concerned the court assessing the overall justice of a case when determining whether special provision for costs should be made in a family provision claim. Williams J at [18] stated the following factors may be relevant:

– whether one party has engaged in unreasonable conduct in the commencement or maintenance of the proceedings which has resulted in the other party (or parties) to the proceeding incurring unnecessary costs;

– whether an applicant’s claim for provision out of an estate is frivolous, vexatious or made without reasonable prospects of success;

– whether an applicant’s claim, although unsuccessful, was otherwise reasonable, meritorious or borderline; and

– the relative size of the deceased estate.

Judicial advice for trustees

Re Perpetual Trustee Company Limited as a trustee for the Joseph Banington Davis Settlement [2020] NSWSC 1574 concerned the dual purpose of an application for judicial advice by an executor/ trustee. Robb J at [72] noted that:

It is…not right to see a trustee’s application for judicial advice about whether to sue or defend proceedings as directed only to the personal protection of the trustee. Proceedings for judicial advice have another and no less important purpose of protecting the interests of the trust.

The addition of these recent cases to 101 Succession Answers (QLD) is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

The Lighthouse Project – FED

by

The Lighthouse Project is a new family-violence and risk screening initiative that will run in both the Family Court and the Federal Circuit Court for parenting matters. The legislative framework is provided by the recent Family Law Amendment (Risk Screening Protections) Act 2020.

The project will be initially available in the Adelaide, Brisbane and Parramatta registries of the courts. It is scheduled to commence before the end of 2020.

The Lighthouse Project includes:

  • early risk screening through a secure online platform;
  • early identification and management of safety concerns; and
  • assessment and triage of cases by a specialised team, who will provide resources and safe and suitable case management.

All cases identified as high-risk following the screening process will be referred to a dedicated list in the court. The specialist list will be known as the Evatt List. This will be a judge-managed list which will focus on early information gathering and intervention through a judge-led, dedicated support team in appropriate cases.

Both courts have a dedicated page on their websites with information about the Lighthouse Project.

The By Lawyers Family Law Children publication has been updated accordingly. Information on The Lighthouse Project has been included under Pre-Action procedures in the full commentary and on the matter plan. Practitioners are also reminded of the related information on family violence and cross-examination of parties, in the Going to court folders.

Wills guide reviewed – QLD

by

The continuing commitment of By Lawyers to updating and enhancing our publications has seen the Queensland Wills guide reviewed.

Subscribers using this popular publication will find a re-ordered and extended matter plan, revised and updated commentary and a number of new precedents. Execution is now a top-level heading on the matter plan, with dedicated commentary on issues such as blind witnesses, gifts to witnesses and solicitors as witnesses. The revisions also include:

  • First steps and taking instructions for wills
  • Testamentary capacity and the test in Banks v Goodfellow
  • The formal requirements for a valid will
  • Informal wills
  • Intestacy
  • Executors
  • Execution
  • Challenges to the validity of a will

New and amended precedents

  • Letter to client to confirming instructions
  • To do list
  • Instructions for signing
  • Letter reminding client that will is ready for signing

Other resources in the Wills guide reviewed

Links have been added to the By Lawyers reference materials Other trusted and useful resources. New cases have been added to 101 Succession Answers (QLD).

Both of these resources can be found in the Reference materials folder on the matter plan.

101 Costs Answers – ALL STATES

by

101 Costs Answers is the latest addition to the By Lawyers ‘101’ series of helpful reference materials.

Located in the Reference materials folder on every By Lawyers matter plan, this publication contains valuable commentary and precedents on all aspects of legal costs.

The precedents include all of the By Lawyers costs agreements/client services agreements and costs disclosures, drawn together from all By Lawyers publications into a convenient single publication.

The By Lawyers costs agreements are compliant with the strict requirements of the various state laws. They cater for all areas of law, with detailed recitals of the scope of work usually undertaken in each type of matter. This not only defines the retainer but makes it easy for practitioners to produce documents quickly upon engagement.

The 101 Costs Answers commentary includes:

Disclosure requirements

The commentary helps practitioners to navigate some of the more complicated disclosure requirements including regulated costs and the specific obligations for different types of litigation matters. The effect of non-disclosure is also covered.

Disbursements

Commentary on defining and recovering disbursements includes relevant case law and examples. The By Lawyers costs agreements are drafted to clearly identify usual disbursements.

Counsel’s fees

The commentary deals with the contractual relationship between solicitors and barristers as well as disclosure requirements. With the solicitor responsible for payment of counsel’s fees regardless of the solicitor’s agreement with the client, the By Lawyers costs agreements include counsel’s fees as specific disbursements which the client is obliged to pay.

Debt recovery

Where debt recovery is necessary, 101 Costs Answers contains letters of demand and example pleadings to assist with the recovery of costs. There is also detailed commentary on costs assessment procedures and the relevant forms for each state are available on the matter plan.

Like all By Lawyers publications, 101 Costs Answers contains interactive links to relevant legislation and cases, which are always kept updated.

Personal Injury QLD

by

The By Lawyers Personal Injury QLD publication has been reviewed, including the addition of a recent Supreme Court case relating to the extension of limitation periods.

Limitation periods are a critical consideration for practitioners advising and representing clients in personal injury claims. Strict limitation and notice periods apply. Extensions are possible under s 59 Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002, but good reasons for delay must be shown and the Court does not exercise its discretion to extend limitation periods lightly. Section 59 also applies to any extension of the limitation period that is granted under the Limitation of Actions Act 1974.

The issues relating to such an application were examined recently in Faram v Hensec Pty Limited [2020] QSC 327. The application to extend the limitation period in that case was refused where the applicant had failed to comply with the necessary pre-action procedures.

The By Lawyers Personal Injury QLD commentary deals in detail with limitation periods and pre-action procedures.

This review has also seen the commentary updated and revised for enhanced searchability.

Related By Lawyers guides for Queensland litigation include Motor Vehicle Accidents, Workers Compensation, District Court, Supreme Court and 101 Subpoena Answers.

Family provision claims QLD

by

New precedents have been added to the By Lawyers Family Provision Claims QLD publication.

Following an author review of the guides, there is new content on the matter plans for both Acting for the Estate and Acting for the Claimant.

The new content to assist practitioners acting for clients in relation to claims on a deceased estate under Part 4 ss 40-44 Succession Act 1981 and  Chapter 15 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules includes:

Acting for the Estate – new family provision precedents

  • Letter to beneficiary affected by settlement of claim
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavits for signing
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavits
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing

Acting for the Claimant – new family provision precedents

  • Letter to potential claimant
  • Authority to settle and receive
  • Direction to pay and authority to receive
  • Letter to client enclosing settlement deed
  • Deed of family arrangement
  • Letter to client after filing claim
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavit
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to client enclosing estate affidavits
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – Payment
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – No payment

This review of the Family Provision Claims QLD publication and the addition of these new family provision precedents is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Non-disclosure – All states

by

Non-disclosure agreements and clauses have been added to all By Lawyers guides. These precedents augment the existing Confidentiality Deed and clauses in the Folder of Blank Deeds, Agreements and Statutory Declarations in Folder A. Getting the matter underway on every By Lawyers matter plan.

In general, non-disclosure is passive and unilateral, whereas confidentiality is active and bipartite. The former generally requires a party simply not to reveal or release confidential information, whereas the latter requires a party to take positive steps to keep information secret and safe.

There are also other distinctions to be drawn when dealing with confidential information. Sometimes only one party is to provide confidential information to the other. In other cases, two or more parties propose to exchange it. Sometimes the parties wish only to protect the contents of their agreement, whereas sometimes they wish to protect other specific information relevant to their decision to enter into the agreement, or relevant to the subject matter of the agreement.

The various By Lawyers deeds and agreements and precedent clauses have been revised and enhanced to encompass these distinctions.

The commentary on Deeds and agreements in the Folder of Blank Deeds, Agreements and Statutory Declarations has also been enhanced to cover these points.

Apart from the precedents available in the Folder of Blank Deeds, Agreements and Statutory Declarations, relevant precedents relating to non-disclosure and confidentiality are also located in various guides as required.

Adding these non-disclosure agreements and clauses, and revising the existing confidentiality deeds and clauses, is part of By Lawyers continual commitment to the expansion and enhancement of our content.

Amended precedents:

Deed for general use

Agreement for general use

Confidentiality deed

Confidentiality clause for defined information – All parties

Confidentiality clause for defined information – One party

New precedents:

Non-disclosure agreements – Informal

Non-disclosure agreement – Formal

Confidentiality clause for terms of agreement – All parties

Confidentiality clause for terms of agreement – One party

JobKeeper extension – FED

by

The Federal Government has announced another Jobkeeper extension. The payment scheme will continue until 28 March 2021.

Options for flexibility for managing workforce costs, such as reducing working hours continue. Employers are no longer allowed to require employees to take annual leave.

The amendments change the eligibility requirements for employers. Two broad categories of employers have been created: those who qualify for the new scheme after 28 September 2020, referred to as ‘qualifying employers’ and those who previously received at least one payment but no longer qualify, referred to as ‘legacy’ employers.

Qualifying employers

The minimum requirements under this JobKeeper extension remain the same regarding notification and consultation. The By Lawyers example content letters remain available from within the commentary and have been updated where necessary.

Any JobKeeper enabling directions or agreements existing on 27 September 2020 remain valid if the employer continues to qualify for the scheme.

Legacy employers

Legacy employers must have received one or more JobKeeper payments in the period prior to 28 September 2020, but have ceased to qualify. They now need to show a 10% decline in current GST turnover for the previous quarter. They must obtain a ‘10% decline in turnover certificate’ from a financial service provider.

Small business employers may choose to make a statutory declaration instead.

Legacy employers have been given access to modified directions and agreements and have extra notice and consultation requirements. Any existing on 27 September 2020 will need to be reissued or new arrangements made. They may not request an employee to work less than 2 hours per day or less than 60% of their ordinary hours as at 1 March 2020.

The By Lawyers example content letters provide for legacy employers.

The Fair Work Commission has the power to deal with disputes relating to legacy employers and satisfaction of the 10% decline in turnover test.

More information on Jobkeeper extension

The JobKeeper section of the By Lawyers Dealing with COVID-19 Legal Issues – Some practical information commentary has been updated. A link to this helpful resource is available at the top of the matter plan in every By Lawyers guide.

Connect with us