ByLawyers News and Updates

Costs agreements – All states

by

Enhancement of By Lawyers costs agreements

All By Lawyers costs agreements have been reviewed, consolidated, and reformatted to ensure they are in strict compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements in each state and territory, and to improve presentation and readability.

A good cost agreement precedent provides transparency, reduces disputes with clients over fees, and ensures that firms get paid. It is important these documents are correct, however, the increasing complexity of cost disclosure requirements makes this difficult. By Lawyers precedents provide firms with accurate and effective costs agreements for all matter types in all jurisdictions.

Summary of key changes

  • A key enhancement is the inclusion of a Terms and Conditions section, which consolidates general information that applies across all matters.
  • All related information has been grouped together to assist with readability and comprehension.
  • A Next steps section has been added, outlining the steps required to be taken by the client to move the engagement forward.
  • The automation in relation to fees, disbursements, and internal expenses has been improved for LEAP users.
  • The scopes of work, now available under each cost agreement on the matter plans, have been enhanced. For LEAP users, scopes of work can be added to a costs agreement via the Insert Clause feature. See Inserting a Clause on the LEAP Community page. Alternatively, all users can simply cut and paste the scope into the precedent.

New categories of costs agreements

The By Lawyers costs agreements have been simplified into 4 categories in most states and territories:

  1. Costs agreement: suitable for most matters.
  2. Costs agreement – Estate administration: specific to applications for probate and letters of administration and administering the estate.
  3. Conditional costs agreement: suitable for litigation such as personal injury claims where the firm agrees to act on a no win no fee basis.
  4. Conditional costs agreement – Uplift fee: suitable for litigation in jurisdictions where the relevant legislation permits an uplift to be applied to the total costs for a successful outcome.

The new costs agreements and scopes of work have been added, as appropriate, to folder A. Getting the matter underway on all matter plans.

Sexual harassment – QLD

by

From 1 March 2025, all businesses with operations in Queensland are required to have a written prevention plan to manage the risks associated with sexual harassment and sex or gendered-based harassment. The requirement arises under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Qld) and the Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011 (Qld).

Any business without such a plan in place or that has not taken reasonable steps to make workers aware of the plan, is in breach of the Regulation and subject to fines of up to $6,000 per offence.

By Lawyers 101 Staff Handbook, part of the popular Practice Management publication, includes a national Discrimination, harassment and bullying policy that is an excellent starting place for QLD firms needing to comply with the legislative requirements.

More detailed state-specific resources are available on the WorkSafe QLD website, including a prevention plan template.

The commentary in the By Lawyers Practice Management publication will assist Queensland practitioners in formulating their management plan and reducing their risk. It includes a detailed discussion about sexual harassment with specific areas of focus for the legal profession and links to relevant cases involving law firms. There is also an outline of the factors that should be considered when implementing firm policies to ensure that they have the desired effect and prevent discriminatory and other unwelcome workplace practices.

Costs – All states

by

By Lawyers 101 Costs Answers reference manual has been extensively reviewed and enhanced.

This comprehensive reference manual is available in the Reference materials folder on all By Lawyers matters plans. The 101 Costs Answers guide is also as part of the By Lawyers Practice Management publication.

Commentary enhancement

An important new section of commentary has been included dealing with disclosure before settlement in litigation matters. Barrister Philippe Doyle Gray, who we are delighted to welcome to the ranks of our authors, covers in detail the requirement under the Legal Profession Uniform Law for clients to receive advice about the cost implications of settlement. Philippe has also made his helpful Settlement Computer available via a link in the By Lawyers commentaries. This automated spreadsheet assists practitioners with the sometimes complicated calculations required to properly give disclosure before settlement, taking into account the various possibilities for the resolution of a matter.

The new section of commentary has been added to the By Lawyers litigation and injuries guides in those states where the Legal Profession Uniform Law applies, namely New South Wales, Victoria and Western Australia.

New precedents

Two new precedent letters to the client have been added to provide clients with the necessary disclosure before settlement:

  • Letter to client – Costs disclosure before settlement – NSW, VIC and WA;
  • Letter to client – Costs disclosure before settlement – QLD, SA, TAS, ACT and NT.

There is one precedent letter for Legal Profession Uniform Law states and one for the other jurisdictions where costs disclosure before settlement is not mandatory but is nonetheless best practice.

These new letters are available in the If required – Updating costs disclosure and security for costs folder on all By Lawyers matter plans. They are also available on the relevant litigation and injuries matter plans under Going to court.

Costs agreements

By Lawyers extensive suite of costs agreements that comply with the regulatory requirements in each state are currently under review. Keep an eye out for a future News & Updates post when the revised versions are published.

General Protections List – FED

by

A National General Protections List operates in the Federal Court of Australia from 1 September 2024. The list will run as a pilot project for an initial period of eight months.

The adoption of the National General Protections List follows the successful conduct of the Adverse Action List before registrars in the Victorian registry of the Federal Court since 2019.

The Fair Work Act’s general protections provisions in Part 3-1 of Chapter 3 cover:

The purpose of the new list is to allow registrars to conduct initial case management of proceedings filed under the general protections provisions in Part 3-1 of Chapter 3 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) with the intention of:

  • promoting consistency and efficiency in the case management of general protections proceedings;
  • ensuring that general protections proceedings are heard in the appropriate court, having regard to any points of principle and the quantum of claims;
  • ensuring that the resources of the court in relation to mediation are targeted towards the most appropriate proceedings; and
  • ensuring early and appropriate case management and timetabling of any interlocutory or procedural matters before the proceeding is allocated to a Docket Judge.

The first list will take place on 4 October 2024. It will be conducted virtually.

A registrar will conduct the list every Friday, with staggered start times to accommodate time differences between various states and territories. After initial case management or after mediation with a registrar, cases will be allocated to a Docket Judge.

On filing, the registry will list new general protections proceedings for a first case management hearing within 4-6 weeks of the application being accepted for filing. In advance of each list, parties will receive correspondence from the court with relevant listing information.

The commentary on General protections claims in the By Lawyers Employment Law guide has been updated accordingly.

Right to disconnect – FED

by

The right to disconnect under the Fair Work Act 2009 applies from 26 August 2024 for non-small business employers and from 26 August 2025 for small business employers.

Section 333M of the Act provides that an employee can refuse to monitor, read, or respond to contact, or attempted contact, from their employer or a third party if the contact relates to their work and is outside their working hours, unless the refusal is unreasonable.

Sub-section 333M(3) sets out a non-exclusive list of matters that can be taken into account to determine whether the refusal is unreasonable, including:

  • The reason for the contact;
  • How the contact is made and how disruptive it is to the employee;
  • The extent to which the employee is compensated to be available or to work outside their normal hours;
  • The nature of the employee’s role and their level of responsibility;
  • The employee’s personal circumstances including any family or caring responsibilities.

All modern awards  are required to include a right to disconnect provision. See the Fair Work Commission‘s webpage for more information on variations to awards.

The right to disconnect is a workplace right for the purpose of s 341 of the Act, which means the adverse action protections apply.

The Fair Work Commission can deal with disputes about the right to disconnect, including by making orders to stop an employee refusing contact or an employer requiring it. Contravention of an order is a civil remedy provision under Part 4-1 of the Act for which fines apply.

The commentary and precedents in the By Lawyers Employment Law guide have been updated accordingly.

Publication reviews – All states

by

Publication reviews are part of By Lawyers’ commitment to quality and keeping our subscribers up to date with changes in practice and procedure.

Our publication reviews target commentaries, or precedents, or both. The purpose of the reviews is to update and ensure consistency in styles, formatting, hyperlinks, naming protocols and, if necessary, the substantive content.

The results of a review can include new, amended, or deleted commentary, commentary headings, and precedents.

Sometimes the title or location of a precedent will be altered.

Occasionally there are amendments to the sequence of folders, commentary headings, precedents, and hyperlinks on the matter plan.

Any changes applied will be reflected in an amended matter plan.

Practitioners using our guides will not always realise when a publication review has been conducted. However, sometimes the resulting changes will be apparent, and amendments or enhancements might take a moment to get used to.

Lately, our in-house team, in conjunction with our authors in the various jurisdictions around Australia, have been focussed on reviewing the Full Commentaries in the following publications:

Some of these are still a work in progress, so keep an eye out for any changes.

We love to help our subscribers, and we love feedback. If you have any questions or concerns about changes arising from a publication review, do not hesitate to let us know. We are always happy to discuss any change we have made, or consider others. If you can’t find a section of commentary or a precedent, send us an email and we will point you in the right direction.

And, if you like the changes we have made, please take a moment to let us know so we can continue helping you to enjoy practice more.

Our email is: askus@bylawyers.com.au

Fair Work Act – FED

by

The final tranche of amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009, under the Fair Work Act Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act 2024 apply from 1 July 2024.

The changes introduce a detailed definition of casual employment, and a limited right to disconnect from work.

Casual employment under the Fair Work Act

Section 15A of the Fair Work Act 2009 sets out a general rule for when an employee is a casual, along with detailed guidance for applying the rule, and some exceptions to it.

The general rule is that an employee will be a casual if:

  • the employment relationship is characterised by an absence of a firm advance commitment to continuing and indefinite work; and
  • the employee would be entitled to a casual loading or a specific rate of pay for casual employees under the terms of a fair work instrument if the employee were a casual employee, or the employee is entitled to such a loading or rate of pay under the contract of employment.

Whether the relationship is characterised by an absence of a firm advance commitment to continuing and indefinite work is to be assessed on the basis:

  • of the real substance, practical reality, and true nature of the employment relationship; and
  • that a firm advance commitment can be in the form of the contract of employment or, in addition to it, in the form of a mutual understanding or expectation between the employer and employee.

The section sets out a number of considerations that may indicate the presence of such a commitment, and includes notes about how the commitment might be manifested.

There are also some specific exceptions to the general rule for academic and teaching staff at higher education institutions.

The right to disconnect under the Fair Work Act

Section 333M of the Act provides that an employee can refuse to monitor, read, or respond to contact, or attempted contact, from their employer or a third party if the contact relates to their work and is outside their working hours, unless the refusal is unreasonable.

Sub-section 333M(3) sets out a non-exclusive list of matters that can be taken into account to determine whether the refusal is unreasonable, including:

  • The reason for the contact;
  • How the contact is made and how disruptive it is to the employee;
  • The extent to which the employee is compensated to be available or to work outside their normal hours;
  • The nature of the employee’s role and their level of responsibility;
  • The employee’s personal circumstances including any family or caring responsibilities.

The right to disconnect is a workplace right for the purpose of s 341 of the Act, which means the adverse action protections apply.

The Fair Work Commission can deal with disputes about the right to disconnect, including by making orders to stop an employee refusing contact or an employer requiring it. Contravention of an order is a civil remedy provision under Part 4-1 of the Act for which fines apply.

The commentary and precedents in the By Lawyers Employment Law guide has been updated accordingly.

Employment Law updates – FED

by

As employment lawyers would be well aware, employment law updates have been more frequent over the past few years than in any other area of law.

The By Lawyers Employment Law publication has been regularly updated since December 2022 to reflect the staged commencement of various changes under federal legislation including:

  • Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022
  • The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act 2023
  • Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes No. 2) Act 2024

The Fair Work Commission has also implemented new rules to reflect these legislative changes.

To ensure coherence and consistency following all these employment law updates, the Employment Law matter plans and commentary have recently been reviewed by our author and our in-house legal editorial team.

Topics covered in the commentary that have been amended and reviewed because of the various employment law updates include:

  • The Overview including the objects of the Fair Work Act;
  • Equal remuneration requirements;
  • Prohibitions on pay secrecy;
  • Anti-discrimination and special measures;
  • Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work;
  • Flexible work arrangements;
  • Extensions of unpaid parental leave;
  • Small business redundancy;
  • Regulating labour hire arrangements – fixed term contracts and labour hire orders;
  • Added protection against discrimination under the National Employment Standards, especially concerning family violence;
  • The definition of casual employee;
  • Casual conversion; and
  • Unfair contracts.

See the following By Lawyers News and Updates posts for more details of the changes:

The By Lawyers Employment law publication is up to date with all changes.

Legislative amendments impacting various aspects of enterprise agreements are largely beyond the scope of the publication.

Relevant cases have also been added to 101 Employment Law Answers in the Reference Materials folder on the matter plan, including Feldschuh v Strong Room Technology Pty Ltd [2024] FWCFB 254, in which the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission (FWC) held that a company director was not also an employee.

Electronic signing and witnessing

by

A new guide to Electronic Signing and Witnessing has been added to the Reference Materials folder on all By Lawyers matter plans.

This helpful resource summarises the various legislation across all Australian jurisdictions for electronic transactions.

Electronic signing and witnessing

In Australia under federal, state, and territory legislation many transactions can be completed electronically.

Electronic signing and witnessing are available for many, but not all, transactions and documents encountered in every day practice. However, the availability of electronic signing and witnessing is considerably different in each jurisdiction.

The new guide summarises the applicable legislation in each jurisdiction, to assist practitioners understand when electronic signing and witnessing is permitted and how it can be done.

Legislation

The Commonwealth took the lead on legislation to enable electronic transactions at the turn of the millennium, and sought the cooperation of the states in enacting consistent laws across all jurisdictions, resulting in the following legislation:

Electronic Transactions Act 2001 (ACT)

Electronic Transactions Act 1999 (CTH)

Electronic Transactions Regulations 2020 (CTH)

Electronic Transactions Act 2000 (NSW)

Electronic Transactions Regulation 2017 (NSW)

Electronic Transactions (Queensland) Act 2001 (QLD)

Electronic Transactions (Northern Territory) Act 2000 (NT)

Electronic Transactions (Northern Territory) Regulations 2001 (NT)

Electronic Communications Act 2000 (SA)

Electronic Communications Regulations 2017 (SA)

Electronic Transactions Act 2000 (TAS)

Electronic Transactions Regulations 2021 (TAS)

Electronic Transactions (Victoria) Act 2000 (VIC)

Electronic Transactions (Victoria) Regulations 2020 (VIC)

Electronic Transactions Act 2011 (WA)

Electronic Transactions Regulations 2012 (WA)

Unfortunately, the approach taken by each state and territory to implementing this legislation differs to various degrees from both the Commonwealth’s and each other’s. Each jurisdiction has exempted certain statutes, transactions, and documents from the operation of their Act or some of its provisions.

This means that, while all jurisdictions have laws providing for electronic transactions and electronic signing, and some have laws for audio visual witnessing, the documents that can be electronically signed and the requirements for execution vary between the jurisdictions.

The new guide brings all of this information together for practitioners to easily reference in any matter they are working on.

New FWC Rules – FED

by

The Fair Work Commission (FWC) rules regulate the work of the Fair Work Commission. They include the procedures and requirements for filing and serving applications and responses in the various types of employment disputes under the Fair Work Act 2009 (FWA) and other legislation.

There are new FWC rules from 27 March 2024. The Fair Work Commission Rules 2024 (Cth) have replaced the Fair Work Commission Rules 2013 (Cth).

The new FWC rules remake and update the 2013 version. In addition to updates for some amended legislation and procedure, the rules have been substantially rearranged and renumbered.

There are now separate chapters of the rules for matters under the FWA, matters under other legislation, and for appeals and reviews.

The chapter for FWA matters is divided into separate parts that accord with all the areas of possible applications under the Act:

  1. National Employment Standards;
  2. Modern awards;
  3. Enterprise agreements;
  4. Regulated labour hire arrangement orders;
  5. Transfer of business;
  6. Fixed term contracts;
  7. General protections, unfair dismissal and unlawful termination;
  8. Industrial action;
  9. Right of entry;
  10. Sexual harassment and bullying;
  11. Regulated workers; and
  12. Disputes under dispute procedures in awards, enterprise agreements et cetera.

The requirements for service of applications and responses are now all contained within Schedule 1 to the new rules.

The transitional provisions provide that the new FWC rules apply to new matters and to any step in a matter already on foot, however the FWC can order that the previous rules continue to apply to a matter already on foot.

The By Lawyers Employment Law guide has been updated accordingly.

Connect with us