ByLawyers News and Updates

Workers compensation legislation – NSW

by

There have been a number of small but important amendments to New South Wales workers compensation legislation.

Relevant provisions of the Motor Accidents and Workers Compensation Legislation Amendment Act 2021 commenced on 16 June 2022.

The amendments include:

  • Changes to the Workers Compensation Act 1987 with regard to deemed diseases. These are certain specified diseases and medical conditions which are deemed to be caused by certain employment, such as asbestosis. The Act has been amended so that minimum periods of service in specified employment and minimum exposure requirements can now be included on the list of deemed diseases in the regulations.
  • Additional entitlements for volunteer firefighters, emergency and rescue workers under the Workers Compensation (Bush Fire, Emergency and Rescue Service) Act 1987. This amendment brings the compensation entitlements of these volunteer workers into line with those of paid workers. The new entitlements for volunteers include funeral expenses and funds management fees for dependent children of deceased volunteer workers.

The By Lawyers Workers Compensation publication has been amended accordingly.

A further provision of the amending Act awaits proclamation. This relates to an additional entitlement to compensation for any dependent children of a deceased worker. The fees charged by the NSW Trustee and Guardian to manage the dependent child’s lump sum entitlement will be a separate benefit claimable and paid by the insurer, so that a lump sum compensation amount paid to a dependent child of a deceased worker will not be eroded by fees. This amendment will be incorporated in the By Lawyers publication when it commences.

Revenue – NSW

by

Recent duty and other revenue amendments impacting conveyancing, trusts, and family law have been incorporated as applicable into the relevant By Lawyers publications.

Legislation

The State Revenue and Fines Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous) Act 2022 (NSW) amended various revenue Acts with effect from 19 May 2022, including:

These revenue amendments touch on various areas of practice.

Conveyancing

Options

Ad valorem stamp duty is payable on option fees under put and call option deeds. New section 8 (1)(b)(ix) of the Duties Act 1997 provides that duty is payable by the grantee within three months of an option being granted. This changes the previous position where duty was only payable on an option fee if the option was exercised.

Duty is assessed on the option fee, not including security deposits, performance payments, and legal costs.

The grantee is not entitled to claim a refund for any stamp duty paid, regardless of whether the call option is exercised. Also duty paid on the option fee is not credited toward the duty payable on the property when the option is exercised and the contract completed.

The changes do not apply to option agreements entered into before 19 May 2022.

Off the plan

A new section 49A (1D) of the Duties Act 1997 provides that to qualify for a 12-month deferral of stamp duty on off-the-plan purchases, a residence requirement must be met. At least one of the purchasers must use and occupy the property as their principal place of residence for at least 6 months, within 12 months of completion. Australian Defence Force personnel are exempted from the residency requirement. A new version of the Revenue NSW purchaser declaration form is available. Part 6 of the form relates to off-the-plan purchases and provides for the nomination of ADF personnel.

Surcharge duty

A new s 104ZJA(1) (c) of the Duties Act 1997 provides that an Australian-based developer which pays surcharge purchaser duty on a transfer of residential land may have it refunded they later change the use of the land to wholly or predominantly commercial or industrial.

The application for a refund must be lodged online using the application type Australian Based Developer Application for Exemption & Reassessment.

First home owners

Section 13A (3) of the First Home Owner Grant (New Homes) Act 2000 has been amended to include a new definition of the eligibility cap, including how to calculate the total value of the transaction based on the type of transaction and when it occurs.

Land tax

New sections 5B(2A) and 5B(2B) of the Land Tax Act 1956 provide for a discretionary exemption allowing those who do not occupy their principal place of residence for 200 days continuously in a year to remain exempt from land tax. This allows owners to, for example, live and work overseas for a period without losing the exemption.

The By Lawyers Sale of real property (NSW), Purchase of real property (NSW) and 1001 Conveyancing Answers (NSW) publications have been updated accordingly.

Trusts

The amending Act broadens the scope of dutiable transactions under s 8(1)(b)(ix) of the Duties Act 1997 by introducing duty on transactions that result in a change in beneficial ownership and acknowledgement of trust. 

Under s 8(3), the definition of change in beneficial ownership has been extended to include the creation and extinguishment of dutiable property, a change in equitable interests in dutiable property, and dutiable property becoming and ceasing to be subject to a trust.

This amendment directly arises from the case of Benidorm Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of Revenue [2020] NSWSC 471 where the Supreme Court held that the definition of declaration of trust in s 8(3) of the Duties Act 1997  as it then was must have a legal consequence, or consequences, beyond merely acknowledging that which already exists. The taxpayer in that case held real property and shares on trust for a beneficiary. When the beneficiary died his sole beneficiary and executor made a declaration of trust substantially the same as the original trust. On appeal the taxpayer was successful and was able to avoid paying duty on the second declaration, which acknowledged and evidenced a trust that was already in place. Such an acknowledgment of trust will now be caught by the Act.

The By Lawyers Trusts publication has been updated accordingly.

Family Law

A new s 68 (1A)(b)(iia) of the Duties Act 1997 means that for de facto relationships transfers of property effected by an agreement made to divide relationship property due to the breakdown of a relationship will be exempt from duty. Previously, to be exempt from duty the transfer had to be effected by a binding financial agreement, court order, or purchase at a public auction. This brings the exemption for de facto couples into line with that for married couples. These exemptions are discretionary and depend on sufficient evidence being supplied in support of the application.

A new version of the form Revenue NSW ODA 069 – Application for Exemption or Refund – Break up of marriage or De facto Relationship is available and needs to be completed.

The By Lawyers 101 Family Law Answers publication has been updated accordingly.

Comparative CPD requirements

by

In all states and territories of Australia legal practitioners are required, as a condition of their practising certificates, to participate in compulsory professional development and training. Although the requirements are reasonably uniform, the terminology differs. In some states the requirement is known as Continuing Legal Education (CLE), or Mandatory Continuing Legal Education (MCLE). In others it is known as Compulsory Professional Development (CPD). There are also different requirements for barristers and solicitors.

For consistency, Continuing Professional Development (CPD) is used in this guide.

In each jurisdiction, the relevant one-year period begins on 1 April and ends on 31 March.

The CPD requirements in each state and territory are summarised below:

AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) = 10 units

Core Areas

A minimum of one CPD unit from each of the following areas:

  • Legal ethics and professional responsibility;
  • Practice management and business skills;
  • Professional skills; and
  • Substantive law and procedural law.

Section 47 of the Legal Profession Act 2006 (ACT) and the Law Society of the ACT CPD Guidelines.

NEW SOUTH WALES

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development = 10 units

Compulsory Fields

A minimum of one unit per year from each of the following fields:

  • Ethics and Professional Responsibility;
  • Practice Management and Business Skills;
  • Professional Skills; and
  • Substantive Law.

Legal Profession Uniform Continuing Professional Development (Solicitors) Rules 2015 and s 52 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW).

NORTHERN TERRITORY

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) = 10 points

Core Competencies

A minimum of one point per year from each of the following mandatory competency areas:

  • Ethics and professional responsibility;
  • Practice management and business skills; and
  • Professional Skills in legal practice.

Schedule 2 of the Legal Profession Regulations 2007.

QUEENSLAND

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) = 10 units

Mandatory Core areas

A minimum of one unit per year in each of the following mandatory core areas:

  • Practical legal ethics;
  • Practice management and business skills; and
  • Professional skills.

Part 6 of the Queensland Law Society Administration Rule 2005.

SOUTH AUSTRALIA

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (MCPD) = 10 units

Required Areas

A minimum of one unit per year from each of the following required areas:

  • Practical legal ethics;
  • Practice management and business skills; and
  • Professional skills.

Legal Practitioners Education and Admission Council Rules 2018.

TASMANIA

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) = 10 units

Mandatory Core Competency Areas

A minimum of one unit per year from each of the following mandatory competency areas:

  • Practical legal ethics;
  • Practice management and business skills; and
  • Professional skills; and
  • Substantive law.

Law Society of Tasmania’s Practice Guideline 4 – Continuing Professional Development Scheme and s 56 of the Legal Profession Act 2007.

VICTORIA

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) = 10 units

Compulsory Fields

A minimum of one unit per year from each of the following compulsory fields:

  • Ethics and Professional Responsibility;
  • Professional Skills;
  • Substantive Law; and
  • Practice Management and Business Skills.

Legal Profession Uniform Continuing Professional Development (Solicitors) Rules 2015 and s 52 Legal Profession Uniform Law.

WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) = 10 points

Mandatory Competency Areas

A minimum of one point per year from each of the following mandatory competency areas:

  • Practice management;
  • Professional skills;
  • Ethics and professional responsibility; and
  • Substantive law.

Legal Profession Act 2008, Legal Profession Rules 2009 and Legal Profession Regulations 2009.

Summary of continuing professional development activities

CPD Activity Activity format Formula
Max CPD Maximum number of CPD units that can be completed in a day.

  • TAS maximum = 6.
 N/A
Attendance Course, seminar, workshop, lecture, conference, discussion group, multimedia or web-based program.

  • TAS maximum = 3
  • WA maximum = 6
  • All other Jurisdictions = No limit.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
Study Private study of audio/visual material recording of an event that occurred in the CPD year.

  • NT maximum = 5
  • QLD, VIC, ACT = No limit.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
View View or listen multimedia or web-based program.

  • ACT – No limit
  • NT maximum =5
  • SA maximum = 5
  • TAS maximum = 5
  • WA maximum = 4.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
Private Private study of audio/visual material update solicitor’s knowledge and skills.

  • ACT – No limit
  • NSW maximum = 5
  • NT maximum =5
  • QLD maximum = 5
  • VIC maximum = 5.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
Research Research, preparation or editing of a legal article.

  • ACT maximum = 5
  • NSW maximum = 5
  • NT maximum =5
  • QLD maximum = 5
  • SA maximum =5
  • TAS maximum = 3
  • VIC maximum = 5
  • WA maximum = 5.
 1,000 words = 1 CPD
Activity preparation Preparation of CPD activities.

  • ACT maximum = 5
  • NSW maximum = 5
  • NT maximum =5
  • QLD maximum = 5
  • SA maximum =4
  • TAS maximum = 4
  • VIC maximum = 5.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
Presenting. Presentation of a CPD activity.

  • ACT maximum = 5
  • NT maximum =5
  • QLD maximum = 5
  • SA maximum =4
  • VIC maximum = 5.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
Present WA Presentation of a CPD activity and commentator.

  • WA maximum = 6.
 1 hour – 2 CPD
Membership actives Membership of legal committee, taskforce or practice section of a law association or similar body.

  • ACT maximum = 3
  • NSW maximum = 3
  • NT maximum =3
  • QLD maximum = 3
  • SA maximum =5
  • TAS maximum = 3
  • VIC maximum = 3.
 2 hours = 1 CPD
Graduate study Post graduate study.

  • NT maximum = 5
  • TAS maximum =5.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
Specialist Completion of a specialist accreditation program. 10 points incl compulsory
Practice Management Completion of practice management course. 10 points incl compulsory

QCAT guide – QLD

by

The By Lawyers QCAT guide has been extensively reviewed and enhanced.

The Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal matter plan and commentary headings have been reordered for improved sequencing and searchability. New commentary and cases have been added on various topics including:

Commentary on specific matter types in the QCAT guide includes helpful links to the relevant legislation such as:

These enhancements to the By Lawyers QCAT guide assist practitioners in advising clients and conducting matters in the tribunal’s civil disputes division.

Leasing precedents – QLD

by

New and updated leasing precedents have been added to the By Lawyers Leases QLD publication.

Queensland practitioners will find these leasing precedents helpful with a range of common transactions in retail and commercial leases.

The new and updated precedents include:

  • Assignment deed.
  • Guarantee document.
  • Variation deed.
  • Deed of surrender.
  • Deed of variation of lease – deferral of rental payments. This deals with rental relief prompted by the economic impacts of COVID-19 in accordance with the National Cabinet Mandatory Code of Conduct.

The new and updated leasing precedents include clauses addressing common leasing scenarios such as:

  • First right of refusal.
  • Demolition and relocation.
  • Covenants protecting mortgagee’s interests.
  • Liquor licencing requirements such as transfer of licence, and consent to licence.
  • Execution clauses for individuals and corporations tailored for use in deeds, agreements, and contracts.

Also included are precedent letters for standard lease transactions such as:

  • Covering letters to lessee’s solicitor submitting a lease, deed of surrender, deed of assignment, or deed of variation. These precedent letters include execution instructions and a checklist of items to be returned to a lessor before a tenant is allowed to take possession of the premises.
  • Letter to a lessor client enclosing a lease with instructions on how to sign.
  • Letter to titles office enclosing a lease for registration.

The full commentary in the Leases QLD publication covers key practical issues and considerations for landlords and tenants. These include renewals, subleases, interruptions, and outgoings. The specific legislative requirements under the Retail Shop Leases Act are also addressed extensively.

Enforcement – QLD

by

The By Lawyers Enforcement (QLD) publication has been extensively reviewed and expanded.

Part of the individual civil litigation publications, the Enforcement guide deals with enforcing and resisting judgments and orders in civil claims matters in the Magistrates Court, the District Court, and the Supreme Court. This publication is designed to assist practitioners who are advising and representing clients that seek to recover or resist a judgment debt, or other court order, whether or not the practitioner acted for the client in the substantive matter.

The commentary has been substantially re-ordered and enhanced to cover all available enforcement options in all courts, from examination and attachment to various warrants and writs.

New precedents provided on the matter plan include:

  • File cover sheet
  • Retainer instructions
  • Costs agreement and disclosure document
  • Initial letter to client
  • Letter of demand
  • To do list

Other related By Lawyers guides include Insolvency and 101 Subpoena Answers.

Adverse action – FED

by

The recent employment law case of Qantas Airways Ltd v Transport Workers’ Union of Australia [2022] FCAFC 71 considered adverse action under the Fair Work Act 2009 and the obligation on an employer to establish that a decision affecting a worker is not contrary to the prohibitions in the Act.

Adverse action is covered in the By Lawyers Employment Law guide.

Sections 340 to 345 of the Fair Work Act prevent an employer from taking adverse action, as defined in s 342, against an employee who exercises a workplace right, defined in s 341.

For example, if an employee is dismissed, which constitutes adverse action being taken against them, because they made a complaint against their employer, which constitutes their exercise of a workplace right, then the employee may be able to bring a general protections claim against the employer.

In the recent case Qantas made a decision, while its fleet was grounded for the pandemic, to outsource ground handling operations at Australian airports. That resulted in Qantas employees losing their jobs to external providers. The union sought reinstatement of the employees on the basis that Qantas’ decision constituted adverse action on a number of bases. Qantas denied this and argued that the decision was made for operational business reasons.

The court found for the employees on one of the adverse action grounds, namely that the real reason for Qantas’ action in standing down employees was to prevent the exercise of a workplace right, being their right to negotiate a new Enterprise Bargaining Agreement which fell due shortly afterwards. Interestingly, that meant the court upheld the adverse action claim on the basis of a workplace right that did not exist at the time of the decision, but may exist at some future point in time.

The court looked in detail at how the decision was made, what the company took into account, and its knowledge of the future workplace right. The court found that Qantas knew it was circumventing the future right, whereas if it had no such knowledge the outcome may have been different.

The case may go on appeal, but it serves to remind workers of the robust nature of their rights under the Act and employers of the extent of their obligations.

This case will be added to the By Lawyers 101 Employment Law Answers publication and any developments on any appeal will be monitored.

Excluded beneficiary – NSW

by

A recent Supreme Court case regarding an excluded beneficiary will be of interest to wills and estates practitioners. The court considered the effect of statements under s 100 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW).

Nikolaos Tsiokanis died in 2019, aged 86. His will appointed two of his children as the executors of his estate. He made only $100  provision for his other daughter. The deceased made a lengthy statement in the will as to his reasons for effectively excluding his daughter.

The daughter brought a family provision claim. The estate was not a large one.

The court held that the relationship the deceased had with the executors was a stable one and they played an important role in caring for the deceased. The court said the deceased was entitled to, and did, take the plaintiff’s behaviour into account and was satisfied that it justified the reduction of the plaintiff’s share in the estate to nominal provision.

The court also held that the deceased was entitled, when considering any claim by an excluded beneficiary, to consider the nature and value of his estate and to consider, and give priority to, the competing claim of each of the executors with whom he had a close, loving, and supportive relationship.

The court noted that statements made by the deceased are admissible pursuant to s 100(2) of the Succession Act, however the court is not required to accept, unquestioningly, the truth, or accuracy, of the statements. This is particularly so if the content is denied by the applicant, or where there is other evidence that casts doubt upon their accuracy. The court needs to consider that the deceased may have made untrue, or inaccurate, statements, either deliberately, or unintentionally, or it may be that their view is misconceived.

Where evidence of a statement of a deceased is admitted under s 100(9), for the purpose of destroying, or supporting, the credibility of the deceased, s 100(10) permits evidence to be given for the purpose of showing that the deceased’s statement is inconsistent with another statement made, at any time, by the deceased.

Georgopoulos v Tsiokanis & Anor [2022] NSWSC 563 (11 May 2022) will be added to the By Lawyers 101 Succession Answers publication.

Domestic and family violence – QLD

by

Some temporary procedural arrangements for initiating and hearing domestic and family violence applications in the Magistrates Court of Queensland have become permanent from 30 April 2022.

These arrangements were originally put in place as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, but the resulting efficiencies have seen the parliament entrench arrangements that allow parties and practitioners to interact with the court remotely.

Amendments under the Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2021 impact various Acts and procedures. Those relating to domestic and family violence matters include:

Audio visual link

A new section 142A of the Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012 provides that the Magistrates Court may conduct all or part of the proceeding by the use of audio visual links, or audio links. This includes:

  • appearances;
  • giving evidence;
  • making submissions;
  • taking an oath or affirmation.

Electronic filing

A private application for a Temporary Protection Order (TPO), or an application to vary a TPO, can be filed electronically in any Queensland Magistrates Court if the court is closed on a normal business day, or if the applicant is required to isolate under a public health order.

Listing before verification

In circumstances of urgency, where a private applicant is unable to verify their application for a Temporary Protection Order before a Justice of the Peace or solicitor, they can obtain a hearing date, and then serve the application on the respondent, without verification. The application can be subsequently verified in front of the magistrate who hears the matter.

The commentary in the By Lawyers Domestic Violence guide has been updated accordingly. An alert has been added to draw practitioners’ attention to the likelihood that proceedings will involve audio visual appearances and evidence.

Removal of an executor – VIC

by

New precedents for the removal of an executor have been added to the Probate and Letters of Administration matter plans.

In Victoria, an application can be made to the Supreme Court for the removal of an executor under s 34(1)(c) of the Administration and Probate Act 1958.

The court can remove the executor if, following an examination of the facts including a significant weighting to the testator’s intention to appoint the executor, the court is satisfied there is:

  • undue delay in the administration of the estate; or
  • a conflict of interest; or
  • an unworkable relationship between co-executors;

that would lead to significant mischief or harm to the beneficiaries’ interests.

In Connock v Connock (in His Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Connock) [2021] VSC 64 the plaintiff was the widow of the deceased. Both had previously been married and had children from these marriages. The plaintiff’s interest in the estate was limited to the assets of the deceased’s superannuation fund and proceeds from various bank accounts. The deceased’s will made no provision for the widow to take an interest in the residue of the estate.

The executor, the deceased’s child of the first marriage, commenced estoppel proceedings seeking a declaration that the plaintiff held the estate assets for her benefit and maintenance during her lifetime, but, on her death, for the benefit equally of the deceased’s children – one of whom was the executor.

The plaintiff claimed and the court accepted that the executor had a conflict of interest between the executor’s duties and his personal interest in the outcome of the estoppel proceeding, but that this conflict did not warrant the removal of the executor. The court held that, although the executor is in a position of conflict, in the circumstances the welfare of the beneficiaries of the estate did not warrant his removal.

The new form content precedents added to the Probate and Letters of Administration publications are:

  • Originating motion to remove and replace executor;
  • Originating motion to remove and replace trustee;
  • Originating motion to remove and replace executor and trustee.

Connect with us