ByLawyers News and Updates
  • Publication updates
    • Federal
    • New South Wales
    • Victoria
    • Queensland
    • South Australia
    • Western Australia
    • Northern Territory
    • Tasmania
    • Australian Capital Territory
  • By area of law
    • Bankruptcy and Liquidation
    • Business and Franchise
    • Companies, Trusts, Partnerships and Superannuation
    • Conveyancing and Property
    • Criminal Law
    • Defamation and Protecting Reputation
    • Employment Law
    • Family Law
    • Immigration
    • Litigation
    • Neighbourhood Disputes
    • Personal injury
    • Personal Property Securities
    • Practice Management
    • Security of Payments
    • Trade Marks
    • Wills and Estates
  • Legal alerts
  • Articles
  • By Lawyers

County Court costs – VIC

6 January 2025 by By Lawyers

New rules provide for County Court costs to be taxed in the Costs Court under the Supreme Court Scale of Costs that operates by reference to hourly rates from 1 January 2025.

Costs in the County Court are dealt with under Order 63 of the County Court Civil Procedure Rules 2018, which now adopts the Scale of Costs in Schedule 1 of Appendix A to the Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015.

In most cases, the parties will agree on the amount of costs to be paid. If they do not agree, the dispute is referred to the Costs Court.

The scale is based principally on time costing. If a client has been charged on the basis of hourly rates for work done, Section 1 of the Scale applies and provides that the costs payable to the entitled party are to be allowed on the basis of reasonable hourly rates, up to the maximum hourly rate set out in the scale. There are 3 tiers of maximum rates according to a practitioner’s years of post-admission experience. There are no minimum rates.

Section 1 also sets out maximum hourly rates for work done by employees of a law practice who are not legal practitioners. The maximum rates for those employees depend on whether their work required legal skill or knowledge.

All claims must be reasonable. In setting rates to be charged to clients, and in making costs claims, practitioners must observe their overarching obligation to ensure that costs are reasonable and proportionate under s 24 of the Civil Procedure Act 2010.

The time-based model does not mean that a law practice must charge their clients on an hourly basis. The scale also provides for assessment of costs where the entitled party has not been charged on the basis of hourly rates. In such a case, the Costs Court will allow a reasonable amount for the work.

See the By Lawyers County Court (VIC) and Supreme Court (VIC) publications for more information.

Filed Under: Legal Alerts, Litigation, Publication Updates, Victoria Tagged With: costs, costs orders, County Court, Litigation | Victoria, scale of costs

Costs Court – VIC

17 December 2024 by By Lawyers

Changes to the way costs are calculated in the Costs Court have effect from 1 January 2025 following amendments to Order 63 of the Supreme Court Rules, and the Appendix that deals with costs.

The new scale of costs is based principally on time costing, whereas the previous scale was based principally on items of legal work or particular services.

If a client has been charged on the basis of hourly rates for work done, Section 1 of the scale applies and provides that the costs payable to the entitled party are to be allowed on the basis of reasonable hourly rates, up to the maximum hourly rate set out in the scale. There are three tiers of maximum rates according to a practitioner’s years of post-admission experience. There are no minimum rates.

The scale also sets out maximum hourly rates for work done by employees of a law practice who are not legal practitioners. The maximum rates for those employees depend on whether their work required legal skill or knowledge.

The maximum hourly rates are not an endorsement by the Court that those rates are reasonable in every case, or even in most cases, nor an invitation for practitioners to charge clients the maximum hourly rate and then claim that rate as between the parties.

All claims in the Costs Court must be reasonable. In setting rates to be charged to clients, and in making costs claims, practitioners must bear in mind their overarching obligation to ensure that costs are reasonable and proportionate: s 24 of the Civil Procedure Act 2010.

In assessing costs, the Costs Court will determine whether the amount claimed relative to the work performed is reasonable on an item-by-item basis. This means that the same hourly rate will not necessarily be allowed for all time spent or work done by the same individual.  The hourly rate allowed for a lawyer drafting a letter requiring legal skill may be higher than the rate for the same lawyer collating court books.

An application can be made for the Court to allow an increase to the maximum rates if there are special grounds arising out of the nature and importance, difficulty, or urgency of the case. If the matter runs to trial, then the trial judge will usually be best placed to determine such an application.

The time-based model does not mean that a law practice must charge their clients on an hourly basis. The scale provides for the assessment of costs where the entitled party has not been charged on the basis of hourly rates. In such a case, the Costs Court will allow a reasonable amount for the work.

The scale sets out what the court can consider in determining reasonableness for both time-based costing and alternative costing. These include the actual hourly rates charged to the client, the complexity of the matter, the time required, and the difficulty or novelty of the questions involved.

The By Lawyers Supreme Court – Acting for the Plaintiff (VIC) and Supreme Court – Acting for the Defendant publications have been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Legal Alerts, Litigation, Publication Updates, Victoria Tagged With: Costs Court, Legal costs, litigation, Litigation | Victoria, scale of costs

County Court – VIC

5 August 2022 by By Lawyers

The County Court Commercial Division Omnibus Practice Note PNCO 2-2022 came into operation on 1 August 2022.

The new Commercial List Practice Note is largely a consolidation of all the previous practice notes for the division into a single omnibus practice note.

The main changes are in relation to the introduction of electronic processes for discovery, affidavits, and subpoenas.

The Court has also issued a Notice to practitioners regarding the Commercial Division Standard Orders Booklet 2022, also released on 1 August and to be read in conjunction with the new practice note. This collection of the court’s required content and format for consent orders is to be consulted by parties drafting consent orders to be submitted to the Court.

The By Lawyers VIC Litigation guides County Court – Acting for the plaintiff and County Court – Acting for the defendant have been updated accordingly, with references and links to the new omnibus practice note and standard orders booklet in the commentary. There are no new forms or precedents required.

Additional updates have also been made to the commentaries for new Common Law practice notes that have been released recently.  The Court’s Common Law division has not consolidated its practice notes into a single omnibus practice note at this stage.

Filed Under: Legal Alerts, Litigation, Publication Updates, Victoria Tagged With: County Court, Litigation | Victoria, Practice Note, practice note updates, VIC County Court

County Court lists – VIC

28 February 2022 by By Lawyers

New County Court lists commence in the Commercial Division from 1 March 2022.

The County Court (Chapter I Miscellaneous Amendments) Rules 2021 provide for the Expedited Cases List to become the Complex Cases List from that date. The amending rules provide that the Complex Cases List shall consist of any proceeding that is appropriate for more intensive case management. Transitional provisions in the amending rules provide that proceedings in the Expedited Cases List immediately before 1 March 2022 are, on that day, taken to be entered in the Complex Cases List.

There is also a newly established Arbitration List, for all matters under the Commercial Arbitration Act 2011.

The commentaries in the By Lawyers County Court – Act for the Plaintiff and County Court – Act for the Defendant publications have been updated to include these new County Court lists.

This is the final tranche of changes under these rules amendments. Other changes that have already commenced relate to the preparation and filing of affidavits and exhibits in the County Court, and mediation by the registrar. See our previous News & Updates posts in that regard.

Filed Under: Legal Alerts, Litigation, Miscellaneous, Victoria Tagged With: County Court, Litigation | Victoria

Affidavits and exhibits – Supreme Court – VIC

28 September 2021 by By Lawyers

The way affidavits and exhibits are prepared and filed in the Supreme Court’s Common Law Division and Commercial Court is changing.

From 1 October 2021 the Court will no longer accept affidavits for filing that include multiple exhibits, or which separate the affidavit and any exhibit. Affidavits must be in a single fully text-searchable PDF format file including any bundle exhibit.

Affidavits must be filed as a single, searchable PDF document, with all pages consecutively numbered. This includes the pages of any exhibit – see Exhibits to affidavits and Filing and service of affidavits in the By Lawyers Supreme Court (VIC) commentaries for more information.

There may only be one exhibit to an affidavit, except for confidential affidavits.

Where more than one document is exhibited to an affidavit, the documents must be combined into a single ‘bundle exhibit’, ordered in the sequence they are referred to in the affidavit. The exhibit must be part of the affidavit, in a single fully text-searchable PDF format file, with legible page numbers at the bottom right-hand corner of each page that correspond with the digital display page numbers of the PDF, that commence from the first page of the affidavit to the last page of the bundle exhibit.

See Affidavits and exhibits in the By Lawyers Supreme Court (VIC) publication for more information.

In a separate but related change to procedure, from 1 October 2021 all evidentiary documents filed in proceedings in the Common Law Division and Commercial Court may not be inspected by any non-party until the document has been read or relied upon in open court. This applies to affidavits, exhibits, witness statements, expert reports, written submissions, outlines of argument and chronologies.

See Practice Note SC Gen 20 Inspection of Civil Court Files by Non-Parties and Notice to the Profession (Changes to File Inspections and Affidavits) for more information.

Filed Under: Legal Alerts, Litigation, Publication Updates, Victoria Tagged With: affidavits, exhibits, Litigation | Victoria, Supreme Court Victoria

Supreme Court – urgent applications – VIC

19 October 2020 by By Lawyers

The By Lawyers Victorian Supreme Court litigation publication has been reviewed by our author, resulting in consolidation and enhancement of the commentary, especially relating to urgent applications.

Both the Acting for the Plaintiff and Acting for the Defendant guides in the Supreme Court publication have been reviewed.  The matter plans and related commentary have been re-ordered, with additional subheadings for improved searchability. The commentary on Urgent cases and applications has been expanded. Direct links have been added to the relevant Supreme Court webpages with contact details and specific procedures for making urgent applications.

See the subfolder If required – Urgent applications and injunctions, in folder C. Going to court and folder D. Interlocutory steps on both matter plans, for the relevant commentary, links and precedents. Folder D also contains commentary and precedents covering all types of interlocutory applications, urgent and otherwise.

The Victorian Supreme Court publication also includes an Enforcement Guide, which provides practitioners with comprehensive practical assistance on enforcing judgments for their clients.

Also included in the publication is the popular reference manual 101 Subpoena Answers. This valuable resource substantially augments the commentary in the Supreme Court guide regarding the law and practice on issuing and responding to subpoenas.

This author review is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Filed Under: Litigation, Publication Updates, Victoria Tagged With: Litigation | Victoria, Supreme Court Victoria

Magistrates Court – Civil – VIC

2 October 2020 by By Lawyers

The By Lawyers Magistrates Court – Civil litigation publication has been reviewed by our author, resulting in consolidation and enhancement.

Both the Acting for the Plaintiff and Acting for the Defendant guides in the Magistrates Court – Civil publication have been reviewed. Precedents on the matter plan have been consolidated, with some updates and amendments. This includes a number of bespoke By Lawyers precedents in the nature of ‘court forms’ drafted for use where there is no prescribed court form for certain actions required under the rules of court.

Amended precedents include:

  • Notice of discontinuance
  • Notice of ceasing to act
  • Notice of change of solicitor
  • Notice of change of solicitor’s address
  • Offer of compromise
  • Acceptance of offer of compromise under order 26
  • Application for administrative transfer to the County Court
  • Answers to interrogatories

The precedent Notice of Defence to Counterclaim has been deleted. This is because when a counterclaim is served the rules apply as if the defendant were the plaintiff and the plaintiff were the defendant. Accordingly, the usual Defence – Form 8A is used to defend a counterclaim which is on the matter plan.

Commentary on administratively transferring matters to the County Court, pursuant to s 17 of the Courts (Case Transfer) Act 1991, and appropriately responding to counterclaims has also been added.

This review is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Filed Under: Litigation, Publication Updates, Victoria Tagged With: courts, Litigation | Victoria, VIC County Court, VIC magistrates court

Default judgment in the Supreme Court Commercial List – VIC

25 March 2019 by By Lawyers

An order of a Commercial List Judge is now required before a plaintiff can obtain a default judgment in the Supreme Court Commercial List, where a matter is being managed by a Commercial List judge.

A new r 2.07 has been inserted into the Supreme Court (Miscellaneous Civil Proceedings) Rules 2018, pursuant to the Supreme Court (Chapters II and III Miscellaneous Amendments) Rules 2019.

The new rule is effective from 25 March 2019.

The Default judgment commentary in the By Lawyers Victorian Supreme Court – Acting for the plaintiff guide has been updated accordingly.

The amendment does not prevent a plaintiff making an application for default judgment under Order 22 or 23 of Chapter I or Part 4.4 of Chapter 4 of the Civil Procedure
Act 2010.

Filed Under: Litigation, Victoria Tagged With: Commercial List, default judgement, Litigation | Victoria, Supreme court of Victoria

Podcast – Personal Injury Guide – Victoria

17 July 2018 by By Lawyers

If you are wondering what all the fuss is about with By Lawyers new Personal Injury Guide for Victoria, listen to this podcast from our Senior Consultant and Editor Brad Watts explaining the content and advantages of this newest addition to the By Lawyers litigation guides.

Brad takes you through the new guide from start to finish and discusses key pieces of commentary and the helpful precedents that make it easy to represent a client with a personal injury claim. The content discussed includes:

  • Limitation periods and taking proper instructions
  • Costs agreements
  • Assessing the viability of a personal injury case – elements of negligence under the Wrongs Act
  • Supporting and preparing the claim – gathering evidence from the client and witnesses
  • Settling the claim early through mediation and offers of compromise
  • Managing the case in court

You can access this episode on Soundcloud – or click below to listen!

Filed Under: Litigation, Personal injury, Victoria Tagged With: Damages, Litigation | Victoria, negligence, personal injury, podcast, victoria

New Guide – Personal Injury – Victoria

3 July 2018 by By Lawyers

We are delighted to announce the launch of the latest addition to By Lawyers’ Injuries publications, being a Personal Injuries Guide for Victoria.

This publication covers all aspects of advising and representing clients with personal injury claims under the Wrongs Act 1958.

The publication contains helpful commentary and precedents for conducting a claim from start to finish.

Commentary

The detailed and practical commentary discusses all aspects of personal injury claims, including:

  • Limitation periods
  • Taking comprehensive instructions
  • Establishing a duty of care
  • Establishing a breach of duty
  • Factual causation and scope of liability
  • Particular negligence situations such as occupiers’ liability
  • Defences, including obvious and inherent risks
  • Damages
  • Supporting and preparing a claim
  • Mediation
  • Offers of compromise
  • Costs considerations
  • Going to court – Supreme Court and Country Court procedures.

Precedents

Easy to use precedents provided for each stage of the matter include:

  • Retainer instructions
  • Initial letter to plaintiff
  • Costs agreement
  • Letter to medical panel
  • Letter to plaintiff advising on mitigation of damages
  • Example content – pleading and particulars
  • Brief to counsel
  • Subpoenas and Notices to produce
  • Authority and instructions for payment of settlement or award

Before advising a client, it is important to understand the nature and extent of the restrictions imposed upon claims and damages by the Wrongs Act, as well as the defences created.

The By Lawyers Personal Injuries Guide will enable Victorian practitioners to confidently assist clients with personal injury claims.

Filed Under: Litigation, Personal injury, Publication Updates, Victoria Tagged With: courts, Litigation | Victoria, personal injury, Victoria litigation

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Preferred State

Connect with us

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 · Privacy Policy
Created and hosted by LEAP · Log in