ByLawyers News and Updates

Family Law – Property Settlement publication review

by

The By Lawyers Family Law author has reviewed the Property Settlement publication covering commentary, matter plan and precedents.

Commentary updates include the following additions:

  1. Evidentiary issues with spousal maintenance – the best evidence for the effect of health issues on the earning capacity of the applicant is usually that of a medical practitioner; and regarding the attempts made by the applicant to secure paid employment, if acting for the respondent, evidence from a recruitment expert as to the applicant’s employability and likely salary may be useful;
  2. It is best practice to advise clients, even in consent matters, to provide and request disclosure of at least the basic documents. If they do not want to do so, advising them of the risks for an agreement or orders to be set aside on the basis of non disclosure is recommended;
  3. Consent orders and the registrar seeking further clarification – a requisition may be avoided by providing a covering letter or statement of agreed facts along with the documents to be filed, explaining the orders and background which gives rise to what otherwise may appear unjust;
  4. Federal Circuit Court Practice Direction No. 2 of 2017 providing strict directions for affidavits in interim matters;
  5. Section 79(9) and s 90SM(9) of the Family Law Act provides that the court shall not make an order in a property settlement proceedings, other than an interim order or a consent order, unless the parties have attended a conference with a Registrar or Deputy Registrar, i.e. a conciliation conference. If the matter is urgent or there is another special circumstance, the court may make an order notwithstanding parties have not attended a conference; and
  6. If a party seeks to amend their application or response refer to Federal Circuit Rule 7.01 and Family Law Rule 11.10.

The new requirements for affidavits in the Family Court has led to a new Exhibit page to Affidavit form being created by LEAP. This has been linked where necessary in the matter plan.

There were only minor amendments to several letters regarding use of the term “initiating applications” as opposed to “application for final orders”.

 

Family Law Rules – Additional changes as of 1 March 2018

by

Documents to be used in conjunction with affidavits

As of 1 March 2018, in the Family Court, a document that is to be used in conjunction with an affidavit and tendered in evidence in a court proceeding, must be identified in the affidavit but must not be attached to or annexed to the affidavit, or filed as an exhibit to the affidavit.

There may be exceptions where court orders or the Rules provide otherwise: for example r 15.62 in relation to expert reports.

Any document referred to in the affidavit must be served with the affidavit on the other parties after filing. The document must then be tendered in evidence at the court event when the relevant affidavit is relied upon or as required: r 15.08(2)

While as of 1 March 2018, the Family Law Rules have changed, providing for annexures not to be attached to affidavits: r 15.08, in matters in the Family Court, the Federal Circuit Court continues to permit annexures to be attached. Given the majority of matters are filed in the Federal Circuit Court, not the Family Court, in practice the norm will continue to be that relevant annexures are attached to affidavits.

Undertakings

Rule 17.06 has been added, relating to undertakings. The rule sets out the form of undertakings and, in summary provides:

  • Undertakings may be given orally or in writing.
  • If they are in writing, it must be signed and filed.
  • If they are given orally, a written record must be made, signed, filed and served.
  • A definition of undertakings as to damages.

We have updated our Property Settlement and Children commentaries accordingly.

Family Law Rules – changes as of 1 March 2018

by

As of 1 March 2018, changes came into effect in relation to consent orders in the Family Court.

The relevant By Lawyers publications, Children and Property Settlement, have been updated. The new forms have been linked to the matter plans and the commentary additions consist of the following:

Children changes

What was previously the annexure to consent parenting orders is now incorporated into the Application for Consent Orders form. A separate annexure is no longer required.

Three new forms were added for use in the Family Court.

The Notice of Child Abuse, Family Violence or Risk of Family Violence (Application for Consent Orders) must be filed with the Application for consent orders if parenting orders are sought and a party has said at item 25 of the Application there has been, or is a risk of child abuse, neglect or family violence.

The second form is the Notice of Child Abuse, Family Violence or Risk of Family Violence (Current Case). This form is now only for where cases are on foot: not for consent orders.

A third new form is the Submitting Notice. This form may be filed in Family Court proceedings if a party has been served with an Initiating Application, Response to Initiating Application, Reply or a Notice of Appeal, and does not want to contest the relief sought: Family Law Rules r 8.07.

Property Settlement changes

Previously, if the consent orders contained a provision for a superannuation splitting order, you had to ensure that a superannuation information form had been completed by the Trustee of the relevant super fund or a valuation had been obtained to the superannuation interest. However, as of 1 March 2018, a superannuation kit is no longer required. Proof of value of the interest is required to be filed with the Application.

Family Law Rules – Amendment

by

ALERT – FROM 1 MARCH 2018 – APPLICATION FOR CONSENT ORDERS

Family Law Amendment (2018 Measures No. 1) Rules 2018

Parenting matters: Changes to consent orders and submitting notices. New forms for abuse/violence.

Financial matters: Superannuation interest – kit no longer required. Must file proof of value of the interest with application.

FAMILY LAW – BINDING CHILD SUPPORT AGREEMENTS

by

The Binding Child Support Agreements commentary has been updated with relevant case law.

Balzano & Balzano [2010] FamCAFC 11 at [40]-[41] and Gallup & Gallup [2009] FMCAfam 839 at [52]-[53] both demonstrate the extreme difficulty in having a binding child support agreement set aside.

Family Law – The Harman Undertaking – Information obtained on discovery or subpoena

by

Commentary has been added to the Children and Property Settlement publications regarding the Harman undertaking:

Information obtained on discovery, subpoena or included within an affidavit cannot be used for a collateral or ulterior purpose unrelated to the proceedings in which that production occurs. This is called an implied or ‘Harman’ undertaking after Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280. It is a substantive legal obligation owed to the party who produces the documents and to the court: Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36 (6 August 2008) at [107]-[108].

Family Law

by

Family Law 

NOVEMBER
  • Further Information – Added “Parenting orders – what you need to know”
  • Costs Agreements – Included reference to time limit for requesting itemised bill as per the Family Law Rules, reference to interstate costs laws added, updated interest clause
OCTOBER
  • Costs Agreements
    • Disputes section improved, fields for client and firm details added, trust account details added, solicitor’s lien added, execution clauses for individuals and corporations added and general formatting and grammatical improvements.
    • VIC/NSW – included reference to time limit for bringing costs assessment included total estimate of legal costs section with provision for variables and included authority to receive money into trust.
    • WA – added clause on scale fees.
  • Property Settlement Commentary – Amend – Step one – identify and value the net property 3.
  • New precedents
    • To do list – Children
    • To do list – Financial Agreement
  • 101 Family Law Answers – added new commentary on Foreign Resident Capital Gains Withholding Payments.
AUGUST
  • Divorce, Children and Property Settlement guide – New Costs Agreements added for Tasmania and Northern Territory.
  • Children commentary –  Considerations specific to children matters added to commentary on social media evidence
  • New precedents
    • Letter to other side inviting them to family dispute resolution
    • Letter to other side’s solicitor inviting them to family dispute resolution
JULY
  • Children commentary – Amended to discuss in more detail paternity and the presumption of parentage. In certain circumstances, proving parentage can be particularly important. Parentage is also a relevant consideration as the number of blended families in Australia continues to rise.
JUNE
  • Divorce commentary – Updated and restructured the commentary discussing divorce applications and reduction of court fees.
APRIL 
  • Property Settlement – New precedent added – Letter to other side’s solicitor with offer of settlement – Calderbank offer.
  • File Cover Sheets for all publications have been completely re-formatted for a better look.
MARCH
  • Property Settlement – Commentary concerning social media evidence in financial proceedings has been added to the property settlement guide.
  • Children commentary – Added section on making urgent applications – Early hearing and urgent orders ex parte.
FEBRUARY
  • Children commentary – Added section on variation of parenting orders. In particular, a commentary on the threshold test as established in Rice v Asplund (1978) 6 Fam LR 570 has been added.
  • Making life a little easier for practitioners – look out for Blank Deed, Agreement and Execution Clauses folder in the matter plan at the end of each Getting the Matter Underway.
JANUARY
  • All By Lawyers Family Law cost agreements have been updated in line with the 2016 Family Law Rules itemised scale of costs.

Connect with us