ByLawyers News and Updates
  • Publication updates
    • Federal
    • New South Wales
    • Victoria
    • Queensland
    • South Australia
    • Western Australia
    • Northern Territory
    • Tasmania
    • Australian Capital Territory
  • By area of law
    • Bankruptcy and Liquidation
    • Business and Franchise
    • Companies, Trusts, Partnerships and Superannuation
    • Conveyancing and Property
    • Criminal Law
    • Defamation and Protecting Reputation
    • Employment Law
    • Family Law
    • Immigration
    • Litigation
    • Neighbourhood Disputes
    • Personal injury
    • Personal Property Securities
    • Practice Management
    • Security of Payments
    • Trade Marks
    • Wills and Estates
  • Legal alerts
  • Articles
  • By Lawyers

JobKeeper extension – FED

15 September 2020 by By Lawyers

The Federal Government has announced another Jobkeeper extension. The payment scheme will continue until 28 March 2021.

Options for flexibility for managing workforce costs, such as reducing working hours continue. Employers are no longer allowed to require employees to take annual leave.

The amendments change the eligibility requirements for employers. Two broad categories of employers have been created: those who qualify for the new scheme after 28 September 2020, referred to as ‘qualifying employers’ and those who previously received at least one payment but no longer qualify, referred to as ‘legacy’ employers.

Qualifying employers

The minimum requirements under this JobKeeper extension remain the same regarding notification and consultation. The By Lawyers example content letters remain available from within the commentary and have been updated where necessary.

Any JobKeeper enabling directions or agreements existing on 27 September 2020 remain valid if the employer continues to qualify for the scheme.

Legacy employers

Legacy employers must have received one or more JobKeeper payments in the period prior to 28 September 2020, but have ceased to qualify. They now need to show a 10% decline in current GST turnover for the previous quarter. They must obtain a ‘10% decline in turnover certificate’ from a financial service provider.

Small business employers may choose to make a statutory declaration instead.

Legacy employers have been given access to modified directions and agreements and have extra notice and consultation requirements. Any existing on 27 September 2020 will need to be reissued or new arrangements made. They may not request an employee to work less than 2 hours per day or less than 60% of their ordinary hours as at 1 March 2020.

The By Lawyers example content letters provide for legacy employers.

The Fair Work Commission has the power to deal with disputes relating to legacy employers and satisfaction of the 10% decline in turnover test.

More information on Jobkeeper extension

The JobKeeper section of the By Lawyers Dealing with COVID-19 Legal Issues – Some practical information commentary has been updated. A link to this helpful resource is available at the top of the matter plan in every By Lawyers guide.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: coronavirus, COVID 19, employment, Employment law, jobkeeper

Criminal records – Employment – FED

31 August 2020 by By Lawyers

Commentary on the disclosure of criminal records by job seekers has been added to the By Lawyers Employment guide. This useful enhancement covers ‘spent’ convictions in all Australian jurisdictions.

Employees and job candidates have rights under state legislation except in Victoria, and also under federal legislation, relating to their employer or prospective employer accessing their criminal records.

Employers normally have the right to conduct criminal record checks on current and prospective employees. This generally does not include ‘lapsed’ or ‘spent’ convictions.

All states, except Victoria, have different legislative schemes for convictions that lapse, commonly known as ‘spent’ convictions. Commonwealth crimes fall under federal legislation which also covers the ACT and the Northern Territory.

These legislative schemes prescribe when certain criminal convictions lapse, after which time they may not be used as a basis for making decisions about a person’s employment. This allows offenders to put their past behind them, provided they have had the required law-abiding period.

For example, under s 85ZV of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), an organisation is prohibited from taking into account or disclosing to others an individual’s past criminal conviction under federal law if it is defined as having lapsed. An individual is not required to disclose such a conviction when applying for employment. A lapsed conviction is defined as an adult conviction more than ten years old, or a juvenile conviction more than five years old. The maximum penalty for the original offence cannot exceed 30 months imprisonment.

There are exceptions, such as where people are applying for jobs that involve working with children.

For further information on ‘spent’ convictions and employment applications see the By Lawyers Employment guide.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: criminal record, employees, employment, Employment law

Retainer instructions – Practice management – All states

24 August 2020 by By Lawyers

A folder containing ALL of the By Lawyers Retainer Instructions precedents has been added to the Practice Management guide.

One of the most important tasks when acting in all areas of law is taking the initial instructions. At the commencement of the engagement with the client it is crucial to take accurate, comprehensive instructions covering every necessary aspect of the matter, so the scope of the retainer can be agreed, the issues identified and understood and the client properly advised.

Every By Lawyers matter plan has these Retainer Instructions precedents, drafted and refined by experienced practitioners to make this critical process as efficient as possible. They assist practitioners to obtain all relevant information up-front.

To make it easier to access these key precedents, especially when seeing new clients where a file has not yet been opened, all 123 of them are now available from a dedicated Library of retainer instructions in the By Lawyers Practice Management guide, under Folder A: The Practice.

This enhancement will greatly assist our website subscribers, making all the Retainer Instructions available via a single subscription to the Practice Management guide, at no additional cost. For users accessing By Lawyers via the exclusive arrangements with LEAP Legal Software, the availability of these precedents all together in one guide makes it very easy to save or print the relevant Retainer Instructions for any matter type to use in the initial conference with a client even before a dedicated client file is opened.

Filed Under: Federal, New South Wales, Practice Management, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: practice management, retainer instructions

JobKeeper – updates – FED

19 August 2020 by By Lawyers

The Federal Government has further amended the JobKeeper extension. These further changes to our previous post are shown in italics.

The employment stimulus package will continue for a further six months until 28 March 2021.

Amendments

There are changes to employer eligibility for JobKeeper and to the payment rates. The additional six-months is divided into two periods:

  • 28 September 2020 to 3 January 2021; and
  • 4 January 2021 to 28 March 2021.

Eligible employers will continue to claim a fortnightly payment of $1,500 per eligible employee until 27 September 2020.

Eligible employees will continue to receive a minimum of $1,500 per fortnight before tax from their employer until 27 September 2020.

From 28 September 2020 the payment rates will be reduced.

Eligibility for employers

From 28 September 2020 to 3 January 2021 businesses with turnover of less than $1 billion must experience a decline in turnover of 30% for the September 2020 quarter only compared to the equivalent 2019 quarter. The employer must have been in an employment relationship with each eligible employee on 1 March 2020 or 1 July 2020 and needs to confirm that they are currently employed. From 4 January 2021 to 28 March 2021, the December 2020 quarter only must fall by the relevant percentage compared to the December 2019 quarter.

JobKeeper payment rates

From 28 September to 3 January 2021 for employees who worked 20 hours or more per week on average in February 2020 or June 2020, employers will receive $1,200 per employee fortnightly. These employees must therefore be paid a minimum of $1,200 fortnightly before tax. For employees who worked less than 20 hours per week on average in February 2020 or June 2020, the employers will receive $750 per employee fortnightly. These employees must therefore be paid a minimum of $750 fortnightly before tax.

From 4 January 2021 to 28 March 2021 the relevant amounts fall from $1,200 to $1,000 and from $750 to $650.

If employees were employed for both February 2020 and June 2020 then the period with the higher number of hours worked is to be used.

More information

The JobKeeper section of the By Lawyers Dealing with COVID-19 Legal Issues – Some practical information commentary has been updated. A link to this helpful resource is available at the top of the matter plan in every By Lawyers guide.

 

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: Employment law, jobkeeper

JobKeeper – FED

5 August 2020 by By Lawyers

The Federal Government has confirmed the JobKeeper extension. The employment stimulus package will continue for a further six months until 28 March 2021.

Amendments

There are some changes to employer eligibility for JobKeeper and to the payment rates. The additional six-months is divided into two periods:

  • 28 September 2020 to 3 January 2021; and
  • 4 January 2021 to 28 March 2021.

Eligible employers will continue to claim a fortnightly payment of $1,500 per eligible employee until 27 September 2020.

Eligible employees will continue to receive a minimum of $1,500 per fortnight before tax from their employer until 27 September 2020.

From 28 September 2020 the payment rates will be reduced.

Eligibility for employers

From 28 September 2020 to 3 January 2021 businesses with turnover of less than $1 billion must experience a decline in turnover of 30% for each of the June and September quarters compared to their equivalent 2019 quarters. The employer must have been in an employment relationship with each eligible employee on 1 March 2020 and needs to confirm that they are currently employed. From 4 January 2021 to 28 March 2021, the December 2020 quarter must also have fallen by the relevant percentage compared to the December 2019 quarter.

JobKeeper payment rates

From 28 September to 3 January 2021 for employees who worked 20 hours or more per week on average in February 2020, employers will receive $1,200 per employee fortnightly. These employees must therefore be paid a minimum of $1,200 fortnightly before tax. For employees who worked less than 20 hours per week on average in February 2020, the employers will receive $750 per employee fortnightly. These employees must therefore be paid a minimum of $750 fortnightly before tax.

From 4 January 2021 to 28 March 2021 the relevant amounts fall from $1,200 to $1,000 and $750 to $650.

More information

The JobKeeper section of the By Lawyers Dealing with COVID-19 Legal Issues – Some practical information commentary has been updated. A link to this helpful resource is available at the top of the matter plan in every By Lawyers guide.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Employment Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: employment, Employment law, jobkeeper

HomeBuilder scheme

24 July 2020 by By Lawyers

From 4 June 2020, a $25,000 grant is available to certain individuals who build a new home or substantially renovate an existing home. The grant cannot be used to buy an existing house and is limited to Australian citizens earning less than $125,000 or couples earning less than $200,000.

The value of new builds is capped at $750,000. For renovations, the home must be worth less than $1.5 million before the renovation, and projects must cost between $150,000 and $750,000.

The building contract must be signed between 4 June 2020 and 31 December 2020, and work must commence within three months of the contract date.

Applications will be through the relevant revenue department once the necessary agreements have been signed by the State and Commonwealth Governments.

The By Lawyers Purchase Guides have been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Conveyancing and Property, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: HomeBuilder scheme

Staff handbook – All states

1 July 2020 by By Lawyers

The By Lawyers 101 Policies & Procedures guide has been re-named 101 Staff Handbook.

101 Staff Handbook is part of the By Lawyers Practice Management publication.

The handbook provides numerous policies and procedures to assist with management of a legal practice. These can be adopted or adapted by the firm as required.

Practitioners can also use this resource to assist their commercial clients with implementing appropriate policies and procedures in their businesses.

The extensive, practical content in the handbook covers all areas of legal practice. It includes the following most recent additions:

  • Managing client communications – Policies and procedures covering all aspects of firm communications including phone, email and written correspondence, plus a comprehensive complaint handling procedure.
  • Confidential information – A policy on protection of confidential information, which includes breaches.
  • Intellectual property – A simple policy for protecting the firm’s existing IP and dealing with any new IP created by team members in the course of their employment.
  • Working from home – A policy which clarifies the rights and obligations of team members and the firm in relation to working from home arrangements.

 

Filed Under: Federal, Miscellaneous, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Practice Management, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: policies, practice management, Procedure manuals, staff handbook

1 July updates – All states

30 June 2020 by By Lawyers

1 July updates are a big focus for By Lawyers. This is because many Commonwealth and state legislative instruments provide for scheduled indexing of relevant monetary amounts and increases in government fees and charges.

These updates can include court filing fees, lodgement fees for property dealings, minimum weekly compensation amounts for Workers Compensation and various fines.

By Lawyers always monitor these changes for our subscribers. Each year we ensure that our publications are amended where necessary to reflect 1 July updates.

We also monitor and update for legislative indexing and increases which occur regularly at other times. These include 1 January changes and also other specific dates prescribed by some statutes.

The 1 July updates have been applied, or are in the process of being applied as they get released, to the following By Lawyers publications:

  • Conveyancing and Property;
  • Criminal;
  • Litigation;
  • Family;
  • Estates;
  • Injuries; and
  • Employment.

Stay updated with By Lawyers guides and precedents. Happy new financial year!

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Federal, Legal Alerts, Miscellaneous, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: 1 July, conveyancing, legislation, updates, workers compensation

101 Family Law Answers – FED

22 June 2020 by By Lawyers

The By Lawyers reference manual 101 Family Law Answers has been updated with recent cases in the following sections:

Arbitration in family law

See Palgrove & Palgrove [2020] FCCA 846 at [12]-[29] for a discussion of arbitrability and the court’s jurisdiction to facilitate arbitration.

Injunctions

Dunworth & Falletti [2020] FamCA 178 where the balance of convenience favoured the grant of restraint.

Rahman & Rahman [2020] FamCA 156 where the husband’s appeal failed against an injunction that restrained him from leaving Australia until a lump sum payment was made.

Orders – Variation and the rule in Rice & Asplund

See Findlay & Reis [2020] FCCA 425 for an application to vary a parenting order, which was dismissed in accordance with the principles in Rice & Asplund.

Relocation

Franklyn & Franklyn [2019] FamCAFC 256 where a mother’s unilateral relocation was allowed on appeal, as she was still able to adhere to interim consent orders for the father’s fortnightly contact.

Soulos & Sorbo [2019] FamCAFC 231 where the father’s appeal was allowed to set aside the parenting orders permitting the mother and child to relocate overseas.

Section 75(2) factors – Disparity in financial positions

In Metzer & Metzer [2020] FCCA 119 the wife was unable to establish a 10% likely loss of earnings on the evidence presented. An adjustment of 2% only was made in favour of the wife.

Five factors were listed at [182] that are usually considered when determining residual earning capacity:

  1. physical capacity, including the reasonable restrictions required by reason of injuries;
  2. psychological capacity, taking into account any necessary restrictions, of which there was no evidence in this case;
  3. vocational capacity, for suitable jobs within suitable occupations, including all of her education, training and experience and transferable skills;
  4. labour market, including factors such as the existence of such jobs in the real world labour market which is to be considered, including any barriers to entry and competitiveness including by reason of work history and age; and
  5. earnings, including the likely range of earnings for such available jobs by reference to reliable published labour market statistics or current labour market research information.

101 Family Law Answers is a valuable resource for practitioners. It is available as a related guide and in the reference materials folder in all By Lawyers Family Law publications. It provides more detailed information and relevant cases on the various Family Law matter types – Property Settlement, Children, Financial Agreements and Divorce. It also covers some general procedural issues and the enforcement of orders.

Filed Under: Family Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: arbitration, children, children orders, family law, injunctions, property settlement, relocation

Subpoena objections – FED

27 May 2020 by By Lawyers

New cases on subpoena objections in the Federal jurisdiction have been added to the By Lawyers reference guide 101 Subpoena Answers.

In Kitchen v Director of Professional Services Review under s 83 of the Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth) (No 3) [2020] FCA 634 the Federal Court affirmed McIlwain v Ramsey Food Packaging Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1233 and also Tamawood Ltd v Habitare Developments Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 364 to the effect that:

  • a request for a subpoena cannot be used to disguise an application for discovery of documents, or as an alternative to an application for further and better discovery;
  • documents for production must be identified with reasonable particularity;
  • the material sought must have an adjectival relevance, that is, an apparent relevance to the issues in the principal proceedings; there must be a legitimate forensic purpose for the production of documents;
  • a mere ‘fishing’ exercise can never justify the issue of subpoenas;
  • a wide-ranging subpoena seeking documents of doubtful relevance at great inconvenience to, or that risk compromising the commercial privacy of, a third party, may not readily attract the grant of leave; and
  • the issue of the subpoena must not, in all the circumstances, be oppressive in terms of its impact on the recipient.

101 Subpoena Answers is available in all By Lawyers litigation guides. It can assist practitioners with issuing and responding to subpoenas in all jurisdictions including the various grounds for subpoena objections.

Filed Under: Federal, Litigation, New South Wales, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: litigation, subpoena objections, subpoenas

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • …
  • 18
  • Next Page »

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Preferred State

Connect with us

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 · Privacy Policy
Created and hosted by LEAP · Log in