ByLawyers News and Updates

New subpoena case – ACT

by

A new subpoena case has been added to the By Lawyers reference manual 101 Subpoena Answers.

In Instyle Estate Agents Guhgahlin Pty Ltd v Hambrook [2020] ACTSC (26 October 2020) the court set aside a number of subpoenas in a civil matter, following Federal, NSW and previous ACT authorities.

The decision is particularly useful because it canvasses the plaintiffs’ four separate grounds for objection to the subpoenas, namely:

  • that they lacked a legitimate forensic purpose;
  • that they in effect sought discovery from non-parties, or alternatively, the terms of the subpoenas were impermissibly wide so as to constitute ‘fishing’;
  • that the terms of the schedules to each subpoena were so wide as to be oppressive; and
  • that the issuing party failed to pay both conduct money and money for the reasonable expenses of production.

McWilliam AsJ discussed and determined the court’s power and the applicable legal principles in respect of each of those grounds of objection.

This new subpoena case augments the many cases from all Australian jurisdictions to which links are provided in this helpful publication publication. It will particularly assist ACT practitioners in understanding and applying the law on subpoena objections.

101 Subpoena Answers is available in the Reference Materials folder on the matter plan in every By Lawyers litigation publication.

Family provision claims QLD

by

New precedents have been added to the By Lawyers Family Provision Claims QLD publication.

Following an author review of the guides, there is new content on the matter plans for both Acting for the Estate and Acting for the Claimant.

The new content to assist practitioners acting for clients in relation to claims on a deceased estate under Part 4 ss 40-44 Succession Act 1981 and  Chapter 15 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules includes:

Acting for the Estate – new family provision precedents

  • Letter to beneficiary affected by settlement of claim
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavits for signing
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavits
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing

Acting for the Claimant – new family provision precedents

  • Letter to potential claimant
  • Authority to settle and receive
  • Direction to pay and authority to receive
  • Letter to client enclosing settlement deed
  • Deed of family arrangement
  • Letter to client after filing claim
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavit
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to client enclosing estate affidavits
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – Payment
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – No payment

This review of the Family Provision Claims QLD publication and the addition of these new family provision precedents is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Family provision claims VIC

by

New precedents have been added to the By Lawyers Family Provision Claims VIC publication.

Following an author review of the guides, there is new content on the matter plans for both Acting for the Estate and Acting for the Plaintiff.

The new content to assist practitioners acting for clients in relation to claims on a deceased estate under Part IV of the Administration and Probate Act 1958 includes:

Acting for the Estate – new family provision precedents

  • Letter to beneficiary affected by settlement of claim
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavits for signing
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavits
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing

Acting for the Plaintiff – new family provision precedents

  • Letter to potential claimant
  • Authority to settle and receive
  • Direction to pay and authority to receive
  • Letter to client enclosing settlement deed
  • Letter to client after filing claim
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavit
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to client enclosing estate affidavits
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – Payment
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – No payment

This review of the Family Provision Claims VIC publication and the addition of these new family provision precedents is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Family provision claims SA

by

New precedents have been added to the By Lawyers Family Provision Claims SA publication.

Following an author review of the guides, there is new content on the matter plans for both Acting for the Respondent and Acting for the Applicant.

The new content to assist practitioners acting for clients in relation to claims on a deceased estate under the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1972, includes:

Acting for the Respondent – new family provision precedents

  • Letter to beneficiary affected by settlement of claim
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavits for signing
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavits
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing

Acting for the Applicant – new family provision precedents

  • Authority to settle and receive
  • Direction to pay and authority to receive
  • Letter to client enclosing settlement deed
  • Letter to client after filing claim
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavit
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – Payment
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – No payment

The review of the Family Provision Claims SA publication and the addition of these new family provision precedents is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Supreme Court – urgent applications – VIC

by

The By Lawyers Victorian Supreme Court litigation publication has been reviewed by our author, resulting in consolidation and enhancement of the commentary, especially relating to urgent applications.

Both the Acting for the Plaintiff and Acting for the Defendant guides in the Supreme Court publication have been reviewed.  The matter plans and related commentary have been re-ordered, with additional subheadings for improved searchability. The commentary on Urgent cases and applications has been expanded. Direct links have been added to the relevant Supreme Court webpages with contact details and specific procedures for making urgent applications.

See the subfolder If required – Urgent applications and injunctions, in folder C. Going to court and folder D. Interlocutory steps on both matter plans, for the relevant commentary, links and precedents. Folder D also contains commentary and precedents covering all types of interlocutory applications, urgent and otherwise.

The Victorian Supreme Court publication also includes an Enforcement Guide, which provides practitioners with comprehensive practical assistance on enforcing judgments for their clients.

Also included in the publication is the popular reference manual 101 Subpoena Answers. This valuable resource substantially augments the commentary in the Supreme Court guide regarding the law and practice on issuing and responding to subpoenas.

This author review is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Magistrates Court – Civil – VIC

by

The By Lawyers Magistrates Court – Civil litigation publication has been reviewed by our author, resulting in consolidation and enhancement.

Both the Acting for the Plaintiff and Acting for the Defendant guides in the Magistrates Court – Civil publication have been reviewed. Precedents on the matter plan have been consolidated, with some updates and amendments. This includes a number of bespoke By Lawyers precedents in the nature of ‘court forms’ drafted for use where there is no prescribed court form for certain actions required under the rules of court.

Amended precedents include:

  • Notice of discontinuance
  • Notice of ceasing to act
  • Notice of change of solicitor
  • Notice of change of solicitor’s address
  • Offer of compromise
  • Acceptance of offer of compromise under order 26
  • Application for administrative transfer to the County Court
  • Answers to interrogatories

The precedent Notice of Defence to Counterclaim has been deleted. This is because when a counterclaim is served the rules apply as if the defendant were the plaintiff and the plaintiff were the defendant. Accordingly, the usual Defence – Form 8A is used to defend a counterclaim which is on the matter plan.

Commentary on administratively transferring matters to the County Court, pursuant to s 17 of the Courts (Case Transfer) Act 1991, and appropriately responding to counterclaims has also been added.

This review is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

District Court litigation – NSW

by

The By Lawyers District Court Litigation publication has been revised following the Court’s re-issue of Practice Note DC (Civil) No. 1. The revised practice note commenced on 31 August 2020.

The revision of this critical practice note also provided the opportunity for an author review of the District Court litigation publication, with resulting enhancement.

Both the Acting for the Defendant – District Court Civil (NSW) and Acting for the Plaintiff – District Court Civil (NSW) Guides have been reviewed. The matter plan is re-ordered and the procedural requirements of the practice note are further emphasised.

In addition, a new precedent Letter to client enclosing Practice Note DC (Civil) No. 1, has been added to each guide. The new precedent assists practitioners in complying with the court’s disclosure requirements. 

This review and the addition of the new precedent is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

New Family provision precedents – NSW

by

Following an author review, a raft of helpful new Family provision precedents have been added to the By Lawyers Family Provision Claims (NSW) publication.

There is new content on the matter plans in both Acting for the Estate and Acting for the Plaintiff.

The new content includes:

Acting for the Estate – new family provision precedents

  • Letter to eligible person
  • Letter to beneficiary affected by settlement of claim
  • Letter to client enclosing Practice Note SC EQ 7
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavits for signing
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavits
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing

Acting for the Plaintiff – new family provision precedents

  • Letter to potential claimant
  • Letter to client enclosing Practice Note SC EQ 7
  • Letter to client enclosing settlement deed
  • Authority to settle and receive
  • Direction to pay and authority to receive
  • Letter to client enclosing settlement deed
  • Letter to client after filing claim
  • Letter to defendant serving summons and other documents
  • Letter to client enclosing draft affidavit
  • Letter to client enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client after first directions hearing
  • Letter to client enclosing estate affidavits
  • Letter to witness enclosing affidavit for signing
  • Letter to client updating costs disclosure
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – Payment
  • Letter to client finalising the matter – No payment

This review and the addition of these new family provision precedents is part of By Lawyers continuing commitment to enhancing our content and helping our subscribers enjoy practice more.

Workers’ compensation – QLD

by

Recent amendments to workers’ compensation legislation have commenced in Queensland.

All workers’ compensation provisions of the Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2019 have commenced as of 1 July 2020. They mostly apply only in relation to new claims.

The amendments include:

  • extending workers’ compensation coverage to unpaid interns;
  • requiring employers and insurers to provide ongoing rehabilitation and return to work services if the injured worker has been unable to return to work after their entitlement to weekly benefits and medical expenses ceases;
  • requiring employers and insurers to take reasonable steps to provide support services for workers with psychiatric and psychological injuries on a without prejudice basis while their claims are being assessed;
  • removing the requirement for the worker’s employment to have been the major significant contributor to a worker’s psychiatric or psychological injury;
  • making the decision of an insurer not to provide support services to workers with psychiatric and psychological injuries reviewable;
  • extending circumstances in which insurers have discretion to waive time requirements for lodging an application;
  • replacement of dollar amounts of compensation with reference to QOTE, being the seasonally adjusted amount of Queensland full-time adult ordinary time earnings, as declared by the Australian Statistician;
  • requiring self-insured employers to report injuries and payments to WorkCover;
  • making provision for qualification, via accredited training, of the rehabilitation and return to work coordinators that employers must appoint under the Act;
  • providing that apologies or expressions of regret by employers regarding workplace injuries are not admissible or able to be considered on the question of liability in an action for common law damages – this applies retrospectively to apologies or expressions of regret made before the commencement of these amendments.

The By Lawyers Queensland Workers’ Compensation publication has been updated accordingly.

Personal injury – QLD

by

A useful recent case has been added to the commentary in the By Lawyers Personal injury – QLD publication.

In Folwell v Mayer [2020] QSC 162 the court allowed the applicant an extension of time. The circumstances were that the applicant had issued a complying notice of claim under Part 1 of the Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 (Qld) within the limitation period, but had not otherwise completed the pre-litigation procedures required under the Act and was out of time to commence proceedings.

The applicant applied under s 59 of the Act for leave to commence proceedings even though the limitation period had expired.

The court reviewed the legislation and the cases on such applications, in some detail.

The factual circumstances were also examined closely, especially the chronology of the steps taken in relation to the matter by the applicant and her solicitors. These factual details proved to be determinative, as is usually the case in such applications.

The court found that the applicant herself had been less than pro-active in pursuing her claim, but further found that ‘… on the material before the court, the failure to conscientiously comply with the legislative requirements… rests predominantly with the applicant’s solicitor, rather than the applicant herself.’

The court also noted that ‘…the respondent does not identify any specific prejudice it will suffer if the application is granted.’

In the circumstances, notwithstanding the delay, the court determined that the applicant had an arguable claim and there could still be a fair trial. Accordingly the court ruled that ‘…the interests of justice favour exercising the discretion to grant the application to alter the limitation period under s 59’.

The case has been added to the commentary in Personal injury – QLD under Limitation periods.

Connect with us