ByLawyers News and Updates

Costs agreements – All states

by

Enhancement of By Lawyers costs agreements

All By Lawyers costs agreements have been reviewed, consolidated, and reformatted to ensure they are in strict compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements in each state and territory, and to improve presentation and readability.

A good cost agreement precedent provides transparency, reduces disputes with clients over fees, and ensures that firms get paid. It is important these documents are correct, however, the increasing complexity of cost disclosure requirements makes this difficult. By Lawyers precedents provide firms with accurate and effective costs agreements for all matter types in all jurisdictions.

Summary of key changes

  • A key enhancement is the inclusion of a Terms and Conditions section, which consolidates general information that applies across all matters.
  • All related information has been grouped together to assist with readability and comprehension.
  • A Next steps section has been added, outlining the steps required to be taken by the client to move the engagement forward.
  • The automation in relation to fees, disbursements, and internal expenses has been improved for LEAP users.
  • The scopes of work, now available under each cost agreement on the matter plans, have been enhanced. For LEAP users, scopes of work can be added to a costs agreement via the Insert Clause feature. See Inserting a Clause on the LEAP Community page. Alternatively, all users can simply cut and paste the scope into the precedent.

New categories of costs agreements

The By Lawyers costs agreements have been simplified into 4 categories in most states and territories:

  1. Costs agreement: suitable for most matters.
  2. Costs agreement – Estate administration: specific to applications for probate and letters of administration and administering the estate.
  3. Conditional costs agreement: suitable for litigation such as personal injury claims where the firm agrees to act on a no win no fee basis.
  4. Conditional costs agreement – Uplift fee: suitable for litigation in jurisdictions where the relevant legislation permits an uplift to be applied to the total costs for a successful outcome.

The new costs agreements and scopes of work have been added, as appropriate, to folder A. Getting the matter underway on all matter plans.

Family violence visas – FED

by

New eligibility criteria for visas under family violence provisions of the Migration Act commenced on 17 December 2024.

The provisions are intended to prevent secondary visa applicants from feeling compelled to remain in a violent relationship with the primary applicant for fear of an adverse visa outcome.

Violent behaviour can include physical abuse, sexual abuse, verbal or emotional abuse, social abuse, and financial abuse.

Eligibility for family violence visas

A secondary applicant must satisfy the primary criteria of being a member of a family unit at the time of being granted a visa.

A member of a family unit is a spouse or de facto partner, or a child or step-child of the primary visa applicant. A person over the age of 18 is deemed to be a child if they have not turned 23, and are dependent on the family head or the spouse or de facto partner of the family head. If they are over 23, they are still a member of the family unit if they are dependent due to a disability. A dependent grandchild or step-grandchild of the primary applicant is also a member of a family unit. 

Without the family violence provisions, a secondary visa applicant whose relationship with the primary visa applicant has broken down would no longer be a member of a family unit and would not satisfy the primary criteria to be granted a visa.

However, a secondary visa applicant who ceases to be a member of a family unit as a result of family violence perpetrated against them by the primary visa applicant can still apply for a visa under the family violence provisions. 

See the Types of domestic and family violence page of the Department of Home Affairs for further details. 

Evidence

A secondary visa applicant who claims family violence must provide evidence to the Department of Home Affairs about the primary applicant’s violent conduct towards them, and their prior relationship status. Evidence of family violence can include medical reports, police statements, court orders, convictions and a statutory declaration for a family violence claim.  See the Family violence provisions – Secondary applicants page of the Department of Home Affairs for further information. 

The family violence provisions have been expanded to include several new visa subclasses previously not covered:

  • Parent (Subclass 103);
  • Remaining Relative (Subclass 115);
  • Carer (Subclass 116);
  • Business Talent (Subclass 132);
  • Contributory Parent (Subclass 143);
  • Pacific Engagement (Subclass 192);
  • Aged Parent (Subclass 804);
  • Remaining Relative (Subclass 835);
  • Carer (Subclass 836);
  • Contributory Aged Parent (Subclass 864); and
  • Business Innovation and Investment (Subclass 888).

Publication updates

The By Lawyers Immigration publication has been updated to include the new visa types. 

Administrative Review Tribunal – FED

by

The Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) commenced on 14 October 2024. It replaced the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) and the Immigration Assessment Authority (IAA) which are both abolished.

The new tribunal was set up with the stated objective of providing an independent mechanism for review that:

  • is fair and just;
  • ensures that applications to the tribunal are resolved as quickly, and with as little formality and expense, as a proper consideration of the matters before the tribunal permits;
  • is accessible and responsive to the diverse needs of parties to proceedings;
  • improves the transparency and quality of government decision‑making; and
  • promotes public trust and confidence in the tribunal.

The ART consists of a President and a Deputy President, both of whom must be judges, as well as senior members and general members.

The tribunal’s governing legislation is the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 (the Act) and the Administrative Review Tribunal Regulations 2024 (the Regulations).

Provisions of other legislation can apply in addition to or instead of the Act. The Migration Act 1958 contains several such provisions.

The Minister has rule-making power under the Act, and the President of the ART can make practice directions.

Publication updates – Immigration

The Administrative Review Tribunal deals with matters including reviewable migration decisions and reviewable protection decisions. The By Lawyers Immigration guide has been updated accordingly.

Changes concerning how reviews of visa decisions are dealt with include:

  • The divisions of the previous tribunal have been replaced with eight jurisdictional areas, one of which is migration. Lists within each jurisdictional area led by a Deputy President or Senior Member will focus expertise on particular types of applications.
  • The procedures of the tribunal are harmonised and contained in the Regulations, the Rules and Practice Directions.
  • Fast-track reviews under the provisions of Part 7AA of the Migration Act 1958 in relation to protection visa decisions, previously dealt with by the IAA, are no longer available and the provisions have been repealed.
  • Reviews under Parts 5 and 7 of the Migration Act 1958 are now heard by the Administrative Review Tribunal.
  • Appeals and reference of questions of law can be made from the ART to the Federal Court under Part 7 of the Act.
  • A guidance and appeals panel has been established consisting of senior tribunal members to review tribunal decisions if there is an issue of significance to administrative decision-making, or an error of fact or law materially affecting the tribunal’s decision.
  • The ART is subject to monitoring by the newly established Administrative Review Council with regard to the overall administration of justice, not individual decisions.

Commencement and transitional provisions

The new law applies to all new and existing cases from 14 October 2024. Proceedings commenced in the AAT of IAA under the old statutory regime will automatically be transferred to the ART and dealt with under the new law.

Proceedings for review of a reviewable protection decision previously fast-tracked by the IAA will be continued and finalised by the ART.

New forms will be created, but the old forms can continue to be used for review applications after 14 October 2024.

New visa – FED

by

New visa

The Australian Government has introduced a new permanent residence visa, subclass 192, from 3 June 2024 which permits eligible nationals of participating Pacific Island countries and Timor-Leste to apply if they are first selected in a ballot.

The new visa is intended to deepen connections and improve mobility and migration opportunities within the Pacific region.  It gives priority to countries with limited permanent migration opportunities to Australia, or citizenship rights with New Zealand, France, and the United States.

Three thousand places are allocated for this visa annually.

To be eligible to apply for the visa, an applicant has to be randomly selected in a ballot. The ballots are intended to ensure a fair and transparent process and equal access to the new visa for persons of any skill level, occupation, and gender. A separate annual ballot is held for each country and registration through the Department of Home Affair’s ImmiAccount is required.

Eligibility requirements to take part in the ballot are:

  • aged between 18-45 years at the commencement of the ballot registration period for the particular country
  • hold a valid passport issued by one of the participating countries
  • be born in, or have a parent that was born in, any of the participating countries, or Australia, New Zealand, Samoa, or the Marshall Islands
  • not be a citizen of New Zealand
  • not already be registered in the same ballot
  • pay the registration fee of AUD25.

Registration for the ballot has to occur within the registration period when the ballot is open.

If an applicant is selected, they can submit their visa application within 120 calendar days.

To apply for the permanent visa, selected applicants have to be between 18 and 45 years old, have a formal job offer in Australia, and meet general visa requirements

More details can be found in the full commentary in the By Lawyers Immigration guide.

Visa subclasses – FED

by

There have been changes to a number of visa subclasses. These changes create new conditions and affect the expiration dates and cancellation grounds across various visa subclasses.

The Migration Amendment (2022 Measures No. 2) Regulations 2022 introduce the following three migration law changes.

  1. Visa holders in the 482 temporary skill shortage visa subclass can apply for a further 482 visa without leaving Australia. Applicants must have been in Australia between 1 February 2020 and 14 December 2021, when international borders were shut. This only applies to 482 visas in the short-term stream. Applicants will be able to make a further 482 visa application onshore from 1 July 2022 to 1 July 2023.
  2. Holders of skilled graduate visa subclass 476 who were affected by the COVID-19 pandemic have now had their visas extended to 14 April 2024. The extension commenced retrospectively on 31 January 2022, and includes secondary visa holders.
  3. Tourists who hold an Electronic Travel Authority eligible passport can now apply for a tourist visa subclass 601 through the new Australian ETA digital app, in addition to the existing Electronic Travel Authority website.

The Migration Amendment (Protecting Australia’s Critical Technology) Regulations 2022 introduces concepts of public interest criterion in granting and cancelling visas. These changes impact student visa subclass 500, and a postgraduate research course will satisfy the public interest criterion. However, the Minister may cancel any visa class where there is an unreasonable risk of any unwanted transfer of critical technology by a visa holder.

The By Lawyers Immigration commentary for both LEAP and website subscribers has been updated with these amendments. The commentary summarises the new conditions and dates for each affected visa subclass neatly within existing coverage of those visa subclasses.

Immigration status – Divorce – FED

by

A new section ‘Immigration status’ has been added to the Divorce section of the By Lawyers reference manual 101 Family Law Answers.

This new section provides guidance on establishing whether a party is ‘habitually resident’ in Australia when both the applicant and the respondent hold a temporary visa.

Section 39(3) of the Family Law Act 1975 provides that for the court to have jurisdiction to grant a divorce order, either the applicant or the respondent must be:

  1. an Australian citizen;
  2. a person domiciled in Australia; or
  3. ordinarily resident in Australia for one year immediately preceding the filing date.

Section 4(1) of the Family Law Act 1975 provides that ‘ordinarily resident’ includes ‘habitually resident’.

If both the applicant and the respondent hold a temporary visa, and either has been living in Australia for 12 months, the next step is to establish whether they are habitually resident. The applicant or respondent will need to establish they have settled, or intend to settle, in Australia by providing evidence of accommodation, employment and other community connections. The type of visa currently held and an intention to apply for permanent residency will also be relevant.

The claim to habitual residence is best addressed in an affidavit in support of the divorce application. This will avoid the application being adjourned or listed for submissions on the residency issue.

101 Family Law Answers provides practitioners with valuable information on the more unusual and detailed aspects of family law and includes many helpful links to cases and legislation. It can be found in the Reference Materials folder on all of the matter plans in the Family Law publication.

For more information on temporary visas, see the By Lawyers Immigration publication.

 

Visa changes – FED

by

Recent amendments to immigration legislation have resulted in visa changes from 1 July 2021.

Visa changes

The Home Affairs Legislation Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Regulations 2021 repealed the Subclass 132 (Business Talent) visa. The  criteria and conditions for the Subclass 188 (Business Innovation and Investment (Provisional)) and Subclass 888 (Business Innovation and Investment (Permanent)) visas have also been amended.

The repeal of the Subclass 132 visa includes both its streams; the Significant Business History and Venture Capital Entrepreneur streams. This removes the direct-to-permanent pathway and instead focuses on the provisional-to-permanent pathway provided by the Subclass 188 visa pathway to a Subclass 888 visa.

The amending regulations also repeal the Premium Investor stream of the Subclass 188 visa. This visa stream was assessed by the government as unsuccessful.

Current applicants and holders for these three streams of visa are not affected by these changes.

Summary of changes

The amendments to the criteria and conditions for the Subclass 188 (Business Innovation and Investment (Provisional)) and Subclass 888 (Business Innovation and Investment (Permanent)) visas entail:

  • The assets and turnover requirements for the Business Innovation stream of the Subclass 188 visa have been increased to attract business migrants with more financial capital to invest in Australia.
  • The designated investment requirement, based on passive investment in government securities, has been changed. The requirement is now to make a complying significant investment. This change is made through various amendments to the Subclass 188 visa and by increasing the minimum investment required from $1,500,000 to $2,500,000.
  • The requirements for the Entrepreneur stream have been adjusted to make this stream more attractive for start-up and early-stage entrepreneurs. These amendments to the Subclass 188 and 888 visas include:
    • Removal of the requirement for applicants to secure significant investment by way of a $200,000 funding threshold and limits on eligible sources of funding; and
    • A new requirement for applicants to be endorsed by a State or Territory government and innovation industry partners.
  • The extension of the Subclass 188 provisional visa validity period to five years and amending the period of provisional residence required for grant of the Subclass 888 permanent visa. For most streams this represents a reduction of the period required from four to three years, meaning holders can seek to progress to permanent residence more quickly.

The By Lawyers Immigration publication has been updated to reflect these amendments.

Immigration work – FED

by

Immigration publication substantially enhanced

Practitioners doing immigration work will find the By Lawyers Immigration publication has been substantially reviewed and expanded. The new content includes significant new commentary on reviews, appeals and ministerial intervention.

Lawyers doing immigration work

Practitioners will be aware that barriers to lawyers doing immigration work were lifted from 22 March 2021. Amendments to the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) removed the requirement for lawyers with an unrestricted practising certificate to also be registered as migration agents before doing immigration work for their clients. See the previous By Lawyers Obiter post Lawyers doing immigration work for more information.

The resultant opportunity has seen By Lawyers Immigration publication expanded to assist practitioners acting for clients in immigration matters.

Review, appeals and ministerial intervention

The existing section of the By Lawyers Immigration publication has had new commentary and precedents added. This new content will assist practitioners acting for an applicant who seeks to review a decision concerning an existing visa or a visa application. The publication now covers all possible review options up to and including High Court appeals.

New commentary and precedents

Enhancements include the addition of the following precedents and the expansion of the related commentary to provide highly practical resources on the review and appeals process:

Administrative Appeals Tribunal

  • Letter to client with costs agreement explaining the tribunal process
  • Letter to client re invitation to provide information from tribunal
  • Letter instructing expert witness to prepare report and attend tribunal hearing
  • Statement of Issues, facts and contentions
  • Draft minutes for consent order – Administrative Appeals Tribunal
  • Letter to client – Application for review of tribunal decision successful
  • Letter to client advising of tribunal refusal and attaching decision

Immigration Assessment Authority

  • Letter to client – Application for review of authority decision successful
  • Letter to client advising of authority refusal and attaching decision
  • Example content – Statutory declaration by applicant – Submission accurately and completely presents claim

Judicial review

  • Letter to client with costs agreement explaining the court process
  • Brief to Counsel
  • Example content – Grounds for application for judicial review
  • Example content – Affidavit to accompany application for judicial review
  • Example content – Final orders sought by the applicant
  • Example content – Affidavit for filing or tendering evidence
  • Example content – Affidavit in support of application for extension of time to lodge application for judicial review
  • Letter to client after decision – Application granted
  • Letter to client after decision – Application refused

The enhancement of this publication assists practitioners to do immigration work for clients in all type of Migration Act matters.

Lawyers doing immigration work – FED

by

Removal of dual registration requirement

Barriers to lawyers doing immigration work have finally been lifted. From 22 March 2021 amendments to the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) remove the requirement for lawyers to also be registered as migration agents before doing immigration work for their clients.

Amendments to the Migration Act

Australian legal practitioners who hold an unrestricted practising certificate, as defined in the Migration Act, can now conduct immigration matters as part of their usual practice, with no requirement to register as migration agents under the Act.

Amendments to the Act by the Migration Amendment (Regulation of Migration Agents) Act 2020 effectively define an ‘unrestricted’ Australian legal practitioner as one who has completed their compulsory period of supervised practice after first being admitted. Those who hold an ‘unrestricted’ practising certificate are permitted to give immigration assistance in connection with legal practice without being registered as migration agents. They will no longer be able to be registered migration agents: s 276 of the Act.

Newly admitted Australian legal practitioners still within their supervision period may still become registered migration agents. In fact those practitioners may not provide immigration assistance to their clients unless they are registered migration agents. Their dual registration may continue for up to 4 years. This is intended to facilitate such lawyers doing immigration work while completing their supervision period.

The definition of Australian legal practitioner in s 275 of the Act, as amended, excludes lawyers who are admitted but who do not hold a practising certificate. It also excludes lawyers who are eligible to practice under the law of a country other than Australia or New Zealand. Those practitioners will need to register as a migration agent to be able to give immigration assistance in Australia.

Regulation

‘Unrestricted’ Australian legal practitioners are not subject to regulation by the Office of the Migration Agents Registration Authority (OMARA), whereas registered migration agents – including those who are ‘restricted’ Australian legal practitioners – are.

To be registered as a migration agent, an eligible ‘restricted’ Australian legal practitioner must satisfy the requirements of s 289A of the Act.

A registered migration agent must notify OMARA in writing within 28 days of becoming a legal practitioner, with a penalty of 100 penalty units for failure to do so: see s 312 of the Act. They will then be de-registered by OMARA.

Forms

From 22 March 2021 a legal practitioner who wishes to commence providing immigration assistance and has never been issued a Migration Agent Registration Number (MARN), will
need to complete the Australian Legal Practitioner Number (LPN) form from the Department of Home Affairs website. Al link to this form is available on the Immigration matter plan.

Appointment of a Registered Migration Agent, Legal Practitioner or Exempt Person, form 956 allows the holder of an Australian Legal Practising Certificate to advise the Department of Home Affairs that they have been appointed by a client to provide immigration assistance under the Migration Act 1958 and, if applicable, to receive documents on their behalf.

The By Lawyers Immigration Guide has been updated accordingly. This publication is available to assist lawyers doing immigration work for their clients.

101 Costs Answers – ALL STATES

by

101 Costs Answers is the latest addition to the By Lawyers ‘101’ series of helpful reference materials.

Located in the Reference materials folder on every By Lawyers matter plan, this publication contains valuable commentary and precedents on all aspects of legal costs.

The precedents include all of the By Lawyers costs agreements/client services agreements and costs disclosures, drawn together from all By Lawyers publications into a convenient single publication.

The By Lawyers costs agreements are compliant with the strict requirements of the various state laws. They cater for all areas of law, with detailed recitals of the scope of work usually undertaken in each type of matter. This not only defines the retainer but makes it easy for practitioners to produce documents quickly upon engagement.

The 101 Costs Answers commentary includes:

Disclosure requirements

The commentary helps practitioners to navigate some of the more complicated disclosure requirements including regulated costs and the specific obligations for different types of litigation matters. The effect of non-disclosure is also covered.

Disbursements

Commentary on defining and recovering disbursements includes relevant case law and examples. The By Lawyers costs agreements are drafted to clearly identify usual disbursements.

Counsel’s fees

The commentary deals with the contractual relationship between solicitors and barristers as well as disclosure requirements. With the solicitor responsible for payment of counsel’s fees regardless of the solicitor’s agreement with the client, the By Lawyers costs agreements include counsel’s fees as specific disbursements which the client is obliged to pay.

Debt recovery

Where debt recovery is necessary, 101 Costs Answers contains letters of demand and example pleadings to assist with the recovery of costs. There is also detailed commentary on costs assessment procedures and the relevant forms for each state are available on the matter plan.

Like all By Lawyers publications, 101 Costs Answers contains interactive links to relevant legislation and cases, which are always kept updated.

Connect with us