ByLawyers News and Updates

Library of initial letters – Traffic Offences – VIC

by

By Lawyers Victorian Traffic Offences guide has been expanded with the addition of 13 new initial letters to the client. These helpful precedents make initial client communication easier for solicitors advising clients in traffic matters.

The new letters contain details of the applicable penalties for some of the most common traffic offences. They enable practitioners to quickly and accurately advise clients on the available sentencing options for their offence immediately after the first conference and in advance of the first court attendance.

These new precedents are conveniently located within a folder called Library of initial letters to client in Folder A. Getting the matter underway.

The new letters cover drink and drug driving offences including all Blood Alcohol Content offences, driving while impaired and failing a roadside test. There are separate letters for both permit and full licence holders.

Because each letter has been drafted to correspond to a particular drink or drug driving offence and provides all details of the applicable penalty, they help practitioners prepare the client for court faster by eliminating the need to research the specific penalties which apply for a driving offence every time. The letters set out any applicable term of imprisonment, the number of penalty units for any fine, the licence suspension or disqualification period, the Interlock order requirements, the Behaviour Change Program requirements and other licence conditions.

To see the library of new initial letters just Click on the Guides and Precedents button from criminal or traffic matter  in LEAP, or select the Victorian Traffic Offences Guide on the By Lawyers website.

Criminal & Traffic Law – Finalisation letters – NSW

by

Enhancements to finalisation letters

The finalisation letters in the By Lawyers Criminal and Traffic Guides (NSW) have been enhanced.

The finalisation letters now cover all sentencing outcomes, including Community Correction Orders.

There are now separate finalisation letters in the Traffic guide for drink driving offences, which include an Interlock order as a sentencing outcome, and for general offences, which do not include the Interlock outcome.

In both guides there is now also a separate letter dealing with deferral of sentence under s 11 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.

Feedback regarding By Lawyers content

This enhancement was completed as a response to client feedback. At By Lawyers we love to receive feedback from our subscribers and we really appreciate busy practitioners taking the time to let us know what they need from our content.

We are always available via email: askus@bylawyers.com.au.

For LEAP users with By Lawyers as a companion product, there are two additional ways to provide feedback:

  • When in a LEAP matter, in the top right hand corner of the screen there is a blue question mark icon. Clicking on it reveals a drop-down box for the LEAP Community pages – one of these is ‘Help, support and feedback’. There is also a By Lawyers tab on the LEAP Community page which provides helpful information about using By Lawyers content.
  • When using any precedent in LEAP there is  a ‘Provide Feedback’ button in the ribbon at the top of the document, next to ‘Save to matter as PDF’. This opens to a feedback form, where any issues or suggestions regarding the precedent can be provided. Where such feedback relates to a By Lawyers precedent, LEAP send it on to us and we will always address it promptly, directly with the user.

By Lawyers have often introduced new precedents or enhanced our commentaries as a result of subscriber suggestions. Whenever we see a need for the suggested additions or amendments we are happy to oblige, so as to benefit not only the firm that made the request but all of our other users as well. Sometimes our subscribers will not only identify an issue, such as a new precedent that might be needed, but they will also provide us with the resolution – a precedent they have developed themselves and are happy for us to publish for the assistance of others. The law is, after all, a noble profession and helping each other in a collegiate way is one of the hallmarks of being a lawyer.

Our mission at By Lawyers is to help our subscribers enjoy practice more. Responding to feedback is one of the ways we do it.

Costs disclosure – Increase of legal rates during a matter

by

Increase of legal rates during a matter

All By Lawyers Costs Agreements and Client Service Agreements have been updated to include a clause notifying a client that legal rates may increase during the course of a matter requiring a revision of the costs estimate provided. This clause provides for 30 days written notice of any proposed changes to legal rates. While such a clause is not required by Legal Profession legislation concerning costs disclosure requirements, providing such notice on initial costs disclosure is considered best practice.

All of our Guides contain Costs Agreements (Client Service Agreements for QLD Guides) within the folder ‘A. Getting the mater underway’. All of our agreements are compliant with the relevant Legal Profession legislation and are reviewed and updated regularly to ensure compliance.

Judicial registrars in the Magistrates’ Court – VIC

by

Some recent legislative amendments have expanded the categories of criminal offences which can be dealt with by judicial registrars in the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria.

The offence of Improper Use of a Motor Vehicle has now been added to the list of offences which can be dealt with by a judicial registrar rather than a magistrate.

All traffic offences commence in the Magistrates Court and most traffic offences remain there, as only a relatively few traffic offences such as culpable driving and dangerous driving causing death are serious enough to be dealt with on indictment.

Some criminal offences, including some traffic offences can be dealt with in the Magistrates’ Court by a judicial registrar – see Rule 6(ea) of the Magistrates’ Court (Judicial Registrars) Rules 2015 for a full list of these. This now includes Improper Use of a Motor Vehicle. One of the ways in which that offence can be committed is to drive a motor vehicle in a manner which causes the motor vehicle to undergo loss of traction by one or more of the motor vehicle’s wheels. The maximum penalty for the offence is 5 penalty units.

The Full Commentary in the By Lawyers Victorian Magistrates’ Court – Criminal publication has been updated accordingly.

The commentary also includes, in the Overview, an explanation of the nature and value of ‘penalty units’.

Domestic violence amendments – SA

by

Some of the domestic violence amendments under the Statutes Amendment (Domestic Violence) Act 2018 have now commenced. The act makes a number of changes to domestic violence provisions, most of which commenced on 31 January 2019.

Amendments that commenced on 31 January 2019 include:

  • additions to the definition of ‘abuse’ in s 8 of the Intervention Orders (Prevention of Abuse) Act 2009 to include forcing a person to marry another person, preventing a person from entering the person’s place of residence and taking an invasive image (within the meaning of Part 5A of the Summary Offences Act 1953) of a person and threatening to distribute the image without the person’s consent;
  • increased penalties for breaching an intervention order, where a breach is a ‘second or subsequent’ offence, which generally means offences within 5 years of each other, AND the breach involves physical violence or the threat of it, then the maximum penalty is $20,000 and 4 years imprisonment (whereas the maximum penalty for a first offence is $1250 and 2 years imprisonment);
  • s 10A(d) of the Bail Act 1985 has been amended to classify certain domestic violence offences as ‘aggravated offences’ in  relation to which there is a presumption against bail;
  • new s 20A—Choking, suffocation or strangulation in a domestic setting has been added to the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935. This offence provides that a person who is, or has been, in a relationship with another person and chokes, suffocates or strangles that other person, without that other person’s consent, is guilty of an offence, the maximum penalty for which is imprisonment for 7 years.

Amendments yet to commence include:

  • where police are seeking to urgently vary an existing final order the court may now conduct a preliminary hearing in the absence of the defendant and may take evidence by telephone or such other means as the court determines appropriate and the rules of court allow;
  • where an Intervention order is sought by police, the applicant and anyone else for whose protection the order is sought, may give their evidence in the proceedings by recording and may only be cross-examined about that evidence if the court permits it.

These provisions are suspended until proclaimed, commencing on 6 December 2020 at the latest.

The commentaries in the By Lawyers Criminal SA and Intervention Orders SA guides have been updated accordingly.

Standardised bail conditions – Criminal QLD

by

The Queensland Supreme Court has developed and made available standardised bail conditions, through its Streamlining Criminal Justice Committee and Rules Committee.

The document is not a practice direction or court form and has no formal application; it is simply an attempt by the court to provide examples of clearer proposed bail conditions so that clients granted bail can better understand their obligations. The document is a useful aid in the drafting of proposed orders when bail is sought and might assist practitioners and their clients in seeking and obtaining bail before the Magistrates Court.

See the By Lawyers Criminal Magistrates Court matter plan for a copy of the Standardised Bail Conditions – and helpful commentary on bail applications generally.

Access to criminal case information – WA

by

There is now a greater public right of access to criminal case information in the WA Magistrates Court. Practitioners acting for accused persons in the WA Magistrates Court should be aware – and, where appropriate, advise their clients – that an amendment to the Magistrates Court (General) Rules 2005 (new rule 40) now allows any person to request from the court the following information relating to a particular case:

  1. the charge;
  2. any conviction or order made in respect of the charge; and
  3. any penalty imposed on the accused in relation to the charge.

However, this rule is expressly subject to the non-publication provisions of s 171 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2004. In appropriate circumstances, consideration should be given to seeking a non-publication order under s 171(4) to avoid the effect of this rule.

Also, this rule does not allow anyone to generally access the accused’s criminal history other than the outcome of the specific case.

The commentary in the By Lawyers Criminal Magistrates Court (WA) guide has been updated accordingly.

Apprehended violence orders amendments- NSW

by

On 1 December 2018 a number of provisions strengthening apprehended violence orders in NSW commenced:

  1. a new ‘without consent’ version of the s 37 Crimes Act 1900 offence of choking, suffocation and strangulation, created specifically for the domestic violence context by the Crimes Legislation Amendment Act 2018;
  2. provisions in the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Amendment Act 2018 making it clear that stalking and intimidation can be by internet or other such electronic means;
  3. new Crimes Legislation Amendment (Victims) Act 2018 provisions providing that proceedings for apprehended violence orders will be held in a closed court if they involve any person under the age of 18 years, with such persons entitled to have a support person present.

The By Lawyers Apprehended Violence Orders (NSW) guide has been updated accordingly.

Further, commencing 17 December, certain provisions of the Justice Legislation Amendment Act (No 3) 2018 mean that an apprehended domestic violence order can be made against a paid carer for the protection of a dependant, but not against a dependant for the protection of the paid carer.

There are also amendments pending proclamation in the Crimes Legislation Amendment Act 2018 which change the default duration of apprehended domestic violence orders.

The By Lawyers Apprehended Violence Orders (NSW) guide will be updated when these further amending provisions commence.

Circumstances of aggravation – Traffic offences – WA

by

Amendments to s 49AB of the Road Traffic Act 1974 (WA) have commenced, providing for new circumstances of aggravation which have the effect of doubling the maximum penalty for the offence of dangerous driving causing death from 10 years to 20 years imprisonment.

The new circumstances of aggravation now in s 49AB(1) of the Act include:

  • Excessive speed
    Circumstances of aggravation include driving more than 30 kph over the applicable speed limit. Previously, the section provided for 45 kph over, but the threshold has been lowered by the amendments.
  • No authority to drive
    Circumstances of aggravation include the driver having ‘no authority to drive’. This includes the driver having never held a licence, having an expired licence, having been refused a licence, or being at the time of the offence disqualified from holding or obtaining a licence. The provision extends to any Australian licence, not just WA.
  • Failure to comply with conditions of an extraordinary licence
    Circumstances of aggravation include where the driver holds an extraordinary licence but at the time of the offence is driving in contravention of the requirements or conditions of the extraordinary licence, for example, where the driver is authorised to drive a car but at the time of the offence is riding a motorcycle.
  • Failure to comply with alcohol interlock scheme
    Circumstances of aggravation include the driver being required to drive a vehicle fitted with an alcohol interlock device but at the time of the offence driving a vehicle without such a device, not having the required authorisation to drive, or driving in breach of the alcohol interlock condition of an authorisation to drive.

The By Lawyers Traffic Offences – Magistrates Court (WA) guide has been updated accordingly.

Criminal procedure NSW

by

Mandatory pre-trial disclosure has been introduced into Division 3 of Part 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986, which now requires mandatory pre-trial disclosure for both the prosecution and the accused. The provisions are set out at ss 142 – 144 of the Act.

These provisions only apply after an indictment has been presented or filed in proceedings: s 141. As this only occurs after the matter is transferred from the Local Court to the District or
Supreme courts, mandatory pre-trial disclosure does not apply to summary matters, or to indictable matters which proceed summarily – that is, matters that remain in the Local Court.

If the matter is committed to a higher court on the basis of a plea of not guilty, the mandatory pre-trial disclosure provisions will need to be considered and complied with. The accused’s obligation is to provide:

(a)  the name of any Australian legal practitioner proposed to appear on behalf of the accused person at the trial,

(b)  the nature of the accused person’s defence, including particular defences to be relied on,

(c)  the facts, matters or circumstances on which the prosecution intends to rely to prove guilt (as indicated in the prosecution’s notice under section 142) and with which the accused person intends to take issue,

(d)  points of law which the accused person intends to raise,

(e)  notice of any consent that the accused person proposes to give at the trial under section 190 of the Evidence Act 1995 in relation to each of the following:

(i)  a statement of a witness that the prosecutor proposes to adduce at the trial,

(ii)  a summary of evidence that the prosecutor proposes to adduce at the trial,

(f)  a statement as to whether or not the accused person intends to give any notice under section 150 (Notice of alibi) or, if the accused person has already given such a notice, a statement that the notice has been given,

(g)  a statement as to whether or not the accused person intends to give any notice under section 151 (Notice of intention to adduce evidence of substantial mental impairment),

(h)  if any expert witness is proposed to be called at the trial by the accused person, a copy of each report by that witness that is relevant to the case and on which the accused person intends to rely,

(i)  notice as to whether the accused person proposes to raise any issue with respect to the continuity of custody of any proposed exhibit disclosed by the prosecutor,

(j)  notice of any significant issue that the accused person proposes to raise regarding the form of the indictment, severability of the charges or separate trials for the charges,

(k)  if the prosecutor disclosed an intention to adduce at the trial any audio or visual recording or the transcript of any audio or visual recording:

(i)  any request that the accused person has that the recording or transcript be edited (other than in circumstances to which subsection (2) (d) relates), and

(ii)  particulars sufficient to clearly identify the edits that the accused person requests.

As pre-trial disclosure relates only to trial matters in the superior courts, it is substantively outside of the scope of the By Lawyers Criminal Local Court guide. However because the provisions may be relevant to the overall strategic approach for a successful defence of indictable charges, a note has been added to the commentary alerting practitioners to these requirements.

Connect with us