ByLawyers News and Updates

County Court – VIC

by

The County Court Commercial Division Omnibus Practice Note PNCO 2-2022 came into operation on 1 August 2022.

The new Commercial List Practice Note is largely a consolidation of all the previous practice notes for the division into a single omnibus practice note.

The main changes are in relation to the introduction of electronic processes for discovery, affidavits, and subpoenas.

The Court has also issued a Notice to practitioners regarding the Commercial Division Standard Orders Booklet 2022, also released on 1 August and to be read in conjunction with the new practice note. This collection of the court’s required content and format for consent orders is to be consulted by parties drafting consent orders to be submitted to the Court.

The By Lawyers VIC Litigation guides County Court – Acting for the plaintiff and County Court – Acting for the defendant have been updated accordingly, with references and links to the new omnibus practice note and standard orders booklet in the commentary. There are no new forms or precedents required.

Additional updates have also been made to the commentaries for new Common Law practice notes that have been released recently.  The Court’s Common Law division has not consolidated its practice notes into a single omnibus practice note at this stage.

Transport Accident Claims – VIC

by

Amendments that extend entitlements to compensation under the transport accident claims legislation have commenced.

Part 3 of the Road Safety Legislation Amendment Act 2022  commenced on 6 July 2022. It amends the Transport Accident Act 1986 to extend benefits for claimants and their supporting families. The definition of a dependent child is amended to include a child who is under the age of 18 years, rather than 16 years. The definition of an immediate family member is amended to include a grandchild, alongside a partner, parent, grandparent, child, and sibling.

The extension of the definitions means that family counseling is available for the grandchildren of grandparents severely injured or killed in a transport accident. Claims can also be made for travel or accommodation expenses for grandchildren visiting their injured grandparent in hospital after a transport accident or attending the funeral of their, grandparent killed in a transport accident and to provide a replacement carer if the grandparent was the primary carer for the grandchild.

New provisions have been added to the Transport Accident Act that deal with the pre-accident weekly earnings for various types of earners who were, immediately before a transport accident, already receiving a weekly payment in respect of total or partial loss of earnings suffered as a result of, or materially contributed to by, an injury resulting from a previous transport accident.

The amending Act also clarifies the Transport Accident Commission’s capacity to disclose information to other statutory agencies and expands its ability to prosecute fraud offences committed with respect to transport accident claims.

The full commentary in the By Lawyers Transport Accident Claims (VIC) publication has been updated accordingly.

Unrelated provisions of the amending Act which affect the Road Safety Act 1986 have not yet commenced. These will be the subject of further update and publication amendments in due course.

Legal Profession Uniform Law – WA

by

The Legal Profession Uniform Law applies in Western Australia from 1 July 2022.

Overview

The Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2022 applies the existing national Legal Profession Uniform Law (LPUL) in WA, together with subordinate legislation. it is intended to simplify and standardise regulation for legal practitioners. It brings WA into line with New South Wales and Victoria. The Uniform Law replaces the Legal Profession Act 2008 (WA).

The Uniform Law is governed by the Legal Services Council and the office of the Commissioner for Uniform Legal Services Regulation. Each participating jurisdiction has a representative on the council.

The council establishes the rules and policies that underpin the Uniform Law. The Commissioner oversees the dispute resolution and compliance functions of the Uniform Law.

The WA Legal Services and Complaints Committee and the Legal Practice Board continue to carry out complaint and investigation functions, grant practising certificates, and provide professional development.

While the Uniform Law makes many sweeping changes, the main effects on everyday practice concern costs disclosure and billing.

Costs disclosure

Disclosure obligations vary depending on the estimated legal costs in a matter.

Disclosure is not required where the total legal costs are not expected to exceed $750 excluding GST and disbursements. Where the total legal costs are not expected to exceed $3,000 excluding GST and disbursements, a law practice may use the prescribed uniform standard disclosure form contained in Schedule 1 of the Legal Profession Uniform General Rules.

Costs disclosure must be in writing and given to the client when instructions are taken, or as soon as reasonably practical after. It must include the basis on which legal costs will be calculated and an estimate of the total legal costs. It must include information about the client’s rights to negotiate the costs agreement, receive a bill, request an itemised bill, negotiate the billing method, and whether the costs are subject to a costs determination.

If there is any significant change the disclosure must be updated.

If a law practice fails to meet its disclosure obligations any cost agreement is void and the client is not required to pay the costs. The law practice cannot then commence or maintain any proceedings for recovery of costs until they are assessed, or any dispute determined by the Legal Practice Board. A contravention can also result in disciplinary action.

Where disclosure is made under the main disclosure requirements of the Uniform Law, a law practice must take all reasonable steps to satisfy itself that the client has understood and given consent to the proposed course of action for the conduct of the matter and the proposed costs.

Billing

The billing provisions of the Uniform Law do not apply if the client is a commercial organisation or government authority.

A bill may be expressed as a lump sum, or itemised. A client receiving a lump sum bill may request an itemised bill. The request must be made within 30 days after the date on which the legal costs became payable, and must be complied with within 21 days after receiving the request.

If the total amount of legal costs specified in an itemised bill is higher than the amount previously specified in a lump sum bill, the additional costs are only recoverable if the law practice previously told the client in writing that could be the case.

Each bill or covering letter accompanying each bill must be signed by a principal of the law practice, or nominate a principal of the law practice as the responsible principal for the bill.

A client may request progress reports on costs which must be provided within a reasonable period.

Lawyers may not charge for preparing or giving a bill or a progress report.

Bills must include a written statement setting out the client’s options to dispute the legal and the time limits applicable.

Interest may be charged on unpaid costs 30 days after a complying bill has been given if the bill contains a statement that interest will be payable and the rate chargeable. The maximum rate is prescribed, currently 2% above the cash rate target specified by the Reserve Bank of Australia at the time the bill was given.

By Lawyers updates

By Lawyers have made the introduction of the Legal Profession Uniform Law easy for our WA subscribers. Changes to By Lawyers publications to cover the LPUL include:

  • New costs agreements and short form costs disclosure for all WA guides and Federal guides. These are also available in 101 Costs Answers.
  • Updates to the Example Invoice Incorporating Notification of Client’s Rights – WA and the stand-alone Notification of Client’s Rights – WA precedents available on all WA and Federal matter plans.
  • Updates to the commentary on the requirements for professional executors in the Probate and Letters of Administration publications for WA.
  • Updates to the costs section in the Wills commentary including the Conflicts concerning practitioner’s own interests section and the Solicitors as executors section.
  • Updates to the WA trusts accounting section in the Practice Management guide
  • Relevant updates to 101 Costs Answers.

1 July updates – All states

by

1 July updates are always a big focus for By Lawyers. Many Commonwealth and state legislative instruments provide for the scheduled indexing of relevant monetary amounts and adjustments – usually increases – in government fees and charges. These regular updates occur at the start of every financial year impacting many different areas of law, and therefore numerous By Lawyers publications.

These updates include court filing fees, lodgment fees for property dealings, land tax thresholds, minimum weekly compensation amounts for Workers Compensation, and penalty units for fines for various criminal offences and civil penalty provisions.

By Lawyers always monitor and apply these changes for our subscribers. Each year we ensure our publications are amended where necessary to reflect 1 July updates.

We also monitor and update for similar legislative indexing and increases which occur regularly at other times of the year. These include 1 January changes and other specific dates for various areas of law as prescribed by some statutes.

The 1 July updates have been applied this year, or are in the process of being applied as they get released, to the following By Lawyers publications:

  • Conveyancing and Property;
  • Business and Franchise;
  • Criminal;
  • Litigation;
  • Estates;
  • Injuries; and
  • Employment.

Quite separately, there is also usually a raft of new and amending legislation from both Commonwealth and state parliaments which is set to commence on 1 July. This year is no different in that regard. By Lawyers have made various substantive amendments to a number of publications to account for the commencement of such legislation. Please see the various other By Lawyers News and Updates posts dealing with those updates.

By Lawyers always keep our content – and our subscribers – up to date!

Bail after conviction – NSW

by

Bail after conviction must now be refused for offences where the accused will receive full time imprisonment, unless special or exceptional circumstances exist.

The Bail Amendment Act 2022 (NSW) commenced on 27 June. It adds a new s 22B to the Bail Act 2013.

The new section provides that on an application for bail after conviction of an accused person, before they are sentenced for an offence for which they will receive full-time custody, the court must refuse bail unless the accused can establish special or exceptional circumstances exist to justify the decision to grant or dispense with bail.

The same applies to a detention application brought by the prosecution in the Supreme Court under Section 40 of the Bail Act.

However, if the offence of which the accused person has been convicted is a show cause offence, the requirement for the accused person to establish special or exceptional circumstances to justify a decision to grant bail or dispense with bail applies instead of the requirement that the accused person show cause why their detention is not justified.

The Bail section of the By Lawyers Criminal – Local Court NSW commentary has been updated accordingly.

Motor accidents – NSW

by

There have been a number of small but important amendments to NSW motor accidents legislation.

Relevant provisions of the Motor Accidents and Workers Compensation Legislation Amendment Act 2021 commenced on 16 June 2022.

The amendments include:

  • The definition of pre-accident weekly earnings in the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 has been amended to include consideration of any increased earnings to which the claimant would have been entitled had the injury not occurred. Circumstances such as a change of job, a planned move from part-time to full-time hours or a previously negotiated pay increase within 12 months before the accident can be taken into account when determining the amount of statutory benefits payable for lost income.
  • The calculation of weekly statutory benefits for lost earnings now takes into account any increase in the claimant’s actual post-accident earnings.
  • Clarification that anyone injured in a no fault motor vehicle accident, and who has more than a minor injury, is entitled to receive statutory benefits past the 26 week cut-off period. This amendment addresses an anomaly identified by the Supreme Court in AAI Limited v Singh [2019] NSWSC 1300, when the court noted: Notwithstanding that a path through the labyrinth of Pts 3 and 5 of the Motor Accidents Injuries Act has been found for the purposes of resolving this proceeding, it is apparent that these provisions, Pt 5 in particular, require careful and detailed reconsideration. Amendment will be necessary if a spate of litigation generated by the obscurities of these provisions is to be avoided.

The commentary in the By Lawyers Motor Vehicle Accidents – Accidents from 1 December 2017 guide has been updated accordingly. The link to AAI Limited v Singh which was added after that case was decided in 2019 has been removed.

Workers compensation legislation – NSW

by

There have been a number of small but important amendments to New South Wales workers compensation legislation.

Relevant provisions of the Motor Accidents and Workers Compensation Legislation Amendment Act 2021 commenced on 16 June 2022.

The amendments include:

  • Changes to the Workers Compensation Act 1987 with regard to deemed diseases. These are certain specified diseases and medical conditions which are deemed to be caused by certain employment, such as asbestosis. The Act has been amended so that minimum periods of service in specified employment and minimum exposure requirements can now be included on the list of deemed diseases in the regulations.
  • Additional entitlements for volunteer firefighters, emergency and rescue workers under the Workers Compensation (Bush Fire, Emergency and Rescue Service) Act 1987. This amendment brings the compensation entitlements of these volunteer workers into line with those of paid workers. The new entitlements for volunteers include funeral expenses and funds management fees for dependent children of deceased volunteer workers.

The By Lawyers Workers Compensation publication has been amended accordingly.

A further provision of the amending Act awaits proclamation. This relates to an additional entitlement to compensation for any dependent children of a deceased worker. The fees charged by the NSW Trustee and Guardian to manage the dependent child’s lump sum entitlement will be a separate benefit claimable and paid by the insurer, so that a lump sum compensation amount paid to a dependent child of a deceased worker will not be eroded by fees. This amendment will be incorporated in the By Lawyers publication when it commences.

Revenue – NSW

by

Recent duty and other revenue amendments impacting conveyancing, trusts, and family law have been incorporated as applicable into the relevant By Lawyers publications.

Legislation

The State Revenue and Fines Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous) Act 2022 (NSW) amended various revenue Acts with effect from 19 May 2022, including:

These revenue amendments touch on various areas of practice.

Conveyancing

Options

Ad valorem stamp duty is payable on option fees under put and call option deeds. New section 8 (1)(b)(ix) of the Duties Act 1997 provides that duty is payable by the grantee within three months of an option being granted. This changes the previous position where duty was only payable on an option fee if the option was exercised.

Duty is assessed on the option fee, not including security deposits, performance payments, and legal costs.

The grantee is not entitled to claim a refund for any stamp duty paid, regardless of whether the call option is exercised. Also duty paid on the option fee is not credited toward the duty payable on the property when the option is exercised and the contract completed.

The changes do not apply to option agreements entered into before 19 May 2022.

Off the plan

A new section 49A (1D) of the Duties Act 1997 provides that to qualify for a 12-month deferral of stamp duty on off-the-plan purchases, a residence requirement must be met. At least one of the purchasers must use and occupy the property as their principal place of residence for at least 6 months, within 12 months of completion. Australian Defence Force personnel are exempted from the residency requirement. A new version of the Revenue NSW purchaser declaration form is available. Part 6 of the form relates to off-the-plan purchases and provides for the nomination of ADF personnel.

Surcharge duty

A new s 104ZJA(1) (c) of the Duties Act 1997 provides that an Australian-based developer which pays surcharge purchaser duty on a transfer of residential land may have it refunded they later change the use of the land to wholly or predominantly commercial or industrial.

The application for a refund must be lodged online using the application type Australian Based Developer Application for Exemption & Reassessment.

First home owners

Section 13A (3) of the First Home Owner Grant (New Homes) Act 2000 has been amended to include a new definition of the eligibility cap, including how to calculate the total value of the transaction based on the type of transaction and when it occurs.

Land tax

New sections 5B(2A) and 5B(2B) of the Land Tax Act 1956 provide for a discretionary exemption allowing those who do not occupy their principal place of residence for 200 days continuously in a year to remain exempt from land tax. This allows owners to, for example, live and work overseas for a period without losing the exemption.

The By Lawyers Sale of real property (NSW), Purchase of real property (NSW) and 1001 Conveyancing Answers (NSW) publications have been updated accordingly.

Trusts

The amending Act broadens the scope of dutiable transactions under s 8(1)(b)(ix) of the Duties Act 1997 by introducing duty on transactions that result in a change in beneficial ownership and acknowledgement of trust. 

Under s 8(3), the definition of change in beneficial ownership has been extended to include the creation and extinguishment of dutiable property, a change in equitable interests in dutiable property, and dutiable property becoming and ceasing to be subject to a trust.

This amendment directly arises from the case of Benidorm Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of Revenue [2020] NSWSC 471 where the Supreme Court held that the definition of declaration of trust in s 8(3) of the Duties Act 1997  as it then was must have a legal consequence, or consequences, beyond merely acknowledging that which already exists. The taxpayer in that case held real property and shares on trust for a beneficiary. When the beneficiary died his sole beneficiary and executor made a declaration of trust substantially the same as the original trust. On appeal the taxpayer was successful and was able to avoid paying duty on the second declaration, which acknowledged and evidenced a trust that was already in place. Such an acknowledgment of trust will now be caught by the Act.

The By Lawyers Trusts publication has been updated accordingly.

Family Law

A new s 68 (1A)(b)(iia) of the Duties Act 1997 means that for de facto relationships transfers of property effected by an agreement made to divide relationship property due to the breakdown of a relationship will be exempt from duty. Previously, to be exempt from duty the transfer had to be effected by a binding financial agreement, court order, or purchase at a public auction. This brings the exemption for de facto couples into line with that for married couples. These exemptions are discretionary and depend on sufficient evidence being supplied in support of the application.

A new version of the form Revenue NSW ODA 069 – Application for Exemption or Refund – Break up of marriage or De facto Relationship is available and needs to be completed.

The By Lawyers 101 Family Law Answers publication has been updated accordingly.

Excluded beneficiary – NSW

by

A recent Supreme Court case regarding an excluded beneficiary will be of interest to wills and estates practitioners. The court considered the effect of statements under s 100 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW).

Nikolaos Tsiokanis died in 2019, aged 86. His will appointed two of his children as the executors of his estate. He made only $100  provision for his other daughter. The deceased made a lengthy statement in the will as to his reasons for effectively excluding his daughter.

The daughter brought a family provision claim. The estate was not a large one.

The court held that the relationship the deceased had with the executors was a stable one and they played an important role in caring for the deceased. The court said the deceased was entitled to, and did, take the plaintiff’s behaviour into account and was satisfied that it justified the reduction of the plaintiff’s share in the estate to nominal provision.

The court also held that the deceased was entitled, when considering any claim by an excluded beneficiary, to consider the nature and value of his estate and to consider, and give priority to, the competing claim of each of the executors with whom he had a close, loving, and supportive relationship.

The court noted that statements made by the deceased are admissible pursuant to s 100(2) of the Succession Act, however the court is not required to accept, unquestioningly, the truth, or accuracy, of the statements. This is particularly so if the content is denied by the applicant, or where there is other evidence that casts doubt upon their accuracy. The court needs to consider that the deceased may have made untrue, or inaccurate, statements, either deliberately, or unintentionally, or it may be that their view is misconceived.

Where evidence of a statement of a deceased is admitted under s 100(9), for the purpose of destroying, or supporting, the credibility of the deceased, s 100(10) permits evidence to be given for the purpose of showing that the deceased’s statement is inconsistent with another statement made, at any time, by the deceased.

Georgopoulos v Tsiokanis & Anor [2022] NSWSC 563 (11 May 2022) will be added to the By Lawyers 101 Succession Answers publication.

Domestic and family violence – QLD

by

Some temporary procedural arrangements for initiating and hearing domestic and family violence applications in the Magistrates Court of Queensland have become permanent from 30 April 2022.

These arrangements were originally put in place as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, but the resulting efficiencies have seen the parliament entrench arrangements that allow parties and practitioners to interact with the court remotely.

Amendments under the Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2021 impact various Acts and procedures. Those relating to domestic and family violence matters include:

Audio visual link

A new section 142A of the Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012 provides that the Magistrates Court may conduct all or part of the proceeding by the use of audio visual links, or audio links. This includes:

  • appearances;
  • giving evidence;
  • making submissions;
  • taking an oath or affirmation.

Electronic filing

A private application for a Temporary Protection Order (TPO), or an application to vary a TPO, can be filed electronically in any Queensland Magistrates Court if the court is closed on a normal business day, or if the applicant is required to isolate under a public health order.

Listing before verification

In circumstances of urgency, where a private applicant is unable to verify their application for a Temporary Protection Order before a Justice of the Peace or solicitor, they can obtain a hearing date, and then serve the application on the respondent, without verification. The application can be subsequently verified in front of the magistrate who hears the matter.

The commentary in the By Lawyers Domestic Violence guide has been updated accordingly. An alert has been added to draw practitioners’ attention to the likelihood that proceedings will involve audio visual appearances and evidence.

Connect with us