ByLawyers News and Updates

Defamation – TAS

by

The long-awaited second stage of the uniform defamation law reform has effect in Tasmania from 16 June 2025.

These reforms have already commenced on in the ACT, NSW, and VIC. Other states are expected to follow in time.

The amendments include:

Exemption from liability in defamation as publishers for digital intermediaries

The legislation now provides an exemption from liability in defamation for digital intermediaries providing caching, conduit, or storage services, provided the intermediary did not:

  1. initiate the steps required to publish the matter;
  2. select any of the recipients of the matter;
  3. encourage the poster of the defamatory material to publish the matter;
  4. edit the content of the matter either before or after it was published; or
  5. promote the matter either before or after it was published.

This exemption applies regardless of whether the digital intermediary knew, or should have known, the digital material was defamatory.

Exemption from liability under defamation law for search engine providers

Like digital intermediaries, search engine providers are not liable for defamatory material comprising search results if the provider’s role is limited to providing an automated process for the search engine user to generate search results or hyperlinks, provided the search results or hyperlinks are not promoted or prioritised by the search engine provider receiving a payment or another benefit by or on behalf of a third party.

The provision applies regardless of whether the search engine provider knew, or  should have known, the digital material was defamatory.

Early determination of digital intermediary exemptions

The court must determine whether a defendant has a digital intermediary exemption and whether the exemption is established as soon as practicable before the trial commences unless there are good reasons to postpone the determination. In doing so, the court can make any orders it considers appropriate, including dismissing the proceedings, if satisfied the digital intermediary exemption is established.

Content of offer to make amends

The digital intermediary exemptions from liability as publishers include changes to offers to make amends. For digital content, an offer to make amends can now include an offer to prevent access to the defamatory material, instead of, or in addition to other forms of redress.

Orders for preliminary discovery in defamation cases about posters of digital matter

Defamation litigants can take advantage of pre-litigation or preliminary discovery to assist in identifying the poster of defamatory material or their physical or digital address. This assists with serving concerns notices and court proceedings.

Defence for publications involving digital intermediaries

This new defence is available if a digital intermediary has provided an accessible complaints mechanism for an aggrieved person to use and they use it to make a complaint.

The digital intermediary must have taken reasonable steps to prevent access to the defamatory material, either before the complaint was received, or within seven days of receiving it.

The complaints mechanism must be an easily accessible address, location, or other mechanism available for the plaintiff to use to complain to the defendant about the publication of the digital matter concerned.

Defence available to content moderators

The defence of digital intermediary is available to defendants who moderate content by taking steps to detect or identify and remove, block, disable, or otherwise prevent access to content that may be defamatory, or that breaches the terms or conditions of the online service.

Orders against non-party digital intermediaries

If a plaintiff secures judgement, or an injunction, against a defendant in proceedings the court may order a non-party digital intermediary to take access prevention steps, or other steps the court considers necessary to prevent or limit the continued publication or re-publication of the matter complained of.

The court can require access prevention steps to be taken in relation to all or only some of the users of an online service.

The new section does not limit the court’s other powers to grant injunctions or make other orders for access prevention.

Service of notices and other documents

The amendments expand the existing options for serving notices and documents to include messaging or other electronic communication to an electronic address or location indicated by the recipient.

Extension of the defence of absolute privilege under uniform defamation law

Concerns were raised in the Stage 2 review of the uniform defamation law about liability in defamation for someone reporting a person to the police for suspected wrongdoing, and then being sued by that person in defamation if the police dismiss the complaint for lack of evidence or absence of culpability on the part of the person reported.

These concerns were addressed by amending the absolute defence provisions of the uniform defamation law to provide that defamatory matter published to a police officer while the officer is acting in an official capacity is covered by the defence of absolute privilege.

Publication updates

The By Lawyers Defamation and Protecting Reputation publication has been updated accordingly.

Family Law Act – FED

by

Changes to the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) under the Family Law Amendment Act 2024 have effect from 10 June 2025.

The bulk of the amendments relate to property matters, including:

  • significant changes to s 79 of the Act by codifying the four-step process and bringing the s 75(2) considerations into s 79;
  • introducing a new s 79(5) concerning material wastage of assets by one party and the treatment of liabilities;
  • new principles for conducting proceedings;
  • adding the pre-action disclosure obligations in the FCFCOA’s rules into the Family Law Act;
  • requiring greater consideration of the impacts of family violence on property division, including introducing a new 79(4)(ca) relating to the effect of family violence on a party’s ability to make contributions to the marriage, and adding examples under the definition of family violence of economic or financial abuse;
  • a new s 79AA making property orders enforceable against the estate of a deceased party;
  • a new definition of companion animals and the ability for the court to make orders about ownership of them, including transfer to a third party;
  • extension of the Less Adversarial Trial process to property cases in certain circumstances;
  • expanding the court’s power to order arbitration.

Amendments that are not specific to property cases include:

  • repealing ss 44(1B) and 44(1C) to remove the limitation on divorce orders within 2 years of marriage;
  • the requirement for an appearance at a divorce hearing by a sole applicant where there are children under 18 years;
  • updating the costs provisions in the Act by introducing a new Part XIVC and repealing ss 117, 117AA, 117AC, 117C(2);
  • more comprehensive regulation of children’s contact services;
  • introducing a new Division 1B in Part XI, being a scheme to protect sensitive information held by professional service providers.

The By Lawyers Property Settlement and 101 Family Law Answers publications have been updated accordingly.

Some changes under the amending Act commenced on 11 December 2024. They related to Commonwealth Information Orders in children proceedings, and separation declarations relevant to financial agreements. The Children and Financial Agreements commentaries have already been updated for those changes.

In the course of these updates, all the By Lawyers Family Law publications have been thoroughly reviewed and enhanced. Subscribers will notice new and revised commentary, re-ordering of content in the commentaries and on the matter plans, new and amended precedents, new cases, and updated links to legislation and other useful resources. As always, we welcome feedback from our users about these publication updates to: askus@bylawyers.com.au

Commercial law AI prompts – All States

by

The following new commercial law AI prompts have been added to the Companies, Trusts, Partnerships and Joint Ventures guides:

  • By Lawyers AI Prompt – Letter to client with advice on shareholders agreement;
  • By Lawyers AI Prompt – Letter to client with advice on discretionary trust deed;
  • By Lawyers AI Prompt – Letter to client with advice on unit trust deed;
  • By Lawyers AI Prompt – Letter to client with advice on partnership agreement;
  • By Lawyers AI Prompt – Letter to client with advice on joint venture agreement.

These new commercial law AI prompts will assist practitioners advising clients on complex documentation for the various types of entities.

AI prompts are transforming legal document drafting. Technical precision in prompting artificial intelligence can significantly improve the utility and credibility of its output, especially when the AI draws exclusively from data contained in client matters and not from outside sources.

A well-drafted AI prompt acts like a clear direction from a senior lawyer to a junior about how to prepare a document. It sets precise parameters for the task, identifies the required information and where it must be drawn from, specifies the document’s form and any legal or procedural rules with which it must comply, and forbids the use of external or unauthorised sources, including invention – or in AI’s case, hallucination.

The outcome of using an AI prompt in a matter that contains sufficient reliable data is a competent first draft of a document that the lawyer can then refine and perfect, either with or without further input from AI.

Even if sufficient data is not available in the matter to satisfy the prompt’s requirements for the document, the AI will identify the missing data the lawyer needs to obtain via instructions or other means.

By Lawyers is pleased to introduce AI prompts to our publications, helping our subscribers harness the power of LEAP’s Matter AI.

Costs agreements – All states

by

Enhancement of By Lawyers costs agreements

All By Lawyers costs agreements have been reviewed, consolidated, and reformatted to ensure they are in strict compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements in each state and territory, and to improve presentation and readability.

A good cost agreement precedent provides transparency, reduces disputes with clients over fees, and ensures that firms get paid. It is important these documents are correct, however, the increasing complexity of cost disclosure requirements makes this difficult. By Lawyers precedents provide firms with accurate and effective costs agreements for all matter types in all jurisdictions.

Summary of key changes

  • A key enhancement is the inclusion of a Terms and Conditions section, which consolidates general information that applies across all matters.
  • All related information has been grouped together to assist with readability and comprehension.
  • A Next steps section has been added, outlining the steps required to be taken by the client to move the engagement forward.
  • The automation in relation to fees, disbursements, and internal expenses has been improved for LEAP users.
  • The scopes of work, now available under each cost agreement on the matter plans, have been enhanced. For LEAP users, scopes of work can be added to a costs agreement via the Insert Clause feature. See Inserting a Clause on the LEAP Community page. Alternatively, all users can simply cut and paste the scope into the precedent.

New categories of costs agreements

The By Lawyers costs agreements have been simplified into 4 categories in most states and territories:

  1. Costs agreement: suitable for most matters.
  2. Costs agreement – Estate administration: specific to applications for probate and letters of administration and administering the estate.
  3. Conditional costs agreement: suitable for litigation such as personal injury claims where the firm agrees to act on a no win no fee basis.
  4. Conditional costs agreement – Uplift fee: suitable for litigation in jurisdictions where the relevant legislation permits an uplift to be applied to the total costs for a successful outcome.

The new costs agreements and scopes of work have been added, as appropriate, to folder A. Getting the matter underway on all matter plans.

Criminal AI prompts – NSW

by

New criminal AI prompts have been created.

The following By Lawyers AI prompts have been added to the matter plans for Local Court Criminal and Traffic:

  1. Brief to counsel

  2. Submissions for a s 9 application

  3. Submissions for a s 10 application

  4. Submissions for a bail application

  5. Letter to medico-legal expert requesting a report for sentencing

These new criminal AI prompts will assist practitioners appearing for clients in criminal and traffic matters in the NSW Local Court.

AI prompts are transforming legal document drafting. Technical precision in prompting artificial intelligence can significantly improve the utility and credibility of its output, especially when the AI draws exclusively from data contained in client matters and not from outside sources.

A well-drafted AI prompt acts like a clear direction from a senior lawyer to a junior about how to prepare a document. It sets precise parameters for the task, identifies the required information and where it must be drawn from, specifies the document’s form and any legal or procedural rules with which it must comply, and forbids the use of external or unauthorised sources, including invention – or in AI’s case, hallucination.

The outcome of using an AI prompt in a matter that contains sufficient reliable data is a competent first draft of a document that the lawyer can then refine and perfect, either with or without further input from AI.

Even if sufficient data is not available in the matter to satisfy the prompt’s requirements for the document, the AI will identify the missing data the lawyer needs to obtain via instructions or other means.

By Lawyers is pleased to introduce AI prompts to our publications, helping our subscribers harness the power of LEAP’s Matter AI.

Claim farming – NSW

by

Claim farming is the practice of giving or receiving consideration for a claim referral or potential claim referral or soliciting or inducing a claimant to make a claim for personal injury. This practice is now banned under the Claim Farming Practices Prohibition Act 2025 (the Act) which came into effect on 9 April 2025.

When the Act applies

The Act applies to all personal injury claims as defined in s 11 of the Civil Liability Act 2002, including intentional torts. Some personal injury claims are not covered, including dust diseases claims, claims relating to tobacco use, workers compensation, and motor vehicle accident claims.

Criminal consequences

The Act makes breaches of its provisions a criminal offence with a maximum penalty of $55,000.

Section 5 makes it an offence to contact a person:

  • to solicit them to make a claim for personal injury damages; or
  • to refer them to a third party to provide services in relation to a claim; or
  • using a third party to contact a person for the above purposes,

if the person making the contact receives a fee or other benefit, or agrees or expects to receive a fee or other benefit, or asks that someone else receive a fee or other benefit because of the contact.

Section 6 makes it an offence to:

  • provide or receive a fee or other benefit for the referral of a claim in civil proceedings; or
  • enter into agreements or arrangements relating to referrals of claims for a fee or other benefit.

Professional consequences

Conduct contrary to the Act by a lawyer can also amount to unsatisfactory professional conduct or professional misconduct irrespective of whether the lawyer has been convicted of an offence under the Act. Section 165B of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014, which sets out the conduct capable of amounting to unsatisfactory professional conduct or professional misconduct, was amended to include contraventions of the Act.

Costs consequences

The Act further inserts s 61A to the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 which provides that if a lawyer breaches the Act and is convicted, legal costs cannot be charged or recovered for the claim and any costs that have been paid must immediately be refunded. The costs can be recovered as a debt by the client.

Exceptions

Some exceptions apply to the application of the Act. It is not an offence if a lawyer acting for a claimant refers the matter to another person providing a service for the claim, or the claim is transferred because the law practice is sold.

There is also an exception for advertising, marketing, or promoting a legal practice: s 7.

Publication updates

The By Lawyers Personal Injury (NSW) guides have been updated accordingly.

First home – WA

by

First home owner and off-the-plan duty changes

Changes have been introduced to the value caps for vacant land and established homes in WA that qualify for the first home owner concessional rate of duty, along with measures to extend and expand the off-the-plan duty concession.

The changes apply to transactions entered into from 21 March 2025.

RevenueWA expects to configure its systems to apply the new rates in early May 2025. Any eligible transactions entered into on or after 21 March 2025 that settle before the changes are implemented can be reassessed for a refund of duty after settlement.

Transfer duty – First home

First home owners buying an established or new home, or buying vacant land and then entering onto a contract to build a home on it and receiving a first home owners grant, can apply to be assessed at the first home owner rate of duty.

When the unencumbered value of a first home in Perth and Peel is:

  • up to $500,000 – no duty is payable;
  • between $500,001 and $700,000 – $13.63 per $100, or part thereof, above $500,000 is payable;
  • over $700,000 – full duty is payable, and no reduced rate applies.

When the unencumbered value of a first home in regions outside Perth and Peel is:

  • up to $500,000 – no duty is payable;
  • between $500,001 and $750,000 – $11.90 per $100, or part thereof, above $500,000 is payable;
  • over $750,000 – full duty is payable, and no reduced rate applies.

When the unencumbered value of vacant land purchased by an eligible first home buyer anywhere in WA, is:

  • up to $350,000 – no duty is payable;
  • between $350,001 and $450,000 – $15.39 per $100, or part thereof, above $350,000 is payable;
  • over $450,000 – full duty is payable, and no reduced rate applies.

Off the plan duty concession

For new off-the-plan homes within strata developments:

  • the expiry date of the existing duty concession is extended from 30 June 2025 until 30 June 2026;
  • no duty is payable for dwellings purchased before construction has commenced up to $750,000, with a 50% duty concession for properties valued above $850,000; and
  • a 75% duty concession is available for dwellings purchased while under construction up to $750,000, with a 37.5% duty concession for properties valued above $850,000.

This applies to all dwellings within strata and community title schemes, including townhouses and villas, not just multi-tiered developments.

Publication updates

The By Lawyers Purchase of Real Property (WA) guide has been updated, including the commentary and the Retainer Instructions – Purchase of Real Property.

 

Retirement Villages – QLD

by

By Lawyers are pleased to have published a new guide for Retirement Villages (QLD).

With a separate matter plan, commentary, and precedents, the new guide is available as part of the Conveyancing (QLD) publication.

 

Buying a retirement unit

The Retirement Villages (QLD) guide assists practitioners acting for buyers and residents. It sets out the practical steps of conducting a standard residence contract transaction, and highlights important aspects of the law that must be complied with.

The commentary covers in retail the:

  • relevant considerations when taking instructions and advising on a retirement village transaction, including its potential effects on the age pension and rent assistance from the Commonwealth government;
  • types of residence rights, registered and unregistered, that are available to buyers and residents;
  • types of entry payments that can be required under a residence contract, such as a purchase price or an ingoing contribution;
  • stamp duty, goods and services tax and capital gains tax implications;
  • the standard outgoings of a retirement unit that will be payable;
  • important documents that must be obtained before advising on a residence contract, such as compulsory pre-contractual disclosure documents and financial documents of the scheme;
  • necessary steps in entering and completing a residence contract.

Moving into, living in, and exiting a retirement unit

The commentary further deals with:

  • taking occupation of a unit, recurrent charges and other financial considerations during residence;
  • the obligations of residents and scheme operators after moving into and during residence at the retirement village;
  • ending a residence in a retirement village, including termination, the sale of the accommodation unit, exit fees, exit entitlements and sharing in capital gains or losses;
  • available options to resolve village disputes such as mediation and applying to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) and appeals processes.

Practical precedents

The guide also contains helpful precedents, including:

  • Retainer Instructions;
  • To Do List;
  • Checklist of Important Considerations – Retirement Village; and
  • Letter to Client Providing Advice on Residence Contract.

For detailed guidance on property transactions and additional relevant precedents, the Retirement Villages – QLD guide is best used in conjunction with the By Lawyers conveyancing and property publications: Purchase of Real Property (QLD) and Leases (QLD).

ADVO – NSW

by

From 31 March 2025, new offences for knowingly contravening an apprehended domestic violence order (ADVO) apply.

The new offences are found in s 14(1A)–(1C) of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007.

Section 14(1A) makes it an offence to knowingly contravene an ADVO with the intention of causing physical or mental harm to the protected person under the order, or to cause the protected person to fear for their safety or that of another person. A maximum penalty of 3 years imprisonment or 100 penalty units, or both, applies.

Section 14(1B) provides that a person intends to cause a protected person:

  • physical or mental harm; or
  • to fear for their safety or the safety of another person,

if the person knows the conduct is likely to cause that harm or fear.

Under s 14(1C), a person who:

  • knowingly contravenes an ADVO against them; and
  • on at least two other occasions in the 28 days immediately preceding the contravention, also knowingly contravened:
    • an ADVO in relation to the same person who was protected under the ADVO the person contravened earlier; or
    • the same ADVO, whether or not in relation to that same protected person; or
    • an ADVO arising from the same application under Part 10 of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007, whether or not in relation to the same protected person, and
  • the conduct would be considered by a reasonable person to be likely to cause the protected person physical or mental harm, or to fear for their safety or the safety of another person, whether or not that harm or fear was actually caused,

is guilty of an offence subject to a maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment or 150 penalty units, or both.

The By Lawyers Apprehended Violence Order (NSW) guide has been updated accordingly.

Franchising Code – FED

by

A new Franchising Code of Conduct operates from 1 April 2025.

The new code is set out in Chapter 2 of the Competition and Consumer (Industry Codes-Franchising) Regulation 2024. Sections have been significantly reordered and renumbered from the previous code in Schedule 1 to the Competition and Consumer (Industry Codes-Franchising) Regulation 2014. The new code of conduct generally applies to all franchise agreements entered into, renewed, extended or transferred on or after 1 April 2025. However, some changes apply from later dates under transitional provisions relating to franchise agreements and disclosure requirements.

Amendments

Key changes to franchise agreements and disclosure requirements under the new code include:

Franchise agreements

  • Removal of the requirement for franchisors to create, maintain, or provide a Key Facts Sheet for prospective franchisees. This applies from 1 April 2025.
  • Restrictions on restraint of trade clauses where a franchise agreement contains an option for the franchisee to renew or extend the agreement and the franchisor does not do so. This applies to agreements entered into, transferred, renewed, or extended on or after 1 April 2025.
  • Franchisees must be compensated for early termination in certain circumstances. Agreements are required to specify how compensation is determined. This applies to agreements entered into, transferred, renewed, or extended on or after 1 November 2025.
  • Franchisees must have a reasonable opportunity to make a return on any investment required by the franchisor as part of entering into the agreement. This applies to agreements entered into, transferred, renewed, or extended on or after 1 November 2025.
  • Franchisors may, on certain expanded grounds, terminate a franchise agreement with 7 days’ notice. This applies to agreements entered into, transferred, renewed, or extended on or after 1 April 2025.
  • Franchisees can opt out of both disclosure and the 14-day cooling-off period if a new agreement with the same franchisor is substantially similar to their current agreement. This applies from 1 April 2025.
  • Marketing and cooperative funds are now combined as a specific purpose fund to which franchisees contribute and which must be used for a specified purpose related to the business’s operation. This applies from 1 November 2025. Franchisors are to operate existing marketing and cooperative funds in compliance with the old code until this time.
  • The Australian Small Business and Family Enterprise Ombudsman now has the ability to name and shame franchisors who refuse to engage in or who withdraw from alternative dispute resolution processes. This applies from 1 April 2025.

Disclosure requirements

From 1 November 2025, all disclosure documents must include certain information set out in Schedule 1 of the Regulation.

Additional information to be provided in the new disclosure document includes:

  • telephone number and email address of former franchisees;
  • whether a franchisee could face competition from businesses not associated with the franchisor; and
  • details about whether the franchisee is required to undertake significant capital expenditure during the term of the franchise agreement.

Any materially significant facts that arise between the preparation of a disclosure document and when it is provided to a potential franchisee must also be disclosed.

A franchisor need not include the new requirements for specific purpose funds and significant capital expenditure in its disclosure document until 1 November 2025, but may choose to do so.

From 1 April 2025, the franchisor’s Franchise Disclosure Register profile must also include:

  • any convictions for a serious offence;
  • any relevant judgment in civil proceedings;
  • any relevant bankruptcy or insolvency; and
  • whether its franchise agreement provides for arbitration of disputes.

Publication updates

The By Lawyers precedents Franchise Agreement and Model Disclosure Document for Franchisee or Prospective Franchisee precedents, available on the Sale of Business and Purchase of Business matter plans for each state, and the commentary on Franchises, have all been updated accordingly.

Connect with us