From 1 May 2023 Practice Direction 9 of 2023 Caseflow Management – Civil Jurisdiction governs caseflow management in civil proceedings in the Supreme Court.
The new Practice Direction is to be read with Practice Direction 11 of 2023 Consent Orders of the Registrar.
Practice Direction 18 of 2018 Efficient Conduct of Civil Litigation also applies under the new practice direction.
These practice directions are all intended to facilitate compliance with the overriding obligations under r 5 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 that the parties and the court resolve the real issues in the proceedings in a procedurally fair, efficient, timely, and cost effective way.
The new practice direction is based on the Supreme Court having the expectation that cases will either be resolved or ready for trial within 180 days of the defence, or the last of multiple defences, being filed. If not, the Supreme Court registry will issue an Intervention Notice to which the plaintiff must respond within 28 days by filing one of the following documents:
- Notice of Discontinuance; or
- Notice that the matter has settled; or
- Request for Trial Date.
If the matter is neither resolved nor ready for trial, the plaintiff must file proposed orders, either by consent or otherwise, and the matter will be listed in the Caseflow Management List where the registrar will make the proposed orders, or refer the matter to a caseflow management conference, or list it before a judge for review.
Failure to comply with the practice direction may result in sanctions including adverse costs orders and immediately listing the proceedings for trial.
When cases are settled, they are placed in the Caseflow Settlement List and remain there until a Notice of Discontinuance is filed, or the court makes an order disposing of the matter.
The commentaries in the By Lawyers Supreme Court Acting for the Plaintiff and Acting for the Defendant guides have been updated accordingly.