ByLawyers News and Updates

Personal injury lists – VIC

by

The Supreme Court has introduced new procedures for matters in the personal injury lists.

Changes have been made to first directions orders in the four specialist personal injury lists in the Common Law Division with the intention of increasing efficiency, and reducing delays and adjournments.

Personal injury lists

In the Supreme Court, personal injury claims are dealt with in four specialist lists:

  • Personal Injuries List
  • Dust Diseases List
  • Institutional Liability List
  • Civil Circuit List

New forms for consent orders

Parties submitting minutes of proposed consent orders in these lists must now use the revised First Directions forms available on the Court’s website and on the matter plan in the By Lawyers Personal Injury (VIC) publication.

The major changes to the standard orders include:

  • the ability for the parties to agree to extend or abridge, by consent, the time for interlocutory steps before the post-mediation directions hearing, or, in the case of expedited Dust Diseases List matters, the final directions hearing;
  • time for issuing subpoenas and serving supplementary reports and final particulars of special damages;
  • when supplementary medical and expert reports can be served close to trial; and
  • matters about which the court expects to be informed at the post-mediation directions hearing, including expert evidence.

Practice notes

The personal injury lists are each managed subject to their relevant Practice Note being:

First Directions Hearing

After the defence is filed, the court will contact the parties to arrange a First Directions Hearing.

The court expects a practitioner with conduct of the file, or a good working knowledge of it, to appear at all directions hearings.

The parties are encouraged to submit consent orders to avoid an appearance.

Publication updates

The commentary and matter plan in the by Lawyers Personal Injury (VIC) publication has been updated accordingly.

Statutory benefits – MAIA – NSW

by

A recent case on statutory benefits under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 has been added to the By Lawyers Motor Accidents From 1 December 2017 (NSW) Guide.

The Act provides that benefits for treatment and loss of income are payable to those injured in motor vehicle accidents, regardless of fault. Where the accident is wholly or mostly caused by the claimant, those benefits cease after 26 weeks.

In AAI Limited v Singh [2019] NSWSC 1300 the Supreme Court considered the potentially complicated question of when the claimant is, or might be deemed to be, at fault and therefore whether statutory benefits should cease after 26 weeks. The court identified an anomaly in the legislation, being an inconsistency between s 5.1 and s 5.6 and opined that ‘Amendment will be necessary if a spate of litigation generated by the obscurities of these provisions is to be avoided’.

The court in this instance determined that the statutory benefits payable to a driver of a single vehicle accident, who was not at fault, should not cease after 26 weeks.

This case has been added to the By Lawyers Commentary under the sections titled No-fault accidents and When do statutory benefits cease, as valuable guidance for subscribers acting for claimants in receipt of statutory benefits.

 

Motor vehicle accidents – NSW

by

The By Lawyers NSW Motor vehicle accidents publication has been reviewed by our author, experienced solicitor Kim Rickards, an accredited specialist in personal injury law.

This publication contains two separate guides, covering the two different statutory schemes for motor vehicle accidents which occurred before, or on and after, 1 December 2017.

Accidents prior to 1 December 2017

Claims arising from motor vehicle accidents which occurred prior to 1 December 2017 are governed by and made under the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (MACA).

Recent decisions which have considered MACA and the operation of the scheme have been added to this commentary. These include IAG Limited T/as NRMA Insurance v Khaled [2019] NSWSC 320  and IAG Limited t/as NRMA Insurance v Qianxia Lou [2019] NSWSC 382.

The main issue in these cases was whether an assessor had properly considered, under the SIRA guidelines, whether to issue a certificate under s 92(1)(b) of MACA that the matter was not suitable for assessment by the Claims Assessment and Resolution Service (CARS). The issue of such a certificate is required before the applicant can commence court proceedings for a claim.

Accidents on or after 1 December 2017

Claims arising from motor vehicle accidents which occurred on or after 1 December 2017 are governed by and made under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017.

Enhancements to this commentary have been made in a number of areas including Costs and Common law claims, including the very practical suggestion that the insurer be requested to concede that the threshold of 10% whole person impairment is overcome, so as to permit prompt commencement of a common law claim where fault exists on the part of another driver.

 

Connect with us