ByLawyers News and Updates
  • Publication updates
    • Federal
    • New South Wales
    • Victoria
    • Queensland
    • South Australia
    • Western Australia
    • Northern Territory
    • Tasmania
    • Australian Capital Territory
  • By area of law
    • Bankruptcy and Liquidation
    • Business and Franchise
    • Companies, Trusts, Partnerships and Superannuation
    • Conveyancing and Property
    • Criminal Law
    • Defamation and Protecting Reputation
    • Employment Law
    • Family Law
    • Immigration
    • Litigation
    • Neighbourhood Disputes
    • Personal injury
    • Personal Property Securities
    • Practice Management
    • Security of Payments
    • Trade Marks
    • Wills and Estates
  • Legal alerts
  • Articles
  • By Lawyers

Subpoenas – FED

21 January 2025 by By Lawyers

A new Practice Direction concerning electronic inspection of material produced under subpoenas has come into force in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.

It applies to family law proceedings filed in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) and replaces the Court’s Special Measures Information Notice – COVID-19 Electronic Subpoena Inspection.

The new practice direction is to be read together with the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021.

When seeking to inspect subpoenaed material, parties and legal practitioners must provide the following information in their request:

  • file number;
  • date and type of court hearing, conference or expert report;
  • specific material that access is being requested to, and whether it is ‘inspection only’ material (see below, as defined in rule 6.37(2)(b) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021);
  • confirmation that a Notice of Request to Inspect has been filed;
  • whether electronic access to the material is sought;
  • a copy of photo identification or confirmation that they are a lawyer acting on behalf of a party, and the law firm at which they work.

Requests can be made by email. Each registry has a subpoena email address, as listed in the practice direction.

If the material to which access is sought is not inspection only material, and photocopy access is permitted, the registry will provide the material electronically if possible directly to the party or practitioner requesting the material, usually by email.

Inspection only material is:

  • child welfare records, criminal records, medical records and police records, as defined in the Rules; and
  • any other material excluded from photocopy access by order of the court.

Electronic access to inspection only material will not be permitted unless there are exceptional circumstances. Instead, the material needs to be inspected in person at a registry.

The practice direction also makes provision for the tendering of subpoenaed material at a hearing.

The By Lawyers Family Law Property Settlement and Children publications have been updated accordingly, along with the information about subpoenas in family law matters in the 101 Subpoena Answers reference materials.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Family Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: 101 Subpoena Answers, family law, family law rules, FCFCOA, inspection of documents, Subpoena, Subpoena to produce

Priority Property Pool – FED

22 November 2023 by By Lawyers

From 30 October 2023, under a new Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia practice direction, special procedures apply for property matters that qualify as Priority Property Pool (PPP) Cases.

Some registries of the FCFCOA have operated special arrangements under the PPP500 pilot since February 2020. The arrangements will now apply to proceedings in all registries.

Priority Property Pool Cases are those where the net value of the asset pool is, or appears to be, less than $550,000 excluding superannuation interests, or not significantly greater and the court considers it appropriate to include the matter as a PPP case.

Previously, under the pilot program, the cap was $500,000.

Priority property Pool cases can include matters involving applications for property settlement, spouse maintenance, or urgent spouse maintenance.

Cases will not qualify as a PPP Case if:

  1. they involve entities such as a family trust, company, or self-managed superannuation fund the value of which is contested and requires valuation or expert investigation,
  2. only parenting orders are sought,
  3. both parenting and financial orders are sought, or
  4. child support is the issue.

The new Family Law Practice Direction – Priority Property Pool Cases applies. It revokes and replaces the previous Family Law Practice Direction Priority Property Pools Under $500,000, and must be read in conjunction with:

  • the Family Law Act 1975,
  • The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021,
  • the court’s Guide for practitioners and parties in PPP Cases, and
  • the court’s Family Law Practice Direction – Financial Proceedings.

PPP Cases proceed differently to standard cases. The Guide for practitioners in PPP Cases sets out the applicable procedure. Important differences from standard case procedures include:

  • At each court date the parties’ lawyers must inform the judicial registrar of the costs their client has incurred to date, their estimated costs to the conclusion of a final hearing, and the source of the funding for representation.
  • Adjournments are discouraged and will be granted only in exceptional circumstances.

The By Lawyers Family Law Property Settlement publication has been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Family Law, Federal, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: family law, family law act, family law property, family law rules, Priority Property Pool Cases

Family law rules – FED

28 November 2022 by By Lawyers

Changes to the family law rules from 28 November include the abolition of the need to file a parenting or financial questionnaire with an initiating application. Parties now only file a questionnaire if they have not filed an affidavit with their application or response.

Other amendments to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 include:

  • Rule 1.09: Changing the form for seeking rescission of a divorce order from an Application for Review to an Application in a Proceeding;
  • Rule 2.01: Requiring that an application must concisely state the orders sought;
  • Part 2.6: Making the rules on service of documents in Australia apply to service generally;
  • Part 5.6: Inserting new rules 5.28 and 5.29 requiring that the Annexure to Proposed Consent Parenting Orders be attached to an application for interim parenting orders proposed to be made in chambers, as was already required for final orders;
  • Rule 5.28 and rule 10.04: Allowing draft consent orders to be signed by a party’s legal representative;
  • Rule 6.06 and rule 8.09: Removing the requirement to file parenting or financial questionnaires with an initiating application if the party has filed an affidavit;
  • Rule 7.35: Providing for the court to accept the opinion of a court-appointed assessor unless there are exceptional circumstances; and
  • Rule 14.07: Allowing the court to consider an Application for Review in chambers if the parties consent, and requiring parties to seek leave for any further evidence to be filed in support of an Application for Review.

Amendments to the costs schedule in the rules commence on 1 January 2023.

Amendments have also been made to the delegations table in Schedule 4 to the Rules, with effect from 28 November 2022.

The amended delegations increase the powers of Senior Judicial Registrars and Judicial Registrars in dealing with aspects of case management, including allowing the registrars to:

  • deal with an application for an interlocutory consent order under the new part 5.6 of the Rules;
  • apply on a limited basis the court’s power under s 69ZR of the Family Law Act 1975 to make a finding of fact, determine a matter, or make an order in relation to an issue arising, at any time before final orders are made in child-related proceedings;
  • order a party to undergo drug or alcohol screening or testing;
  • make spousal or de facto maintenance orders on a limited basis;
  • make an order for child maintenance – Senior Judicial Registrars only;
  • make an injunction under s 114 against a third party – Senior Judicial Registrars only;
  • make orders in relation to costs, costs estimates, and assessment of costs under s 117;
  • grant leave to institute proceedings out of time – Senior Judicial Registrars only;
  • grant leave for joinder of a party to a proceeding after the first court date;
  • issue a subpoena, order the production and inspection of documents, and hear subpoena objections;
  • summarily dismiss an application that has no reasonable prospects of success;
  • make summary orders in response to a claim by a party that an application or response is frivolous, vexatious, or an abuse of process, or that an application has no reasonable likelihood of success;
  • make certain case management orders or directions under r 10.11;
  • make orders varying or setting aside orders under the slip rule if the original orders were made by a Senior Judicial Registrar or Judicial Registrar;
  • make declarations regarding the costs of a child, and amend administrative assessments that are more than 18 months old under the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989; and
  • grant a stay under s 111C of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988.

Filed Under: Family Law, Federal, Legal Alerts, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Publication Updates, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: family law, family law rules, Financial settlement, parenting

Expert evidence – Family law – FED

28 September 2021 by By Lawyers

A new precedent for use when obtaining expert evidence has been added to the Family Law guides.

When the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (FCFCOA) commenced operation on 1 September 2021, it did so with a new set of rules: the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (the Family Law Rules 2021). The rules apply in all family law matters across both divisions of the court.

Part 7.1 of the Family Law Rules 2021 makes provision for expert evidence. Rule 7.13 provides that experts must be given a recent copy of Divisions 7.14, 7.15, and 7.16. These rules cover requirements for instructions to experts, information about disclosure by experts, their duties and obligations, as well as clarification of the requirements for a single expert report.

A new enclosure has been created which conveniently includes all of the rules in these divisions. The enclosure can be given to the expert witness when they are instructed, thereby making it easy for practitioners to comply with the requirements under the rules. This enclosure has been added to these Family Law matter plans – Property settlement, Children and Financial agreements, for use when obtaining expert evidence. There are corresponding precedent letters to experts on each matter plan.

For Property settlement matters, the new precedent enclosure is located in the Going to court folder under If required – Valuer. There is also a Letter to the valuer for single expert valuation.

For Children matters, the new precedent enclosure is located in the Going to court folder under If required – Single expert witness report. There is also a Letter to single expert witness.

For Financial agreements matters, the new precedent enclosure is located in the Enforcement folder under If required – Single expert witness report. There is also a Letter to single expert witness.

The By Lawyers Family law publication is up to date with all of the recent changes to the family law system after the merger of the two courts into the FCFCOA.

Filed Under: Australian Capital Territory, Family Law, Federal, New South Wales, Northern Territory, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia Tagged With: expert evidence, family law, family law rules, valuation

Reference Manual – 101 Family Law Answers – additional commentary

23 April 2018 by By Lawyers

Stamp duty and other charges

Whilst stamp duty is the common duty parties seek an exemption from, s 90(1) does not only provide an exemption from stamp duty. It provides that certain agreements/orders are not subject to any duty or charge under any law of a State or Territory. This may include land titles office fees on a discharge of mortgage, withdrawal of caveat and/or registration of mortgage.

Practitioners need to be mindful when drafting orders to ensure their orders specify what is required: for example, whether a refinance is required, or whether a withdrawal of caveat is provided.

Filed Under: Family Law, Federal, Publication Updates Tagged With: charges, family law, family law rules, stamp duty

Family Law Rules – Additional changes as of 1 March 2018

8 March 2018 by By Lawyers

Documents to be used in conjunction with affidavits

As of 1 March 2018, in the Family Court, a document that is to be used in conjunction with an affidavit and tendered in evidence in a court proceeding, must be identified in the affidavit but must not be attached to or annexed to the affidavit, or filed as an exhibit to the affidavit.

There may be exceptions where court orders or the Rules provide otherwise: for example r 15.62 in relation to expert reports.

Any document referred to in the affidavit must be served with the affidavit on the other parties after filing. The document must then be tendered in evidence at the court event when the relevant affidavit is relied upon or as required: r 15.08(2)

While as of 1 March 2018, the Family Law Rules have changed, providing for annexures not to be attached to affidavits: r 15.08, in matters in the Family Court, the Federal Circuit Court continues to permit annexures to be attached. Given the majority of matters are filed in the Federal Circuit Court, not the Family Court, in practice the norm will continue to be that relevant annexures are attached to affidavits.

Undertakings

Rule 17.06 has been added, relating to undertakings. The rule sets out the form of undertakings and, in summary provides:

  • Undertakings may be given orally or in writing.
  • If they are in writing, it must be signed and filed.
  • If they are given orally, a written record must be made, signed, filed and served.
  • A definition of undertakings as to damages.

We have updated our Property Settlement and Children commentaries accordingly.

Filed Under: Family Law, Federal, Publication Updates Tagged With: affidavit, family court, family law, family law rules

Family Law – Updated Costs Agreements

19 December 2017 by By Lawyers

The Costs Agreements for the Family Law publications – Property Settlement, Children, Financial Agreements and Divorce – have all been updated for each State and Territory to include the amended Itemised Scale of Costs that takes effect on 1 January 2018.

Filed Under: Family Law, Federal, Publication Updates Tagged With: costs, costs agreements, family law, family law rules, Itemised scale of costs, scale of costs

Family Law – Amended Itemised Scale of Costs

7 December 2017 by By Lawyers

The changes to the Itemised Scale of Costs in the Family Law Rules apply from 1 January 2018.

Filed Under: Family Law, Federal, Legal Alerts Tagged With: costs, costs agreements, family court, family law, family law rules

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Preferred State

Connect with us

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 · Privacy Policy
Created and hosted by LEAP · Log in