ByLawyers News and Updates

Changes to Family Law- FED

by

A summary of the upcoming changes to family law parenting applications has been added to the By Lawyers Family Law – Children guide.

The upcoming changes to family law arise under two separate pieces of legislation, each of which commences on 6 May 2024.

Family Law Amendment Act 2023

Significant amendments to the way parenting orders are dealt with under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), include:

  • a refined list of factors for the court to consider when determining the best interests of the child, the emphasis now being on safety and the needs of individual children;
  • a new subsection requiring the court to consider the right of an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander child to connect with their family, community, culture, country, and language;
  • provisions that allow the court to consider any views expressed by the child to the independent children’s lawyer;
  • the repeal of the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility and the related equal time and substantial and significant time provisions;
  • codification of the rule in Rice v Asplund that requires a court to be satisfied a that significant change in circumstances has occurred before varying parenting orders; and
  • a mechanism for the court to address repetitive filing of applications by one party to oppress another party.

Family Law Amendment (Information Sharing) Act 2023

This legislation:

  • seeks to establish a regime for information about domestic violence, children at risk, and firearms licensing to be shared between the relevant State authorities and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (FCFCOA);
  • amends the Family Law Act to make such material admissible in children’s matters, subject to exceptions and safeguards, for example legal professional privilege.

The 2nd reading speeches note that the measures in each Act are complementary and that both Acts will work together to create a family law system that meets the needs of its users, centring the voices and best interests of children, and ensuring their safety and wellbeing is the paramount consideration.

Publication updates

By Lawyers guides are always up to date. When these changes to family law commence, the Family Law – Children publication will be updated accordingly. In the interim, the following content has been added to the guide too assist firms in understanding and transitioning to the changes:

  • an Alert has been added at the top of the matter plan and the top of the full commentary;
  • a heading Changes effective 6 May 2024 has been added under the Overview in the commentary and on the matter plan, with a concise summary of the amendments;
  • a Comparative table detailing the changes to the Family Law Act effective 6 May 2024 has been added as an Appendix to the commentary, with a link on the matter plan.

Priority Property Pool – FED

by

From 30 October 2023, under a new Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia practice direction, special procedures apply for property matters that qualify as Priority Property Pool (PPP) Cases.

Some registries of the FCFCOA have operated special arrangements under the PPP500 pilot since February 2020. The arrangements will now apply to proceedings in all registries.

Priority Property Pool Cases are those where the net value of the asset pool is, or appears to be, less than $550,000 excluding superannuation interests, or not significantly greater and the court considers it appropriate to include the matter as a PPP case.

Previously, under the pilot program, the cap was $500,000.

Priority property Pool cases can include matters involving applications for property settlement, spouse maintenance, or urgent spouse maintenance.

Cases will not qualify as a PPP Case if:

  1. they involve entities such as a family trust, company, or self-managed superannuation fund the value of which is contested and requires valuation or expert investigation,
  2. only parenting orders are sought,
  3. both parenting and financial orders are sought, or
  4. child support is the issue.

The new Family Law Practice Direction – Priority Property Pool Cases applies. It revokes and replaces the previous Family Law Practice Direction Priority Property Pools Under $500,000, and must be read in conjunction with:

PPP Cases proceed differently to standard cases. The Guide for practitioners in PPP Cases sets out the applicable procedure. Important differences from standard case procedures include:

  • At each court date the parties’ lawyers must inform the judicial registrar of the costs their client has incurred to date, their estimated costs to the conclusion of a final hearing, and the source of the funding for representation.
  • Adjournments are discouraged and will be granted only in exceptional circumstances.

The By Lawyers Family Law Property Settlement publication has been updated accordingly.

Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia – FED

by

The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (FCFCOA) commences operation on 1 September 2021.

The FCFCOA is an amalgamation of the former Family Court of Australia and Federal Circuit Court of Australia.

The new court has two divisions:

  • Division 1 is a superior court of record that includes the judges from the former Family Court. It deals with the most complex matters and exercises appellate jurisdiction.
  • Division 2 is a court of record that includes the judges from the former Federal Circuit Court, which is the single point of entry for all family law and child support matters.

There is a common set of forms and rules across the two divisions. The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (the Family Law Rules 2021) apply in all family law matters, except in Western Australia where the Family Court Rules 2021 (WA) apply. Western Australia also has its own dedicated portal – the eCourts Portal of Western Australia.

They provide for the practice and procedure in both divisions of the FCFCOA except for a few matters such as transfer from Division 2 to Division 1 as set out in the Family Law Rules 2021.

The new court’s website is available: www.fcfcoa.gov.au.

A practice direction deals with Transitional arrangements.

Division 2 of the new court also has a general federal law jurisdiction, like the former Federal Circuit Court.

All By Lawyers Family law publications – Children, Divorce, Financial Agreements, and Property Settlement – are being updated for the commencement of the new court. This includes a full review of the:

  • commentaries, for the new terminology, procedures and hyperlinks to the new rules;
  • matter plans, with a single Going to court folder reflecting the new process; and
  • precedents, to incorporate all necessary changes.

There is a 90 day grace period for using the old forms in the new court. The new court forms will be added to the By Lawyers matter plans as they become available.

By Lawyers always keep our subscribers up to date!

Parenting orders and the Coronavirus – FED

by

The Chief Justice of the Family Court has issued a comprehensive and helpful bulletin on parenting orders and the Coronavirus.

A key point in the bulletin is His Honour’s call that:

As a first step, and only if it is safe to do so, parties should communicate with each other about their ability to comply with current orders and they should attempt to find a practical solution to these difficulties. These should be considered sensibly and reasonably. Each parent should always consider the safety and best interests of the child, but also appreciate the concerns of the other parent when attempting to reach new or revised arrangements.

His Honour notes that the Courts remain open to assist parties and to provide parents with general guidance. The Family Court’s general Coronavirus arrangements are available on the Court’s website and are being regularly updated.

The most important point regarding Coronavirus and parenting arrangements is that the best interests of the children remains the paramount consideration: s 60CA Family Law Act 1975.

In accordance with their obligations to act in their children’s best interests, parents and carers are expected to comply with Court orders in relation to parenting arrangements, notwithstanding the ‘highly unusual’ current circumstances. This includes facilitating time being spent by the children with each parent or carer pursuant to parenting orders. This is where sense and reason need to be applied by the parties, and where lawyers can play a critical role.

For more information about parenting orders and the Coronavirus, including what the parties should consider and what the Court will consider when making orders, see the commentary on parenting orders in the By Lawyers Family Law – Children Guide.

 

Keep up-to-date with our latest COVID-19 News & Updates

Setting aside financial agreements – FED

by

A recent case on setting aside financial agreements has been added to the By Lawyers 101 Family Law Answers publication.

Section 90K(1) of the Family Law Act 1975 provides for the limited circumstances in which a court will consider setting aside financial agreements entered into by married couples. The equivalent section for de facto couples is s 90UM.

In Frederick & Frederick [2019] FamCAFC 87, the Full Bench of the Family Court set aside a financial agreement on the grounds that there had been a material change in the circumstances relating to the care, welfare and development of a child of the marriage and the applicant would suffer hardship if the agreement were not set aside – s 90K(1)(d).

See 101 Family Law Answers and the By Lawyers Family Law commentary for more information.

Amendments to Family Law Act – FED

by

Amendments to the Family Law Act commenced 10 March 2019 relating to family violence and cross-examination of parties.

They will apply to cross-examinations occurring on 10 September 2019 and thereafter, regardless of when proceedings were instituted.

The following sections have been added to the Family Law Act 1975:

  • 102NA Mandatory protections for parties in certain cases; and
  • 102NB Court‑ordered protections in other cases.

Section 102NA provides greater protection for parties in circumstances of family violence where there are self-represented parties.

If a party intends to cross-examine the other party, in certain circumstances, they may not do so personally and cross-examination may only be conducted by a legal representative. Those circumstances are:

  1. there is an allegation of family violence between the examining party and the witness party; and
  2. any of the following are satisfied:
    • either party has been convicted of, or is charged with, an offence involving violence, or a threat of violence, to the other party;
    • a family violence order, other than an interim order, applies to both parties;
    • an injunction under s 68B or s 114 for the personal protection of either party is directed against the other party;
    • the court makes an order that the requirements of legal representation for cross-examination are to apply.

If a party intends to cross-examine the other party personally and there are allegations of family violence, the court must ensure that during the cross-examination there are appropriate protections for the party who is the alleged victim of the family violence.

The By Lawyers Children and Property Settlement commentaries have been updated accordingly.

Reference Manual – 101 Family Law Answers – additions

by

 

Additions have been made to the 101 Family Law Answers reference manual.

The following commentary was added to Admissibility of settlement negotiations:

A without prejudice offer to settle parenting matters was admitted in the Western Australia case S and K [2007] FCWA 17. In this case the court said:

There is no doubt that it is important to preserve confidentiality and to foster an environment that allows parties to negotiate without fear they will be compromised in an endeavour to settle matters. However, offers can be made for a number of reasons and the overarching principle is always the best interests of the child. It is not the sole consideration but it is the paramount one.

The Court should not be precluded from obtaining information to ensure that the principle is met…

Note: This is a single judge decision and hasn’t been followed in subsequent cases since it was handed down in 2007.

The following useful case references were added to Relocation:

Carne & Feldt [2013] FCCA 1851: the court permitted an interim relocation 100 km (1 hour) away. The child was 6 years old and the mother was relocating to live with her new partner, the father of her unborn child.

Cavanagh & Kennedy [2013] FCCA 345: the mother unilaterally relocated with the parties’ 7 year old daughter to a place an ‘hour and a half away’ despite an earlier final order providing for equal shared parental responsibility and that each ‘parent is restrained from relocating outside the … district unless agreed in writing between the parties’. The court ordered she return.

Morgan & Miles [2007] FamCA 1230: dealt with a move of 144 km and whether this constitutes ‘a relocation’.

Family Law – Reference Manual – 101 Family Law Answers

by

The Reference Manual – 101 Family Law Answers is the first of the By Lawyers reference manuals to be updated to the new stylish format.

As well as the new format, two commentaries have been added in the Enforcement chapter.

Court enforcement of a child support debt: A child support debt, a debt occasioned due to non payment of a registered maintenance liability, is a debt to the Commonwealth, as opposed to the payer, and is recoverable by action taken by the Child Support Registrar: s 113; or by the payee: s 113A. …

Property orders – Enforcement and the overseas factor: Unlike parenting orders, the Family Law Act, Rules or Regulation make no provision for the registration of property orders in overseas jurisdictions, or the registration and enforcement of overseas property orders in Australia. Furthermore, Australia is not party to any international conventions which provide for the reciprocal recognition of property orders overseas. …

 

Connect with us