ByLawyers News and Updates
  • Publication updates
    • Federal
    • New South Wales
    • Victoria
    • Queensland
    • South Australia
    • Western Australia
    • Northern Territory
    • Tasmania
    • Australian Capital Territory
  • By area of law
    • Bankruptcy and Liquidation
    • Business and Franchise
    • Companies, Trusts, Partnerships and Superannuation
    • Conveyancing and Property
    • Criminal Law
    • Defamation and Protecting Reputation
    • Employment Law
    • Family Law
    • Immigration
    • Litigation
    • Neighbourhood Disputes
    • Personal injury
    • Personal Property Securities
    • Practice Management
    • Security of Payments
    • Trade Marks
    • Wills and Estates
  • Legal alerts
  • Articles
  • By Lawyers

County Court – VIC

24 March 2025 by By Lawyers

Common Law Division Practice Note PNCLD 1-2025 takes effect in the County Court from 25 March 2025 and replaces 21 existing practice notes.

The new practice note, which stretches to 159 pages and includes a dictionary setting out key definitions, covers all the practices and case management expectations for all proceedings in the Common Law Division, including for the various specialist lists, and Appeals.

The new Common Law Division practice note supersedes the following practice notes:

  • PNCLD 1-2023 Common Law Division practice note
  • PNCLD 2-2023 Serious injury applications practice note
  • PNCLD 3-2022 WorkCover List practice note
  • PNCLD 4-2023 Family Property List practice note
  • PNCLD 5-2023 Medical List practice note
  • PNCLD 6-2023 Confiscation List practice note
  • PNCLD 7-2023 Defamation List practice note
  • PNCLD 8-2023 Adoptions, Surrogacy and Name Change List practice note
  • PNCLD 12-2023 Applications for approval of compromise practice note
  • PNCLD 13-2022 Applications by a solicitor for costs in work injury damages claims practice note
  • PNCLD 14-2023 Applications to file a notice of ceasing to act practice note
  • PNCLD 15-2023 Applications to take evidence by deposition practice note
  • PNCLD 16-2023 Information Technology (IT) practice note
  • PNCLD 17-2023 Judicial mediation practice note
  • PNCLD 18-2023 Subpoenas practice note
  • PNCLD 19-2023 Institutional Liability List practice note
  • PNCLD SP-2-2022 Suppression, pseudonym (and like) order applications practice note
  • PNCLD SA 2-2022 Applications for compensation under s85B of the Sentencing Act 1991 practice note
  • PNCLD SO 2-2022 Applications for supervision orders under the Serious Offenders Act 2018 practice note
  • PNCLD FV 2-2024 Family Violence and Personal Safety Intervention Order appeals practice note
  • PNCI 9-2021 eCase: electronic subpoenas practice note.

The specialist lists dealt with by the practice note are:

  • The Civil Claims lists: Serious Injury List; WorkCover List; Medical List; Institutional Liability List; Defamation List; Family Property List; and the General List.
  • Adoptions, Surrogacy and Name Changes List.
  • Confiscation List.
  • Appeals and Post Sentence Application List.

Commentary links for both Acting for the Plaintiff and Acting for the Defendant in the By Lawyers County Court (VIC) publication have been updated accordingly.

Filed Under: Defamation and Protecting Reputation, Domestic Violence Orders, Legal Alerts, Litigation, Motor Vehicle Accidents, Publication Updates, Victoria, Workers Compensation Tagged With: civil claims, civil procedure, Practice Notes, VIC County Court

Magistrates’ Court – VIC

10 February 2025 by By Lawyers

Two important new practice directions apply in the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria from 10 February 2025.

  1. Practice Direction No. 1 of 2025 governs practice and modes of appearance, in person or online, in proceedings across the criminal and family violence divisions of the Magistrates’ Court. It revokes Practice Direction No. 6 of 2022.
  2. Practice Direction No. 2 of 2025 governs practices in the civil division of the Magistrates’ Court. It revokes 51 previous practice directions.

The following are the key points of each.

Magistrates’ Court criminal and family violence jurisdiction

Practice Direction No. 1 of 2025 sets out the procedure for all appearances, online or in person, except a first remand hearing which is covered by Practice Direction 1 of 2024.

In general, online appearances by clients and practitioners are available, encouraged, and in many cases required. However, physical appearances are also possible, mainly by request, and in some cases required.

The practice direction sets out detailed arrangements for all types of appearances, including:

  • accused on bail or summons;
  • bail applications and other hearings with the accused in custody;
  • contest mention hearings, committal mentions, special mentions, and applications, and matters in Judicial Registrar lists;
  • contested hearings and committal hearings;
  • specialist courts and programs;
  • intervention orders – applications and hearings; and
  • filing materials with the court.

Represented accused and their lawyers are to appear in person or online as provided for in the practice direction, unless the court directs otherwise.

If a represented accused appears in person, their lawyer must also appear in person, unless otherwise directed by the court.

If a practitioner seeks to appear in a mode contrary to that set out in the practice direction, they must apply to do so by contacting the relevant court registry at least 7 days before the date.

When appearing online, it is the practitioner’s responsibility to ensure they and their client have audio-visual capability from an appropriate private location, and their online appearance must not cause delay or interrupt the court.

Magistrates’ Court civil jurisdiction

Practice Direction No. 2 of 2025 applies to all civil proceedings including the WorkCover Division, Industrial Division, and Federal Jurisdiction matters. It excludes matters arising under the Family Violence Protection Act 2008, the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010, and Industrial Division criminal proceedings.

The practice note covers the following for general civil matters:

  • overview and purpose;
  • definitions;
  • jurisdiction;
  • self-represented litigants;
  • issuing proceedings, filing documents and corresponding with the court;
  • attending the court;
  • consent orders;
  • appropriate dispute resolution;
  • applications in open court and directions hearings;
  • call overs for contested matters and open court applications;
  • contested hearings; and
  • inspecting subpoenaed documents.

Specific directions in the WorkCover Division include:

  • medical panel referrals;
  • inspection of medical and other records;
  • subpoenas relating to confidential communications; and
  • dependents’ compensation.

Specific directions in the Industrial Division include:

  • support for self-represented litigants;
  • filing documents;
  • pre-hearing conferences; and
  • contested matters.

Specific directions in the Federal jurisdiction concern the commencement of proceedings.

Appendix A to the practice direction lists the 51 previous Magistrates’ Court practice directions that are revoked.

Publication updates

The commentary and hyperlinks in the following By Lawyers Magistrates’ Court (VIC) guides have been updated accordingly:

  • Civil – Acting for the Plaintiff;
  • Civil – Acting for the Defendant;
  • Intervention Orders;
  • Criminal; and
  • Traffic.

Filed Under: Criminal Law, Domestic Violence Orders, Litigation, Publication Updates, Victoria Tagged With: civil claims, civil procedure, Intervention orders, Magistrates Court Civil - Acting for the Defendant, Magistrates Court Civil - Acting for the Plaintiff, VIC magistrates court

Civil rules – SA

18 January 2024 by By Lawyers

The Uniform Civil Rules 2020 have been amended with effect from 1 January 2024. These rules apply to all South Australian courts that deal with civil matters.

Amendments under the Uniform Civil (No 10) Amending Rules 2023 include the following:

Remote appearances

A  substituted r 15.4 allows the court to direct or permit a party or a lawyer to appear by audio or audio-visual link, if the court considers it is justified in the circumstances.

This requires:

  • an application in the prescribed form; or
  • an oral application at a prior hearing; or
  • ticking the remote appearance box on any form filed via the court’s electronic filing system; or
  • sending an email to the chambers of the judicial officer who will hear the matter.

The request must specify why the remote appearance is necessary.

If a request is granted the requesting party must pay any costs involved, and if they are uncontactable after 15 minutes of the appointed time it will be treated as a non-appearance.

An application for a witness to appear by audio link or by audio visual link must be made by an interlocutory application in the prescribed form supported by an affidavit in the prescribed form, or an oral application at a prior hearing.

Setting aside judgement by consent

A new rule 142.13 provides that a default monetary judgment can be set aside and the proceedings discontinued by consent by the parties filing the new form 126A Application and Consent to Set Aside Default Judgment and Discontinuance, provided there is no cross-claim, third party claim, or interested party.

Publication updates

The commentaries and matter plans in the By Lawyers Magistrates Court Civil guides- Acting for the Applicant and Acting for the Respondent have been updated in line with the amended civil rules.

Filed Under: Legal Alerts, Litigation, Publication Updates, South Australia Tagged With: civil claims, civil procedure, CourtSA, litigation, SA Magistrates Court

QCAT guide – QLD

3 June 2022 by By Lawyers

The By Lawyers QCAT guide has been extensively reviewed and enhanced.

The Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal matter plan and commentary headings have been reordered for improved sequencing and searchability. New commentary and cases have been added on various topics including:

  • The doubt over QCAT’s ability to deal with matters involving interstate parties or dealings. The High Court decision of Burns v Corbett; Burns v Gaynor; Attorney General for New South Wales v Burns; Attorney General for New South Wales v Burns; New South Wales v Burns [2018] HCA 15 provides that state tribunals do not have jurisdiction to decide disputes where the parties reside in separate states, unless they are constituted as a state court. The commentary discusses the doubt over whether QCAT is constituted as a state court, including the recent case of Spedding Estates Pty Ltd ATF The Spedding Family Trust v Cotterill & Downie [2022] QCATA 3 where the tribunal decided it does not have jurisdictional limits.
  • Joinder, including recent cases, to assist practitioners advising clients who are seeking to join parties, or resist being joined.
  • Early strike-out and dismissal of proceedings.
  • Costs and the factors taken into account when the tribunal is asked to make a costs order.
  • Particular matter types dealt with by QCAT, namely, building disputes, consumer disputes, debt recovery, dividing fences and tree disputes, and retail shop lease disputes.

Commentary on specific matter types in the QCAT guide includes helpful links to the relevant legislation such as:

  • for building disputes, links to the Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991;
  • for consumer disputes, links to the Australian Consumer Law, contained in Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth);
  • for dividing fences and tree disputes, links to the Neighbourhood Disputes (Dividing Fences and Trees) Act 2011;
  • for retail tenancy, links to the Retail Shop Leases Act 1994.

These enhancements to the By Lawyers QCAT guide assist practitioners in advising clients and conducting matters in the tribunal’s civil disputes division.

Filed Under: Litigation, Miscellaneous, Publication Updates, Queensland Tagged With: civil claims, litigation, QCAT

Enforcement – NSW

19 April 2022 by By Lawyers

The By Lawyers Enforcement (NSW) publication has been extensively reviewed and expanded.

Part of the individual civil litigation publications for each court, the Enforcement guide deals with enforcing judgments and orders in civil matters in the Local Court, the District Court and the Supreme Court. It is a stand-alone publication, designed to assist practitioners who are advising and representing clients that seek to recover or resist a judgment debt or other order, whether or not the practitioner acted for the client in the substantive matter.

The commentaries have been substantially enhanced. New precedents provided on the matter plan include:

  • File cover sheet
  • Retainer instructions
  • Costs agreement and disclosure document
  • Initial letter to client
  • Letter of demand
  • To do list

The commentaries and precedents cover all manner of enforcement procedures, for all levels of courts, from examination and attachment to various warrants and writs.

Related By Lawyers guides include Insolvency and 101 Subpoena Answers.

Filed Under: Litigation, New South Wales, Publication Updates Tagged With: civil claims, enforcement, litigation

Pre-action procedures – SA

28 January 2022 by By Lawyers

New precedents have been added to the Magistrates Court guides to assist practitioners to comply with the requirements for pre-action procedures in civil claims.

The options and requirements for pre-action procedures are set out clearly in Division 3 of Chapter 7 of the Uniform Civil Rules 2020.

The commentary in the By Lawyers SA Magistrates Court publications sets out these requirements and also deals with:

  • Alternatives to pre-action steps, involving the optional use of a Form P1 Final Notice, and Form P2 Enforceable Payment Agreement which sets
    out the money that the debtor owes and an agreed payment plan. These forms are available on the matter plans;
  • Pre-action steps for originating applications, including letters of demand and costs considerations;
  • Pre-action steps for minor civil claims, for which there is a simplified process.

The commentary also provides practical tips on taking instructions and giving advice about pre-action steps and letters of demand. This focuses on the overarching obligations that apply in all proceedings to parties and their representatives as set out in the rules. These are particularly pertinent to drafting letters of demand or pre-action claims.

New precedents

Two new precedents have been added to the Magistrates Court (SA) – Acting for the applicant matter plan:

  • Pre-action claim letter to respondent’s solicitor
  • Pre-action claim letter to respondent

Four new precedents have been added to the Magistrates Court (SA) – Acting for the respondent matter plan:

  • Pre-action response accepting offer
  • Pre-action third party notice
  • Letter serving pre-action response on other proposed respondents
  • Letter serving pre-action third party notice on applicant

These new precedents were prepared by our South Australian litigation author following a request from a subscriber. By Lawyers love to receive feedback from our users and often enhance our publications as a result. It is one of the ways we help lawyers enjoy practice more!

Filed Under: Litigation, Publication Updates, South Australia Tagged With: civil claims, litigation, Pre-action procedures, SA Magistrates Court

Personal Injury QLD

6 November 2020 by By Lawyers

The By Lawyers Personal Injury QLD publication has been reviewed, including the addition of a recent Supreme Court case relating to the extension of limitation periods.

Limitation periods are a critical consideration for practitioners advising and representing clients in personal injury claims. Strict limitation and notice periods apply. Extensions are possible under s 59 Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002, but good reasons for delay must be shown and the Court does not exercise its discretion to extend limitation periods lightly. Section 59 also applies to any extension of the limitation period that is granted under the Limitation of Actions Act 1974.

The issues relating to such an application were examined recently in Faram v Hensec Pty Limited [2020] QSC 327. The application to extend the limitation period in that case was refused where the applicant had failed to comply with the necessary pre-action procedures.

The By Lawyers Personal Injury QLD commentary deals in detail with limitation periods and pre-action procedures.

This review has also seen the commentary updated and revised for enhanced searchability.

Related By Lawyers guides for Queensland litigation include Motor Vehicle Accidents, Workers Compensation, District Court, Supreme Court and 101 Subpoena Answers.

Filed Under: Litigation, Personal injury, Publication Updates, Queensland Tagged With: civil claims, limitation periods, litigation, personal injury, personal injury QLD

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Preferred State

Connect with us

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 · Privacy Policy
Created and hosted by LEAP · Log in