ByLawyers News and Updates

Central Practice Direction – FED

by

The Central Practice Direction: Family Law Case Management outlines the core principles applicable to family law proceedings and establishes a consistent national case management system in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.

The practice direction requires that before filing an Initiating Application or a Response to an Initiating Application, lawyers give their clients a copy of the practice direction. There is a brochure on the matter plans in the By Lawyers family law publications, being a convenient PDF version of the practice direction, for this purpose.

A new precedent letter to the client has been added to the matter plans, enclosing the brochure and summarising its key points. This assists the practitioner to both comply with their obligations and explain the importance of the practice direction to their clients.

The Central Practice Direction incorporates the overarching purpose, enshrined in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021 under which the court was created, to facilitate the just resolution of disputes as quickly, inexpensively, and efficiently as possible.

The ten core principles by which the overarching purpose is to be achieved are in summary:

  1. assessment of risk to vulnerable parties;
  2. rapid and inexpensive agreements;
  3. efficient use of the court’s resources;
  4. effective case management;
  5. active dispute resolution;
  6. adverse consequences for non-compliance;
  7. costs obligations;
  8. full disclosure between parties of all relevant information and focus on the real issues;
  9. hearing preparation; and
  10. resolution or determination of all cases promptly.

Following the principles, the Central Practice Direction makes it clear that the court expects parties and their lawyers to always:

  • minimise costs;
  • promptly give full and frank disclosure of information;
  • communicate productively; and
  • identify and seek to resolve the issues genuinely in dispute.

The Practice Direction prohibits aggressive and unnecessarily adversarial conduct. The safety of parties and children is a priority. Parties are not required to put themselves or their children at risk or compromise if they feel unsafe or believe abuse or violence affects their ability to negotiate fair or reasonable outcomes. The interests of children are always the court’s paramount concern.

Law Practice Certificates – QLD

by

Law Practice Certificates are required in personal injury claims and workers’ compensation claims from 31 October 2022.

The Personal Injuries Proceedings and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2022 (QLD) has now fully commenced. The Act has a number of important implications for personal injury proceedings, motor vehicle accident claims, and workers’ compensation claims in Queensland. See the previous By Lawyers News and Updates post: Personal Injuries – QLD.

Claim farming prohibited

The Act amends both the Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 and the Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 to address the practice of claim farming.

Claim farming is mainly where a third party approaches potential clients to pressure them into making a compensation claim for personal injuries. Claim farmers sell the clients’ information to a legal practitioner, or claims management service provider, to bring the claim. It can also occur when lawyers make direct approaches to injured persons or inappropriately seek referrals.

Law Practice Certificates

The amendments introduce a requirement for practitioners acting in personal injuries and workers’ compensation matters to certify to claimants and respondents or insurers, at various stages of claims, that claim farming has not occurred.  This certification takes the form of a Law Practice Certificate which must be given to the claimant and the respondent/insurer before the claim commences, or shortly after the lawyer becomes instructed if the claim is already on foot, and at other stages of the proceedings such as when advising on a settlement.

Failing to provide a Law Practice Certificate when required and providing a false or misleading certificate are offences.

The obligation to provide Law Practice Certificates already exists under Division 2A of the Motor Accident Insurance Act 1994. These amendments bring the requirements for common law and workers’ compensation claims into line with motor vehicle accident claims. The form of the certificate previously used for motor accident claims has been replaced with a newly approved version, which must be used for all three types of claims.

Publication updates

Relevant amendments have been made to the commentaries in the By Lawyers Queensland Personal Injury, Workers’ Compensation, and Motor Vehicle Accident Claim publications.

Law Practice Certificate forms are being finalised and will be added to the matter plans shortly.

Personal injuries – QLD

by

The Personal Injuries Proceedings and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2022 (QLD) has a number of important implications for personal injuries proceedings, motor vehicle accident claims, and workers compensation claims in Queensland.

Costs for speculative personal injuries claims

Sections 346 and 347 of the Legal Profession Act  2007 (QLD) are amended to provide that certain items, including interest and credit facility fees, are included as legal costs rather than disbursements for the purpose of the maximum payment permissible for the conduct of a speculative personal injury claim. Counsel’s fees are generally excluded from these items, if counsel’s services are provided after the notice of claim is given, or urgent proceedings are commenced.

Section 347(8) defines the relevant additional items, which can include any disbursements prescribed by regulation.

Workers’ compensation – terminal condition claims

The Amending Act reinstates a time frame in s 39A of the Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 which defines a terminal condition for the purpose of a worker’s compensation claim. For injuries from 1 July 2022 a terminal condition of a worker is one that a doctor certifies is expected to terminate the worker’s life within five years after the diagnosis. The insurer still needs to accept the doctor’s diagnosis, otherwise, there will be a dispute over whether the condition is terminal or not.

Claim farming prohibited

The Act amends both the Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 and the Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 to prevent claim farming.

Claim farming is where a third party approaches potential clients to pressure them into making a compensation claim for personal injuries. Claim farmers sell the clients’ information to a legal practitioner, or claims management service provider, to bring the claim.

The Act introduces a requirement for practitioners acting in personal injuries and workers’ compensation matters to certify to claimants and respondents or insurers, at various stages of claims, that claim farming has not occurred. A breach is a criminal offence. These provisions effectively already exist for claims under the Motor Accident Insurance Act 1994. The commencement of these provisions, and the approved form for Law Practice Certificates, await proclamation.

Publication updates

Relevant amendments have been made to the commentaries in the By Lawyers Queensland Personal Injuries, Motor Vehicle Accident Claims and Workers’ Compensation publications.

1 July updates – All states

by

1 July updates are always a big focus for By Lawyers. Many Commonwealth and state legislative instruments provide for the scheduled indexing of relevant monetary amounts and adjustments – usually increases – in government fees and charges. These regular updates occur at the start of every financial year impacting many different areas of law, and therefore numerous By Lawyers publications.

These updates include court filing fees, lodgment fees for property dealings, land tax thresholds, minimum weekly compensation amounts for Workers Compensation, and penalty units for fines for various criminal offences and civil penalty provisions.

By Lawyers always monitor and apply these changes for our subscribers. Each year we ensure our publications are amended where necessary to reflect 1 July updates.

We also monitor and update for similar legislative indexing and increases which occur regularly at other times of the year. These include 1 January changes and other specific dates for various areas of law as prescribed by some statutes.

The 1 July updates have been applied this year, or are in the process of being applied as they get released, to the following By Lawyers publications:

  • Conveyancing and Property;
  • Business and Franchise;
  • Criminal;
  • Litigation;
  • Estates;
  • Injuries; and
  • Employment.

Quite separately, there is also usually a raft of new and amending legislation from both Commonwealth and state parliaments which is set to commence on 1 July. This year is no different in that regard. By Lawyers have made various substantive amendments to a number of publications to account for the commencement of such legislation. Please see the various other By Lawyers News and Updates posts dealing with those updates.

By Lawyers always keep our content – and our subscribers – up to date!

Comparative CPD requirements

by

In all states and territories of Australia legal practitioners are required, as a condition of their practising certificates, to participate in compulsory professional development and training. Although the requirements are reasonably uniform, the terminology differs. In some states the requirement is known as Continuing Legal Education (CLE), or Mandatory Continuing Legal Education (MCLE). In others it is known as Compulsory Professional Development (CPD). There are also different requirements for barristers and solicitors.

For consistency, Continuing Professional Development (CPD) is used in this guide.

In each jurisdiction, the relevant one-year period begins on 1 April and ends on 31 March.

The CPD requirements in each state and territory are summarised below:

AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) = 10 units

Core Areas

A minimum of one CPD unit from each of the following areas:

  • Legal ethics and professional responsibility;
  • Practice management and business skills;
  • Professional skills; and
  • Substantive law and procedural law.

Section 47 of the Legal Profession Act 2006 (ACT) and the Law Society of the ACT CPD Guidelines.

NEW SOUTH WALES

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development = 10 units

Compulsory Fields

A minimum of one unit per year from each of the following fields:

  • Ethics and Professional Responsibility;
  • Practice Management and Business Skills;
  • Professional Skills; and
  • Substantive Law.

Legal Profession Uniform Continuing Professional Development (Solicitors) Rules 2015 and s 52 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW).

NORTHERN TERRITORY

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) = 10 points

Core Competencies

A minimum of one point per year from each of the following mandatory competency areas:

  • Ethics and professional responsibility;
  • Practice management and business skills; and
  • Professional Skills in legal practice.

Schedule 2 of the Legal Profession Regulations 2007.

QUEENSLAND

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) = 10 units

Mandatory Core areas

A minimum of one unit per year in each of the following mandatory core areas:

  • Practical legal ethics;
  • Practice management and business skills; and
  • Professional skills.

Part 6 of the Queensland Law Society Administration Rule 2005.

SOUTH AUSTRALIA

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (MCPD) = 10 units

Required Areas

A minimum of one unit per year from each of the following required areas:

  • Practical legal ethics;
  • Practice management and business skills; and
  • Professional skills.

Legal Practitioners Education and Admission Council Rules 2018.

TASMANIA

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) = 10 units

Mandatory Core Competency Areas

A minimum of one unit per year from each of the following mandatory competency areas:

  • Practical legal ethics;
  • Practice management and business skills; and
  • Professional skills; and
  • Substantive law.

Law Society of Tasmania’s Practice Guideline 4 – Continuing Professional Development Scheme and s 56 of the Legal Profession Act 2007.

VICTORIA

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) = 10 units

Compulsory Fields

A minimum of one unit per year from each of the following compulsory fields:

  • Ethics and Professional Responsibility;
  • Professional Skills;
  • Substantive Law; and
  • Practice Management and Business Skills.

Legal Profession Uniform Continuing Professional Development (Solicitors) Rules 2015 and s 52 Legal Profession Uniform Law.

WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Annual Mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) = 10 points

Mandatory Competency Areas

A minimum of one point per year from each of the following mandatory competency areas:

  • Practice management;
  • Professional skills;
  • Ethics and professional responsibility; and
  • Substantive law.

Legal Profession Act 2008, Legal Profession Rules 2009 and Legal Profession Regulations 2009.

Summary of continuing professional development activities

CPD Activity Activity format Formula
Max CPD Maximum number of CPD units that can be completed in a day.

  • TAS maximum = 6.
 N/A
Attendance Course, seminar, workshop, lecture, conference, discussion group, multimedia or web-based program.

  • TAS maximum = 3
  • WA maximum = 6
  • All other Jurisdictions = No limit.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
Study Private study of audio/visual material recording of an event that occurred in the CPD year.

  • NT maximum = 5
  • QLD, VIC, ACT = No limit.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
View View or listen multimedia or web-based program.

  • ACT – No limit
  • NT maximum =5
  • SA maximum = 5
  • TAS maximum = 5
  • WA maximum = 4.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
Private Private study of audio/visual material update solicitor’s knowledge and skills.

  • ACT – No limit
  • NSW maximum = 5
  • NT maximum =5
  • QLD maximum = 5
  • VIC maximum = 5.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
Research Research, preparation or editing of a legal article.

  • ACT maximum = 5
  • NSW maximum = 5
  • NT maximum =5
  • QLD maximum = 5
  • SA maximum =5
  • TAS maximum = 3
  • VIC maximum = 5
  • WA maximum = 5.
 1,000 words = 1 CPD
Activity preparation Preparation of CPD activities.

  • ACT maximum = 5
  • NSW maximum = 5
  • NT maximum =5
  • QLD maximum = 5
  • SA maximum =4
  • TAS maximum = 4
  • VIC maximum = 5.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
Presenting. Presentation of a CPD activity.

  • ACT maximum = 5
  • NT maximum =5
  • QLD maximum = 5
  • SA maximum =4
  • VIC maximum = 5.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
Present WA Presentation of a CPD activity and commentator.

  • WA maximum = 6.
 1 hour – 2 CPD
Membership actives Membership of legal committee, taskforce or practice section of a law association or similar body.

  • ACT maximum = 3
  • NSW maximum = 3
  • NT maximum =3
  • QLD maximum = 3
  • SA maximum =5
  • TAS maximum = 3
  • VIC maximum = 3.
 2 hours = 1 CPD
Graduate study Post graduate study.

  • NT maximum = 5
  • TAS maximum =5.
 1 Hour = 1 CPD
Specialist Completion of a specialist accreditation program. 10 points incl compulsory
Practice Management Completion of practice management course. 10 points incl compulsory

QCAT guide – QLD

by

The By Lawyers QCAT guide has been extensively reviewed and enhanced.

The Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal matter plan and commentary headings have been reordered for improved sequencing and searchability. New commentary and cases have been added on various topics including:

Commentary on specific matter types in the QCAT guide includes helpful links to the relevant legislation such as:

These enhancements to the By Lawyers QCAT guide assist practitioners in advising clients and conducting matters in the tribunal’s civil disputes division.

Leasing precedents – QLD

by

New and updated leasing precedents have been added to the By Lawyers Leases QLD publication.

Queensland practitioners will find these leasing precedents helpful with a range of common transactions in retail and commercial leases.

The new and updated precedents include:

  • Assignment deed.
  • Guarantee document.
  • Variation deed.
  • Deed of surrender.
  • Deed of variation of lease – deferral of rental payments. This deals with rental relief prompted by the economic impacts of COVID-19 in accordance with the National Cabinet Mandatory Code of Conduct.

The new and updated leasing precedents include clauses addressing common leasing scenarios such as:

  • First right of refusal.
  • Demolition and relocation.
  • Covenants protecting mortgagee’s interests.
  • Liquor licencing requirements such as transfer of licence, and consent to licence.
  • Execution clauses for individuals and corporations tailored for use in deeds, agreements, and contracts.

Also included are precedent letters for standard lease transactions such as:

  • Covering letters to lessee’s solicitor submitting a lease, deed of surrender, deed of assignment, or deed of variation. These precedent letters include execution instructions and a checklist of items to be returned to a lessor before a tenant is allowed to take possession of the premises.
  • Letter to a lessor client enclosing a lease with instructions on how to sign.
  • Letter to titles office enclosing a lease for registration.

The full commentary in the Leases QLD publication covers key practical issues and considerations for landlords and tenants. These include renewals, subleases, interruptions, and outgoings. The specific legislative requirements under the Retail Shop Leases Act are also addressed extensively.

Enforcement – QLD

by

The By Lawyers Enforcement (QLD) publication has been extensively reviewed and expanded.

Part of the individual civil litigation publications, the Enforcement guide deals with enforcing and resisting judgments and orders in civil claims matters in the Magistrates Court, the District Court, and the Supreme Court. This publication is designed to assist practitioners who are advising and representing clients that seek to recover or resist a judgment debt, or other court order, whether or not the practitioner acted for the client in the substantive matter.

The commentary has been substantially re-ordered and enhanced to cover all available enforcement options in all courts, from examination and attachment to various warrants and writs.

New precedents provided on the matter plan include:

  • File cover sheet
  • Retainer instructions
  • Costs agreement and disclosure document
  • Initial letter to client
  • Letter of demand
  • To do list

Other related By Lawyers guides include Insolvency and 101 Subpoena Answers.

Adverse action – FED

by

The recent employment law case of Qantas Airways Ltd v Transport Workers’ Union of Australia [2022] FCAFC 71 considered adverse action under the Fair Work Act 2009 and the obligation on an employer to establish that a decision affecting a worker is not contrary to the prohibitions in the Act.

Adverse action is covered in the By Lawyers Employment Law guide.

Sections 340 to 345 of the Fair Work Act prevent an employer from taking adverse action, as defined in s 342, against an employee who exercises a workplace right, defined in s 341.

For example, if an employee is dismissed, which constitutes adverse action being taken against them, because they made a complaint against their employer, which constitutes their exercise of a workplace right, then the employee may be able to bring a general protections claim against the employer.

In the recent case Qantas made a decision, while its fleet was grounded for the pandemic, to outsource ground handling operations at Australian airports. That resulted in Qantas employees losing their jobs to external providers. The union sought reinstatement of the employees on the basis that Qantas’ decision constituted adverse action on a number of bases. Qantas denied this and argued that the decision was made for operational business reasons.

The court found for the employees on one of the adverse action grounds, namely that the real reason for Qantas’ action in standing down employees was to prevent the exercise of a workplace right, being their right to negotiate a new Enterprise Bargaining Agreement which fell due shortly afterwards. Interestingly, that meant the court upheld the adverse action claim on the basis of a workplace right that did not exist at the time of the decision, but may exist at some future point in time.

The court looked in detail at how the decision was made, what the company took into account, and its knowledge of the future workplace right. The court found that Qantas knew it was circumventing the future right, whereas if it had no such knowledge the outcome may have been different.

The case may go on appeal, but it serves to remind workers of the robust nature of their rights under the Act and employers of the extent of their obligations.

This case will be added to the By Lawyers 101 Employment Law Answers publication and any developments on any appeal will be monitored.

Domestic and family violence – QLD

by

Some temporary procedural arrangements for initiating and hearing domestic and family violence applications in the Magistrates Court of Queensland have become permanent from 30 April 2022.

These arrangements were originally put in place as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, but the resulting efficiencies have seen the parliament entrench arrangements that allow parties and practitioners to interact with the court remotely.

Amendments under the Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2021 impact various Acts and procedures. Those relating to domestic and family violence matters include:

Audio visual link

A new section 142A of the Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012 provides that the Magistrates Court may conduct all or part of the proceeding by the use of audio visual links, or audio links. This includes:

  • appearances;
  • giving evidence;
  • making submissions;
  • taking an oath or affirmation.

Electronic filing

A private application for a Temporary Protection Order (TPO), or an application to vary a TPO, can be filed electronically in any Queensland Magistrates Court if the court is closed on a normal business day, or if the applicant is required to isolate under a public health order.

Listing before verification

In circumstances of urgency, where a private applicant is unable to verify their application for a Temporary Protection Order before a Justice of the Peace or solicitor, they can obtain a hearing date, and then serve the application on the respondent, without verification. The application can be subsequently verified in front of the magistrate who hears the matter.

The commentary in the By Lawyers Domestic Violence guide has been updated accordingly. An alert has been added to draw practitioners’ attention to the likelihood that proceedings will involve audio visual appearances and evidence.

Connect with us